k-dhesi Reviews

Jigsaw (I) (2017)

They missed the mark with this one

[3/10 · 24 November 2019]

Now I haven't done a review since I was a teen. But I just finished watching 'JIGSAW' and I felt overly compelled to share my two cents - speaking of which, 2 cents may have been the budget for this film - moreover, 2 cents is what the writers, director and producers deserve for grinding the already over saturated Saw series into complete dust.

In my opinion, the John Kramer aka Jigsaw story should have ended at Saw III - which was awesome despite what most fans of the series say.

Saw IV - Saw VIII (3D) were not quite up to par as the first three films, but they held up well by continuing on right where the previous film left off and giving the audience great insight to John Kramer's life - why he became the jigsaw killer, and how he accomplished most of his 'traps' in the first three films.

Now, there is a hundred and one plots the writers could've chose revitalizing the series with this installment after a seven year gap. Why they went with the story they did is beyond me. I'm honestly shocked it got the green light, this film borderline tarnishes the reputation of the Jigsaw character that the original Saw films created.

I won't spoil it for anyone but if you're expecting to find out more about John Kramer's life - this film does not do that. To be honest, I'm not sure what it was trying to do. The ending leaves you really dissatisfied and instead of filling the holes for questions the previous films may have raised, this film just raises a thousand more.

I too did not want another saw film carrying on from the final events in Saw III, after all, we had four films after that jumping back n forth from Saw I to whichever sequel you were watching - all in a continuous timeline ( I think). But I sure as hell would prefer a sloppy attempt by the old cast seven years later over this half hearted attempt.

Why not go with whole copycat plot? Why not have one of Jigsaw's survivors take over his legacy without being a former 'apprentice'. Why not have one of the Jigsaw's victims family member as the new Jigsaw taking vengeance on Kramer's family and associates. So many ideas, so many way this 'reboot' could've been amazing but nooooooooooo.

The 'game' being played had hardly any context to it, or at least not enough to make you invested in the victims. The victims (I guess the main characters in the film) were extremely one dimensional and you learnt nothing about them. In fact, they barely even played a game. And this was the A plot of the film! There was no thought out traps, a lot of occurrences relied on luck and not careful planning. The game sort of ended extremely quickly and took a sudden u turn - it seemed like they left out half of 'the game' to keep true to the 90 minute run-time, so they suddenly just did the 'let's just have a pig mask stab them and have them wake up somewhere else.' And the twist completely made this entire game pointless and their victims even more pointless.

The B plot pacing was horrible, it was hard to keep up with what's going on with most scenes being shot in a coroners lab. The 'detectives' too were extremely futile.

The writers of this film again closed the film off by connecting the previous films - a very stupid idea because it failed miserably doing so. And instead of going 'ohhh dammnnnn' like the original saw films had you saying after the twist reveal, you went 'what the... wait that makes no sense'.

The one salvation this unique horror franchise has that no other film can compete with is it's 'trap -game torture' scenes. There are many people who watch Saw just to see victims gets torn apart in unimaginable ways.

This film does not even deliver there, in fact the traps are so bad I'm not even sure they could be called 'traps', most of them were games involving more then two people and they lacked all the creativity - there is no gut bursting, spline rippling traps at all. The gore is heavily toned down for this film. There is no suspense if the victims will survive the traps. There is no quick shots of epileptic madness. There is no sixty second time limit to complete the test. There is no 'protagonist' going through trials and tribulations in one of Jigsaw's twisted games. There is no 'live or die, make your choice'. 'There is no game over'. There's certainly not one memorable trap from the movie.

I'm never critical on actors - but by god the performances were terrible, although they had a horrible script to work with so they can't take all blame.

There is a not a single character that makes any mark on the series, aside from the character Eleanor Bonneville, her story seemed interesting and looked as if it was going somewhere but alas it did not - instead the film scratches at the surface of her interesting personal life which doesn't lead anywhere in the end.

'Jigsaw' feels like a small studio trying to replicate the Saw series without trying to get sued for copying the originals. Though, there's nothing original about it - still they failed to capture the dark essence of one of the most epic horror villains of all time - Jigsaw.

The movie never felt like it was Jigsaw game being played. It felt like it was a psychopathic junkie copycat who's trying to replicate what his idol did ten years ago.

If you thought the opening trap in SAW 3D (2010) didn't make any sense, just wait until you see how ridiculously far they take the series seven years later. They missed the mark heavy with this one.

My personal Saw ranking: SAW 1, SAW 3, SAW 2, SAW 5, SAW 6, SAW 4, SAW 7 (3D), JIGSAW

The Walking Dead (2010–2022)

We've become the walking dead for this show.

[2/10 · 14 December 2017]

Where to begin? Well, I haven't done a review in years, but seeing all the ten star reviews left me with a funny feeling. THE SHOW IS NOT AS GOOD AS IT USED TO BE. And that's a vast understatement.

I'll try to be as spoiler free as possible.

Let's set this straight; Season 1 until - Season 5 episode 8 was amazing (Yes that specific, from episode nine on-wards the show became the boring dead); I would even say it's up there with the game of thrones, breaking bad and Lost's of this world, though it's in a horror/action category in comparable to the previous titles. However, Season 5 episode 8 until - Season 8 episode 8 (Current episode of the time of this review) is perhaps the greatest decline in the quality of a television series we have ever witnessed! The narrative has not only gone astray, but lacks any motivation to keep there millions of viewers engaged; but yet we are, week in week out, every year for every season since it's downfall a few years ago, why you ask? why do we continue to watch the show if it's gone more rotten then an egg? Because we are too invested in the show! Seven years and eight seasons is to much of a commitment to give up, but I'm getting closer to the edge with each pathetic episode.

I will skip to the current season of this year; 2017; Season 8

Perhaps the main cause to the downfall of the show was the change of setting; something the show does often throughout the seasons, however, Alexandria is by far the blandest setting the show has to offer, especially when you compare it to the previous settings used. Currently in Season 8, This setting has caused the show to suffer tremendously, losing the sense of adventure the show once gave. Alexandria has seen it all. from zombie invasion to wild tribe people invading since Season 5 when the 'haven' was founded by the characters. Instead of showing another 'haven' being quickly overrun, and the majoirty of the episodes consisting of 'keeping the zombies/bad guys out everyday', the fundamentals of Alexandria and the other founding 'havens' like the kingdom, has introduced many new faces to the show; so many, that almost every episode from seasons 5 onwards are fillers and boy are they overkill for the viewers! The setting is not so much to blame as is the terrible narrative that makes the setting feel incredibly bland; to much time is spent on the lives of these inhabitants of such havens, many whom are side characters, a haven on a show like the walking dead shouldn't be a suburbia fairytale one day and literal hell the next day, time and time again. Far to much screentime, and entire episodes have been wasted on meaningless characters, who NOBODY CARES FOR, especially since the show decides to usher in a background character to fill three quarters of the run time, because 'it's there time to die'. Remember when the show Killed of characters, (even main ones) surprisingly? Remember when those background characters who give the occasional line would get eaten by a zombie, or killed in the line of fire and the show moved forward WITHOUT SPENDING THE NEXT TWO EPISODES from a character death showing other characters sobbing. Speaking of sobbing, the walking dead has officially turned into forty minute clips of the average teenage girl on her period; expect A LOT of close up's of (your most hated) characters crying, thinking about life, all the decisions they made, there past lovers, oh look a zombie, let me stab him, oh no, let me think about my past actions again, the director keeps telling me to do so.

I mean what is the point? It seems like the writers are completely falling flat; and are so hung on this NEEGAN that they use the majority of the season to fill in episodes of pure garbage, horrible drama of the same recycled nonsense, shifting form character to character; it's like the writers suddenly realized; "wait this show is too bad ass, we're showing to much zombie killing, to many humans getting there throats bitten off, to much of humans slashing up other humans, I know! let's turn this action into a drama; All of our characters who've been killing mindlessly (for the purpose of my point) should now spend entire episodes contemplating morality in a 'sex in the city' kind of manner;" yes, I said it. It's obvious for the characters to doubt there moral's every step of the way, given the world of the un dead, but the show executed that brilliantly, through the dimensions and range of the characters (like the twin blond sisters, the junk yard people) in the past, now the show is adamant on spending it's budget on prolonged emotion reaction, mostly spent on characters we don't care for, and the action is now firmly on the back burner, and is boiling, because it's been burning back there for years!

Speaking of action; even that has declined. It's not easy keeping a protagonist alive for eight years in a show where the pursuit is survival; there's only so many 'impossible' situations a guy can get out of, every time. But now the show is really reaching and losing it's credibility on the realism part. I'll explain. The new Villian/s, NEEGAN, has been sticking around for some time over the past few seasons, and because of the obvious love the writers have for this character (considering the majority of season 6 entails the build up to reveal this 'man-god') the likelihood of a character like Neegan,(whom should've been used in the narrative better) Clashing with our protagonist Rick Grimes is stretching out 'the war' for three seasons and going, is not believable. Despite this being done with 'the governor', who was too a bit of an overkill character who should've been swept from the show a long time ago,However, THE SHOW WAS ACTUALLY ENTERTAINING ENOUGH TO BARE SUCH A VILLAIN. The setting of the prison, the constant heart pumping action of every episode, and even the threat of scary zombies (remember them?) held up well. even if the 'battle' was a bit overdue. Can't say the same for the recent recycled, similar, but way more dramatic, neegan villain narrative.

The narrative needs to change immediately for the show to survive another two seasons. The writers have lost all sense of creativity, there is just so many places you can push the narrative towards in this world of constant change. Yet, they are stretching out the same tireless narrative and are failing to deliver entertaining action; which is what the fan's tune in for.

For all new comers thinking of watching the show because everyone talks about, talked rather. I say go for it, you'll see exactly what I'm talking about. It has it's moments where you think the show may return to it's best, but just when you get an episode that's gut enchantingly awesome, the next six will be 'filler episodes' consisting of nothing that advances the plot. to be fair at this point of the show, only Neegan is the only character that can deliver a decently entertaining dialogue scene, Seeing some of our favorite characters (who been on the show for years) pushed aside, due to there constant 'emotional detachment', or there 'sudden revelation not to kill' so the show can save them for the important episodes whilst we get a load of nonsense from villagers, old ladies and crying priests. Don't even get me started on Eugene! You'll see perhaps the best action show on television turn into an episode of Eastenders; From a plot that drew you in, ever since rick opened those gorgeous eyes in that hospital bed, to the zombie slaying, survival bad-ass-ery. To a weak plot that's barely carrying the show, and the viewers who are slowing down every week to get to there device and watch the new episode of there favorite show;

THIS SHOW IS WALKING DEAD INTO FAILURE.

Congratulations writers, you've pulled off the impossible, you've turned a zombie series into sleeping beauty,

I give a 2/10 for the show it ONCE WAS.

KD

Fast Five (2011)

Not only did it suppress the surrounding hype, it kicked, punched, shot and killed the hype.

[8/10 · 28 April 2011]

I couldn't help but to applaud and cheer after the ending credits among with the rest of the over crowded people in the theatre. It exceeded my every expectation and being a hardcore fan of the fast and furious franchise I couldn't have asked for more from the 5th instalment. It has everything from bone crunching action, combat, shoot em up scenes and of coarse what's fast and furious without the cool dream cars.

The gang are finally back together but for this time it's for one last job. The cast is recruited from a range of all the previous fast and furious movies.(1-4) Which was great to see all the characters back together kicking ass. Dwayne Johnson (The Rock) was impressive and my word he gave Vin diesel a tough competition (in the movie as well as their physique!) To be honest I had thought that fast 5 was just going to be a sappy Hollywood attempt just to bring the cash in, well I'll tell you this, the director, the cast and the rest of the crew have smashed the box office and deserve every penny of it. A perfect action/adventure flick for a night out whether your a fast and furious fan or not.

After the phenomenal first instalment (the fast and the furious) A mediocre second instalment (2fast and 2furious) A inconvenient, mildly entertaining third instalment (Tokyo Drift) and a decent mildly thrilling fourth instalment (fast and furious) they bring back all the thrills, action, adventure and fun in fast and furious 5 (probably the best one out of the series so far)

The 12a (PG-13) rating however did seem a bit dodgy. This film included far to much violence enough for it to easily be a 15 (this would allowed the film to bring slightly more adult themes and violence into the flick too)

Don't get it twisted, this film is all Heist and not street racing but when it is as entertaining as this who cares? Thank god they avoided the "3D era" which in my opinion would just ruin the film due to the strange camera angles they do purposely to make it feel like it's in front of you. On that note the camera angles were actually really great and noticeable, especially when they show the spectacular RIO. (setting)

Fast and furious fans will not be disappointed, especially because it has one of the most bad ass cast ever. The twist was a O.M.G moment so I strongly suggest you wait for after the credits to see this (those of you who have seen it will understand!)

Overall I'm completely satisfied with this movie, it's pulled the fast and furious franchise out of the dirt and back into the fun, action-packed adventure that we all love. Take a bow the Fast and Furious crew you killed the hype and by far made the best movie this year so far. Don't miss out on such a exciting adventure and feel how "fast and furious" this film really is.

Criminal Minds (2005– )

The writers of this show must be actual criminals.

[9/10 · 9 March 2011]

I can honestly guarantee that criminal minds is like no other show on t.v. It's not a cheesy series of cops, it's intense and what makes it special is that every episode is different, you can watch any episode from any season (even if you have never seen it before) and you can still follow the story easily! You might think that's a bit stupid but it's really not, it makes it more intriguing as you don't no what to expect in the next episode.

Derek Morgan, Dr. Spencer Reid, Aaron Hotchner, Penelope Garcia, Jennifer Jareau, Jason Gideon and Elle Greenaway are all simple yet sophisticated characters, there apart of the BAU team for the FBI, there profilers who lurk the "UNSUB" judging by the behaviour of the criminal at the scene of crime. What's so different about criminal minds is that the show never ever goes into dept about the characters, there is no real personal story for any of them (so far that is!) but that saves all the drama which is stored into the creative writers behind the scenes who keep coming up with different crimes, murders etc every episode! Criminal minds is almost flawless, the writers deserve a huge round of applause. The show is so believable. Imagine every type of murder you can think of, or better yet every type of criminal you can think of... Done? Criminal Minds is basically all type of criminals, all different murders put into 6 seasons.

The intensity is immense throughout the whole episode! It's always a journey and it's so interesting to step into the mind of a criminal, even for 40 minutes! Once you watch the show, you will most probably say, who would of known there were so many ways someone could get murdered. It's like a treasure hunt, expect the treasure is the killer.

What more could you ask for? It's full of twists, wittiness, great drama, kick ass FBI action, intense confrontation, mind bobbling, creativeness and awesomeness! The only fault i can see happening in the future (maybe!) is since every episode is different (so far!) they must run out of ideas soon, but fingers crossed that they won't.

All in all you can enjoy this at any time, with or without a person. It's intense and different, you won't see another show like this, i promise you. It's like your actually there at times and after a couple of episodes you will actually start believing its real. Looking for something fresh, interesting, thrilling and different every episode, then this is the show for you! Be warned it might leave you paranoid!

Big Mommas: Like Father, Like Son (2011)

Everybody calls me Big Momma!

[5/10 · 24 February 2011]

Well, firstly don't go expecting a big momma like the previous 2. Big Mommas: Like farther, like son is slightly more immature and corny in comparison to the first two. It felt like it was more for 11 year old girls rather then a movie that you and your buddy can enjoy. However sometimes these "corny" movies can pull it off and i think this one did just that!

Ignore the low rating, I don't think it was really that bad. It may not be Martin Laurence at his best, but take into account that he was doing a more "kiddy" movie this time. It did manage to keep me entertained, even though the plot was flat and predictable, I did laugh along with the crowd at Big Mommas wittiness. Also action wise, i would say it was kept at a mediocre level but you can't expect much from a PG movie!

You know when people say "watch it with an open mind and you will enjoy it" Sorry but this is most definitely one of those movies.

What disappointed me the most was i expected a storyline just like the first Big Momma, that's why i was so let down. One other thing is, at times i thought i was watching "High School Musical" (you will understand what i mean if you've seen it!)

It could most definitely fall under the category, "It's so bad, that it's good" But i think the whole purpose of this film was aimed at a younger audience, you can tell that automatically by looking at the cast. It's not the easiest to review because when the film ended i was neither disappointed or satisfied, it was more like a good way to kill a hour or two.

Chances are your kids will love it and you won't be to tortured because it will bring out a couple of giggles and I must admit it, the songs were very catchy and quite nicely done. My final verdict will be "watch it with an open mind and you will enjoy it!"

Friends (1994–2004)

The lives, loves, and laughs of six young friends living in Manhattan.

[10/10 · 7 January 2011]

Will there ever be a show so funny? A show that everyone talks about, a show that makes your day a whole lot better, a show that everyone can laugh out loud no matter how many times they watch it, a show that everyone still watches even today, over and over and over again. And a show, a show that has rules comedy for over 16 years! I'll answer that. No way in hell.

Okay I'm sure you heard of Friends, everyone has. If you watch it then you'll know what i'm talking about. Its absolutely hilarious, you could watch many shows but nothing would make you laugh harder. The only flaw of this series is that it finished in 2004! Ross, Rachael, Joey, Monica, Chandler and Phoebe. The gang. As the series developed you begin to fall in love with the characters, there just so amazingly likable. Although it's just a series, i think what people like the most about friends is the realism of it, 6 "average-classed" friends living in Manhattan, yet you'll get sucked into there lives, i seriously doubt there's even one episode that wouldn't make you smile, cry or roll-on-floor-laughing! It would be impossible for me to pick a favourite episode, there just all so good. If you are the strange one who hasn't seen friends and like comedy, then you haven't seen nothing yet! I cannot recommend this enough, oh how it kept me laughing through my teen years, all i know is that i would never stop watching it. You have to experience the laughs, love and chandlers sarcasm! Everyone see's friends as the show that never gets old, that's so true, you could watch the same episode a million times and still laugh like you watched it the first time.

Among everything else friends is actually educational, believe me? It teaches so many life lessons but in a unique, stupid and absolutely hilarious way. I hope my kids when they reach there teenage years can experience something so funny as friends.

Oh how we just all love the gang. All i can say is. If you haven't watched friends, your missing out on a whole lot of fun. If you used to watch friends, then you know how i feel about the show and if you still do watch friends, you, are the man! Or women! Best comedy show ever made hands down.

"Smelly cat, smelly cat, it's not your fault!"- Phoebe Buffay

"How you doin'"- Joey Tribbiani

"Stop staring at my wife's legs...no, no, stop staring at your sisters legs!"- Chandler Bing

"What is wrong with these pants!" - Ross Geller

"I don't care if the entire cast Eight is Enough comes out of there"- Monica Geller

"Oh my God. I've become my father. I've been trying so hard not to become my mother, I didn't see this coming."- Rachel Green

Paranormal Activity 2 (2010)

A jumpy 90 minutes?

[6/10 · 30 November 2010]

Though it is set to be a low budget film, it had high expectations if it was to out-do the first Paranormal Activity. So just how hard was it to out-do the biggest physiological horror film to ever exist. I think Paranormal Activity 2 just proves how hard it really was because the sequel was some what disappointing. My first advice would be don't watch this until you watch the first one and after you do watch the first one...Don't sleep alone!

What was most disappointing about this sequel is that the scare factor had decreased, there is no physiological effect, nothing to make you sleep with one eye open, after watching the first one i couldn't sleep for 4 months and I'm sure neither could everyone else in the cinema, the difference? During Paranormal Activity 2, most of the audience could'nt stop laughing, not at the movie, but the humour content? Bring in a new director the pressures on, Todd Williams could not exceed Oren Peli's 'paranormal' horror. I believe the director tried to hard to make paranormal 2, they forgot about the physiology behind the paranormal saga and just left it to a jumpy, banging, clashing film (just like any other typical horror movie) Had he kept in mind that the whole point of Paranormal Activity was too make another outstanding sequel that will leave people sleep less and jumping up at night at every little noise they hear. They completely lost the plot and went for a jumpy, sudden noises type of movie. It got consistent, boring and started to look like a cheaper version of the first one.

However with that being said, it was mildly entertaining. It kept me awake and the plot was fresh and well written (unfortuanly the movie wasn't) more characters were introduced, a family this time which i thought was a really good idea. As much as i hate to admit it, it made me jump throughout the film (note that it wasn't supposed to though)I especially like how they slurred the first one into the storyline that was very unexpected (espeically the ending, woahh!) if you seen the first one you will know what i'm talking about.

My final synopsis will be if you have seen the first one and liked it, then definitely watch this but don't be expecting something outstanding. I wouldn't really advice anyone to avoid it, i couldn't call it a waste of money, more like a missed opportunity. Maybe it's just me my expectations might of been a bit to high. It is entertaining, jumpy and ends with quite a twist. See it at your own pace, with an open mind!

Kick-Ass (2010)

Have fear. They're here.

[9/10 · 15 September 2010]

Kick ass simply kicked ass! Its far more than just a superhero spoof....Its a hysterical comedy/action. It reaches out to all those teens or maybe even adults that have always dreamt of actually being a superhero! One thing thats certain, it will keep you laughing without a doubt and another thing i was actually surprised by some of the action, real cool and slick at times.If not the best comedy/action ever made, its a shoe in for 2nd place!

Going to see the film i had no major expectations, in fact i thought of it as another 'high budget' comedy film (which seem to be noway near as funny as the 'low budget' comedies) but i was actually surprised, the result was AWESOME! Definitely worth 2 hours of my life and a couple of moneys from my wallet! Matthew Vaughn has suddenly blasted through the Hollywood barriers, Congrats to him on such a great summer flick!

If your wondering what this film has to offer, let me give you a little taste; Silly unpopular 'invisible' nerds trying to become superheroes, a outrages cast, cool and funny action scenes, a hysterical script and a movie that for once exceeds most peoples expectation! Did i miss anything?

All in all this movie is a cross-over of superbad and superhero movie and is far better then both of them put together! Its a feel good movie and it deserves the hype that it received. Ill recommend for anyone who has a thing called sense of humour. A great feel good summer flick for teens and grown ups. Once again it has to be said. Kick ass kicked ass! Go see it!

Scary Movie (2000)

A killer comedy.

[8/10 · 3 July 2010]

It truly is a killer comedy. A timeless, hilarious masterpiece! 10 years on and it is as still as funny as ever, i remember watching this when i was young in 2000, to tell the truth i didn't understand much being at such a young age! But i took the liberty of buying the DVD as i walked passed it a couple of days ago and boy did it bring back funny memories.

Directed by Keenan Ivory Wayans accomplished exactly what he wanted to do; A laugh-out-loud spoof of horror films. (including the scream saga)Ignore the low ratings and the criticism, people are mistaking this for what it's actually worth, a brainless, pointless, stupid and absolutely hilarious comedy. And that's all it is to it, don't expect a high budget comedy (that to me, usually attend to be very successful with high ratings but not funny at all, makes no sense?) This world needs more spoof movies like the 'Scary movie saga' even though the latest attempts at it (such as Epic movie, Superhero movie, Disaster movie) have been Epic failures due to the Certification (all being 12A) The actors did incredibly well the Wayans brothers, who were hysterical and arguably them at there best. This movie was directed at just the right audience, it knew exactly what it was out for, being rude and over the top at times. Okay so it's no way near to be Oscar material or anything like that, but that's not what it's for!

It's rude, crude and stupid. But most importantly it's a definite spoof classic, without Scary Movie the spoof industry will be dead. If your one of the million that haven't yet seen it, do yourself a favour rent or buy it (as it should be very cheap!) and with a OPEN MIND, when your in the mood for pointless laughs, kick back with a can and watch! Ignore the low rating, definite recommend it your a Wayans fan. If you don't like it then well you can't like every movie you've seen!

District 9 (2009)

You are not welcome here.

[7/10 · 13 October 2009]

District 9 = something new,something different and something great. Reading all the 5 star reviews, the teasing posters up on bill boards and the simple tag line "You are not welcome here." It did more then enough to convince me to watch this flick even before it was released. I did no much information about the film, but it looked too interesting to miss, was i right? completely. I applaud the director Neill Blomkamp for a very unique movie, i was also impressed by the cast. After watching Distict 9 i was awed, but like many others i also believe that it might just be a tad overrated (maybe even not enough for the top 250) but saying that i can understand why it's get's such a high (deserved) rating.

Set in "the slums" of south Africa, a perfect place for this film to be set in. An extraterrestrial race forced to live in slum-like conditions on Earth suddenly finds a kindred spirit in a government agent who is exposed to their biotechnology. Just to make it clear the "extraterrestrial race" are aliens. But sorry people, don't expect blood sucking cruel aliens trying to invade earth! This looks at a different view of what a alien or a "prawn" (as known as) it gave another option that they could in some way be similar to the human race(no by looks though!) That's what i liked about this movie so much, it was far from typical. It started of well with a few minutes explaining the plot about the aliens and use of interviews which makes you wanting more. Even though the action was limited it was really cool and nicely panned out when it was used, (so for all you sci-fi alien action fans, that ones for you!) The ending was very original, good and possibly for some heart touching.

I cant go into further detail or i'll end up spoiling it for you! The camera shots, well. If you don't like loads of camera movements following the cast around (like in the movie cloverfield, borat etc) then you probably wont enjoy to much. The cast were very impressive especially the upcoming Sharlto Copley. So if you love sci-fi, action and mostly thrilling drama you will enjoy this, if your looking for something way different to recent films (the past 10 years or so)you will definitely enjoy this one more. Aliens, cool weapons and African gangsters! Give it a go.

The Final Destination (2009)

It could of been something special.

[4/10 · 12 October 2009]

Well. To begin with i can't say that the movie was completely "awful" or boring. But what i can say that a victorious series, suffered a major downfall. why? Because they actually released it in cinemas across the world. To put it simpler words...... Thrilling: No. horrified: No. Boring: Not too much. Disappointing: pretty much. Enough 3-D: Not really. Entertaining: Mildly.

To be honest it felt like watching a movie made for t.v. And the only reason for the success of Final Destination 3-D was because of the "3-D" (i really feel for the people that had to sit through the film with no 3-d effect) Like most people did. I did not only see the film because of the 3-D (saying that, the 3-D was nothing special, it was to quick and just not enough of it.) I happen to be a huge fan of the final destination series, i have owned every DVD of the following (FD1, FD2, FD3 and i'm pretty sure i wont even rent FD4!) Even though before watching this film i didn't have to much expectations, i had thought that the fourth instalment wont deliver and i was right. I was extremely disappointed with it, and i can't really blame the 3-D. I have to blame the writers and the directors, i usually side with the director even if the film will not be a hit, but this time i can't. I don't know what they were thinking with realising this.

Where were the thrills? The one thing that all the other final destination flicks have done well, is the thrills and the tension. But when sitting through this movie i couldn't help but wondering why was there none of the two, I was actually quite shocked at the fact that FD4 tried to bring some dark humour (and failed to do so) and left out the thrills and the horror that final destination was suppose to deliver. Sounding so harsh, the movie didn't exactly bore me to death, it was entertaining at some parts. But when a little tension was created it will get destroyed by people in watching the film laughing at the stupidity of it and i can't blame them.

If you have never seen any of the final destinations and want to give this one a try, then go ahead, it might appeal to some viewers like newbies who enjoy watching quick kills (especially when it's coming out at you!) But if you have seen 1, 2 and 3. Most likely and being a big fan of the series i hate to say it But you will be disappointed, but give it a try if you want to see the difference between the others and what FD4 did not include, and for god's sake! Watch it in 3-D, otherwise you will be disgusted with it. Well that's pretty much sums up the movie, all in all the movie was disappointing. Then the question, Death saved the best for 3D? NOT TO SURE ABOUT THAT!

Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen (2009)

The CGI Takeover.

[7/10 · 1 July 2009]

I would love to say Transformers 2 was excellent, i would love to compare it to the first one and comment on what they improved on. I guess i can a little. Action was spot on and much more clearer, cool slow motion shots when necessary and great combat between the robots. In comparison to the first Tranformers instalment it was a lot better. Improved and delivered well in that department.

Tranformers: revenge of the fallen pretty much offers visual action at it's best. Fights, shoot em' up scenes and blowing up things. Effects again were mind blowing, just like the first one the effects were truly amazing (as you would expect) nothing has changed there. With offering all those many flaws, somehow it manages to slip everywhere else. Apart from the robots scenes (who had much more screen time compared to the first one.) It was all just a big waste. The scenes between the characters such as Sam Witwicky (Shia) Mikaela was unnecessary as nothing much got developed. Sam's family still had there touch of comedy, which was good to see. They were pretty hilarious. Also old characters were bought back into it, which was nice to see. New robots were introduced too, but there character content was a little weak. But something still was definitely missing, it wasn't the same. I preferred the way the first Transformers instalment was panned out, i missed the more immature "human character's" screen time.

The film does have a long duration, but it didn't really effect me. It went pretty fast. I guess if you prefer a movie with full on fun action, then you will love this one. I suggest you see the first Transformers first though as it introduced the whole "Transformers saga" Overall i find it hard to rate. Were it succeeded in many things (action and adventure) i was let down in the many things that didn't remain from the first instalment (social screen time, comedy) Michal Bay again did well and delivered a good sequel, but i hope there will be a third instalment. It's a love it or hate it type of movie, Transformers fans will be pleased. Watch it yourself and then you will know.

X-Men Origins: Wolverine (2009)

X-men origins: Wolverine review

[7/10 · 24 June 2009]

How much can i say? Great cool action, a furious ride. But yet the movie is average. My expectations were never to high about this one, it was pretty much what i expected, so yes it definitely exceeded my expectation. And have me very pleased after watching. I loved the slick action, very cool and had a "Wanted" feeling. It had me wanting more and more scenes of it. No special plot but still average and that is enough because the action covered for it.

Isn't it always nice to have a explosive fun start, that gives you a slight tip of the ice cream to let you know what you should expect for the rest of the movie. Wolverine did just that, it surely kicked off very well. A nice simple fast first few minutes that had me buzzing. Very well done there. And it did just that, it's cool action packed begging remained for the rest of the film. It's not much more to say. The acting was brilliant, Hugh Jackman was excellent along with the rest of the cast. The plot was slanging, but it doesn't matter. A complete different type of "X-men" and better then the others. It's more fun this time around just focusing on Wolverine. It takes you back from the original X-men. All in all a fun action adventure, mediocre script, plain simple plot but furious cool action. Very worth your time and a great one to watch. But don't expect something real special.

Rush Hour 3 (2007)

Just as good 3rd instalment. That completes a hilarious action packed hours of a trilogy.

[8/10 · 4 June 2009]

After making 2 great films (rush hour, rush hour 2) Brett Ratner installs another wonderful finale. The cast and the crew come back with a bang and perform a sensational 3rd. After making a hilarious action packed sequel (rush hour 2) it's hard to step back up and still show the same amount of rush in a 3rd sequel, i'm sure as many feared there thoughts that rush hour 3 might kill the series and leave many disappointed. We all new it was a tough job but they certainly managed it! Rush hour 3 is a great example of what a trilogy is meant to be like. 6 years after the previous one, it still offers as laughs, in fact even more laughs this time around and very decent "rush hour" action.

Like i said before, Brett Ratner certainly executed a 3rd very well, his sharp mentality and his funny adventure scenes are panned out well. He's the real underdog of this film but doesn't get enough credit for it. Congrats to him. Rush hour 3 is more focused on the "rush" this time. It's definitely more way more funny and will always keep you laughing with some legendary lines from the comedy legend himself Chris Tucker (Carter) and Jackie Chan's fighting and his insane stunts are back and keep you pleased. The two main characters are all back and on another voyage, but this time in Paris. So yes, the acting was very good (as you would expect) the cast were hilarious and definitely spot on. The one thing it maybe lacked a little was it's running time, the film appears to be too short and could definitely be extended a extra 20 30 minutes. If you loved the first 2 instalments and thought they were funny, i can almost guaranteed you will love this threqual, and it's simple. It's full with fun and action, a fun rush hour type adventure and Chris Rock and Jackie Chan will have you on the floor laughing. A nuclear bomb of a complete brilliant trilogy

The Day After Tomorrow (2004)

Stunning effects. Brilliant movie. And a reminder of what could happen to our planet.

[8/10 · 3 June 2009]

Like i said stunning effects, mind blowing in that case. And surely the terrifying truth of what is to come. Going to see this movie i was not expecting much. I watched it the first time a couple of years back but didn't enjoy it that much. But previously i gave it another chance and realised what i have missed with my very own eyes. My first impression of the movie was just simply quite boring, i thought it would be more of a documentary type than a movie with a well written script and cool effects. I was far wrong, it's more both of them combined, an amazing movie definitely. But still get's many facts in about what could happen if what we do carries on.

The day after tomorrow will stun everyone in there minds and eyes. Again the visuals of the special effects were tremendous, everything to the water and some what ice age! Looked real and live. The movie how ever was not really focused on the plot "A climatologist tries to figure out a way to save the world from abrupt global warming. He must get to his young son in New York, which is being taken over by a new ice age" Yes an ice age does occur at one point, but climate change and "Global warming" is expressed in all it's forms and shows the viewers the threat of mother nature. Expect to see the most threatening weather condition and un imaginable truth of what the earth can offer. The acting was flawless Jake Gyllenhaal (Sam Hall) was brilliant and made everything look that much more real, the rest of the cast were good too. The script was witty and clever, very decent. Roland Emmerich (director) knew exactly what he was doing and certainly hit's the mark, most of the scenes really work and are well put together. He also write the script, very impressive from a slightly little league movie director. Well done to him.

Overall the movie is just plain fun and cool to watch, some cool effects along with entertaining drama and impressive idea of mixing a real global threat with a movie, i think the aim of the movie is too reach out to people and have them realise what could possibly happen to either this or more likely the next generation. A true underrated film, a fun and a edge of your seat exciting adventure film.

Spider-Man 3 (2007)

What was going to be a outstanding trilogy accomplishment. Let down due to wasted scenes.

[8/10 · 2 June 2009]

Spider-man and Spider-man 2 impressed the world with it's slick action, cool effects and it's great adaptation to a legendary comic series. Finally a 3rd instalment is released to complete it's trilogy. It did just that, a decent 3rd sequel, but instead of making it decent, it could have been made brilliantly if some scenes were done with more thought put into it. But still spider-man 3 offers many new features in the series and improved in little but many ways.

To start off with something more positive of the movie is always better. You could say that spider man 3 is a little different from the other 2, but not necessarily in a bad way. The fight scenes were better and panned out, simply flawless, best thing about the movie for sure. There was plenty of them too, it's cool to see them mixed too (not always "spider man" vs the villain) so yes they were different in many ways. Camera angles were better, punches, kicks, flips and "super strength" were exploited better in that case. The plot outclassed the one's from the previous instalments, i'm sure you all seen the trailers or clips, so without ruining it for you. The idea of a "black suited spider-man (evil) has everyone exploding of what's going to happen in the movie. So yes, definitely the plot was good thanks to new and old villains involved. Even the acting was brilliant, Tobey Maguire is impressive again and does well. Kirsten Dunst and James Franco were good too.

Now saying all that, your probably thinking. If the movie offers all that, what could possibly be wrong with it. And i could answer you right now. Wastefull scenes. I can't really explain without adding spoilers so i will keep it minimum. The director (Sam Raimi) just completely went wrong with many scenes, (despite the fact most amazing scenes) plenty of film time was really wasted on nonsense. Instead of the movie being full of intense action it started dragging onto some boring drama or romance scenes, which were never necessary. The movie got dragging and the long duration of the movie was because of wasteful scenes like that, the director maybe just took to much film time on things that really didn't matter and left out on some things that could be more important. Also the way that the "villians" got introduced in the movie were too disappointing, they were rushed in the film in strange ways and too quick, like i said because to much film time was wasted. And that's the reason the film's success was cut down.

Even though the film shows a lot on negativity, it's still a good instalment to the series and quite fun to watch, different and sometimes cool. A definite one for spider man lovers. But if more thought was put into it it could have been a outstanding trilogy, but unfortunately it wasn't. But still a good flick.

Wolf Creek (2005)

Weak. Disappointing. Poorly executed. Should have been way better.

[3/10 · 1 June 2009]

I was expecting a good horror flick, a scary freaky slasher. The words in the tag line had me convinced enough that Wolf Creek may actually be decent. But it turns out the word's "Based on true events" were more effective then the actual film it self. In my vision i could see many lacking qualities, the film as a whole could have been so much better with several adjustments, the writers and director didn't take much advantage of a good idea, maybe if they did so and exploited the "True story" more, the film rating would of been much higher and Wolf Creek would have been more entertaining.

Although it shone on disappointment, to the movies defence 1 or two scenes got a little intense, gory and quite freaky. But that is no way near acceptable. The movie kicked off well, nothing shocking or thrilling but a typical horror movie starting, the characters were well introduced and straight away you realise what the characters like doing. Very well done in that department for sure, but then the film go's on and on and your eyes start shutting and your trying your best to sit and watch, it get's beyond boring, draining and not worth your time in the end.

Just like i said before, very poorly executed. Wolf Creek was quite the idea, not a difficult task, but at least deliver a decent flick. But off coarse if definitely didn't do so, i think that the director wanted to stick to it's plan of the plot, he didn't take some qualities in his mind that could of made the film good, thing's like. Briging the horror in a bit quicker, add to the terror and possibly make it slightly more gory etc. Many of these little adjustments and a tweak change of the plot would have added my 3 star rating by 7. I could say it over and over again, poorly executed. The team working on the movie should of looked at the movie again before realising, reviewed on what it could improve on, and simply shoot the whole thing again.

Woudn't really recommend this to anyone. Not what i expected and nothing compared to other horrors, fairly disappointing in many ways. But cast were generally decent and showed a good strong performance. But the movie missed it's mark by a landslide. The text displayed in the movie were the strongest bit Very boring, weak and big waste of time. 3/10

The Fast and the Furious (2001)

A joy ride of entertainment.

[9/10 · 31 May 2009]

The fast and furious will not exactly WOW you. But it will do enough to keep you entertained through out, thanks to it's excellent cast and furious race scenes. The film was a good idea and it could have not been executed any better then it was. The not so familiar director Rob Cohen did a very good job. Most scenes were well panned out and ribbon tied with it's cool racing or just brilliant acting. For that it really does deserve 9 stars.

The major impact this movie had was it's pride. The fast and the furious did not get too a head of them selves and also didn't have the biggest budget to work with. But the movie reflects on a job well done. The movie is just simple plain fun, it take you for a enjoyable ride. The racing scenes were well though out, intense and very fun to watch. Some scenes were all the friends are together were witty and fun to watch too. The script was nothing major but decent. The acting was the brilliant, Vin Diesel knew and played his role very well, his role had the major impact. The plot was interesting but nothing real special. Overall the movie was very enjoyable, great racing, cool cars with a touch of action and humour.

Bad Boys (1995)

A fun action comedy. But a little over done.

[7/10 · 30 May 2009]

Bad boys not doubt was full with loads of laughter and packed with action. The action never really stood out in a way, but it was some very decent shooting scenes. Definitely some scenes were well overdone. But more positives reflect from this movie then negative. It does more then enough to keep you very entertained and connected with what's going on and certainly keeps you laughing! What makes this movie so favoured is for two main reasons.

1) The casting was superb and a sure excellent choice. Not one actor/actress was disappointing never the less the script was too superior to the acting, it was not brilliant but very decent and very funny. The now familiar but up coming star in those times, the legendary Will Smith. (mike Lawry) Was as you would expect powerful, funny and himself! Flawless job. Along side him another star. Martin Lawrence (Marcus Burnett) as you would expect too he was very funny and also a delight to watch. A great partnership to watch, them too together were truly historical they offer many many laughs.

2) Is just simple. You just don't see many flicks like Bad Boys today. It's funny and action packed. It doesn't really get better then a action/comedy like this. The plot too was a tad original and it lead to a fun adventure.

I wouldn't really say negative because this movie was superb. But one thing is for sure, some scenes were a little overdone. Perhaps it was the camera shots or the background music or even the look on the actors faces. The phenomenal director Michael Bay did a magnificent job. After making many minors he stepped up to make his first real movie, with a bigger budget and bigger cast for the big screen. He impressed the world and that is truly reflected on the movie. However some scenes were made too tense, the music in the background or the heat in the actors playing there roles needed to be cut down a little, the tension was to high but the situation is not that big. So yes. Michael Bay or even the movie editors could have cut down some unnecessary "hype" But nothing real major.

All in all. a great flick and excellently executed by Michael Bay. Although a little over done Bad Boys will leave you laughing thanks too the good humour from Smith and Lawrence. Also leave you satisfied with its decent action. A sensational blockbuster to always be remembered.

Never Back Down (2008)

A enjoyable punch up.

[7/10 · 28 May 2009]

Never back down. Was definitely not brilliant, i'll explain why later. But it's still a great teen fighting movie. Packed with some great punch up's and cool fighting. The movies typicality may have just killed it from greater success, with a little more thought and extending some certain feature's the movie could of surprised many viewers. No real idea of the movie stood out, the plot was very simple and obvious, easily written script. But then what does make this movie so good?

It's simple, it's highly entertaining and keeps you occupied with watching some cool direct fight scenes. Everyone likes to watch a good fight, you will see plenty of that exploited in this movie. Furious punches, nice round kicks, tight submissions and explosive K.O's. It may help a little if your familiar with the ufc. The acting was actually quite impressive Sean Faris and Cam Gigandet had some nice bouts. Djimon Hounsou did a flawless job. He was strong mentality wise and physically. His script was the most effective and inspiring. Very impressed with him. What makes this movie 7 stars and not 9 or 10 stars is just like i said before. Yes the film was to predictable and a little weak with some scenes. But nothing major, the film was still very good.

I guess if you like watching a good fight or two, you will definitely enjoy this one. A great movie with impressive strong acting. Inspiring at times and fun to watch.

Spider-Man (2002)

A great adaptation. A great movie.

[10/10 · 27 May 2009]

Comic or marvel lovers will definitely favourite this one. A nice and simple adaptation to a legendary cartoon to a soon to be legendary movie. A delightful action film to watch with your family or friends. It's a fun action, adventure with some dilemmas and romance. A not so "big familiar cast" have to step up for this one and even though they are not formally the talk of the town, they did a very decent job in playing there roles. Partically Tobey Maguire, He gave that touch that the "Spider man" character needed.

Even though it made an outstanding achievement, it lacked on something quite big. But we can discuss that later, for now let's discuss the good: The plot was quite the one. A nerdy young adult, a pushover and a victim for the bully's. Get's bitten by a spider which combines the special feature in the spider ( like the ability to climb, jump further, speed, spider strength and obviously ability to make webs.) with the human features ( human strength. etc) So as you surely should already know Spider Man is obviously a hero with super hero powers. During the movie spider man comes across with a villain as you would expect, so yes loads of fighting and limited action. Yes very limited, no real gore, swearing or shooting. But the action is well panned out and executed well. Some effects were quite cool too. The designers did very well indeed, costumes were perfect. The script was also good, it was witty and clever especially a scene towards the end and the famous line "With great power comes great responsibility."

Now.lets discuss the one main thing it lacked. Without spoiling it for anyone that has not yet seen this movie. Peter Parker comes to use his powers a bit to quick. There should be a 10 to 20 minutes were Peter is still trying to test his powers and realising what he is capable off. It is some doubt in his head about his powers as he confused on what's going on. But his knowledge of the powers come a bit to quick. Nothing really major, but still something that could have made the rating go up 2 more! Overall I'm sure many of you have seen this film already but if you haven't. It's wonderful in many ways. It's cool, funny/witty, its got a decent amount of enjoyable action and some nice special effects. The best super hero movie of it's genre and great adaptation and a highly enjoyable flick.

Wanted (2008)

Their world. Her rules. His destiny.

[7/10 · 27 May 2009]

After reading all the hype, watching the teasing trailers, it comes down to one thing. I had to go see it. It seemed unique, action packed and cool effects along with some nice stunts. Was i right? mostly. Nothing real major was disappointing, although some things were a minor. The action was full and non stop. Very cool effects, and some real nice shooting. But not all was so great. The film however started to get predictable (until the unexpected end) and turned out to be a little confusing.

The cast was the best idea from the producer. A great familiar cast with one or two legendary actors/actresses (Morgan Freeman,Angelina Jolie) did wonderfully. I too was actually quite impressed with James McAvoy role, he played it perfectly. Moving on to the important bit. In case your still wondering. Yes there is more then enough action. The action scenes were also well panned out and effects of the "curving bullets" to the effects of the "jumping and flips" were brilliantly executed.

The movie kicked off very well. It's always good to have a explosive beginning, and this movie did just that. It automatically gave you an idea of what is too come for the rest of the movie. After the furious beginning the movie started to get a bit slow and then rose back up to the action again. The ending was definitely strong, unexpected and a great bursting with fury shooter scene. But occasionally the film was sped up a bit to much with maybe one or two too many flash backs of sorts, it had you quite puzzled at times. But that doesn't take anything away from such a great film.

Maybe all the hype before it came out had people expecting a tad too much, that's where so many are disappointed. But they really shouldn't be. Just forget what you heard and go see it. Plenty of action, cool effects and mind blowing stunts. Also a Witty and clever script.

Saw (2004)

A leap for recent horrors. Gory and Exhilarating

[8/10 · 26 May 2009]

Just the idea of a serial killer named "Jigsaw" has you hooked enough already. Saw an outstanding achievement in horrors. Yes it's sort of weird but it gives you an idea of what's to come in future "Saw series" It's highly entertaining and a decent paced thriller. A nice idea of a sick an twisted mind, projecting that on Jigsaw's victims. From an overview in some ways it could actually been a tad better, but that tad was slightly missed.

Very clever plot. With a dead body laying between them, two men (Whannell and Elwes) wake up in the secure lair of a serial killer who's been nicknamed "Jigsaw" by the police because of his unusual calling card. Reading that a definite mystery is going on and you know that for sure. Your thoughts will wonder why? Why them two? Offcoarse it will all be explained during the movie. So obviously the plot was spot on and a major mystery.

I'm sure you all know already that there all apart of a "game." A game designed by a sick serial killer. So yes expect traps, unknown identity's, gory scenes, a mystery, mind games and a twist. Acting was some what superb, not the most familiar known cast around, but did a very decent job. Especially one. No one else would be chose otherwise.

All in all a obvious explosive horror. With some gore and a lot of thrills and twist. The mood of the movie matches with the intensity of some scenes. A great horror flick for your movie night. And a soon to be legendary in the horror series. Executed well by director James Wan.

The Love Guru (2008)

See it for yourself.

[6/10 · 25 May 2009]

Ignore all the sad haters. The film is actually funny. It's very silly, yes but funny. It was no were near brilliant off coarse but it made me laugh from all it's stupid jokes. Mike myers is legendary, he will bring some nice laughs. He played his role very well and made it believable.

It had a big familiar cast. And yes they all did very well even Justin Timberlake. It's not to much to say but The Love Guru is quite hilarious, see it with a open mind and then surely you should laugh. The low score is only because people are expecting another "Austin Powers" and this movie is far from that. But it still very funny.

The Mummy (1999)

A great fun adventure, With laughs and action.

[8/10 · 24 May 2009]

It's not much to discuss but it can be explained in a few words. Fun: Yes. Scary: No. brilliant film: You could say yes. The Mummy offers a whole lot of shooting and plenty of nice laughs. It's the type you could watch with friends or family. A great big adventure, and an excellent blend of Ancient tomb's with a hilarious discovery team. ( the cast)

The acting was spot on. Brendan Fraser is one that stood out, his witty lines and his eager to shoot things is constant in The Mummy, he's powerful and funny. Without him the movie may not been so brilliant. Read the plot and you know that it's going to be 1 or 2 hours of fun and adventure. Arnold Vosloo does excellent in playing his role. He had the right look and was determined which made his character very believable. The majority of the cast offered laughs.

A great idea. The world need's a movie like this; a fun ride with nice action and clever wit. The special effects were too superior, there were some nice tricks (partically the one in the desert) The tomb's and the mummy's look very ancient yet very real. It's been a decade and it is still as funny and as fun. A whole lot of shooting too. Go see it.