63 Up (2019) User Reviews

63 Up

[Prismark10 · 7/10 · 8 June 2019]

The Up series has been unique in television history. It started in 1964 where it looked at a cross section of 7 years old. Granada television have followed them every seven years from childhood and now to old age. All of the shows were shown on ITV apart from 42 Up which was broadcast on the BBC.

I have only watched it from 28 Up when it was shown in 1985. I was a teenager then, being 28 years old felt some time away for me.

Now the participants are 63 years old. I feel it is only a few short years to go before I am 63.

One participant Lynn Johnson has died since 56 Up was shown. Nicholas Hitchon the Yorkshire farmer's boy who grew up to be a nuclear physicist in America sadly has throat cancer. I always found Nick to be one of the more interesting people in the Up series. He had an abrasive relationship with the show, at times he felt the snippets broadcast misrepresented him. However he continued to appear because of some sense of duty.

This is likely to be his final appearance. Nick mentioned he was at Oxford University at the same time as the British Prime Minister Theresa May who stepped down a Tory leader when this program was initially broadcast. Nick mentions how easy it was for a strata of society from the right public schools continue to run the country. It is questionable if they are actually fit run the country. Even from America, Nick could observe the incompetence of the ruling elite.

Cheeky cockney Tony Walker wanted to be a jockey and ended up as a black cab taxi driver, a bit part actor and a budding entrepreneur. His business ideas never came to much and his cab business has been hit by Uber. Tony had a holiday home in Spain and planned to develop property in Spain as well. So not much of a surprise that he voted for Brexit. In 56 Up he can be heard having a rant at immigrants in London but he himself was happy to partly reside in Spain.

Bruce Balden was a public schoolboy who really hated his time there. He ended up as a teacher in a deprived part of London and even went to teach in a poorer country. Although not mentioned in any of the Up shows, it was Bruce who reached out to another participant Neil Hughes when he hit a rough patch.

John Brigsby was another public schoolboy and the poshest of the lot. He does like to add that he is more Bulgarian than British. He also adds that after his father died when he was a child, his mother had to struggle to make ends meet but managed to pay the public school fees. John became a successful barrister, he has been a part time judge and continues his charitable endeavors in Bulgaria. He does think that Britain has become more egalitarian but even his fellow public schoolboys are hard pushed to agree with him. Andrew Brackfield thinks fame or money is now regarded as more important.

The women in the series have always been short changed. Something Jacqueline Bassett raised with the interviewer Michael Apted as he always asked them about family and relationship questions rather than the state of the world. In 63 Up one female contributor decided not to take part and as mentioned one has died. So it appears even more male dominated.

Neil Hughes was the ebullient boy from Liverpool who wanted to be an astronaut at 7 years of age. By the age of 21 he was living in a squat and working on a building site. At the age of 28 Neil was in a bad place, homeless and mentally unstable. The program always keeps him till last knowing the audience wants to know what has happened to him.

Over time life has gone better for Neil, he has been a Liberal Democratic councillor, a lay preacher, he has married but since separated from his wife. He still gets regular visits by the black dog. Mental illness is also touched on by Tony whose daughter suffers from it.

This might be the last time Michael Apted takes part in this series as he has been involved with it since 7 Up. I have no doubts that if 70 Up is broadcast a few less people will participate as old age takes it toll. It is still a fascinating series.

Nature and nurture at 63

[take2docs · 9/10 · 10 January 2020]

What do a bricklayer, barrister, solicitor, cabbie, politician, forklift operator, astrophysicist, and a few housewives all share in common? Outside of this ongoing documentary series, and other than their being human, perhaps not a whole lot. Then again, maybe not all that much here as well, other than the fact that the majority of them have confessed on camera as to their continued reluctance in being a part of this longitudinal study. This I have never understood. Thanks to the magic of filmmaking, this has, in a manner of speaking, made them all immortal -- their being captured on film for countless future generations to behold and appreciate is something that you would think would fill them with a sense of wonder. What lucky souls these people are to have been a part of this essentially numinous film project.

I was saddened to learn of one of the participants having passed on. Another one's health isn't in the best of shape.

As one who has followed this series since his early twenties (I'm about in my mid-40s as of this writing), I like many others have in a sense grown up with these people, whether they would care to know this or not.

Yes, the included factor of senescence has taken its toll, but here's one loyal viewer who would like to see the director take this project of his to the next level: to "70" if not "77." Not only would either one of these titles make for an apt phonetical finish and bring a full-circle-sense of closure to the series (in their use of the number 7), but anything beyond that, I feel, would not be the dignified thing to do. No one would want to see these beloved subjects in their eighties, at an age when for many octogenarians senility and incontinence begin to enter the picture.

One quibble I have always had with these "Up" features is that their segments take up too much time with flashback footage of earlier clips of interviews. We viewers only get to spend so much time with these people after not having seen them for seven years, and excited we are to learn what's new in their lives. In my opinion, we don't require any time-consuming backstory, as most of us have seen every previous instalment.

I would here like to conclude by way of a relevant memory of my own. A few years back, I went and watched the first seven instalments of this series over the span of a two-week period. What this rather surreal experience impressed upon me the most, was just how short our lives are and how unsettling it was to see how quickly a seven-year-old could turn into a forty-nine year-old in a single fortnight. Not to get too maudlin, but it also got me to thinking how striving after anything in this world, be it a family or a career or higher education, is rather insignificant in the grand cosmic scheme of things. And that we are who we are, in large part, based on forces beyond our control: namely, nature and nurture ... and for some of us, a filmmaker's time constraints.

time remains undefeated

[SnoopyStyle · 8/10 · 27 October 2021]

Time remains undefeated. Death is stalking the series now. It's the uncredited cast member haunting everyone from this point on. Michael Apted remains the director but I don't know for how long. He stays off camera to my disappointment. Some members are battling illnesses. Work is winding down or even gone. Most are happy to talk about their kids and grandkids. A few speak about Brexit. Neil is not fully open about his trouble marriage and I can understand why. Tony's cab business has been heavily damaged by Uber and he has retreated from his Spanish dreams. I wonder if Lynn's family gets their own section in the next one. Does this continue beyond death? More and more, I wonder about mortality in general and the mortality of this series.

Thanks And Good Luck

[boblipton · 10/10 · 30 November 2019]

For half a decade, people have been astonished at Richard Linklater's BOYHOOD, a movie shot over the course of more than a decade, using the same cast.... as if Michael Apted had not been doing the same thing as a documentary for more than half a century since, as a researcher at ITV, he had been a part of the landmark SEVEN UP (1964) and ever since writer, interviewer, director and occasionally the object of his subjects' scorn for his old-fashioned attitudes.

The first one took the quote "Give me a child for seven years, and I will show you the man" and offered to check in every seven years to review the result. Now, as the subjects face retirement, one has died, and others are looking forward to the endings of their lives, they are called on for review. Is that seven-year-old still with them? What have they learned from the 'program' and is it of any value? Is the class system so evident a lifetime ago still in place? How do they feel about Brexit?

I think the series has been a remarkable achievement, and as a survey of the Baby Boomers, fascinating. It's a pleasure and an education to watch these people show up, grow up, and become, slowly and eventually, themselves, typical and unique.

Apted has called the situation for 70 UP (2026?) "fluid". He himself will be 85 if it comes out, along with many death notices for such of the original subjects that yet survive. It's possible, I suppose, but I'm a couple of years older than these people, and there is, therefore, some doubt I will be around to hear from my old friends from Britain. I wish them all well. They have not been easy friends, but they have been far more honest about who they are than most people I know.... or me.

Real Lives in Action

[GeorgeFairbrother · 10 February 2020]

Each time a new instalment arrives, my admiration and respect for the participants grows. They show a real and courageous dedication to the series and its importance, and I'm always mindful that the effects from this level of exposure have not always been positive for them.

Michael Apted has, at times, been guilty of some insensitive and perhaps inappropriate questioning, and has been taken to task quite robustly by his interviewees. And rightly so. It's academic now as to whether or not Mr Apted, a very successful international film director, has actually possessed the empathy to make him the right person to steer this project. But then, without some of his deliberate provocations, would there have been the great, intense moments we've seen? The result, for better or worse, is a sum of all its parts.

It's been a real privilege to visit these old friends every seven years, and share their lives' success, failures, loves and tragedies. In a world full of celebrity for its own sake and superficiality, there is an authenticity here that is rarely found. They deserve our thanks for sharing part of themselves with us. They certainly have mine.

A film that documents the milestones in the lives of people in real time

[barryrd · 10/10 · 12 September 2021]

As I watched 63 Up on Britbox, I recalled hearing about it many years ago. I am pleased that I watched it and even more so because I did some reasearch on the series. As a matter of fact, for several days afterwards, I couldn't get away from reading more about it and the people who participated in it...how they started out as part of this lifelong series and how their lives have changed. I give them full credit for sharing their lives and wonder if the creators of the series ever realized how historic and ground breaking the project would be.

The show is absolutely mesmerizing. I feel a certain chill, knowing these people are younger that I am and I am reading about how their lives are slowly drawing to a close. Also there is a real possibility that this great series may have reached the end, particularly now that the director Michael Apted has recently died. I certainly hope that it does continue but it is up to the participants to decide. If it doesn't, it is still a tremendous achievement. I was particularly struck by one of them who, after a very successful life, revealed that he is now facing a potentially terminal illness. Another of the participants talked about his regret at not having a father figure to look up to and now is a very happy and fulfilled human being with something like eight children. Very exceptional for a baby boomer who lived in the same time frame as the others in the series.

It is very moving in the sense that it provides documented evidence of the changes a group of human beings go through as they age, not only physically but in their personal experience. It is understandable that there would be criticisms of the director and some of the questions he asked. We all have personal limitations and certain biases and my sense is that Michael Apted deserves full credit for staying with the project for so long. The film deserves a place in the history of film making and I sincerely hope the time will come when it is so recognized.

Bittersweet Retirement ..

[speckled10 · 10/10 · 19 January 2022]

This was without doubt the most poignant installment in the series yet.

So terribly sad to see Lynn's passing you could tell pretty soon into the segment and we hadn't seen her in the now but lovely of her family to appear. Very surprised they didn't get the reaction of at least Jackie and Sue if not the others given all times they reuinted on the couch.

Being from Melbourne my heart filled with joy to see Symon visiting Paul and having the big tour of our magnificent modern Melbourne that has changed so much over the years like the UK has. I love Paul and his family being so relatable to people and places I know here I feel a little like his story reflects the Australian story of so many here.

Heartbreaking to see Nicholas in that condition after he was one of the pillars of the series in my opinion being such a strong and interesting character. God willing he will be there for 70 Up if it were to happen. Great to see Peter once again return after missing so many years hope his band is still going strong.

Suprising and dissapointing to see Suzy withdraw when it seemed like she had finally come to accept and be at peace with the series in 56 Up. Lets also hope she returns one more time in good health for 70 Up - to me she was one of the biggest surprises of the entire series her transformation from spoilt petulant youngster to loving family person.

Neil god bless this is probably the best we've seen him since childhood ? Hope he continues on and would not surprise me if he outlives the majority of them all !

Wonderful to see all the others of course Tony will always be Tony as will Bruce and the others. RIP to Michael Apted - I do hope if we have a 70 Up they have each of the children pay their respects to him one way or another.

If not I think the fundamental question of 'Give me the child and I will give you the adult' has already been categorically answered. And that is a 'Yes and No' - you can say a definite yes for some (Tony, John, Jackie ...) but absolute no for others (Suzy, Neil, Peter). 14 Up is a better representation of how the kids would turn out but still not definitive.

Pray for 70 Up with most if all remaning still in good health.

Up and downs

[st-shot · 8/10 · 10 November 2021]

The graying and mortality of the Up family takes center stage in the ninth installment of this incredible landmark series. One member has passed away and another is gravely ill as children and grandchildren dot the reunions and monopolize conversation and concern. Retired or nearing it they all show little to no regret in most cases with all for the most part satisfied with the way things have turned out this far along. There have been disappointments and setbacks but hope springs eternal in all as they look to the future well aware they are past their peak but still have something to offer and look forward to.

I adopted these distant relatives decades back and always look forward to the reunions where I get to catch up with them. It has been interesting watching them grow and mature over time as I have aged with them. Holding up a mirror to my face, mulling over the same questions director Michael Apted poses to them and their responses it remains a cinematic experience like no other for me. Hopefully I'll be around with the rest of them for the next chapter.

Must watch for everyone

[saraccan · 8/10 · 6 August 2020]

The 9th episode of an epic documentary series that I really think everyone should watch at some point in their lives. It is so powerful with its simplicity honesty that anyone can easily find something relevant to them. Witnessing how people change over the years but also how they don't change, understanding the importance of our early years and how they shape our future, the goals that we want to achieve in life and the ones we fail to achieve. It's all here.

A group of people from different backgrounds who were born in 1957 are interviewed every 7 years. (p.s. need to start from first one "Seven Up")

Will 70 up be that long

[mohamadacma · 9/10 · 20 November 2019]

63 up caught up with the children once again after 7 years of life. In this film, we don't see lots of changes but in age and sometimes in regrets being professed. The question give a child unil he is 7 and I will give you the man is once again being contemplated by the 63 year old children who are thinking of what all this film was all about. Some of the kids actually followed an expected course that the 7 year old drew but others were struck by the cruelty of life and the helplessness with which their aspirations had drowned. It is interesting to see one regretting not having spent much time with family and scoffing at the young man who thought that was trying to prove himself by giving himself completely to work. Someonelse, thought that he actually made the best decisions he could ever have made, and another was making himself accept things when he fell extremely ill. The most happy of them all,it appears was the one with the most children and grandchildren. It seems that family as cliched as it is, is really all what matters in the long run. Watching the show, you also can see the how complex and unpredictable relationships can be, not to mention how they can start. That liberal Democrat's story that lingered at the end was one of the most heartbreaking. This guy had other plans for his life that this life in which he lived didn't seem to agree with. A simple man with a simple life.Those who felt that they were fortunate enough and took it upon themselves to help the unfortunate was inspiring. I don't really agree with that 7 years old child man premise. A 7 year old,if received optimal environment and education would prosper beyond doubt.

A fine film in an amazing series

[proud_luddite · 7/10 · 18 February 2020]

In 1964, the short film "Seven Up!" appeared on British television. Its focus was on fourteen seven-year old children of different class backgrounds expressing their aspirations in life. Every seven years, a sequel was made re-interviewing the subjects as they expressed their current (at the time) life situations, concerns, and again, their outlooks for the future. "63 Up" focuses on most of the original fourteen post-middle age.

This film is part of a superb periodic series which uses great editing from its prequels to show the passage of time. The current film has special relevance as it is at the time of life when mortality is rearing its head.

Most of the subjects have lead rather conventional lives but there are a few exceptions particularly a man (Neil) who had great difficulties in his twenties and has had fascinating, unpredictable changes since then.

"63 Up" not only covers changes in the lives of the subjects but occasionally the changes in the world itself or at least in the UK. This includes discussions of the subjects' adult children who will likely face financial difficulties compared to their own prosperity as baby-boomers. In some ways, there could have been more talk on such worldly changes although Tony, a taxi driver, is blunt in describing how the rise of Uber has affected his livelihood.

The rare time an interviewee is asked about Brexit, it was always a man. There are only a handful of women (four out of the fourteen) interviewed and the omission of asking them questions on the state of the world reflects an attitude in earlier clips when as girls or young women, they were asked only about ideals of boyfriends, husbands, and children. Thankfully, an older clip is included in which one of the gals confronts the interviewer/director (Michael Apted) on this - and quite strongly, too.

While many of the stories have much in common and occasionally seem ordinary, it is still easy to care for these people after all these years. - dbamateurcritic

Flawed but Fascinating

[mccann3010 · 8/10 · 23 December 2019]

First, let's address the flaws of the program. The series explores the class system in England and how it determines the opportunities afforded each child. Each series begins with the quote "Give me a child until he is 7 and I will show you the man." Finally, the attitude of the filmmakers toward women is evident, especially in the earliest episodes. The subjects also complain of the superficiality of the series, constrained to half-hour segments on each person every 7 years.

True enough. Yet the series is mesmerizing for revealing changing attitudes and circumstances and how individuals cope with all the struggles we encounter as we age. Career advancement, relationship struggles, financial issues, health and death are glimpsed through the camera lens. Just to see the bright-eyed children at 7 and to see, even superficially, how each individual creates and lives a life reveals something of an era and themselves. The participants are subjected to the most intimate and sometimes mundane questions. Yet, for the most part, they continue to participate and kudos to them. I hope it gives them a chance to reflect and some perspective. I wonder if you would recognize the 7 year old I once was with the mature adult I am now.

Not bad, a bit of an anti-climactic and predictable at this point.

[bobspez · 6/10 · 30 October 2020]

I was really looking forward to seeing this latest installment. I finally got to see all of it through dubious means as there was no legitimate way to view it, and when I finished it I felt a bit of a let down. I'm 11 years older than the group, having just turned 74, and have watched these installments from the first one to the present. I felt this was the least interesting of the entire series.

Here's a few thoughts I came away with. 1. People are pretty much the same. They all got pretty much in life what they sought and are basically who they have always been. Whether they ride a bicycle or a Rolls Royce, they all have adapted to their circumstances and probably all have similar amounts of satisfaction with their lives. 2 Their lives were quite ordinary regardless of class or money. They all found their niche and partners that suited them. 3. Their lives are all winding down. Their days of creating their lives and careers and families are pretty much over, they are now on the way out, making room for the next generations. 4. There were no big surprises in this episode. Their lives mirror the lives of so many people I know and have known. 5. The child is most definitely the father of the man. I was just commenting the other day that I am basically the same person as I was at 5 years old. The blueprint was there and never really changed. The same seems true for all the participants in the series.

Another visit with 'old friends'

[gortx · 21 December 2019]

63 UP (Michael Apted, 2019). In limited release.

The world's greatest ever cinema experiment enters with it's latest installment - 56+ years in the making. At this point, the films are far removed from being stand-alone projects.One must have seen a few of the previous episodes (spaced 7 years apart since 1964) in order to fully appreciate the marvelous work Michael Apted and his team have achieved. And, now, as the group (originally 14 children) have broached the 60 year threshold, the mortality factor has certainly become the overwhelming obstacle to the series continuing. The first of the 14 has already passed on, another is very ill, and two more participants declined being interviewed (one for the very first time; the second (Charles) left in the late-70s/early 80s). Still, as melancholy a Doc as 63 UP is, it's still a fine piece of work. I began watching the series with 1984's 28 UP, and haven't missed one since (I've also caught up with 2 of the 3 other entries recently). So, to see the remaining eleven men and women is like catching up with old friends. American viewers are used to 'reality show' celebrities now, but, keep in mind, this group have been major celebrities in England for much of the past five decades. Tony, the ex-cabbie even relates a story of a passenger asking for his autograph when they were all in the company of Buzz Aldrin - the 2nd man to walk on the moon! Filmmaker Michael Apted (COAL MINER'S DAUGHTER, WORLD IS NOT ENOUGH) is now 78. Apted was a researcher on the original film (now dubbed 7 UP), and has directed all the subsequent films (he told me he had a contingency plan in place in case he wasn't able to finish future episodes). See you in seven years. On to 70 UP

Up for 63 Up

[anna-fergusson · 10/10 · 12 February 2021]

I watched this the 1st time that it came up and then watched it again. I find it fascinating to see what happened to each of the children( now adults) taking part? Did they manage to fulfil their dreams? Were they dealt a bad deck of cards? How did they cope with life's obstacles? It would be interesting to do a film on how they are coping during lockdown. I hope they do another film of when they are 70.

Haven't seen it yet - SO disappointed that on "release" date I've been waiting years for there is no way for me to see it

[IsabelDalhousie · 10/10 · 27 November 2019]

I'm a Brit who has followed this series all my life (I'm their age) and am so disappointed that the published release date is meaningless if I can't see it. You'd think they could have figured out a way to make it available in pay per view SOMEWHERE

Great job

[lousha-1 · 8/10 · 29 January 2023]

I've seen one or the other instalment of the series on film sites over and over again, and I kept putting off watching it. It was hard to imagine how this could be really interesting. But I was rather wrong. It was a fascinating watch. I'm sure it would've been very different to see it in "real time", watching it as one is getting older along with the participants. But it was also great to watch it all in one go.

The series has several flaws, but they are all understandable. It was an idea that was being developed on the go. The biggest problem with it is the extensive amount of repeats from previous episodes, but then again, in their own time that was probably absolutely necessary, since the average viewer would've seen them with several years between them, without any chance of rewatching the previous ones. And of course the selection of participants could've been a lot more diverse, but it wasn't originally planned to be what it eventually became, so probably not a whole lot of thought was given to the selection.

However with all the flaws it's still a glorious, unique, very engaging programme. One quickly becomes attached to the participants, and feels interested in their lives, even if most of them led very ordinary ones. Or maybe exactly because of that. Each episode is very thought provoking, and makes the viewers want to have conversations about a number of subjects. The filmmakers don't really draw any conclusions, offer a lot of wisdom or anything like that, just show glimpses of a few random people's lives, forcing us to look at ours.

All along it felt like a privilege to watch these handful of children grow into adults and eventually reaching retirement age. When watched in the space of a full days, it felt like time travelling. It felt special. I for one felt very grateful for the filmmakers, and especially the participants who stuck with the project even though they did not like it at all, and in some occasions it was incredibly disruptive or inconvenient for their lives.

No Scots, Welsh or Irish

[CanuckInExile · 10/10 · 28 June 2019]

It would have been interesting if Mr Apted decided to include a child from the other home nations. Then it could have been classed as true British cross section. A fascinating series all the same.

Very good, just too long.

[Willy1971 · 8/10 · 11 January 2020]

Well done. Very informative. Excellent editing, but 40 minutes too long.

I think most of the participants here would vouch, ya gotta give credit where credit is due...

[DGPTA · 10/10 · 5 May 2024]

I am very fortunate to be a student of psychology in 2024 because of works like this.

The stories themselves are, without a doubt, wildly entertaining and endlessly fascinating...but, something I don't see a lot of people talking about, is the researchers who first started the experiment, knowing it would be an investment beyond even their own lifetime, but would produce an 'endless' treasure trove worth of data that could be used to study and understand human behavior.

You know, it's not as simple as "talk to people every 7 years and record what they say."

Of course, yes, you absolutely have to give credit to Michael Apted to even conceive of this in the first place, the man is brilliant...but also (and I think he'd agree), there are a lot of moving parts here, and a lot of planning and precision has to go into this to make sure tracking these people throughout their lives wasn't 'just' for entertainment.

So, I'm here to applaud the decades of researchers and research assistants who had the foresight and awareness to even make this possible as a valid experiment in psychology, bracing for an inevitable change of communication mediums and media types while being as minimally invasive as possible. Respect.

Most scientific genius is literally just one person thinking, "let's write down something obvious."

This show is the living definition of that. Pretty cool.

Memorable connection with all our lives.

[JohnDeSando · 23 February 2020]

"Give me a child until he is 7, and I will give you the man."

Director Michael Apted has been revisiting the same group of 14 British-born adults every seven years for 56 years. It's a documentary achievement not ever before attempted. It succeeds magically.

His above thesis centers around the notion that at 7 years you can see the same person at 63. Well, maybe not fully, but their individual personalities come through as Apted flashes back to scenes from previous 7-year iterations, including the first in 1963 to let us see the growth of his engaging subjects.

Almost all participants have achieved some happiness, from laborer and mother to Oxford grads and barrister. Common to most of their happiness is children, as good an endorsement of having children as you will ever see. Yet, disappointments and tragedy follow them as well as impermanent happiness, as happens to all who walk this earth.

Apted smartly updates his take by asking questions about current life, such as Brexit or lack of opportunity to buy a home. It is obvious that their children are often staying home into maturity from their inability to buy. Even Tony, a real estate developer, is forced by 2008 to downsize.

Nick learns 10 days before Apted's arrival that he has lung cancer, and librarian Lynn has died from a playground accident. All in all, life has just moved on relentlessly to its inevitable conclusion.

Somehow Apted doesn't set us off into grim thoughts about the human condition; rather he celebrates the small moments of life that give joy and connect us all in common experiences. As his series seems to be coming to a close, we can enjoy watching cohesive parts of the lives we share with each other.

The young kids are getting old.

[TxMike · 11 January 2024]

Michael Apted, the director and person most responsible for the "UP" series, himself died in 2019, less than one month before he turned 80. If nothing else this placed a punctuation mark on the concept of aging, we are all here temporarily, and with this most recent film we look at the surviving kids at 63, a reasonable retirement age for many people.

This is a landmark, one-of-a-kind, series of films has been a very enlightening story arc, studying how kids change over the decades and how accurate is the concept "show me a boy at 7 and I'll show you the man." As I have watched it over the years I often found myself envious, wishing I had such a film of my growing up.

In most prior years I was able to get the DVD of the series from my local library but this time I had to rely on streaming programming available online.

A very good watch especially for those of us who have watched all the prior installments.