"Mindhunter" Episode #1.6 (TV Episode 2017) Poster

(TV Series)

(2017)

User Reviews

Review this title
7 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
Based on ...
rocketrobbie11134 June 2021
According to an 1988 article in the Altoona Mirror, on June 2, 1979, a 22-year-old woman named Betty Jean Shade had a fight with her live-in boyfriend, Charles "Butch" Soult. She was planning on leaving him. Still, she went on a drive with Soult, his brother, Michael, and sister, Catherine, to the nearby Wopsononock Mountain, so Soult and Shade could take a walk.

When they didn't return after some time, Catherine went searching for her brother - and found him beating Shade to death. Shade died of head and stab wounds. The trio transported Shade's body to the garbage dump three days after the killing, as happens in Mindhunter. Soult mutilated Shade's body in the garbage dump, as Benji did to Betty Jean.

Police first arrested Catherine and Michael Soult, then arrested Charles on a Greyhound bus to Pittsburgh. Though the jury sentenced Charles Soult to death, the trial judge overruled the decision and gave him a life sentence. He's currently serving out his sentence in the State Correctional Institution in Huntingdon, Pennsylvania.

Further, the name "Beverly Jean" may be an homage to a murder which took place in Dallas, Texas in 1970. Beverly Jean Hope, mother of three and popular suburban housewife, was murdered in her large mansion. The crime, to this date, remains unsolved, though new information which emerged in 2016 brought another suspect into the mix: Beverly Jean's ex-brother-in-law. Perhaps it's too small a coincidence, but in Mindhunter, Beverly Jean's murder is partially carried out by Benji's brother-in-law.

Either way, the true story of Betty Jean Shade (and Beverly Jean Hope) are reminders that Mindhunter isn't just a TV show to binge-watch before proceeding to the next one. Mindhunter reminds us of lives cut far too short by heinous acts of violence against women.
11 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
The investigations continue
AvionPrince166 December 2021
Still interested to see the case to follow the psychology problems of the cases and i love also the relationship between characters and found them also a good reason to follow the investigation too.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Sobering
Leofwine_draca21 March 2022
I thought the previous episode's crime story had been tied up but apparently not. This extra-short episode acts as a kind of coda and is most illuminating in the way it portrays how all the best theories and explanations fall down and are compromised in the 'real world'.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Continuation
Hitchcoc21 October 2017
Warning: Spoilers
A slight apology. I melded episodes 5 & 6 in my last review. Perhaps some additional information. We have found out that Wendy is gay and so all those constant questions about kids and husbands and singles groups are quite offensive, although this taking place in the late seventies makes it natural that she would have to sit and take this. Of course, she has been offered an FBI past and is withholding information. We are also beginning to see the tension between Wendy and Debbie as Holden becomes an issue. Onward and upward.
7 out of 36 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
deep analysis
erdicigdem-885017 February 2021
The doctor's analysis of the murder was awesome but there is a limit to what one can do if people are themselves limited so they could not raise the prosecutor who wheel of the legal system.
1 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Welcome aboard
Calicodreamin30 December 2020
A good episode in terms of storyline development and a chance to see an application of the psychosocial methods to an active case.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Episode 6
bobcobb30116 November 2017
Warning: Spoilers
The Wendy stuff is a real waste of Anna Torv, who, if you watched Fringe, is capable of exciting story lines of all varieties.

This was an okay episode, but one that deemphasized what the show is about simply too much for me to enjoy. i want the case of the week, the killer of the week, and we did not really get that.
9 out of 34 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed