Rogue Warfare: The Hunt (2019) User Reviews

LOL.

[WatchAndSmile · 3/10 · 5 December 2019]

It could've been a nice movie if not for a lot of issues. Acting is ok... Dialog is cheesy and fake no blood ever, Enemies are so dumb, in the 90s FPS games had bots on easy level smarter than what they have here Soldiers(the team) don't know how to move properly, how to engage and I am wondering if any of them ever held a gun. They moved around worse than 7 years old kids playing war. Nothing about what was shown can be anywhere real. It's LOL bad! Anything from uniform to clothing to vehicles to weapons - all wrong or fake. Could've been a comedy with a bit different dialog. Maybe if someone dub it, it could be a great comedy

The whole thing is just so fake, it makes good camera work and an ok script look bad. I mean, there is low budget and there's bad job by the directors who couldn't direct simple things.

Is he monologuing AGAIN?

[kaconklin-21018 · 2/10 · 16 August 2020]

The whole movie was a train wreck. The acting is awful, please somebody shoot the bad guy because he's going to talk us to death... in front of the green screen while staring broodingly off into the distance... Again. The uniforms, the weapons, the directing, the accents, overall there is very little to recommend this film.

The best action scene in this movie was...

[Top_Dawg_Critic · 2/10 · 14 January 2021]

...me dying of boredom. The dialogue was horrendous; blah blah and more blah for an entire 103 minutes, pretty much about nothing. 80% of this film was the Supreme Leader and Scientist just facing each other and talking about garbage, or Daniel laughing and screaming hysterically. I wanted to stick sharp pencils in my ears to stop the suffering. I'd rather listen to paint dry for that 103 mins. What was newb writer Andrew Emilio DeCesare on when he wrote this atrocious screenplay? Out of my 1000+ reviews, this is the worst writing by far. Somewhat experienced Mike Gunther's directing wasn't any better. A 5th grade drama class could've done better than setting up a tripod filming two guys on a hill blabbing about nothing. And the non-stop shots of sand dunes and hills, and more sand dunes and more hills... ridiculously amateur. The entire film needed 90 mins cut out, and the 13 min left may have been an enjoyable short. It's a very generous 2/10 from me for the somewhat adequate performances by the soldiers, who I'm sure would've performed better if they had some real casting direction from Gunther. We can use this film to torture our enemies by duct-taping them to a chair and make them watch this film over and over again.

Waste of money in production and rental

[fnlmix · 1/10 · 24 May 2020]

Worst movie I've ever seen. Terrible script. Terrible acting. Terrible direction. Even the music was horrible. Who in their right mind gave this movie a green light? It must have been a write off production. A waste of money for production and rental. Thank god I was able to fast forward through it and not waste the entire hour and 43 minutes of my life that I will never get back.

Low Budget Doesn't Have To Be This Bad

[frankie-08908 · 1/10 · 3 May 2020]

There are too many things wrong to list, uniforms, how weapons are held and used, dialogues it's endless. What really lets you know a lot of the negatives was from laziness is the uniforms and how the actors move, tactics. They didn't even try to get advice.

Btw, LifeLineBudgeting you're reasoning to give 6 stars is laughable and what's ruining most of Hollywood. You were so impressed solely because of diversity lol. What a joke, it matches this laughable movie.

It's no worse than the first.... no better either.

[michael-20728 · 2/10 · 6 December 2021]

I only watched the second because the OCD in me wanted answers. Unfortunately I don't know what the questions were.

I figured watching a movie might stave boredom, how wrong I was. I found reading the reviews more entertaining than the film. Honestly though, I blame the editor. He should have burned the building to the ground and destroyed all the footage when he had the chance.

Seriously though, the extras give better performances than the leading actors and actresses. They struggle to maintain their accents with the French guy sounding British, Australian, and American... occasionally a couple syllables with a french accent. The sniper girl does much better with her role, probably the best out of all of them.

The dialogue is painfully slow and.... painful.

All in all this movie is great... at killing braincells without a drop of alcohol.

waste of time

[marcoasleitao-905-480753 · 1/10 · 7 October 2020]

One of the worst movies i've ever seen, and just because it was a sequel. Actually all 3 movies are complete garbage and not much different one from another. Bad and little action, awful performances, endless speeches, unrealistic portrayal of the military...actually NOTHING HERE IS WORTH ! One star but i would like to give it ZERO

Insulting to actual special forces soldiers

[davidshare · 1/10 · 27 October 2020]

How I managed to watch the first film eludes me, what made me watch the second one was sheer stupidity and I blame that decision on lockdown boredom. Quite frankly these films insult the special forces through their use of incorrect dialog, incorrect use of weapons for covert missions, incorrect understanding of warfare, tactics and leadership and this is coming from someone who has no real world experience of the special forces, just some common sense from reading books and watching "good" films on the subject! Not to mention the long dull rantings of the stereotypical bad guy and his brainwashed stooge. I mean he was wearing a pair of his mum's fishnets on his face! And who leaves a suitcase bomb with lethal sarin after a battle without securing it! For safety you'd take that with you and also so you'd have intel to recognise the bomb maker's signature at another time? You know, to keep the world safe? At one point the french soldier is popping off headshot after headshot rambo style without even looking down the scope! He should be in the Olympics! And how one soldier doesn't guard the entrance of the enemy tent whilst his team mates complete part of the mission? What happens...Yes you'll get captured you dumb twits! I will not be watching the third film. The director, producers and writers should have stayed in bed. Just terrible terrible terrible. The only saving grace was the russian sniper she was fairly attractive.

Total disrespectful movie to the uniform.

[woodycp · 1/10 · 5 August 2020]

US Army Soldiers with beards and long hair not likely, Wrong headgear Army doesn't wear marine hats. The wearing of the uniform is a total joke. Low budget movie and acting. Don't understand why movie companies don't have military advisors when making a movie.

The Only Good Thing is Will Yun Lee Got A Check

[mmauter · 2/10 · 3 August 2020]

Watching the terrorist leader's seemingly never-ending monologue, while his toadie nods in agreement, was almost as much fun as crawling over broken glass.

Great popcorn flick

[mnaji · 10/10 · 3 August 2020]

Action packed with a diverse cast. For a low budget it was nicely executed.

not bad

[lifelinespublishing · 6/10 · 2 December 2019]

Simple storyline, TERRORISTS versus the WORLD scenario, I like how diversified the characters are, the Russian lady Sniper is one example., plus for that

overall, not bad if you're looking for a good action movie. just don't mind much the Terrorists dialogue too much.

Why?

[steveex2003 · 2/10 · 18 June 2020]

In other aspects of life one can take stock of a bad position and walk away. Not so in the movie industry. This is not the worst you'll likely have seen, but it is sufficiently poor to wonder how anybody ever signs off on such a project. Awful dialog, direction, set pieces and performances. Just really bad. Even if you set out expecting very little, you'll still hate it.

I should have read the reviews.

[uniqueanomaly · 1/10 · 30 August 2020]

Wasted 45 minutes on this clichéd hack. Dialog by Crayola, every hero bullet was a kill shot. Don't waste your time.

Commander???

[lvwood-09684 · 1/10 · 19 August 2020]

Since when is a Three Star General called Commander??? Waste of time. I got so involved in the mistakes I had to finish watching it. None of the Actors or Crew could have ever Served in the Military. If you called a General by the term Commander you would be polishing their boots, shoes, and toilet for eternity.

Another pile of bile v2

[grantwilson-63858 · 1/10 · 6 November 2021]

So i took it upon myself to watch the second istalment. What another pile of bile. Should have learned my lesson but no i enjoy pulling my nails out with that rusty hammer. Good luck with this horse droppings.

Rubbish!

[fairholme-02590 · 1/10 · 19 September 2020]

Low budget straight to dvd crud...dreary script appalling backing music...should appeal to mouth breathers and Trump basers.

Quarantine outcome!

[dazebala · 1/10 · 11 August 2020]

I honestly don't know where to start about the horrible quality of such a bombshell of a failing movie!! Acting is bad(except for (Brisco) Long and boring to death dialogues,especially with the so called supreme leader. Waste of time and thank god it was part of the paid Netflix subscription.

Low budget and questionable

[jiannawilliams-12278 · 1/10 · 8 August 2020]

It is lacking in every single way imaginable. There is not a single redeemable aspect of this movie, that I can confidently say, makes up for its atrocious nature. It is not the worst movie to ever grace the earth, but it reeks of a low budget student project completed last minute.

Not again 🙄

[chocosean · 2/10 · 17 June 2020]

How there is a second and what possessed me to watch this after the first is beyond me other than maybe they improved it. It was actually a tiny better but still. How this director can watch it back and not cry into his pillow. The dialogue is awful again. Talking school kid could write better. Awful and best part is there is a third 😭

Great quick watch

[anonymousav · 9/10 · 5 August 2020]

It may be a low budget film, but it is high in entertainment value! Fun movie to watch

Review

[catpantry · 7/10 · 5 April 2020]

Colb, warms a donut with a piece of glowing metal. Fresh from the wreckage, A powder room had fallen from the top of the ship and landed next to Colbs skinny boat (Colbs plan had been to be moved by the things aroud him). It was the gas engine that was keeping a green flower floating in an exact path inside the powder room. Ounce the ocean water siezed the engine, the flower immediately shot over and into Colbs mouth like a bumb moving towards the donut table at a funeral.

Disappointed I watched the whole thing.

[Jay-255 · 2/10 · 2 August 2020]

Mediocre to bad acting. They obviously had no military advisor, the "team" just didn't act like a military team. And having a 3-star general with 2 Lt. Colonels out in the middle of nowhere running a "team" is absurd.

Waste of time.

[mikeclovis2010 · 1/10 · 2 August 2020]

The writers must have written the entire script while polishing off a six-pack. It would have been better without any dialogue.

Not very convincing

[bruce-bmacfar · 3/10 · 19 June 2020]

Team America World Police has a better grasp of the geopolitical zeitgeist than this film has. The actors are less wooden too. I hope it was a successful tax write off. Hurka durka.