This was kind of a dull episode of Law and Order. I like them actually admitting they were wrong and showing how the process of dropping charges actually goes: we don't get that kind of thing very often on this show, despite it happening a lot in real life. But they did not really explain how they found out who really did it, outside of listening to a call. Why did the waiter identify the wrong person? The husband and wife clearly do not look alike at all, so it seemed odd. I imagine the defense attorney would pick that situation apart when this finally did go to trial with the real killer on the seat.
2 Reviews
Dumbfounded
commonsensical15 May 2024
Warning: Spoilers
23 years of watching L&O. I have never written an IMDB review before. I'm shaking my head in disbelief. A pretty good episode that ended so abruptly I had to check to see if this is a 2-parter. Nope. It's almost like the writers had no idea how to end... so they just did! No explanation whatsoever, just closing credits. He didn't do it, the wife did. She didn't come across as a track star, the stoned waiter couldn't catch up and ID her, but he saw the car??? I know I won't sleep tonight trying to make sense of this one. IMDB has informed me I need 46 more characters to meet the minimum limit of.
See also
Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews
