Tinker' (2017) Poster

(2017)

User Reviews

Review this title
72 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
How did it win awards?
uberdonkey68 December 2018
It was difficult getting through this film. Not one of the characters seemed human. Lots of ideas which don't really fit together. A very disjointed film in that quirks of each character are revealed, but it all seems meaningless. There is no suspense, apart from.just waiting for the end of the film. Many scenes are drawn out. The men are all unecessarily quiet or grumpy. When the kid asks 'where are we going' I felt exactly the same way about the film. It seems like the director started filming without a script, and then just made it up as he went along, but never really coming up with a consistent thread or story. "You look to the stars? I look to the stars. Some say fools look to the stars. You're not wrong. Four sides, four different winds. Energy comes from all around you and is drawn to the earth"

If that type of dialogue is gripping for you, as well as other unrelated and disjointed hippy pseudoscience, then maybe you'll like this film. My guess is most audiences are more sophisticated. Well, anyway; overall a film with little emotion, little engagement with the characters and a meandering 'plot' (using the word plot loosely).
28 out of 41 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Not terrible, but not good either. Feel good hippie flick.
rmcgervey24 January 2021
Warning: Spoilers
There's no good science fiction here. It's more a tale for hippies that believe in the healing powers of crystals and think essential oils are a good substitute for showers and bathing.

I somewhat enjoyed the movie, but I admit I was "tinkering" on my phone as well and there's really nothing in this movie to keep you glued to the screen or on the edge of your seat.

And the ending was a big disappointment.

Decent acting, nonsensical and pointless script and story. I guess there's a moral in there somewhere. Like maybe don't be a dick to your kids?!
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Not bad but some things left unexplained.
kevindonohoo28 July 2020
Warning: Spoilers
I found this movie on Netflix after searching for something about Nikola Tesla and this one came up, so I watched.

I enjoyed the movie. The acting was relatable, emotional and heart-felt. The interaction between Grady and Kai felt real and you could definitely feel the tension between them in the beginning. Grady's 'father' was the kind of guy everyone would wish as a mentor, honest and kindhearted.

However, the movie had some elements that left me confused at the end. Like what was Manna's purpose in the movie and what happened to him after? Did he just run off or did he commit suicide? He's never mentioned again after that. Maybe he was there to talk about his own situation and to show how Grady should be more grateful to have Kai. Also, the ending. So Grady (with help of Kai) got his machine to work using the programmed crystals that Kai's mom got from their father. This was what he had spent his entire life trying to find. What happened next? It just stops.

I liked the movie because the acting was good and it was a subject that is interesting but feel the story line and character development was lacking.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Some good acting, but disappointing ending.
rt-pittman11 January 2019
Warning: Spoilers
Good performance by young Colton Crawford, Clayne Crawford and Clayne's mother Lennie Crawford, but Christian Kane is the best feature of the movie. Kind of plodding pace, and the Tesla machine built of twigs and crystals was hokey. Bringing in the supernatural and a glimpse of heaven is not in keeping with the serious work Tesla did. I wouldn't recommend it, but don't regret seeing it.

The fake 10 star reviews are from fans of Clayne Crawford, trying to support him and prove he should not have been fired from Lethal Weapon.
20 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Don't worry. There's absolutely no science in it.
S_Soma23 March 2019
Warning: Spoilers
A little note to those reading user reviews of TINKER': when you see user review titles saying things like "brilliantly captured" and "I'm a fan" with a winky emoticon and other such gushing sentiments, I suggest that you take a quick moment and research the reviewer behind them. A disappointing number of them, with respect to this movie, turn out to be one-review-wonders. In other words, probably shills. Seeing this sort of thing almost always indicates that even the people directly associated with a movie's creation have no faith in it to stand on its own and have made an attempt to prop it up with fake reviews, creating fake reviewers to do so. It's the best indication I know to reliably predict that a movie is genuinely abominable.

On with the review.

TINKER' tells the story of a grumpy, socially catastrophic farmer who discovers that his father worked with some of the material that the government seized from the Tesla estate after his death. (The fact that the government seized some of Tesla's work immediately following his death is historically accurate. The government was hoping to find workable "death ray" technology. This historical event is a subculture favorite amongst "energy" conspiracy theorists.)

The farmer uncovers his father's notes regarding the work he had done on Tesla's efforts with wireless energy transmission. Inspired, he begins trying to build a wireless energy transmitter himself. In the middle of this project, the farmer inherits his nephew when the farmer's sister dies of cancer. As it happily turns out, the nephew, rather peculiar in his own right but essentially a sweet boy, possesses "special" abilities and is just naturally tuned into "vibrations" and the advanced esoteric properties of crystals. Yep. The nephew is so skillful with crystals, as a matter of fact, that he can use them to go back in time and visit his mother prior to her death. As luck would have it, this nephew's intuitive capabilities are just the ticket the farmer needs to successfully complete his wireless energy transmission machine. Socially-tragic-geek-bonding happens and the world no longer has any energy problems.

The end.

Obviously, movies are a form of art. They're not entirely unlike a painting or a sculpture. And as such, they have no obligation to conform to anyone's preconceived notions about what they OUGHT to be other than, hopefully, the director's own vision. This is how you get BARBARELLA or anything from, say, Fellini. This is why I review movies based upon my perception of what it was the movie itself INTENDED for itself to be. Criticizing a movie for not living up to my expectations is fundamentally unfair if my expectations are out of alignment with what the movie was trying to say.

Unfortunately, I found sussing out what TINKER' intended to be confusing.

If TINKER' was intended to be a giant, steaming pile of foam-brained new-age jibber-jabber tripe, then it should get a 10 out of 10 because that's exactly what it is. I congratulate the director.

Unfortunately for me personally, I took TINKER' to be a science-fiction movie based upon the fact that it's listed as such on the IMDb website. This set up the expectation within me that it would have, perhaps, something to do with "science" and, stated plainly, it absolutely does not. Science fiction movies have quite a bit of poetic license latitude to speculate upon scientific advancements that have yet to occur in creating their futuristic storylines. But if a "science fiction" story blatantly violates science that is already well understood at the time of the story's writing, then it's no longer science-fiction; it's just ignorant balderdash, liberal-arts-major drivel or "speculative fiction". You pick.

There is a particular and devoted branch of screwball nutcasery that focuses obsessively on "things having to do with Tesla and 'energy''". Beneath this general heading fall several subheadings: mystical "vibrations", free energy, magnet energy, vague descriptions of "energies" in general with no specificity, wireless transmission of "energy", government theft and suppression of Tesla's discoveries, and so on. TINKER' touches upon all of these. And just to make sure they didn't leave any boxes unchecked, TINKER' also folds pyramids and crystals into the mix. Tesla did make a statement or two regarding crystals being "living beings" as I recall, and the true believers also make connections between pyramids and Tesla, but I tend to put that down to that group's excessive, um, enthusiasm.

In short, TINKER' is a big mashup of every true-believer-with-a-screw-loose wish list, right down to the doofus farmer and uneducated child solving the mysteries of the universe shtick, all wrapped up in a single movie.

To my way of thinking, the tragedy of superstitious, pseudoscientific mumbo-jumbo promulgated in movies like this is that it tends to obfuscate the fact that there is what I think of as REAL magic in the REAL world that we can personally experience every day. How about the fact that you can take a bit of copper wire, an old iron nail and a battery and build your own electromagnet in a matter of minutes? Or move some of those simple parts around, throw in a fixed magnet, and you can make a motor that can do actual, physical work? Or move those parts around again, physically move the magnet around yourself and have the system convert your mechanical energy into electrical power? And you can do this all with the same handful of parts. What could be more magical than that?

And there are magical shapes in the world, too. Only they're not pyramids or crystals. How about the shape of a converging/diverging rocket nozzle? Use one of THOSE in the right way and you can leave the earth and go to the moon or Mars.

And think of the drama of it all. However far we may go in the universe, the origins of human space travel will always have their roots with the Monsters of Peenemünde.

And how about the fact that a moving, slightly curved magical shape can "create" lift and make you fly like a bird and float on the breeze like a dandelion seed? If that isn't a magic shape I don't know what is. Just try to do ANYTHING even HALF as cool is that with a pyramid.

And if you REALLY want to do something magic with crystals, you can use them to make a laser, make a super-accurate watch with oscillating crystals (which I guess you can call "vibrations" if it makes you feel good about yourself) or break visible light into its constituent wavelengths. Or hyper accurately tune a radio.

And by the way, every time you use your cell phone you're participating in the "magic" of wireless energy transmission. I used "wireless energy transmission" to power an AM radio 24/7 with NO BATTERIES OF ANY KIND half a century ago when I was 10. ooooOOOOoooo...

If you have any kind of formal education that remotely touches on actual science, physics or math, TINKER' will probably just make you angry unless you get seriously baked ahead of time. THEN it might be pretty funny.

If you're a true believer, neither this review nor anything else I, or anyone else, could ever say will ever put so much as a dent in your belief system, so off you go and give it a watch. Have fun.
29 out of 42 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Load of old Tinkers!
omendata3 January 2019
Yip that is what i do now to find out the real reviews; quite sad really that the ratings cannot be relied upon now to find good movies to watch - The first 10 reviews on here are all false shills with only one review under their belts and giving a movie 9 or 10 means its the best movie you have ever seen imho and those come about once in a blue moon if you are a real movie goer these days.

Then come the real reviews - A soon as I saw the 1/10 reviews I kinda knew what to expect and should have switched off but due to my Movie-OCD once I have started to watch I must finish and so I did - Damn OCD!!! lol >;O)

Well , what can I say but ... you guessed it , the 1/10 reviewers were kinda right. I would rate the movie more of a 3 out of 10 as it does have some merit and has some pathos and thought provoking moments but it really could have been condensed into a short 30 min episode of Under The Dome!
28 out of 46 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Non-linear Loomer
compugor8 April 2019
The brooding story takes a long time to coalesce, especially with the presentation being so disjointed; nevertheless with excellent acting and quality cinematography it remains absorbing. It succeeds in creating a sense of transcending time & space but by the time it finally comes together its a bit of a letdown as far as the supernatural elements. Even so, the human drama aspect is powerfully delivered.
11 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Makes no sense whatsoever
andyp30022 January 2019
Its a pointless, dull and very disjointed movie. How do people imagine such clap trap and then have the nerve to force it onto others in the name of art?

I am at a total loss with this film, what on earth is all that rubbish about crystals, its just crazy mixed up mumbo jumbo.

Give it a miss...please.
18 out of 31 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
I melted into this one..
gazzyace6 December 2018
A quirky little indie film thats got a little piece of magic. Well written, well acted and beautifully shot. Check this one out.. Ratings shmatings!
9 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Disjointed & nonsensical snoozefest
americanarmsdealer24 March 2019
Don't expect a point. There is none. Stilted acting, nonsensical plot with babbling about conspiracy theories, metaphysical nonsense, and pointless artsy shots that are supposed to be meaningful. Don't waste your time on this one, and don't believe the fawning reviews.
18 out of 31 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Brilliantly captured Film
jolynnheadley5 July 2018
This is the type of movie that you have to pay attention to. It is not full on action packed, it is a thinker! I drove 5 1/2 hours to see this at a film festival and I would do it all over again! If you are the type of person that likes to truly fall in love with characters and understand them from the depths of their souls, then watch this movie! You won't regret it!
53 out of 77 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Crystals whooooo!
johan-7790517 January 2019
Warning: Spoilers
Pseudo science fantasy with likable characters. The afterlife theme took it too far but indulging fantasy nontheless.
5 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
This Is Not Sci-Fi
mbianco-605027 December 2018
This is a family drama. Good acting but the plot and characters seem to go in different directions. If you're looking for good Sci-Fi this is not it. And yes, I registered just to tell you this.
17 out of 30 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
STINKER not TINKER!
charvelstrat816 December 2018
Seriously now i am convinced the ratings here are not accurate! This movie has a lot of 10/10 ratings and that is just beyond impossible! Either that or most people just don't know what a good movie is and like absolute tripe like this waste of time film! This yawnfest is so slow it is like watching paint dry and the story( ( iate to even call this a story) is just bad and unbelievable.
24 out of 45 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Science meets unicorns and fairies!
snowskichick27 March 2019
Warning: Spoilers
Being a scientist this was ridiculous and painful to watch! The only reason I didn't change it was because my fire stick remote was out of reach and I had a cat on my lap... you know sleeping cat... you stay there forever. I collect rocks, hold on I have to go stick them outside for a minute to store some energy from the moon so I can power my microwave. You know that burrito won't cook itself! Crystals will change the world! #letssolvetheworldsenergycrisis
10 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
No plot point whatsoever
dwbowes25 March 2019
This movie has no point. The only thing i got out of this is the writers really like the idea of crystals having some magical powers or something? The "machine" the guy is working on makes no sense. The only reason i'm giving this 3 stars is because the filming was good, if there was some sort of meaning behind the plot it would be enjoyable. I don't understand how there are so many good reviews for this film
13 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
This will fill some time if you've watched all the good stuff on Netflix.
mkdlfp25 March 2019
I came close to falling asleep during this movie. It was slow going, the characters were emotionless, and for most of the movie there didn't even seem to be a plot. That describes about the first hour to hour and ten minutes of this 1h 37m flick, but in the last half hour or so it surprisingly started to come together and gain my attention. The characters remained boring cyborgs, but their relationships became clearer making you care more about them, and an actual plot appeared out of the mist as well. I still felt like they could have expanded the ending a little more, especially since the film finally started to become interesting, but at least after watching the first 66% of it as a snoozefest I didn't feel as cheated with the improved final third of the movie. It was kind of like going on a boring date and then getting a nice kiss at the end that makes you kind of forget that the first part of the date had been forgettable.
2 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
The only saving grace was that it eventually ended
david-1623930 March 2019
A train wreck of ineffective emoting and pseudo-scientific silliness. Perhaps the creators took solace in a line from the interminable wasteland of a script: "Just because you can't see something doesn't mean it's not there." Absent anything remotely passing for writing, acting, or a plot, they nevertheless held out hope that the audience would somehow view this as more than just an hour and thirty-seven minutes of new age nonsense sprinkled with facile feelings. Sadly, their faith in the suspension of disbelief was sorely misplaced.
11 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Slow, boring, stupid and preachy.
edwin-hensley13 April 2019
"He came here for a little while, but he's gone back.,, Randy's not here. A few years ago, remember when I got so sick? I died! No heart, no lungs, no brain. And that's why I can stand here and say he's not in this pot. Eternity is our home. I know that. It's for sure. It's true." Those giving this movie a 10 want to preach this movie quote to you. In reality, this movie was slow, boring and stupid, It combines Tesla woo with Crystal woo and a movie trope orphan and his hard-hearted non-believing uncle. Garbage. Not the science fiction I was hoping to find.
8 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A really good film
Snootz27 February 2021
We find here some really incompetent 1-3 star reviews. I understand why some rated it low; it's a slow burner that didn't meet sci fi expectations or fill anyone's adrenaline addiction. But this film deserves far greater recognition. If this had been a dramatization of a real event, it might have been regarded as an exceptional film. They could have dropped the science fiction wrapping and made this simply a film about humanity and relationships; it would have served far better and perhaps been more highly regarded.

But in this case the sci fi is merely a sub-plot within a greater story. The trappings were about plant growth, but in truth the overall film is about personal growth.

If anything, the science fiction element detracts a bit from this, which is why I give it 8 stars instead of 10. But that 8 stars is for directing, cinematography, music and some of the best acting we've seen in quite some time. Clayne Crawford does an exceptional job in the main role. The supporting actors do very well. That's the real winner in this: the characters are believable. The sci fi is just sort of thrown in.

Overall the story being told is good-- a far distance from "one of the worst movies ever made". Those who rated this 7 to 10 stars have good reason for doing so.

If one is into spaceships, aliens, huge planetary explosions, laser battles, space babes or disaster flicks... this isn't the film for you. But if one goes into this looking for good acting, sensible story telling and unique characters, while the plot is a little unexpected... this is a gem of a film.
11 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Only rated it a one because there is nothing lower...
latrans672 April 2019
Warning: Spoilers
To say that the story (or lack thereof) was essentially a huge plot hole is an understatement. The film is basically an endless array of inane dialog, needless closeup or distance shots taken for no reason that is discernable. Then there is a jumbled section where a kid uses sticks, twine, and rocks to time travel so that his mother can tell him that he has to help his uncle build a Tesla Coil to wirelessly transmit power and make plants grow faster.

A complete waste of time, energy, effort, and actors. Even if it were a vanity film... a total waste to have this catastrophe of a film on a resume.
10 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Good money in fixing chain saws.
arclinecreative9 April 2019
The guy drives a $40K truck, lives in a nice home and his only income is from fixing weedeaters and chainsaws. Tesla died in '43 and the protagonists father was working on things stolen from Tesla's apartment. He doesn't tell his son, hoping the torch might be passed. Instead, he hides his notes in a place where only a idiot would stumble across it. There are SO many things wrong with this movie. But pretend to be a crotchedy old reclusive 'genius' with some shoddy heroes arc and see what sticks. This is one of those movies that never should've been made.
10 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
10 Minutes into it and I'm already bored
gp-4815930 March 2019
My guess is that all of the positive reviews were written by cast and crew, yes, acting is actually good, but the story...
9 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
It's ok
josiejosjs23 March 2019
This movies is great, however, there is minimal speech and many pieces of the movie were confusing
8 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Don't believe the ratings above 3 stars
roydo438 December 2020
If you hate shaky hand held or claustrophobicly close camera shots with weak writing you'll hate this movie. Weak plot, competent acting bad editing and directing. All those good reviews were submitted by cast and crew and associated family members. Avoid
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed