Burnt (2015) Poster

(I) (2015)

User Reviews

Review this title
284 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
As a line cook/chef for 11 years, I found it very accurate.
udaykumarthambimuthu3 October 2022
Warning: Spoilers
Preface: I've spent 11 years of my life in the hospitality industry (in two countries, Australia and Canada), worked my way up from dishwasher/prep cook all the way to head line cook and ultimately sous chef, before finally leaving the industry last month, to do something else with my life.

Now, on to my review, as well as a stern rebuttal of many of the other reviews I have read on here.

Quite a few, claim the film is bland and boring.

They claim that it doesn't contribute enough attention to the food or the industry, that the main character is unlikable and the romance is strained.

They are WRONG. Well at least about the movie not dedicating enough attention to the food. I agree that the main character is an unlikable monster with a vicious temper, a penchant for the dramatic, and the romance is indeed strained, but I'm gonna give it to you straight up.

The rest of the cast does an excellent job of portraying their roles; I was particularly impressed with Sienna Miller, Matthew Rhys, Omar Sy, Daniel Bruhl and Riccardo Scamarcio.

They all played their roles perfectly, to my eyes, and the discord that occurs between the characters is pretty stock standard for the dynamic that would exist in a brand new restaurant with a totally new menu, hoping to impress the Michelin star inspectors in LESS THAN A MONTH. Not to mention all the past baggage of Adam's poor conduct already looming over them.

The scenes that revolve around the food: treat it with the utmost respect. The scene where Adam (Bradley Cooper) is cooking in that young british chef's kitchen;

The attention he pays to each and every aspect of EVERY SINGLE INGREDIENT, is the kind of attention, care, and borderline fetishization that the very best chefs put into their food. It persists throughout the film, and its not an exaggeration of the extremely high regard with which chefs treat their ingredients, especially when those ingredients cost so much that it reduces the profit to a razor-thin margin.

Ideally, you want the food cost for a dish to cost around 20% of the final cost on the menu, not counting labour, electricity, water, gas, and a great many other incidentals such as waste (you buy a 2kg fish, you aren't getting 2kg of fish after its been scaled, gutted, boned and trimmed - but the secret of a good chef is using all that 'garbage' to make things like fish stock).

I'd say for the food they were serving, the food cost probably came to at least 55%, if not higher.

The number one rule in any decent restaurant, regardless if it is a 4 star restaurant in downtown Los Angeles, or a 3 Michelin star restaurant in Paris: RESPECT THE FOOD. Doesn't matter if you're serving poached turbot with an exquisitely prepared beurre blanc and perfectly cooked and seasoned vegetables, or if you're slanging filet mignons at a steakhouse.

The food comes before EVERYTHING else, and I mean, EVERYTHING.

And I'm sorry to shatter your rose-colored glasses, ladies and gentlemen, but the vast majority of hospitality employees, especially chefs, are not very well adjusted people.

A great many of them aren't particularly pleasant to be around, and its not just the likes of Gordon Ramsay, Marco-Pierre White and David Chang.

Heston Blumenthal, George Calombaris, and Shannon Bennett, as well as several prominent restaurant groups (The Rockpool dining group in particular) in Australia have recently been sued by the Fair Work sector of the government for stealing wages and tips that number in the tens of millions of dollars.

Not to mention the mental and physical and often sexual harassment that goes on under the table, and is rarely, if ever addressed.

This kind of behaviour isn't an anomaly, its the standard.

Hospitality is an industry that is riddled with misfits, drug addicts, alcoholics, narcissists, egomaniacs, nymphomaniacs, and the list goes on. Many of us got into hospitality because we felt we never fit in anywhere else. We didn't do well at school, and the concept of a stable 9-5 was a complete anathema to our natures. And then we realised, we were great cooks, and there might just be a place that we could call home: the kitchen.

Escoffier called a kitchen crew a 'brigade' for a reason. It has to operate with almost military precision, there is no room for dead weight, bleeding hearts or 'good enough'. It has to run like clockwork, and anyone who doesn't meet those requirements, is quickly and unceremoniously kicked to the curb. Kitchen crews that work together long enough are like an immensely dysfunctional family, we love and hate each other in equal parts.

The simple fact of the matter is, it takes a special kind of masochist to cook for a living.

Especially at the highest level of the industry. The sheer amount of stress during the breakfast/lunch/dinner rush, the wear and tear on the body, the cuts, the burns, the insane hours, the owners of the restaurant breathing down your neck constantly about food cost margins, as well as abuse from the managers and fellow chefs; It all adds up to a very, very stressful job that no rational human being would ever consider as a career.

Culinary school honestly doesn't mean much in the first few years of working in restaurants, you have to be able to take the heat, the stress, the injuries, the missed birthdays, funerals, public holidays, I even knew a few guys who were late to their own weddings or the birth of their first child.

IF, and ONLY IF, you can handle all that, then culinary school provides the foundation of knowledge and technique that separates the truly great chefs from the laymen.

The reason they do it? FOR THE FOOD. The acclaim and the money are a secondary concern.

It's even worse if the chef happens to be a Michelin star chef - did you seriously think the likes of Thomas Keller, Eric Ripert, Julien Tongurian, Adrian Ferra, and Grant Achatz, clock in at 8am and go home at 5pm? Absolutely not, they're at the markets as soon as the sun peeks over the horizon, in that kitchen at 5am, and they do not leave until dinner service finishes.

I'd wager an average Michelin star chef spends at least 100 hours a week in the kitchen alone, not counting trips to the markets to pick up the best ingredients, the hours spent agonizingly going over the tiniest little details to create the most sumptuous and satisfying dish possible. And then there's the ordering, scheduling, payroll... The list goes on, almost indefinitely.

And on the subject of Michelin stars: Bernard Loiseau shot himself in the head because he thought he MIGHT lose a star from his restaurant, and Benoît Violier followed his example recently. That's how much it means to them, to get to that level, and stay there on top.

You don't even want to know how many restaurant employees commit suicide, overdose or just plain drop dead from health issues as a result of that unsustainable lifestyle, each and every year. It numbers in the thousands.

You can hate the character of Adam Jones, and you should, he is a real nasty piece of work, but please don't think Bradley Cooper was trying to emulate Gordon on Hell's Kitchen, or one of MPW's famous blowouts.

It is FAR more common than you could even imagine. I've seen knives thrown across the kitchen, empty 40L stockpots kicked 20 feet across the room, broken up a couple of fist fights between cooks who had at least five too many drinks after work, and probably a few lines of Bolivia's finest to wash those down.

Chefs, bartenders, servers, a fair portion of us are prone to self medication, just to keep up with the exhausting pace and insane demand to perform. Stimulants during the day, alcohol and/or downers to get to sleep at night, if we do sleep.

Adam's fall from grace isn't purely for dramatic effect, nor is his breakdown after Michel (Omar Sy) ruins his sauce by putting too much cayenne pepper in it. He staked EVERYTHING, on that meal, and his sous chef sandbagged him (and I can't disagree that vengeance was in order, dropping rats into your friend and colleague's new restaurant? That's just the type of vicious and petty thing a chef like him would resort to, just for the sake of his own ego).

The romance is shoehorned in, for sure, but that kind of relationship is not unheard of when it is 2 chefs under the same roof. We are extremely high energy, extremely driven people, and when chefs date, it very rarely ends well. It could have been made more palatable, certainly.

I honestly I would have just tossed the romance angle out the window and focused on the meat and potatoes of the story, so to speak.

If you want to criticize the film, criticize it for what it is, not just because you dislike the way the main character treats his 'friends' and staff.

There are plenty of feel good cooking films out there, if you want a sugar-coated view of the restaurant business with an obligatory happy ending, there are a great many others I can recommend, for example: The Hundred Foot Journey, Chef, Mostly Martha, these are films that will satisfy that itch.

If you want a pure, unadulterated view of what restaurants are like at the very highest standard, this film is not far off the mark.

I'd also recommend a little documentary called Michelin Stars: The Madness of Perfection, if you enjoyed anything about this film and want to know more about the pinnacle of the restaurant business.
73 out of 76 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Must see for people who love cooking
jessemaas934 January 2016
Despite some pretty bad reviews I think it's a pretty strong movie. Especially for people who love to cook of like high-end dining, it's a great movie. Burnt gives an excellent look in the world of high- end dining and professional kitchens. Bradley Cooper puts on a good performance and makes the experience very real. The evolution his character makes may be a little predictable, but I think that's not a bad thing. You should not underestimate the acting skills of Bradley Cooper. The character is written for him in my opinion. Also the character that's played by Daniel Brühl, Tony, is an interesting one and I think that Daniel performs this role outstandingly. Tony is a very proper and tight man, but his character evolves during the movie into a very pleasant one. Brühl makes his character very real with the accent and a particular way he moves in. The plot of the movie may be a little predictable, but that's not a problem. I think all the roles are filled in nicely and all of the characters make the story into a real experience, not only about cooking but also about the difficult world of a Michelin-star restaurant. Summarized I can say this movie is a must-see for people who love cooking and things like that. It's not a mind-blowing story, but in combination with some great acting it makes the movie worth watching. An average of 6,7 is way to low for this movie in my opinion.
57 out of 83 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Visually appetizing, but bland taste
Jazzy311335 January 2016
Movies like burnt are so frustrating to watch and in cases like this, the fault almost always lies with the director and / or meddling producers. I am not 100% sure, but I believe that this script was on the black list and even if it was not it probably was damn good to attract the acting talent to such a project. The acting was well done (no pun intended) and none of the actors mailed in their performance. So why does the sum equal less than the parts?

In my reviews, I like to rate movies based on promise and delivery. The trailer is the promise and the viewing experience is the delivery. And I always try to give films the benefit of the doubt. Rating a movie a 1 or a 10, is not helpful to your fellow users.

When you decide to spend your valuable time and money on burnt, you know you're not getting a big budget, special effects extravaganza or a gripping whodunit. You want the movie to show you the inner workings of a kitchen, the struggle and cut throat atmosphere of creating and maintaining a top rated restaurant and some relationship drama that feels possibe. Doesn't have to be good will hunting emotion, but enough to keep us invested. The story and character motivations should never be so illogical or vague as to distract the viewer.

Burnt is not a complete misfire. I enjoyed the scenes in the restaurant kitchen, they were beautiful shots. And most of the scenes themselves were well acted, Bradley seemed invested in the role. The role actors also did an adequate job. The major problem was there was no real tension. The stakes never seemed remotely high.

SMALL SPOILERS: Bradley's character had a vague back story about drug abuse and wanting redemption, but he never seemed to really struggle. He vanishes from the restaurant scene after burning out, and then, after some self penance, he is able to finagle his way into running a brand new restaurant and in no time at all wins a Michelin star? There is some tension with the debt he owes, but you never feel worried because he could always borrow the money from the super rich Maître d'. And in the end his gorgeous ex waltzes in and pays it off?

You can tell as you watch the movie that there are some plot points that were probably compelling in the screenplay, but unfortunately just got lost in translation. I read that when the movie was edited, an actor's entire role was edited out. Maybe that was why the movie seemed kind of disjointed. Every genre of movie has fatal flaws. In niche genres like this, you never want your movie to feel "like a day in the life". It's a movie, give us some stakes. Burnt felt like I got a behind the scenes peek at running a top restaurant. If I wanted that I could watch a 30 minute Food Network show.

Final verdict: Bradley Coopers fans would enjoy. Otherwise, wait till it comes out NetFlix and you're bored one rainy night.

This question probably makes more sense in the forum section, but I find it an interesting parallel. Another food movie came out around the same time called Chef. It was marketed more as a family drama / feel good, subtle comedy. The main character also finds semi redemption by falling back in love with cooking, by going back to the basics after burning out. He also reconnects with his young son. I had the same after taste watching that movie. Cool scenes involving food, but no real stakes or unexpected turns. That movie, however, got stellar reviews. Sometimes I just do not understand professional movie critics at all.
89 out of 135 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
He yells a lot. Sooo he must be a great chef/coach/teacher/captain...
Dr_Sagan4 January 2016
There are a lot of movies out there where the leader of a team, talented, strict and know-it-all, tries to discipline his group, in the background of a match or a contest of some sort. Music, sports, army, classes, even spelling contests and of course ...haute cuisine.

Common factor in all these movies: The leader ...yells a lot! And he is mean to his pupils. And he doesn't forgive the tinniest of mistakes. And he has enemies. Or rivals. And an old teacher who was mean to him like he is now mean to them. And there is a purpose. A trophy. And a love subject.

Pretty much this summarize Burnt too. So, the premise is not so original but in the end it's all about the execution and the fun and the interest.

Well, I think in this department 'Burnt' succeeds. The plot has some clever twists. The pace of the film is right and there are some great natural performances especially from the chameleon actress Sienna Miller and the always serious Daniel "Nikki Lauda" Brühl.

You wont get any cuisine lessons with this movie though. I know this is not the point, but other movies leave you with some knowledge and an increased interest about the special craft. What is that haute cuisine all about? We only get a glimpse of that. Something about 'Culinary Orgasms' but we never get to understand what this could actually be.

Overall: Not boring. Good Pace. Miller's and Brühl's performances are very good. Plus the movie itself is not ...fattening! (unless you eat a lot of popcorn!) So, What else do you need?
132 out of 173 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Burnt is fine, but not good, forget about the great ones in the culinary basket.
scottshak_1119 November 2015
John Wells helms a good movie, but he doesn't have a big rad plot to save him. A washed out burnt down Chef has cleaned up, buffed his act up, and put himself together in an endeavour to pursue perfection. He is reaching out for a third Michelin star and anything less would end up getting burnt by his wrath.

So we know how recalcitrant chefs are. Seen enough Gordon Ramsay to reach that conclusion. Bradley as Adam Jones touches that nerve wrecking breakdown to achieve what he has planned to do. He shouts, despises, scorns and insults his crew to get their juices running. He doesn't care how evil he might look or sound while trying to get results. He is unaffected by emotions, reckless with his life but careful with the food he is preparing. If his preparation doesn't meet the standard in his head, he flings it away and doesn't even hold himself from bashing it to the wall.

He might be a man with a mission, but he is arrogant, mean and a heartless prick. He is also in a huge drug debt which gawks him from a distance, and occasionally batters him up good. He is trying hard to reach it, and there is always someone or something that messes him up and compels him to start at Ground Zero.

What is quite interesting to watch is the brilliant presentation of its frames. The food shown in Burnt will at once make you hungry. There are great close up shots that will sizzle your palates. But everything disappears leaving you wanting for more. Also, there isn't one great recipe that is highlighted marvelously or shown being cooked proper which will bum foodies out. The story lacks substance which is sad. Screenplay of the flick is good. The score is kind of okay, but could have used some more depth.

Cooper fans are gonna love him in this new avatar. His acting is still very engaging. His dramatic bits are great to watch and Siena Miller complements him yet again quite beautifully. Daniel Bruhl plays Tony beautifully too. Emma Thompson has been given some marvelous lines, while Alicia Vikander has kind of a cameo in there.

Remember the golden rule to truly enjoy anything: Don't compare! Burnt shouldn't be compared with other similar culinary movies in the library and you might relish it.
21 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Why are people saying this is a comedy?
neil-47612 November 2015
Warning: Spoilers
Chef Adam Jones burnt himself out on drink, drugs and sex by way of achieving too much too young and, in so doing, made some enemies and stored up some problems. Now clean, he is seeking to re-establish himself: but does he still have what it takes, because his people skills are sadly lacking.

For some baffling reason, this is labelled as a comedy: I have no idea why, because it is almost devoid of any element of amusement at all. It is a straightforward drama which blends Adam's gradual character development (by virtue of friends who, frankly, he doesn't deserve to have) with very generous helpings of what, I believe, is called "food porn" – teasingly lingering shots of exotic foodstuffs being prepared and served.

Bradley Cooper as Adam is rather good, and his development arc is believable. The food porn does nothing for me, other than make me think that I would never for a second consider eating at a restaurant which charges an arm and a leg for a minuscule helping of pretentious food on a silly shaped plate which would look more at home in the Museum Of Modern Art. Food fans will have their own views, of course. There is some nice London location work.

Cooper gets to show off a bit, the support cast are enjoyable (especially Daniel Bruhl as the restaurateur/hotelier who really shouldn't let Adam through the front door) and the story moves along efficiently, if rather inconsequentially. I didn't actually care very much, though, apart from on short sequence which, to my surprise, moved me immensely (I'll just say "birthday cake).

This is one for London-based foodies.
22 out of 33 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Bradley Cooper, Master Chef
blanche-213 May 2017
Warning: Spoilers
The film Burnt came out in 2015 and won six awards here and there. Nevertheless, it did not do particularly well at the box office.

It must have been badly marketed, because I found it delightful and well acted by Bradley Cooper, Sienna Miller, Daniel Bruhl, Matthew Rhys, Emma Thompson, and Uma Thurman.

Cooper plays Adam Jones, a highly successful chef in France who wrecked his life with drugs, booze, and women. He comes to London to reinvent himself as a premiere chef and wants a third star from Michelin. He looks up people he worked with in Paris and attempts to convince them to work for him, and he also looks for new people. He's impressed with a sous chef (Sienna Miller), who doesn't like him at first.

Adam decides to take over his friend Tony's (Daniel Bruhl) restaurant by showing up the night that Michelin is in the restaurant. With his reputation on the line, Tony has no choice but to let him cook.

With a team in place, Adam shows himself to be a complete perfectionist who yells, screams, and breaks dishes when the food isn't the way he wants it. One night, after what he thinks is a complete disaster, he shows up wasted at the restaurant of a rival (Matthew Rhys) who tries to help.

Such a fun and interesting film, and who minds looking at Bradley Cooper? We get to see some of what goes on in the kitchen of a top restaurant - the film used top people as consultants - and learn just enough to make us curious about what is a truly fine art.

Highly recommended.
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
formulaic but good enough
SnoopyStyle25 April 2016
Adam Jones (Bradley Cooper) had a meltdown as a two-star Michelin chef in Paris. He was addicted to drugs, alcohol, and women. He burnt down all his bridges, and spent the last couple of years shucking a million oysters in New Orleans. Now clean and sober, he decides to achieve the third star in London. He convinces maître d' Tony to get him started. He recruits many of the old mates and some new ones including sous-chef Helene (Sienna Miller).

Bradley Cooper is doing an angry brat looking for salvation. This movie crystallizes when his character tells the therapist that he's gathering a team like the Seven Samurai. Most of these characters become story constructs. There are still good stuff here. I like Sienna Miller and her character. The longer she held out against the inevitable romance, the better her character is. I like the switch with the villain of the movie. I'm always up for some food porn. Overall, it's too formulaic, too much flash, but is good enough of a watch.
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Burnt : a great film with an indie feel
rahulvaidya05525 December 2023
This gem of a movie came out in 2015. Quick cuts initially, focused on the story of the movie and not wasting the viewers time to set up the film. For people who like indie films with a setup and purpose this has been living in the shadows for a lot of people who enjoy films. I am biased towards films that have an indie feel to it and have great music playing in the background.

This film is a great watch for viewers who are interested in what goes behind in making fine dining food and showing it as an indie movie. Bradley cooper plays the part of "genius who threw it all away" very well. The "gifted but tormented" trope may have been used by a lot of film makers but a few have been able to justify it. And this film certainly does it with style. This redemption story comes with its set of subtle twists and turns. But it keeps the story centered on the heart of the film. Watch it if you like food, what goes on in making great food and people who strive for perfection in making that food.
11 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Need a little more meat to the bone
vistheindian23 December 2015
Quickie Review:

Adam Jones (Bradley Cooper) is a gifted chef who ruined his life and career with drugs and alcohol. Determined to get set his life and career ambitions straight, he returns to London to lead his kitchen to Michelin star status. Burnt is packed with talented actors such as Bradley Cooper, Sienna Miller, and Daniel Brühl. A lot of the weight of the movie is on their shoulders, unfortunately they could not carry it all the way through. The main problem is the beats the movie goes through are largely predictable. Quality performances make Burnt an acceptable, decent film, albeit a forgettable one.

Full Review:

Was I excited for Burnt? Honestly, not really. Then again looking at the cast I thought you couldn't go wrong to give this movie a chance. After all last year I saw Chef another foodie related drama that I happen to really like. I also like the TV show Hell's Kitchen, so any flair of Gordon Ramsay should be fun.

Actually Bradley Cooper ended up being more like Gordon Ramsay than I expected. He is a hot head, striving for perfection, and if you do anything wrong, there's going to be a huge mess of broken plates to clean up. As brilliant of a chef as Jones may be, his weakness in the kitchen is that he is old school. So seeing him fit back into the changed world of high class cuisine was interesting. Sienna Miller was also a good addition, as she's the only one who is able to stand up to the head chef. This led to some interesting face-offs in difference of opinions. For me, the best of the three main cast was Daniel Brühl. This actor deserves more praise than he receives. His portrayal of the character is subtle, his actions are motivated by love but he never draws focus to it. To him he is just doing favour or a job, nothing more. In many ways that made him feel more real of a person than any other character in the film.

That being said, I couldn't really care for the character development for long because I knew exactly where everyone was going to end up being. This includes the obligatory love story, the sweet moment with a kid, and the acceptance of responsibilities of a leader. As in any typical story structure there has to be a crisis. However, in this film that crisis occurs way too abruptly. I'll admit that in that point in the story the moment was very effective, but then every character conveniently changes to their perfect selves… I didn't see anything before that said these people were on their way to better themselves, and all that was needed was a catalyst. In other words, things happen in this movie not because it's a coherent flow to the story, but because it must fit the typical story structure of beginning, middle, climax, and resolution. So there all these pieces to the movie that are good on their own, but don't fit well together.

By no means do I hate this movie. It is sufficient. If you are looking for some good performances with great looking food being prepared by great looking people, you couldn't ask for anything more perfect. On the other hand if you require a little more meat to the bone (substance to the story), you are better off waiting.
18 out of 33 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Movie Has Been Written A Thousand Times
cullen7312 September 2016
"It must be great. Bradley Cooper acts in award winning film." But no. It's the same movie that every other actor has done at least once in their career. The lead is arrogant, chip on their shoulder, lacks social skills, loner by choice... There is sexual tension with opposite sex (usually) supporting character. This tension helps the lead start to let down their guard. Something happens that upsets the lead so bad they are worse than every before. Then the lead has a mental break down. The opposite sex character helps pick them up. Usually at that same time the sexual tension is broken. The lead makes peace with their demons from the past. Voila!! He/she is no longer an angry prick but a lovable person with great social skills. It all revolves around an unique career, skill or hobby. The only reason to watch the film. In this movie it is world class chef, but it could be a snake milker, innovative uke player or a deep sea crab hunter.
63 out of 88 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Amazing!
alivissianos30 October 2015
Having worked in kitchens i found this incredibly realistic and everything in this film stays true to the life of so many chefs abusing substances and their passion controlling their lives. I'm not normally a fan of Bradley Cooper, however i was amazed to see his acting talents here and how true he was to a real chef. Definitely a game changer for his career after being unimpressed with him in hangover or wedding crashes.

If you have a passion for anything i think you'll like this film, it simply displays every aspect of what people go through when they're putting everything in their being into something, when it's all in, all or nothing, life and death.

9/10. A must see for all food lovers.
118 out of 176 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
At its best during the kitchen scenes
ginge_mickey25 September 2022
Warning: Spoilers
Burnt tells the story of an angry, flawed, intimidating chef. The many intense kitchen scenes highlight how flawed the typical angry chefs are.

It is an interesting and easy watch and Bradley Cooper is at his most entertaining when he is screaming and shouting in the kitchen (even if he doesn't always make the most convincing French speaking chef).

But you do buy into the journey and the simple enough story of redemption.

The gay waiter is cheap and the chef's drug addiction feels pointless and serves no real purpose. The kiss at the end is also borderline offensive.

I'm also not sure I buy the romance story which seems to come from nowhere. One minute he is shouting at her and without doing too much she suddenly loves him...

Burnt is definitely at its best in the kitchen and it's quite emotional seeing people pull together, trying their best to meet service despite being at breaking point. The cake scene is also a real emotional pull and a reminder of what's important.

I'm also not sure how realistic the cayenne pepper twist is... Would you really bide your time for that long just to get back at someone in that way? I'm also not bothered for Emma Thompson or the therapist side of the story.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Oh god another Bradley Cooper damaged genius bad boy movie
xhidden992 September 2017
Lemme guess he used to be great but 'threw it all away'. He's on a mission of personal redemption. Every one love hates him. He falls in love with his chief competition who of course hates him and adores him. He's substituted drugs and booze for being a colossal a-hole user of people because he's just that talented. He IS the most interesting man in the world. Before him no one ate food. Other than that this is movie where you hear Bradley speak pretty French where you watch people make and eat pretty good food and there's a lot and I mean a lot of histrionics.
108 out of 169 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Ignore the negative reviews
shbeach11 November 2015
A must see for those interested in the inner workings of a restaurant kitchen and the world of high end chefs. Most people have no clue what it is like to be at the top of the restaurant world or how difficult it is to be in this type of a service profession. The intense pressure they put on themselves to be "perfect". Is the movie a bit disjointed along the way, yes but the acting is stellar and its worth it just to see the food prep and get the overwhelming inside experience. Bradley Cooper is fantastic! Very good supporting actors. Many of them are unknowns. The kitchen scenes are the best. Watching the process and the artistry is a unique peek behind the kitchen doors. Go see this one!!
192 out of 287 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Cliche and average
JabberingRaven20 March 2022
This movie can be put as a prime example of cliches and tropes. A broken but genius chef, an adoring friend, or a protege who initially hates our hero but comes to love him gradually - you name it, this movie has it all. Don't get me wrong, this is by no means a bad movie, just very very average fare.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A Great Supporting Cast
slydon137 November 2015
Warning: Spoilers
We meet Adam after he has emerged from his own self imposed punishment for all the damage he did to his friends in Paris when he was a drugs/ booze/ sex addict. His goal is to open a restaurant and get 3 Michelin stars but everybody in the cooking world hates him. Even in London he can't walk down the street without somebody chasing him.

Surprisingly enough, he is able to round up some talented friends in a way that is reminiscent of Jake and Elwood.

He knows that to meet his goal, he has to stay away from things he is addicted to so he insists on hiring Sienna Miller (who would be perfect for him except for his commitment to celibacy).

A stellar supporting cast including Emma Thompson, adorable Daniel Brühl, Omar Sy, Matthew Rhys, Sarah Greene were fun, all on their own.

Bradley Coopers costumes were mainly T-shirts but he changed them so frequently that it was like he was competing with one (or all) of the Helmsworth brothers - not that I'm objecting. His French accent wasn't bad either!

Like most women, I find a man throwing a tantrum unpleasant so I don't watch those cooking shows. Even when Bradley Cooper does it, I congratulate myself on never having to deal with that again. Those are the only unpleasant parts of the film.

The big questions - can Adam Jones learn how to make it through the day without throwing a tantrum like a teenage girl getting her period? Will he realise that it doesn't matter what a review says about his work? Does Adam become a grown-up?

I liked it partly because it was NOT a typical American or British rom-com although all the ingredients were there. It was better for it.
7 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Burnt was a pretty good film about a recovering chef trying a comeback
tavm3 November 2015
This was the only one of the current movies playing at the cinema my friend works at that I hadn't seen yet that I was willing to watch. It was quite entertaining as it went along the narrative. Bradley Cooper plays a once-disgraced chef trying a comeback. So he goes to England where his former boss from France has another restaurant operating there and attempts to work for him again. He also gets some of his former crew back. Then there's a female chef (Sienna Miller) who also reluctantly agrees to work for him. That's because despite his recovery from various vices, he's still quite a jerk as my friend pointed out in the middle of the film. In summary, Burnt took a while but I was pretty entertained as was my friend. Oh, and nice reunion between Cooper and Miller from American Sniper.
10 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Great performance from Bradley Cooper! 6/10
leonblackwood6 March 2016
Review: I quite enjoyed this movie, mainly because of Bradley Coopers performance and the original concept but I would have liked to have seen more depth to the various characters, who constantly get shouted at in the kitchen. Its not a big shock that Gordon Ramsay produced this movie, because of the way that the head chef, Adam Jones (Bradley Cooper) belittles the cooks and strives for perfection and the director cleverly added other elements, like the love story between Adam and Helene (Sienna Miller) and the debt collectors who are hunting down Adam for there money. I also liked Tony (Daniel Bruhl) character, who secretly loved Adam but knew that there relationship would never turn out to be more than friendship. The director could have given Michel (Omar Sy) a bit more depth and it did seem like Adam was going a bit overboard to get the extra Michelin star but I don't know anything about that world so I can't comment on how real the competition is between the head chefs. I find it hard to imagine why someone would want to get into a profession were you get treated like a lab rat and have to work your fingers to the bone, without much appreciation but once you become the head chef, it must be a nice feeling to have full control of bringing beautiful and tasteful food to the masses. Personally, I'm not one to pay loads of money for a lettuce leaf on a plate, with little swirls around the edges but thats just me. Anyway, from an entertainment point of view, this movie is quite good and straight to the point and the mixture of drama and wit really worked in an environment which is so tense and full of pressure. Enjoyable! 

Round-Up: With all of the hype that surrounded this movie on its release, I really thought that it made more money at the box office. Bradley Cooper, 41, who first came to light in the Wedding Crashers in 2005, can't seem to do anything wrong lately, and with 4 movies in pipeline along with Aloha and Joy due to be released, he has a lot to be thankful for. This movie was directed by John Wells, 59, who also brought you the Company of Men and August: Osage County. He hasn't got much experience behind the camera, but he done a great job with this movie, mainly because it delves into a world which is unknown to many people. The person who really made this project a success, has to be Bradley Cooper, who showed realism and emotion throughout the movie and each character played a part in making this an enjoyable watch.

Budget: $20million Worldwide Gross: $35.6million

I recommend this movie to people who are into their comedy/dramas starring Bradley Cooper, Sienna Miller, Omar Sy, Daniel Bruhl, Emma Thompson, Uma Thurman, Lily James and Riccardo Scamarcio. 6/10
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Excellent movie, both fun and inspirational.
acosonic8 January 2016
Obviously kids are giving rates on IMDb, so јudge movie by it's IMDb rating is ridiculous.

I personally hope that IMDb will hide its rating, or at last categorize it somehow, because to be able to fully understand some movies you need to fit the criteria, and in this movies case:

A. You are aged over 20 B. You tried to accomplish something in your life C. You cooked at last 100 meals :) D. You are driven by passion in your life

In my humble opinion, Bradly Cooper's acting is awesome, I didn't really expect he can handle such complex personality well, but he nailed it.

The plot and storyline are perfect. I rarely feel so motivated and inspired after a movie. So, my thanks to the director, writers, actors and producers for creating this movies!

Keep up the good work!
68 out of 113 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
I'm kinda hungry !!!!!
zikhanjunior6 January 2016
When I start watching this film, I didn't have that much of high hope. I was like OK it's some sort of comedy . But whoa !! I was so wrong. What's not to praise about it !!!! Direction,cinematography,acting each & everything was superb. If cooking is an art then this movie is a great presentation . Also for all hopeless,depressed people around the corner this movie is like a breath of fresh air.The chemistry between Bradley Cooper & Sienna Miller was awesome.The rage,ambition,intensity everything you need to become great in what you do -you'll find here. And yeah!! the sky is not the limit,there's more to it.

Seriously ,after watching "Burnt" I felt hungry for good foods .Also I want to start a new career as a chef !!!
5 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Predictable and shallow
schuwomann18 November 2019
The only good thing about this movie is the theme. I love cooking, and I'm a foodie, so obviously the theme appealed to me. Unfortunately, this movie is predictable and shallow. Shame. I won't bother listing all the flaws. If you've seen it then you know what I mean.

I also just want to say: why in the hell would she kiss him after he grabbed her shirt and screamed in her face? For me, that would be the nail in the coffin on any possibility of a relationship. In fact, I found his behaviour throughout the whole movie to be completely over-the-top.
55 out of 83 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Bradley Cooper is brilliantly convincing!
jlvickers31 October 2015
Definitely worth seeing if you enjoy fine dining, haute cuisine, or are simply a Bradley Cooper fan. Convincing performances by a great cast. Cooper is brilliant and continues to reveal the depth of his talent.

Burnt offers a unique perspective and behind the scenes peek into professional kitchens, which I found fascinating and gave me a new appreciation for the demands, artistry, and creative genius of great chefs.

The message on the need for professional counseling and support for someone whose life has self-destructed through substance abuse was in balance. Watching Cooper's character struggle to start anew while still afraid to face his demons is a story line relevant to many. Excellent movie!
71 out of 123 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Though the racist BURNT isn't the best Foodie flick of all time . . .
oscaralbert5 November 2015
Warning: Spoilers
. . . it constitutes a partially palatable snack if you can stomach its anti-Black racial bias. Would Andrew Lloyd Webber cast the title character of JEZUS CHR1ST, SUPERSTAR--along with all His disciples--as a Lily White crew, EXCEPT for the betrayer's role (Judas Iscariot), filled by a Black face?! That's exactly what the Weinstein Co. people have done with BURNT, as the only Black character with a speaking part, Michel, turns out to be a sneaky Iago-type biding his time, waiting to gain vengeance against all White People for some perceived wrong in the distant past (maybe his great granddad times nine was kidnapped to Europe in the 1600s). The title for this racist flick seems to single out Michel, referencing his skin tone and intentions toward everyone else, while portraying Blacks as untrustworthy, back-stabbing ticking time bombs. At a Real Life juncture when half of European Whites are engaged in a War against their current influx of darker-skinned refugees, Weintein's Co.'s schedule for releasing a flick set and shot in Europe such as this racist BURNT is tantamount to throwing gasoline on a theater fire!
10 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Bland
randymcbeast30 December 2015
This movie was pretty pointless. It was more about dressing up Bradley Cooper as a Chef and hoping for the best. The story was bland and even the cookery was outdated. A dish that should not have been served.

I just don't understand how studios can invest so much time and money into a movie and then produce such an uninteresting and meaningless film. Do they not watch it and realize how bad it is? I can only guess that some executive thought that pairing Cooper with the hot trend in cooking and cooking shows would be an instant hit. Well, you can pair the most expensive wine with Burger King and there's a high probability that you won't enjoy the meal.

The movie overall was shot well and the acting was fine. It just went nowhere in the end. Sure, many viewers will just enjoy watching Cooper in a Chef's coat and without, but if you're expecting anything more than that cancel your reservation for this one.
72 out of 119 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed