"Stargate SG-1" Red Sky (TV Episode 2001) Poster

(TV Series)

(2001)

User Reviews

Review this title
5 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Wormholes aren't the only holes here.
IDontRideBarrels10 August 2014
Warning: Spoilers
This episode could be better if it didn't have obvious plot holes.

Plot: SG-1 travels to a planet named K'Tau by overriding certain Stargate safety protocols. As a result, they accidentally create a life- threatening problem for the inhabitants of K'Tau by altering their sun's chemistry. SG-1 manages to get in contact with the Asgard Freyr, who brought the people to that planet.

Freyr says that K'Tau is under the Protected Planets Treaty, so the Asgard can't help SG-1 fix the problem they caused, despite being capable of fixing the problem. Otherwise the Treaty will be void, leaving the Goa'uld free to attack Asgard planets.

Now, this is where the first plot hole appears. The Asgard say they aren't allowed to "artificially advance" people by nullifying "natural disasters." While O'Neill accepts this explanation, it doesn't make any sense at all - especially considering that the problem was caused by humans and would never naturally occur. It's not a natural disaster. The Asgard should therefore be free to help SG-1 without voiding the Protected Planets Treaty, yet for some reason they claim otherwise. (Since this is a really obvious hole, it seems like lazy writing in creating this episode.)

The next plot hole appears when people begin traveling between K'Tau and Earth. Since this is exactly what caused the problem in the first place, wouldn't continued travel from Earth's Stargate result in the problem with the sun worsening?

O'Neill asks - several times - how the Asgard pretending to be gods is any better than the Goa'uld lies about being gods. There are some interesting directions that could be taken here, but these questions pretty much get ignored in favor of advancing the plot (which is already flawed).

There are some other issues with this episode but they're mostly forgivable considering they require suspension of disbelief or happen off-screen so we don't understand exactly what happened.

At the very end, SG-1 believes the Asgard helped after all, but it's entirely possible that they didn't. It's open to speculation, however it doesn't matter since the Asgard could have intervened at any time. Instead, they told SG-1 that they'd rather condemn the people of an entire planet to death instead of help with a small issue, which seems very out of character.
11 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Who Saved the Inhabitants?
claudio_carvalho23 October 2016
The SG1 arrives on a planet with a primitive and superstitious population that worships Thor. The Stargate was blocked and the SG-1 has overridden the protocols creating a wormhole through the sun to go to the planet. They find a dying planet with a mysterious red sky. Samantha researches and finds that they have caused the phenomenon bringing a different mineral that has caused the modification of the sun. The SG-1 tries to revert the situation and contact the Asgard that explain that the Stargate was blocked to protect the civilization from the Goaul'd. However, the Asgardian refuse to help the people as part of the treat they made with the Gouaul'd of not interfering with the civilizations under their protection. Now the SG-1 has to find a means to save them.

"Red Sky" could have been one of the best episodes of "Stargate SG-1". But the episode is strange and without explanation about who saved the inhabitants of the planet. The SG-1 caused the problem; tried to help the locals; offered to bring them Earth; once they do not accept, Jack is right and they should have gone away. My vote is seven.

Title (Brazil: "Red Sky"
10 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Raises several issues
gergle-128 March 2021
Warning: Spoilers
The Asgard have yet to show us how to build a DHD. SGC has to dial addresses through our cobbled together computer system. Sometimes accidents happen because of that. The sun of the planet we are exploring, undergoes changes just after we arrive. We blame ourselves, Carter makes a supposition with no evidence that the wormhole collected Plutonium from another star, and dropped it into this sun. We contact the Asgard, they refuse to help because of the Protected Planet Treaty. O'Neill points out they are acting pretty much the like the Goa'uld, pretending to be gods. This could be a pivotal issue, but is glossed over.

SG 1 makes a plan to launch super heavy elements into the sun, to "balance the Plutonium out". They spend weeks with lots of support personnel building a rocket, religious fanatics blow it up, killing two SGC personnel. The element package is soda can sized, the belief that such a trivial volume could influence a sun sized mass is ludicrous anyway.

Carter launches the heavy elements soda can through the Earth Stargate, closing the wormhole prematurely in an attempt to drop it into the Sun. Returning to the planet, all indicators are it failed. The people are praying to their "gods", Daniel says goodbye, then adds a line of prayer himself. Suddenly, the sky clears, all is well. This reinforces the people's belief that their god saved them.

So, the Asgard continue to play at being deities, we don't get any useful information, the Asgard get the glory, we get the blame.
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Religious indoctrination...
rcsipe27 November 2020
Continuing to feed the delusion of religious indoctrination only ends well in Hollywood.
7 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
SG save a planet
Calicodreamin24 February 2022
As of season five a tired storyline where the SG team wrecks a planet then try to change their whole culture to try and fit their solutions. Decent acting and effects.
2 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed