Jarhead 2: Field of Fire (Video 2014) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
52 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Surprisingly not that bad.
oomblongdada11 August 2014
So first off, this isn't really a sequel. It shares some themes with jarhead and its about Marines, but the storyline is completely unrelated and has a lot more action.

This is a relatively low budget attempt at a great war action/drama and although the writing lacks a lot of polish, the combat scenes are okay, the camera work is okay and the actors all seem to be doing their best with the clunky dialogue. The storyline itself isn't very original but again, its okay.

The film follows a Corporal who is considering leaving the Marines and explores ptsd, survivors guilt, etc. basically war is hell but it forms great bonds. Again, this isn't done exceptionally well but it does keep the movie from becoming a brainless action movie and brings a sense of drama to the film.

As a sequel to Jarhead this movie fails, but as a standalone action/drama flick it's actually fairly enjoyable.
37 out of 41 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Group dynamics
kosmasp22 December 2014
This has nothing to do with the first Jarhead, apart from the title. Well if you are stretching it, you could say that it is open minded when it comes to its characters. We also get the main military man from Avatar ... again being a military man. Less screen time though, still a tough one. The rest is a group of people who are doing a good job making you care for them.

The action is nicely done, though having just watched "Fury" not even close to anything in that movie. The whole setting of this movie does remind me of some 80s movies, which had a similar theme and had some of the same results. It works, but it's not something I can get too excited about.
7 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
'Part 2' in name only
bowmanblue18 October 2014
I enjoyed the first 'Jarhead' film and was curious as to what any 'sequel' would be like. However, at least I kept my expectations low as I knew this was not produced by the same cast or crew as the first, plus part II was released straight-to-DVD, so, how good could it be? The answer... quite good actually, but only as a generic war film, rather than a sequel.

Okay, so occasionally the film mimics the original in style (think captions, mainly near the beginning) and it uses the term 'jarhead' a couple of times, but that's about it. In fact... I'm running out of other things that link the two films.

So, the best thing to do is basically just ignore everything you know about the first movie and go with what's on offer. And, what's on offer is a war movie set in modern Afghanistan. A small team of marines (or 'jarheads' to be precise) are on a routine mission, only to find themselves forced to protect an important female local as she travels across arguably one of the most dangerous regions in the world.

Bottom line: if you like war films, you'll probably enjoy this. It's actually got a half reasonable budget and doesn't feel too much like a straight-to-DVD movie.
14 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Mildly Entertaining Nonsense
blackacid31 January 2016
If Jarhead was a subtle, slow-burning study of the Middle Eastern occupation through the eyes of a grunt, Jarhead 2 is the complete opposite.

It's an entertaining if dumb action flick but has very little in common with reality or common sense.

Ambushed on a supply run, a team of marines switches their mission object to keep an Afghan woman out of the hands of Taliban with the help of Cole Hauser's NAVY Seal.

The acting is fine and the action is well shot, if totally preposterous with overkill.

I can't claim to have served in conflict, but I'm pretty certain soldiers on both sides wouldn't frequently waste RPG's just to blow up one person armed only with a gun, instead of disabling vehicles and such, for which these weapons are designed. A lot of the action pieces seemed designed for cinema gore effects only and pretty much took me out of the reality that the rest of the film worked hard to achieve.

As did a point after a gun fight where the soldiers opt to walk to their destination through hostile territory, instead of commandeering the Taliban cars.

It wasn't the worse movie, and for the most part was exciting enough to hold my attention, but it could have been a lot better had it not been for nonsensical movie tropes that burst the bubble.
17 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Pleasantly surprised.
alisdairedmond20 January 2015
When I first saw that there was going to be a sequel to Jarhead I already felt disappointed, I was a huge fan of the first movie and did not feel it ever needed a sequel. Hearing that it was action in this movie made me even worse as one of the main themes of the first Jarhead was the lack of action.

However I must say after watching this I would say I was pleasantly surprised and do not feel it soiled the Jarhead name like one of those sequels that makes fans pretend it never happened. It started off slow and uninteresting. I thought the main character himself was quite underdeveloped but once this movie gets going you do start to care for these characters. I think the main character could have been a lot more human than just being a marine as I couldn't relate to him. Warning lots of Hu-Rah's and Hell Yea's.

The script itself could have done with a little more polishing with some scenes feeling they could have had more of an impact but there is some intense scenes in this movie which is what I like in an action movie. There was one or two cliché moments but aside from that this was a pretty strong movie. It carried some important messages about how bad situations build great bonds. It also has the sort of Saving Private Ryan "How can one person be so important" cliché. It still pulls it off though.

So go into this with an open mind unlike me. Go in and just have a good time with this.

I personally don't mind if more Jarhead movies come out now as long as they all carry different messages and they are made to be stand alone movies.
11 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Nice to watch but extremely painful in logic department
grot-1677814 November 2015
Warning: Spoilers
This is full of spoilers so don't read it if you want to watch this, but in my humble opinion it does not matter. It is a good ride if you want action but reasons goes out the window from moment go.

For purely entertainment value I would like to give this movie a solid 9, but:

as an action movie this is not so bad. Action is non-stop and it has a relatively believable (to movie goers, not military personnel, and I am not one of them) story. Special effects are also good, and actors are acting better than in most B/straight to video/TV movies. Unfortunately logic has no place here at all.

Movie starts with attack on US held outpost. Outpost is nowhere near a hill top, this is 21 century with choppers providing supplies and so on, this is a matter of life and death. If that wasn't enough there are cliffs at distances of no more than 20 meters overlooking this base, from which enemy fighters can shoot down marines at will. Even guards towers - presumably build for defense - are below these rocks at distances of no more than 20 meters. No need for insurgents to aim, just shoot, yet that base is somehow not overrun. It is simply not possible for any military to construct bases like that, unless singular aim of leadership of said military organization is creating martyrs. And somehow I don't believe it is a goal of US marines.

Than we have a convoy. Four vehicles: first one is heavily loaded with supplies unarmored truck, next two are the marine Humvees and the last one of course is unprotected loaded with supplies truck. Perfect scenario for an ambush. Why even bother with these two Humvees in the middle? Shoot unarmored leading and closing vehicles first on barely passable mountain track and no one should survive. This scenario has been done in Vietnam since 1950's (when French were there) and during USSR intervention in Afghanistan in late 1970's (guess where this movie takes place), yet apparently nobody in US military learned the lessons.

Then we have a firefight with a Taliban's RPG exploding inside a house (a single room) where all heroes are defending themselves, sending them to the floor incapacitated. Taliban enters the house - after sustaining heavy casualties - searches for a target and leaves. Leaving all marines dazed, armed and vengeful, but uninjured. Yet in earlier scene one of the marines themselves - after a firefight - executes wounded Taliban insurgent because he was upset that couple of his friend were killed/injured. I dread to even contemplate who is supposed to have a moral high ground here and this is not a movie that preaches like original Jarhead was.

I am not going to continue with the final scenes, because I think I made my point. Great mindless flick to watch, but beware: once you start to use most simplistic logic all is going to hell extremely fast.
13 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
I was really shocked at how good this one was & I really enjoyed it. On the other hand though this isn't like the original at all
cosmo_tiger17 August 2014
"Keep the faith - Semper Fi." Chris Merrimete (Kelly) has just been promoted. Even though he isn't sure how much longer he will stay enlisted he picks his unit and they head out on a mission to resupply an outpost through Taliban controlled territory. Along the way they come upon what is left of a SEAL team and an Afghan woman whom they were extracting. When things go from bad to worse the mission becomes protecting this woman for reasons unknown to the marines. Like many of you when I saw Jarhead 2 my first thought was, oh no, not another direct to video sequel. There have been a ton of these and none have been good. Behind Enemy Lines is on their 4th one, Death Race has 3, Joy Ride has 3...the list goes on and on. Sitting down to watch this I had very low expectations. I don't often get surprised by movies but this one did. I was really shocked at how good this one was and I really enjoyed it. On the other hand though this is nothing like the original at all. The original dealt with the mental aspect of going through training and heading to a place they don't want to be and having nothing to do. This one is more of a straight action/war movie, and this was actually one of the better war movies that have come out recently. Overall, a movie that was much better then I was expecting and I ended up really liking it. I surprisingly give this a B+.
14 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Jarhead 2 - One was enough
arthur_tafero28 May 2020
This film is kaka. The writing, directing, editing and acting? in it are terrible. It couldn't even make the cut for Mystery Science Theater 3000. It contains every hackneyed phrase and stereotype of the Afghan war. After 30 minutes I didnt know any more about the characters in the film than I did in the first minute. I didnt even know their names. The script and the director make these mindless, action hero figures instead of real people and the process fails miserably. What a complete waste of time and money. Just like the real war.
9 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Visual sedative.
sb_mail200230 April 2020
An embarrassment of a movie really. Looks like amateurs started to make movies in collaboration with big holly production houses. As mentioned, the only thing good about it, works as a sedative, will make you fall asleep in no time.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Not bad at all pretty good
Mmentzer19915 January 2016
I was reluctant to buy this after owning the first "Jarhead" which I was highly disappointed in basically 2 hrs of b.s. But this film although not really a sequel was actually pretty good if your a huge war movie buff or an ex marine, as I am both I definitely recommend it; lots of action (unlike the first one) and a pretty decent storyline. When I seen it on the shelf at Wal mart I was reluctant to buy it being that I never heard of it coming out and because I HATE B grade movies, especially involving war so I looked it up on IMDb as I often do and since it had a decent rating I chose to gamble on it and was definitely not let down. I feel my money was well spent for sure not some B grade movie crap Like I was afraid of. So in conclusion if your a war movie fan try it out.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Poor start
Impman25 April 2021
The film starts with an American base under attack. They've positioned their base just below the hilltop....so when the Taliban attacks they simply shoot down into the base.

I have no military experience whatsoever but even I know that their base is badly situated. Found it difficult to take the rest of the film seriously.
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Surprisingly effective and tense
planktonrules14 August 2014
The title for this film, "Jarhead 2: Field of Fire", appears to be very poorly chosen. This is because it really isn't a sequel to "Jarhead" and you certainly don't need to have seen this prior film to appreciate this new movie. On its own, it's an exceptional film and I strongly recommend it. And, if you didn't know it, a jarhead is a nickname for US Marines--and it's a name they often call each other.

The film is about a small group of soldiers serving in Afghanistan. Oddly, despite this war having lasted well over a decade, very few movies have really talked about it. This picture is a tribute to the American and Afghan soldiers fighting against the Taliban--and it makes its point very personally. Now I know some people reading this have very strong feelings for and against this war--I myself have very mixed feelings. But you cannot help but admire the courage of the individuals willing to risk their lives after you see this film no matter what your views on the war might be. And the film manages to praise and honor them without being jingoistic or overtly political.

As I watched "Jarhead 2", I really wish I could have seen the film with some soldiers who actually have served in Afghanistan to get their insights into the realism of the project. To me, it looked insanely real--about as real and scary as any war picture can be. Although the movie was filmed in Bulgaria, it managed to look pretty much like what I expected Afghanistan to look like. And, the soldiers seemed very professional and believable--like real soldiers. Now for some, this is a problem. To make the film realistic, the film is very bloody. Additionally, like real soldiers, the actors in this film TALK like soldiers--crude, sexually suggestive and totally inappropriate for small kids and the easily offended. However, this DID make the film seem very real, as the soldiers I've known sounded just like these young men and women. Because of all this, the film easily earns its R rating--but I still encourage you to see it. After all, war is so detached from most of us. We see a few reports on TV but really have little idea of the sacrifice or hell these folks go through--and the film is probably about as close as we can get to knowing what it's like to be on the front lines without actually going there. Having unfamiliar faces instead of familiar actors only adds to this effect.

The film has a very simple plot. A convoy is taking supplies to another location when they happen upon a couple US Navy Seals who are trying to escort a local woman to safety. Why, exactly, she is with them is something you learn later in the film. However, the rescue of the Seals and the woman is NOT the end of their problems--it's only the beginning. Soon the caravan is set upon by Taliban fighters and many of the soldiers and all of the vehicles are destroyed. How can the few remaining stragglers possibly escape now that they are trapped behind enemy lines?

This film is very, very tense and personal. The fighting looks very real, the actors appear to bleed and die before your eyes and the film is not pretty, as war is not pretty. This makes the movie tough viewing and certainly isn't for everyone. However, I do strongly recommend the film for many reasons. First, war SHOULD be shown as personal and bloody and awful because it is! While I love old films, the sanitized version of war we got in the 1940s and 50s films from Hollywood made it all seem very 'nice' and Jarhead 2 strips away the myth. Second, although I assume this is a relatively low budget film (despite being released by Universal), you certainly can't tell. The writing, acting and sets all look great and seem real. They certainly got a lot for the money they spent to make this film. Third, I hate that most folks almost always go just to the big-budgeted mega-movies. Many of these films are quite formulaic and the studios don't need your money. Instead, consider spending it on a film that is high quality and gripping from start to finish and which doesn't star Johnny Depp, George Clooney or Angelina Jolie. I have nothing against these actors, but sometimes a film can achieve even more without a big name in the film and "Jarhead 2" actually is a first-rate film.

As always, I'd love to hear from you about the movie. Especially if you are a serviceman or servicewoman, I'd love to know your thoughts--both positive and negative.
21 out of 39 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Not Very Real
ttaf3533 February 2016
When i was in the gulf war, we just had a M16 rifle, chewing gum and a very small toilet roll that incidentally had to last for our whole tour of duty. In this film there are lazer guns, romulan mind-melds an Alien from the planet xena-4 plus every soldier seems to quote " Beam me up scotty" before they get shot. If you want a good action movie go for Wind In The Willows part 2, or you could just watch a few episodes of star trek which may have the same effect on you. Basically don't watch this film. its no good, its akin to jumping around naked with a pineapple superglued to one of your feet. i watched it twice and dozed off several times and that was just during the opening credits. which took almost twenty minutes to get through as for the sound effects they were boring. hang on am i reviewing the right film? this is citizen kane is it not?.
5 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
TV war movie
SnoopyStyle11 September 2017
Marine Corporal Chris Merrimette reluctantly takes a promotion from Major James Gavins (Stephen Lang) as the new leader of his supply squad after his sergeant gets killed by the Taliban. He is eager to return to his wife. His unit consists of Corporal Danny Kettner (Bokeem Woodbine), Lance Corporal Dani Allen, Private Rafael Soto, and Private Justin Li. Afghan Army Private Khalid Hassan Abu Faisal joins them on a resupply mission to a dangerous outpost. They are retasked when they pick up a SEAL team trying to evacuate an anti-Taliban activist.

The interesting thing about the first Jarhead is that the guy struggled with a war which doesn't need him. This is almost an opposite premise. Chris can't wait to get out of the war that desperately needs him. I'm fine with a completely new premise for a completely new war. There is plenty of gunfire action which is more than what I expect from a TV movie. The realism is debatable and that's no small thing. I really question Kettner pulling Faisal off the garbage pile. It would be more real to run away and let the new Arab take the bomb blast if that's what he wants. That conflict between realistic and unrealistic never goes away. I'm sure others have different ideas. The kill ratio seems high. Several times, the guys wipe out the entire opposition. The final rescue mission seems unrealistic. I don't know why they didn't at least try the Taliban's trucks. The realism questioning goes on and on. It's not Rambo but it's not that far from it. Some of the masked Taliban fighters look white. At least, the setting looks good.
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Cheesy acting, bad props and wasted story
rapha_r19 June 2016
Warning: Spoilers
*May contain spoilers*

Well, the acting was bad, the props were all around wrong and not true to facts, very cheesy and wouldn't recommend it. I think the story could have been better put together, it had potential but I didn't feel much emotion in the "emotional" scenes, overall shallow characters, inaccurate props and just not very good.

Pros They explore some political aspects of the war on terror and show how pointless killing leads to nothing and true heroes are those who have the courage to do challenge the tyrants and do simple things like study.

The movie doesn't portrait the marines or seals as some kind of immortal superheroes, they are shown as just humans with a tough job

Womman in the military are shown, this is great for visibility and so womman get more space in society

Cons

Really bad acting Outstandinly inaccurate props Cheesy dialog It doesn't make the viewer care too much about the characters, they don't feel tri-dimensional, just too plain. Overall just wasted potential and military propaganda Just another enlistment movie.
7 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Captivating movie
ultramoviemad20 November 2014
Warning: Spoilers
As one who has never served in the field of fire - I've always had the greatest respect for those who have. I don't think anyone can imagine the absolute horror when involved in close combat where blood is spilled and close comrades die. With Jarhead 2 I remained fully focused throughout.The plot is surely influenced by the events of the current time surrounding the real life story of Malala Yousafzai,shot by the Taliban for her outspoken thoughts on womens rights in Afghanistan.

I felt a real passion for the marine characters in the movie - dedicated to each other and their evolving mission.

One of the ending scenes between the marine & Afghan fighter fighting dying in a hail of bullets was somewhat reminiscent of Butch Cassidy & The Sundance Kid…

By enlarge a very enjoyable movie..
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
a lot of stupid things
obida-alquraan8 September 2014
Warning: Spoilers
a lot of stupid things the first thing is the language they are using some of Arabic terms frequently especially when gunfire , In Afghanistan do not speak Arabic so where did you come from this speech ?! Even when he was praying did not pray correctly LOL ! the second thing is the effects ,,, it was so bad like "RPJ" at the beginning of the movie and when the house was destroyed Marines still alive in the house and Taliban get in the house don't kill any one ,,, What a stupid !! The third thing is when they escaped by car did not face any problems ,,, escaped from a Taliban stronghold with such ease ? nice story but unfortunately a lot of stupid !
21 out of 34 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Funny...
RosanaBotafogo13 June 2022
Funny, sexist and boring jokes from soldiers, but now accompanied by a soldier, with equally infamous jokes in an attempt to balance the sides, and as in all gurra, many bursts of shots, a lot of blood, beheadings and pain... And that exacerbated nationalism , and an overrated sense of heroism....
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
crap compared to Jarhead 1
tregouetsylvain12 September 2014
Jarhead 1 was excellent, this one is way too patriotic, with the Americans on the good side, despite most of the war, occident is going now, is just for resources and lobbies interests, I found it a bit hard, to promote such a propaganda, behind such a cheap scenario. It's about American soldier always doing the right thing, because they fight for America, saving lives, and fighting for freedom, but this does not happen in real life.Nowadays, Marines serve for their presidents, who themselves serve the ones that finance their campaigns. Where jarhead 1 was sticking to a more real feel , here not at all. It could have been a good scenario back in a days' when commando was out, but would not be compared to a big title like apocalypse now , full metal jacket, saint soldiers or jarhead 1.
11 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Good combat scenes, but a Jarhead sequel in title only.
allmoviesfan29 October 2023
If you came here for a direct sequel to Jarhead, I'm afraid you're going to be quite disappointed in that regard. However, if you like modern war films (as I do), you'll get something out of this one nonetheless.

As alluded to above, 'Field of Fire' is a Jarhead sequel in title only, with no resemblance to the original film aside from the presence of Jarheads - US Marine Corps troops. In this DTV sequel (that actually has quite high production standards, and some very good combat scenes, many of them shot in a similar fashion to that which was first made popular by Spielberg in Saving Private Ryan) a group of Marines, including Cole Hauser (not yet famous for his role in Yellowstone) are cut off behind the lines in Afghanistan, and pursued by a multitude of enemy gunmen there. They soon encounter a young Afghani woman, and must shepherd her to the safety of their base.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
This film doesn't even deserve 1 star
masterchiefjb16 July 2015
Oh boy, here we go again. The Hollywood military action movie of the year, and the writers on this 'movie' just spat in the face of The movie Jarhead and everyone involved with that story by even having the same name as it. Where Jarhead showed the flip side of deployment, the stir crazy of waiting, the fear of the unknown, the boredom. This is just another attempt at cashing in of something that worked before. It seem to me that the writers watched The Hurt locker and thought it was a great movie, anyone in the military will tell you other wise, and said to themselves "We can do a movie like this, but let's use marines so we can call it Jarhead 2: fields of fire." I could not get more than 20 minutes through it, and the only reason I wanted to watch it was to see how many mistakes I could find, there are a lot. I'm not going to list any, as there are plenty in other reviews. The main thing about this film is that it is almost like the writers just googled stuff about the military and picked and chose what sounded cool, not knowing anything behind how things really work in the military, like no one in the military says "request permission to do…" or "request permission to speak freely". It's low budget and there is no deeper theme or story behind the action. This is the Marines version of the Hurt Locker
12 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Surprisingly Excellent
philipmyarse12 August 2014
I recently got a chance to see this at a screening and it is surprisingly excellent. I say surprisingly because I never expect too much from a film I know isn't going to be released in theaters, so I figured it would be another addition to the saturated war film DVD market. Not at all. It reminded me a lot of the slow tension builds of The Hurt Locker and Lone Survivor, where the audience knows action is coming, but the character build up allows us to care about the team members who come under fire once the fighting begins.

The actors are all quite good, with a special nod given to Bokeem Woodbine, Danielle Savre and Cole Hauser. The team has a great rapport and the humor is sprinkled in in appropriate doses. While not all of the jokes are hit their mark exactly, the lines delivered by Woodbine are laugh out loud funny, which helps lighten the mood in a film that has an incredible amount of heart.

Well done all around, and proof that not all great films make it to the big screen.
14 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Good for the first 45 minutes
shoobe01-18 October 2022
Warning: Spoilers
Once the Action Movie part started: failure. They did not have the budget or expertise (or ignored the advisors) to make that work. Not just bad tactics an glaring inaccuracies in equipment, but the scale was off. Afghanistan is full of soldiers, Marines, and aircraft. Outside the base they never see anyone. It sorta ruined the believability.

Nice stuff: Acting WAY better than expected. Script mostly okay. Story, action as stated: stupid, but mostly believable people, believable words. It is nice that it was a supply unit, and all NCOs, lots of boring bits around rank and waiting for EOD and so on. Worked well.

When the SEALs showed up and there is handwaving loss of comms and stuff: meh, now we see why it's direct to video, videogame plausbility level of stuff. Too bad.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Political correctness overload
martintyler842 May 2021
Not sure what, but something is wrong with this movie..

We have white guy who thinks he is not good.

We have black guy that is bloodthirsty.

We have lesbian female marine which has daughter and behaves like straight girl.

We have Mujahedin which kills his own.

While action is good, the messages that movie sends are just wrong.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Snooze fest
boltzlife-0596328 March 2020
Wanted to like it as i like the cast, but big disappointment. It just dragged on and on....
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed