Foodfight! (2012) Poster

(2012)

User Reviews

Review this title
169 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
1/10
A mindbogglingly convoluted chapter in animation and cinema itself
StevePulaski28 January 2014
I remember in 2005, as a young child who was just being acquainted with the internet, learning about Lawrence Kasanoff's Foodfight!. The film seemed unlike anything I had ever heard of before, combining dozens of popular advertising mascots such as Mr. Clean, Chester Cheetah, Mrs. Buttersworth, and Charlie the Tuna into one film that would resemble Toy Story if its setting had been transferred to a supermarket. The story of the film is actually one of cinema and animation's most baffling stories of a film's time in development hell and still captivates me whenever I scour the internet looking for a summation of what exactly went on with the picture. The story is one of incredible ambition, controversy, and an unfathomably disappointing conclusion. If you're not familiar with the backstory, I'll give you a little rundown.

In 2001, director Lawrence Kasanoff, who was known for producing the Mortal Kombat films as well as a handful of TV adaptations on the franchise, announced an undertaking like no other - he was going to make an animated film under his own company Threshold Entertainment that focused on the events that would take place inside a supermarket when the lights would turn off. Kasanoff envisioned a spectacle like no other, centering on dozens of recognizable brand mascots that would fend off a new, evil brand that attempted to takeover the marketplace. Not only was a film planned, but merchandize-galore was in addition, with toys, stuffed animals, a potential web show, commercial tie-ins, fast food toys, books, and more were also planned to coincide with the film's release. Kasanoff called Threshold Entertainment "the next Pixar" and also banded together top animators from around the world to piece together a project with incredible ambition. The film was to be released in 2003.

So why is it that for a film this ambitious you probably haven't heard a damn thing about it? Well, for starters, the film's first immediate roadblock came in the form of a burglary in 2003 when hard drives containing the film, its animation, and its conceptual mockups were stolen. The animators and everyone assigned to the project needed to start from scratch. Nonetheless, Kasanoff pushed on with the project, confirming a release date of 2005.

Foodfight! never came out in 2005 and news of it became scarce and vague when it did manage to circulate. The release date was changed several times before finding itself up for auction in 2007 for a surprisingly low $2.5 million, given its ambition and $65 million budget. Finally, the film came out over a decade after it first hit production, in October 2012. It received a very limited theatrical release in Europe and a silent DVD/video-on-demand release in the States, effectively ending one of the most mindbogglingly convoluted chapters in animation history.

Now the question begs an answer, what does Foodfight! look like in its final state? The simple answer is "hell." This is a film that was clearly rushed upon being purchased at the aforementioned auction. The story concerns, as stated, a supermarket that turns into a playground for its product-mascots upon closing. The leader of this world is Dex Dogtective (voiced by Charlie Sheen), a crime-fighter who becomes incredibly suspicious of "Brand X," a new line of products that are hitting store shelves. Dex and his gang of friends Sunshine Goodness (Hilary Duff) and Daredevil Dan (Wayne Brady) prepare to keep the supermarket in their hands, but Dex increasingly finds himself distracted by the likes of Lady X (Eva Longoria), a desirable woman who keeps trying to win Dex's eye and the store manager finds himself dictated by Mr. Clipboard (Christopher Lloyd), who is enforcing Brand X.

To begin with, the animation is awful. This is animation that looks and moves like a broken Sims game on PlayStation. Never in my life did I think I'd call an animated film with so many colors and characters odious but that's exactly what it is. While the characters appear in a three-dimensional state, the backgrounds almost look two-dimensional, and worst, are almost indistinguishable in terms of what they're supposed to be. This is clearly animation that is not finished and was forced to be the finished product. Characters are very stiff when moving, have a peculiar coldness to their movements in addition, and many of them look grotesque and ugly.

Then there's the awful writing at hand here. One can sort of forgive the animation for looking terrible, seeing as, understandably, everyone's hands just wanted to be cleaned of this film, but with twelve years of production and a forced rewrite thanks to a burglary, you would think the writing would be marginally polished. And yet, Foodfight! bears so much sexual innuendo it's ungodly and very inappropriate for children (Daredevil Dan says to the sultry Lady X in one scene, "Oh Mamacita! Yo, sweetcakes, nice packaging! How about some chocolate frosting? I'd like to butter your muffin!"), Lady X boasts fetish-like lingerie as her primary outlets, orchestrating the fan-fiction version of her character, and characters speak almost entirely in grocery-store/food puns. There's no characters here, despite there being like thirty that are recognizable. There are just empty, hollow animated creations programmed to spew something that is allegedly funny.

Foodfight!'s existence and eventual outcome should be a warning to those who have an idea they see bold and ambitious opportunities for. Granted a burglary can't really be blamed on part of the writers and directors but an awful script, a premise that seems to exist solely as a corporate byproduct, fourth-rate animation, and incredibly unforgivable and unnecessary sexual innuendos can be. The fact that Foodfight! is a bad film is the least of its concerns; it's a morally, ethically, and visually reprehensible fiasco that scrapes the bottom of the barrel so forcefully that it's tearing a hole in its base.
184 out of 259 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Unrelenting burning pile of horse excrement
tonymars-6308714 May 2021
A true tragedy that will go down as one of, if not the, worst animation movies ever made!
9 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
No matter how bad you think it is...
info-511131 July 2012
...it's even worse.

All evidence points to this animated film being contrived as a money-making scheme. "Hey, we can create a cheap CGI movie and make companies pay for the celeb voices in advance by inserting their brands in the film!"

The result is worse than crass, it's abominably bad. It's so bad that the film has been stuck in production limbo for a decade and it hasn't aged well. The CGI, the story and the one-liners (oh God, the one-liners...) all bear the mark of genuine and profound incompetence, a complete lack of even the most most rudimentary story-telling skills.

What passes for a narrative revolves around supermarket brands coming to life at night. Rex Dogtective (yeah, go ahead and try to laugh at that one), voiced by Charlie Sheen, mourns his lost love but must soon save his supermarket city from the evil, impersonal Brand X. With the help of ... ah, who cares?

Foodfight! will bore, offend and anger you at the same time, such is its unprecedented badness. Please don't watch it.
137 out of 219 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Run away......
Fun_film_frenzy17 June 2012
Appalling, awful, tasteless and unfunny. CGI worse than a 1995 video game, combined with stunningly inappropriate and crass double-entendres make this an experience painful both to the eyes and the brain. Nazi- themed products take over a supermarket, complete with Eva Longoria's female Hitler character switching outfits between stripper schoolgirl and fetish Nazi. "One brand, one market" she shrieks to the minions gathered at a huge rally. Just vile.

I'm all for a bit of a bit of tasteless comedy, but it's got to be at least a little bit funny. And, please, not crass Nazism and innuendo in a movie aimed at 5 year olds. Oh, and even my kids thought it was lame. I hope the 'stars' got paid well - they should be doing pro-bono work for the next 5 years to make up for it.

Genuinely the worst movie I have seen in the last 10 years - avoid at all costs.
105 out of 177 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Just as awful as everyone says. Pure animated dreck.
MonsterVision9911 March 2022
Genre film producer and Vestron Pictures producer Lawrence Kasanoff tried to cash-in on the success of animated movies made by Pixar and Dreamworks in the mid 90's and early 2000's but he did it in the laziest possible way a kids film can turn out to be.

If it would have been released in 2003 as it was planned, it would probably be considered a bad, strange and awkward hack job but fate had different plans for this piece of garbage. It wasnt enough to be a bad product of its time, fate wanted it to be one of the worst films ever made by delaying the already flawed production for years and releasing this trash into the world.

When you mix a pandering producer who doesnt have much experience at directing, let alone animated features, with a bunch of annoyed underpaid animators, several production difficulties and straight up bad decisions you get... Foodfight.

The film was originally going to be animated to resemble a Looney Tunes cartoon but Kasanoff decided the film would use motion capture, a technique that clashes with the cartoony animation style he wanted. The result is the worst of both worlds. Characters are stiff with their movements but this is often interrupted with more flexible stretchy movements that arent executed properly because of the bad animation and feel completely out of place. Thats not taking into account the awful art direction, ugly 3D models, disgusting textures and generic designs.

When you try to make a project like this, you should at least be familiar with how the medium works, instead of making arbitrary decisions that will inevitably create troubles for you and your crew; there doesnt seem to be a consistent idea or vision for the film besides making it a commercial family picture for the lowest common denominator.
8 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
It's not just a bad movie
KidMacabre11 December 2013
Foodfight! is a cynical, cheap, patronizing, lifeless, lazy, unfunny, tasteless, shoddy, disrespectful, offensive-to-anyone-with-a-brain piece of unmitigated garbage, sure, but it's much more than that.

Because it is meant to be entertainment aimed at children, and because its message amounts to nothing more than "BUY OUR BRANDS, OUR BRANDS LOVE YOU, YOU LOVE OUR BRANDS, EAT OUR FOOD, EAT, EAT, EAT, EAT, EAT..." Foodfight! is not just a bad movie.

Foodfight! is PURE EVIL.

So far, the movie has only made $73,000 on a (shocking) $65 million budget. I guess there is some justice in the world.

Ten years ago, when Threshold Entertainment's hard drives were stolen, writer/director/producer Lawrence Kasanoff called it an act of "industrial espionage." I salute the brave souls who actively hindered the production of this film. You fought for the brain cells of children everywhere. I think watching even fifteen minutes of this movie has made me stupider.

Don't just skip this movie. Burn it, then bury it in a desolate field somewhere. It deserves to die the worthless drop of despicable piddle it is.

Also, ƒ*¢% Larry Kasanoff.
87 out of 162 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Wait, what?
blueflamefilms2 November 2016
You know, this review isn't based on the premise that this is an egregious film. It is, I agree that this film is abhorrent. However, the legend surrounding this lukewarm, atrocious piece of media is far more enjoyable than this pile of excrement.

This *ahem* "film" came out December of 2012. It was supposed to come out in December of 2002. The film was stolen, and that was probably for the best. However, because the directors had faith (or fear that they'd lose 45 MILLION DOLLARS) for this film, so they began again from scratch. And what we got was probably the worst thing of all time.

If this movie was a regular Hollywood flop I'd maybe forgive it. But on account of how atrociously awful this film is in any aspect, I'd expect it to be made by a 17 year cannabis addict who maybe knows a bit of VFX. But this is a 45 million dollar animated film starring Charlie Sheen and Dwayne Brady. If Clerks can be made with a 25,000 dollar budget and Napolian Dynamite for $40,000, how is this god-awful film's budget anywhere past $7.34! Oh I know! Charlie Sheen spent 44 of the 45 million on crack. Yeah, that'd explain this movie. They were on crack the entire time.

Words cannot describe the amount of crap this movie sinks in. It's terrible in every single aspect: And I mean it this time. The animation is the equivalent of nails going into your eyeballs, the sound effects are all crap, the plot is wonky, the characters are so bland they're almost non-existent and it just goes on, and on, and, on, and on, x500. This movie is terrible, almost even laughably bad. In fact, it's so awful it IS laughably bad. I was in tears of joy that it was over, tears of pain that I wasted my precious time on this, and tears of laughter that something so awful even exists.

Watch it just once, and you'll quote me.
48 out of 88 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
A museum piece
Terastas7 March 2014
This isn't just a really bad movie. This is a movie that, ten to twenty years from now, people will be debating whether or not it even existed. Like the animated Titanic movie, it isn't just bad, it is bad in such a way that it will be considered inconceivable that such a movie could have even been green lit; a movie where people will see brief snippets and wonder if it was a real movie or just somebody's entry-level CG demo-reel.

For this reason, this is not a movie that should be watched. This is a movie that should be thrown into the basement under lock and key for twenty years until it becomes obscure and collectible just like Nintendo's Virtual Boy.

I'm not kidding. I have a Dex Dogtective doll, and when I tell people what it is and where it's from, the reaction is always the same: "Holy ****! That thing is real?!" The C.G. is terrible, the characters are one-dimensional, the writing is asinine, the jokes make BioDome look like Waking Ned Devine, and the talent of the voice cast is squandered across the board.

The only thing that makes this movie even worthy of note is the overabundance of marketing icons. But this isn't a precursor to "Wreck-It Ralph" -- won't offer any insights as to what the life of a marketing icon might truly be like (Charlie Tuna makes an appearance, but nobody comments on the fact that he exists to sell the shredded corpses of other tunas). Instead, all we get is a hollow narrative about how buying generic brands is evil. SO BUY OUR CRAP!!! Yes, it's that bad. Right up there with Manos: The Hands of Fate, Tentacolino, Birdemic and The Room: A movie so bad that some people just absolutely have to have it.
56 out of 116 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Execrable, torturous, c**p
Treacle-A17 June 2012
Words cannot begin to express how awful this movie is. Have you ever seen Lawnmower Man? Remember those CGI scenes in which Jeff Fahey gets it on with the CHI woman? OK, now imagine someone watched that and thought "hey, there's a kids' movie here!! I just have to find some way of slapping a script together, hiring the guys who made these really cool graphics in the early 90s and I'll make literally thousands of dollars!"

It doesn't appeal to kids, or adults, or even the blind apparently (a blind guy walked out halfway through saying it stunk). I'm not sure who's left.
59 out of 123 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
This exists (Foodfight)
Mara-Jade-Skywalker-232 January 2019
Can you believe this movie had a budget of 65 million dollars? Just stay away from this film. I am not going a long 3 paragraph long rant because people have said more than enough, so avoid it like the plague.
9 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Worst crossover ever
ericstevenson22 November 2016
I remember watching the Nostalgia Critic's review of this as well as JonTron's. It's truly some of the Critic's best work and should be seen. He compared it to "Wreck-It Ralph". I guess those are similar to the even more awesome Lego movie. They are films that show us that a world of fictional characters can be made into something wonderful. Sadly, this film shows us the complete opposite. I wouldn't quite say it was the worst animated movie I've ever seen. I think that "honor" goes to the 2001 animated Titanic movie. This film has credits that go for eight minutes. That other one had credits for fourteen minutes!

I guess it technically isn't as ugly as "Joshua And The Promised Land", but it really is a worse film. At least that movie was less than an hour long! I hated every minute of this. It has some of the ugliest CGI ever created. These cartoon characters are horrible at showing emotions. They just seem to be staring blankly all the time. All of these characters are ugly. Even the ones who are labeled ugly are really no worse than anyone else. This might be the reason why I'm not into celebrity voices. Of course, anyone would regret being in this movie. What's worse is that there's this guy called General X who explicitly mentions how aroused he is by everything.

The villain, Lady X wears clothes that alone should have gotten this movie a PG-13 rating. The climax is one of the most monotonous things I've ever seen in any movie. It's just characters throwing food over and over. It's painfully drawn out for something that's only an hour and a half long. The movements in this film are amazingly terrible. The facial expressions are among the worst ever created. It's good expressions that make me love animation so much. This film makes no sense. It features this world where food mascots go into their own magical world or maybe it comes to life at the end of the day or it exists on some other plane, but I don't care at all.

It is a hideous film where the cameos serve no purpose at all. I looked in the credits and I found out there were characters like the Energizer Bunny in this. I didn't recall seeing him so they probably just put him in the crowd scenes for no reason and still mentioned him in the credits. The voices are obnoxious, especially this giant nosed sneezing guy. It's also hateful with them explicitly making Jew jokes. Wait, why would Brand X recall the prunes that Lady X came from? That's impossible! This is idiotic in every sense of the word and is as terrible as every Internet critic has made it out to be. Zero Stars
30 out of 64 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
I love this movie. AAAY LMAO.
fullerd-9484131 January 2017
This movie is a cinematic masterpiece, from the sensational motion capture, to that scene with the salesman that I think has Parkinson's. This movie is absolutely glorious from stat to finish. Charlie Sheen should clearly star in more movies, as this only serves to highlight his magnificence. This movie also may or may not be KKK propaganda, the stereotyping is pretty intense, so there's that. Your children should probably watch this movie every night if they want to grow up healthy.

10/10 Aaaaylien out.

P.S.- This is probably just a porno that was accidentally packaged as a movie, so that adds to it if anything.
44 out of 66 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Worst animated movie ever? Not really, but the one that suffered the most during its making
Elvis-Del-Valle21 March 2023
I can't speak badly about this movie because I know there were a lot of complications making this movie take years to make, since most of the money invested was borrowed and the movie was going to have good animation, but the discs that contained the original version they were stolen causing this film to be remade from scratch, but with a more limited budget and cheaper animation so that it will be finished quickly. It seemed like a promising project, but in the end it was not. The animation does not seem to be done by professionals, as it resembles those animated videos made with Source Filmaker and Blender. Some characters came to like me, especially the protagonist, as for the others, because most of the characters are quite bizarre. I would say that this movie needed improvements both in the animation and in the script because some things seemed absurd to me. We mustn't forget to mention that this movie has many off-color jokes, which was not pleasant for the audience considering that it was a children's movie, although the truth is that I laughed a lot at those jokes. Foodfight is not an excellent animated movie, but I've already seen it 4 times in 2 weeks and the truth for some reason doesn't stop attracting my attention. I think it's because of the bizarreness, which is that it never ceases to fascinate me. The movie didn't seem so bad to me, but it's not good either, so I think I could classify it as mediocre or average and that's why I give it a 6/10. I agree that it is not a good movie, but there is something about it that makes me want to see it again. I don't know exactly what it is, but I guess it's like the protagonist Dex used to say: "The secret is inside."
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
its so damn bad
matthewpamment20 October 2016
This movie is so bad, it looks like something that some kid made on a 3d modeling program in his spare time and was super excited to show to parents.

The only thing i liked is that it spawned 2 great review videos on YouTube.

Seriously, if you spent so much money making it, you should at least finalize the quality

I think these people should look at what some people have managed to make on blender, a free modeling program. it does not taker a master mind crew to make a movie that is even slightly watchable
27 out of 59 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
It's Their World v. Brand X
seanherbsrules7 March 2019
The reason I give the 5☘s out of 5👍 is because the early animation makes me inspired storytelling to fight off and recall ALL the Brand X products. Does someone want to clean up in all sections after recalling at the ending, because no spoilers here?
20 out of 38 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
It's bottom-of-the-barrel bad and that's just being nice...
eparazak21 March 2017
Jontron was right! Nostalgia Critic was right! Animat was right! Phantomstrider was right!

Why didn't I listen to them?!

This is an animated feature about a dog named Dex Dogtective who's played by Charlie Sheen and gets depressed after his girlfriend Sunshine Goodness disappears. After a brand called Brand X, controlled by Lady X begins to take over the food market that he and a bunch of grocery mascots live in, they must fight back.

Where do I begin? The animation is hideous; it's the worst animation ever put to film, I'm not even kidding here. It was originally destined to be in a Looney Tunes style when planned in 2002, but when the film went into production issues, the director decided that they should change the style to motion capture. Seeing these two styles combined makes the movie look unnatural. The animation itself looks ugly from the character designs, to the awful effects, to the backgrounds, the list goes on. Ranging from the human designs to the designs of the mascots, they either look unnatural or uncanny. For example, Lady X looks very plastic like and Cheasel T. Weasel has the color of poop. For some reason, the camera moves in almost every single shot. You may see the camera zoom in, spin around a tower or pan in for an extreme close up. The backgrounds have an incredibly low resolution, to the point where some of them look flat. For example, in the beginning of the movie where the store closes, the interior of the store looks flat. Keep in mind that this movie came out in 2012. I could harp on about the animation, but I think I should move on.

The story and characters aren't much better in comparison. To start with the story, we have the concept. Basically, food mascots come to life at night when the store closes. The concept bares a striking resemblance to that of Toy Story's, only with food mascots. To go along with the concept, the movie uses endless product placements from Charlie Tuna and Mr. Clean to the Vlasic bird. It doesn't make the audience feel grateful seeing all of these advertisements in a movie. As for the story itself, it's very incoherent and there are many scenes that don't make much sense. For example, during the midpoint of the feature, Dex can be seen out in the market during the daytime while customers are shopping and it doesn't make sense as to how he is able to be on the outskirts of the store. There are also these weird sexual innuendos that are noticeable that really do make me question the PG rating. During the midpoint of the movie there is a musical number that is really grating on the ears to the point where I nearly went insane listening to it. None of the jokes hit and come off as cringeworthy. Did I mention that the story is incoherent?

The characters...hoo boy, where do I start with them? I can start by listing them. The doctor does nothing but talk rapidly in the most obnoxious voice possible. Cheasel T. Weasel, aka the poop rat is incredibly over the top with his cartoony movements; heck he has an entire shop hidden inside of him. Lady X is a generic villain who tries to seduce our protagonist, and she also wears very suggestive clothes while doing it. Daredevil Dan is an obnoxious racist stereotype. And then there's Sunshine, who maybe the most likable character in this movie since she isn't annoying. Finally, we have the main character Dex Dogtective. Dex is probably the most interesting character of the movie because of his girlfriend's disappearance. However, that doesn't make him likable. What makes him unlikable is the fact that he spouts out food puns all the time. While this gag doesn't make him unlikable per se, it only makes him look tolerable at best. One last thing I'd like to mention about the characters is the voice acting. Many of them are voiced by talented people such as Charlie Sheen, Wayne Brady and Eva Longoria. However, their voice acting in this movie can range from sub-par at best to bad at worst.

If there is one tiny saving grace to the film, it's that the opening song is actually pretty good. However, it doesn't save this from being a terrible movie.

Don't be fooled, the uncanny animation might seem like the only reason why this movie is so hated on the outside. However, if you dig deeper into the movie, you'll see the real reason why it gets so much hate, it has a nonsensical story, annoying characters and sexual innuendos. Please I beg you, do NOT watch this movie. Don't even get this for your kids, it's too inappropriate for them. Give them something else, ANYTHING else.

I want to be done with this movie forever!
8 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
I was just a boy!
jaymaildotcomz8 May 2021
10 years ago I exited a theatre and was met by a person giving free screenings. At the time it sounded like the coolest thing ever. Little did I know I was about to watch the worst thing I had ever seen. Imagine being 10 years old and realizing a movie sucks, like its terrible. I was a kid! I liked everything! This movie gave me nightmares due to the wierd glitching movement of the villain. And above all, it just freaking sucks. It shouldn't even be possible to make something so bad that most 10 year olds in the screening either left early or sat through till the end and left with PTSD. There should be a class action lawsuit against this movie.
8 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
I cannot imagine a more horribly animated film than this one and even film school students would be ashamed to put their names on this mess.
planktonrules13 August 2014
While I love international films, classic Hollywood films and all sorts of bizarre films, I also have a love for terrible films--as many of our readers have no doubt noticed. It all started several decades ago when I read Harry Medved's great book "The 50 Worst Movies of All Time". Since finding and seeing all fifty of these movies, I have also attacked IMDb's list of the 100 lowest rated films of all time. However, as this list is ever-changing, I have to re-check the list periodically to see if there are any new additions. Fortunately (or more like UNfortunately) I noticed a new addition to the list...."Foodfight!". However, unlike many of the bad films I have enjoyed for their sheer awfulness and cheese-factor (such as "The Room", "Plan 9 From Outer Space" and "The Apple"), some films are just horrible and offer no enjoyment whatsoever. "Foodfight!" is surely one of these joyless and horrible films.

The story of how this terrible film got made and released is something in itself. While work on the film began in the early 2000s, the hard drives for the film were apparently stolen and work had to begin again! I assume that these folks simply had never heard of the concept of making backup copies. Also, I can only assume someone stole the film in order to save humanity. Unfortunately, work began again--and the original release date in 2003 came and went. Release dates kept changing until eventually the filmmakers were in default on their loans. The film rights were bought at auction for a tiny fraction of the cost to make the film and it was eventually released to DVD only recently.

So why is this film so horrible? Well, the reasons are countless so I'll just concentrate on the major problems. The biggest and most obvious problem is the computer graphics. This CGI film has the ugliest, cheapest and lousiest looking animated film in history. Film students would be ashamed to put their name on this product...it's that bad. Although the work was done in the 2000s, graphically the film is what you would expect in the early to mid 1990s--well before the first "Toy Story" film. Characters are blocky, haphazardly stuck on the backgrounds, have garish colors and are simply ugly. There is NOTHING about them that ever speaks quality in any manner. The same can be said about the backgrounds--which are usually very fuzzy and look worse than an old-school computer game like "MYST".

The dialog is the second worst thing about this 'movie'. While it's clearly aimed at children and stupid people, too much of it is spiked with sexual innuendo to make it appropriate to the children at least. A few choice pieces of their brilliant dialog would include: 'I'd like to butter your muffins' 'Better take it easy on the potato juice before you become chip-faced' '...you have something to say, candy-arse?!' 'I want to scrub your bubbles, Dex' 'What the fudge?!' As for this final comment, it DOES actually sum up the film extremely well!

The story itself is also simply horrible. Some parents might strongly object to the fact that this film is ALL product placement aimed at children--with many of the characters consisting of unappealing corporate knockoff characters that look like McGruff the Crime Dog, Charlie the Tuna and Mr. Clean (among many others). I could also talk about the plot involving the evil Brand X trying to take over the grocery store where all these characters live....but so many other awful things assaulted my senses that I really didn't even care about the insanely bad and cynical plot.

Despite a plethora of B and C-list stars to provide the voices for these unpleasant characters, there just is no reason to see this film for the average person. For fans of dreck, perhaps it's worth seeing...if extremely unpleasant and boring. And, I could also see professors at schools such as Ringling School of Art and Design showing it to their students as an example of the worst animation to be produced since the beginning of time. Otherwise, steer clear of this wretched piece of bile...
29 out of 67 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Noooooooooooo!!!!!!!!!
kaipomerleau7 October 2016
Warning: Spoilers
This is not a movie. This is a pile of trash and puke in animation history. This is literally the worst thing I've ever had the misfortune of watching in my life. Nostalgia Critic tried to warn people. This movie had a huge budget but none of it should go to these writers or actors. There is nothing to be proud of in this movie. In fact, here's all the problems with this cancer. 1. The animation looks like puke and crap all over Minecraft backgrounds. 2. The characters are all terrible and are not interesting in any way at all. 3. The jokes are little more than stupid food puns or lines that make no sense 4. It manages to be even more insulting towards stereotypes than Family Guy. 5. It throws in random morals in the end that were never emphasized earlier to make it seem emotional. 6. Screw the story! The voice acting doesn't save this movie. Nothing does. Even Chuck Norris' tears can't cure this grotesque cancer. I'd gladly give this 0 out of 10 if I could
13 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
The end of the temporal concept...
jn-neva16 May 2021
This... thing is so out of this universe that I'm convinced, that extra-dimensional eldritch deities must be real. I'm not saying everything in this movie is bad... though that's probably the case. But bad isn't the word I'd use. What I'd use is "wrong". And that in turn doesn't mean "there is something wrong that I can't put my finger on". But "wrong" as in "should not BE". Like it's a perversion and an affront to humanity and nature. That goes for animation, editing, writing, plot, "plot"... EVERYTHING is "wrong", to the point that I am broken in a way I cannot explain. Existential crisis does not quite cut it. There is something truly dark and sinister in play.

Watching this makes me feel like a black hole has spawned somewhere where my head connects with my soul (I believe in those now too, thanks to this) and is slowly sucking away my brain and soul at the same time. Somewhere in another universe there floats a chunk of brain matter with an unfinished human conciousness, and it has been contained for research by that world's version of the SCP Foundation, and it's being documented as a work of cosmic horror in another universe. And each of those universes is a tiny bit worse for it, because each version of this conciousness by its nature spawns other instances of this being in other alternate universes, and none of them might ever learn to truly understand it until it's far too late.

This *thing* is wrong. It should not be. But it is. And none of us are safe from it. For mere knowledge of this atrocity is enough to initiate... not end, because that implies natural flow of time, but the erasure of any beginning. Non-existance itself will not be. There is no word or concept in mortal tongue and mind to comprehend the state.

And humanity played a key part in it.

Tl;dr: Movie bad.
7 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Rotten Warning: Spoilers
Oh boy. This is probably one of the worst movies (animated or not) that I've seen in my entire life.

"Foodfight!" summarizes everything what is wrong with all the modern animated CGI films that try to imitate the Pixar formula, being atrocious at every single level. I just can't think anything remotely positive about this turd: The animation is awful and poorly made (I honestly think that shows like "ReBoot" or "Beast Wars" looked better than this,and they were done almost twenty years ago) the characters are obnoxious, unlikeable and (to add insult to injury) some of them are offensive stereotypes. The plot didn't made any single bit of sense, the jokes were dumb and inappropriate (I know that is a common practice for most of the recent animated films to include some hints of adult humor for the older viewers, but "Foodfight!" is just creepy. And also unfunny.)

"Foodfight!" is nothing but an ugly mess without any single redeeming quality. In fact, I think that it should be used as a textbook example of how NOT to make an animated movie. It is not even the kind of bad film that is entertaining to watch despite (or maybe because) of its many flaws. Instead of that, this is just something completely pathetic.

0/10 (And I would rate it with a negative score if I could)
38 out of 93 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
It's so bad, it's good
beemanmc31 May 2015
I watched this, and it really brainwashed me. I like how the dog is voiced by Charlie Sheen. Also I will never forget that talented name - Dex Dogtective Yes it's bad but if you dig deep enough in the web you'll find a fan-base somewhere, and I'm a dedicated fan myself. So all I can say is: It's so bad, It's good. I've seen bad movies, but most people will be thinking that it makes no sense at all. I know it is a bad movie, and i can say that I did do small research on the director "Lawrence Kasanoff" and he's made some pretty bad films. this is worth watching if you want to review a movie like this. so really, I recommend you to watch this movie at least once. I've seen it twice, its that bad.
28 out of 66 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Amazing animation
nb-8745830 July 2018
Never seen anything better than this before. I honestly hope it gets a great rating.
61 out of 95 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
this movie is #1
lysaali508 May 2021
Sausage party WISHES it turned out like this

this movie has 10 years of hard work and development put into it and multiple production companies involved you know that's the mark of a successful movie!
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Hideous
Juwon_289 September 2017
Horrendous CGI, ludicrous plot, awful voice acting. This film was so torturous to sit through. It's about as interesting as watching puke being splattered all over the place. If I had every copy of this film, I would burn them all. Please don't watch it. It is not worth seeing let alone buying.
8 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed