"The Handmaid's Tale" Offred (TV Episode 2017) Poster

(TV Series)

(2017)

User Reviews

Review this title
14 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
9/10
Episode 1 Offred Review: A Great Look Into The Handmaids, But Not Without Its Flaws
ashboomstick-566544 September 2018
Warning: Spoilers
The Handmaid's Tale doesn't waist any time in enticing the viewer and pulling him or her right into the backstory of the main characters. The showrunners start off strong by setting the show's evocative and intense first scene before the supposed massacre. This massacre led to the creation of the Handmaid's and their harsh treatment under a world similar to that of communism in the 60's and 70's. The scene shows a portion of what happened to the lead character June/Offred before this world was invented, when this terrifying reality was being imagined, but not much else. After this scene wraps up, we become enamoured and terrified with the world of Gillead, a place created in the aftermath of several government problems, which we will slowly find out in a series of flashbacks.

As of right now, anyone watching this first episode should be impressed to say the least. We are immediately introduced to our lead character, and the terrifying realm of Gillead. We slowly learn why this horrific world was created in the first place (although a formal backstory doesn't occur until the show's sixth episode). From here, we are introduced to a variety of eccentric characters who govern Gillead. Several impressive actors include Ann Dowd, as Aunt Lydia. Lydia is given the arduous task of training, as well as caring for the Handmaids. Other phenomenal actors include Yvonne Strahovski as the harsh and emotionally distant Serena Joy Waterford, the lead handmaid, Elizabeth Moss as June/Offred, and Alexis Bledel as Emily . The camera perfectly captures each stern glare that these women can give, along with their anger, loss, fear and unwillingness to be defeated.

Cinematography is one of the most important aspects of the TV/movie world. The Handmaid's Tale is an example of some of the best camera-work. The diverse lighting and varied camera angles help to increase the excitement, tone and mood of the episode. Red is a prominent color on this show, symbolically representing fertility and blood, giving of life and taking it away simultaneously. It is captured beautifully amidst the countlesss len's flares and the magnificent scenery.

It's important that a movie or TV show has a message, or a certain level of social commentary, something to resonate with the viewers long after the credits have rolled. The Handmaid's Tale introduces several political themes almost right away in "Offred." However, the theme that is the most blatant part of this show is dismantling women's rights and use of religion to justify this.

It's safe to say that at this point in time, The Handmaid's Tale tends to be a woman's show, in that it is primarily about women, the torture inflicted upon these poor women as a result of a completely changed society, and the rise to triumph and revenge and redemption they will hopefully achieve once they organize, as they clearly must. All of these Handmaids are forced to birth a baby, because the other women (the women in green who are the infertile wives) can't. The Handmaids are not allowed to read, write or do anything other than what they are told to do.

The men are in charge of everything in this world. They are most particularly in charge of all of the women. Even the women in charge of the Handmaids ultimately report to men in this harsh world. The show implies that the new society has relied heavily on old, familiar religious themes such as the existence of a punitive God who has left us with bad crops and infertile woman because we were a culture without morals. The question of whether something like this could eventually occur, especially regarding the undoing of women's right's, really creates a sense of horror in this show. It captures, (although in an extremely exaggerated fashion) how in the real world something like this might eventually happen. Here are where the problems on this show start to occur.

The show predicts that this is a world that we could possibly be living in a long time from now. Is it correct to say that certain aspects of this show could come true one day? Yes, but this is an extreme level of what could happen. It's also a bit harsh to make the viewer feel as if all men are as tortourous and downright evil as they appear to be are on this show. Nevertheless, these are important themes to explore. For the showrunners to have decided to include these themes at all is a valiant decision, and just for that, I will continue to love this show until the end of days.

Episode 1 "Offred"= 91% -five points taken off for being incredibly slow moving at certain moment -four points taken off for exaggerated depiction of the future, and harsh treatment of all men
9 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Grips you from the start
Leofwine_draca21 November 2020
Warning: Spoilers
I remember reading THE HANDMAID'S TALE back in my school days and not liking it much; Atwood's book felt to me to be one of the most boring and depressing things out there. Decades later and, having heard good things about this new TV show adaptation, I found myself willing to check it out. Episode 1, OFFRED, gets off to a good start, introducing a whole new dystopian future and generally working by mixing plot, character beats and some violent shocks into a grim but gripping whole.
5 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Everything taken from her.
ehaas-310 June 2017
Warning: Spoilers
In the "present", the main character now known as Offred is living under a new regime after the collapse and breakup of the United States which happened just a few years earlier.

But it could have happened generations ago; or so it seems in Cambridge, Massachusetts, home of the ruling elite of the new Republic of Gilead. They've stripped away so much of the culture and history that was there before and replaced it with the preferences of the new rulers.

It seems like odd mixture of influences cobbled together but becomes even more frightening as it begins to make a certain amount of sense in context. The obvious theme is a return to the Puritan period of (part of) America's past. But the Puritans, for all their faults, had some proto- democratic and egalitarian leanings.

But sorry, these don't fit the Republic of Gilead's needs, so on one level it's not Ye Olde New England at all, but a feudal atmosphere where the commoners serve on the estates of "great men." These Commanders of the Faithful don't put up with priests, however, because they speak for God as well as ruling the secular realm. An ominous secret police force called the Eyes are also a big deal and soldiers constantly patrol the streets giving off a Nazi or Stalinist vibe.

Women are of course singled out for the least power and worst treatment, especially if they didn't marry an important man (in which case, they can wear nice clothes, decorate, garden and drink their sorrows away). At least men can try to work their way up the military chain of command or have regular jobs, though they are forbidden to marry or reproduce without permission and can be sent to die in an ongoing war against the remnant of the USA.

"Marthas", the female domestic servants work nearly every waking hour. Handmaids are the ultimate example of reductionism. There has been a sterility plague and the few remaining unmarried fertile women are drafted into a state sponsored pseudo-religious order to bear children for whomever they get assigned to. They are blatantly thought of as walking wombs.

All of these roles are embodiments of typical stereotypes of women that have existed for thousands of years. There is even a color coded uniform for each one, though the Wives are allowed a little more variety in style.

I'm sorry to go to such lengths to describe Gilead, but my point is that for the main character, its immersive atmosphere and largely successful erasure of the recent past makes it quite a task to hold onto her sense of self and reality.

The flashbacks to her last few years before everything changed are painful because they're all she has left of her husband (presumed dead and marriage dissolved by Gilead in any case because she was his second wife), daughter (taken away and given to a "deserving" childless couple) and best friend who was recruited as a Handmaid, too, after the revolution but who disappeared after displaying too much rebellious behavior.

So much of the story is her struggle to stay mentally alive and to be prepared to fight back when and if the time comes. Her internal dialogue is everything from sorrow to mockery of her new masters.

By the end of the pilot, she is ready to privately reclaim her real name-- June--and swear to find her daughter, Hannah.
53 out of 61 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Under his eye
matiasbockerman17 November 2018
Can't believe some rewievs of this show. This is disturbing and I understand that some people do not like this not because show is bad, I rather think this might be too shocking for some viewers. This is a second time I started to watch this and I'm shocked in a good way. I have read the book and I have to say it is great adaptation between book and show. In this very first episode Characters might stay little shallow but they will be involving episode by episode. One of the very enjoyable thing here is a very good dialogue and the bloodcurdling atmosphere. This is a real life horror cause it's so Damn realistic.
27 out of 34 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Brilliant scary and timely series..
akshatdave3 May 2017
Warning: Spoilers
Great direction, casting. I believe it is a relevant morality tale for these times. We should not underestimate the power of religious fundamentalism.This adaptation of Margaret Atwood's novel is just as captivating and chilling as the book. Elisabeth Moss and Yvonne Strahovski give wonderful performances. I have to say it's great to see Strahovski take on such a risky role.As the subject says, this is a brilliant adaptation of the original text. As several articles about it have said, it's incredibly timely. I, unfortunately, made it to the third episodes but I won't be watching it anymore. I can't. It's too terrifying to watch considering that we're 3/4 of the way to this being a reality, at least in the U.S. and especially for women of color. Still, if you can look past that, I would definitely recommend this series. The acting is incredible, the sets and costumes are flawless, and even the way that flashbacks are handled is fantastic. Elizabeth Moss deserves every award and Alexis Bledel and Samira Wiley are right there with her. Even Yvonne Strahovski is brilliant - not that she isn't always, but her character is definitely not as likable in this as those she normally portrays. I hope everyone involved with this understands how important it is that they've made it and that they've made it now. They all have my undying gratitude for taking such an unflinching look at such a terrifyingly real story.The show is wonderfully nuanced in everything from dialog to film editing. This pilot is possibly the best thing I've seen on TV in years.
46 out of 63 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Amazing beginning!!!
This show is very well written and the actors are amazing. Great way to begin a series! I like the flashbacks that help build the characters. I highly recommend this show!
14 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A Gripping Dystopian Masterpiece
badeclerck7 October 2023
Warning: Spoilers
The first episode of The Handmaid's Tale is nothing short of an unsettling and thought-provoking introduction to the harrowing world it portrays. From the very beginning, it immerses the audience in a dystopian society so disturbingly real that it makes you squirm in your seat. Every aspect of this episode, from the haunting soundtrack to the impeccable acting and visuals, contributes to the overwhelming sense of discomfort.

The discomfort, however, is a deliberate and essential part of the experience. It forces viewers to confront the cruelty and injustice that pervade this dystopian world. As you watch, you can't help but feel a sense of rage and a strong desire to reach through the screen and aid these oppressed women. Yet, you are painfully aware that you can't. Instead, you find yourself naively bearing witness to their enslavement, which is almost as distressing as the oppression itself.

Despite the difficulty of watching, this adaptation is a necessary and powerful one. It stays true to the source material's profound impact and serves as a monument to the brilliance of the original literature. The actors excel in their roles, with Elisabeth Moss delivering a remarkable performance as the titular handmaid. Her portrayal is so compelling that it leaves you craving more, eager to delve deeper into the story and explore the complex characters and their fates.

The Handmaid's Tale demands your attention, not for its ease or comfort, but for its unflinching exploration of the darkest aspects of humanity. It is a testament to the enduring relevance of dystopian literature and a stark reminder of the importance of safeguarding our freedoms and equality in the real world. This first episode sets the stage for a riveting and emotionally charged journey that is as necessary as it is uncomfortable.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Before I watch episode 2...
SureCommaNot8 January 2019
This show has gotten such rave reviews, I had to check it out. Now that I've seen the pilot, and only the pilot, I have to wait and see how things progress, but for now I can focus on what I see as the biggest pro and the biggest con, thus far.

The pro: visually stunning. That depth of field is enrapturing. The color tones, too. Just perfect.

The con, and it's a common one: beautiful visuals often happen at the expense of story. And, story-wise, I expected the pilot would have more going for it. We didn't see anything new or innovative. And perhaps the pilot steering away from the pressure to out-dramatize other shows' pilots will turn into a strength, if the rest of the show ends up being compelling, but for now it feels flat and caricaturized, relying on the works of other people to imbue the concepts and visuals with dramatic purport.

I will say, the moment where the two handmaidens realize they both saw each other as fakely pious was eye-opening. This gives me hope that the continuing episodes will attempt some originality, without relying on borrowing tension from other skilled writers and filmmakers. (And yes, I'm taking into account that this show is based on a book.)
15 out of 36 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Offred
Prismark1027 April 2020
There was a decent film adaptation of The Handmaid's Tale in 1990.

This television adaptation would expand on Margaret Atwood's novel and allow it too breath. Atwood makes a brief appearance in the first episode.

However this being US television you just know the series would go on and on getting further away from the kernel of the original story.

The first episode carries on the Dystopian themes of the book. A critique of those who hypocritically advocate traditional values and fundamentalism not only in America but in places in the Middle East.

In a society where the fertility rate has fallen. Offred (Elisabeth Moss) who in a previous society was called June is effectively a slave to the Waterford family.

The Handmaid is assigned to be impregnated by Fred Waterford (Joseph Fiennes) as his wife Serena Joy watches on. She is both repulsed and envious of Offred.

The first episode had a good setting of a theocratic based feudal society, you are always being watched, you could always be reported by someone close to you.

Rebellion is not tolerated. Public hangings are common.

Moss gives a good performance of someone caught in a trap, she wants to rebel but she is also regarded as being pious. She had a life before all this, a husband and daughter, as well as her own name and identity.
4 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Might have good ratings, but the first couple of episodes are painfully slow
grimjawxrules14 July 2019
Never having watched the show before, I picked it up because of its ratings. I'll continue watching it to see if it picks up later on, but so far I've been nothing but disappointed and can only conclude that I've wasted 3 hours watching something which could and should have been cut down to no more than 30 minutes.

Why?

Because we spend at least the first three episodes almost exclusively on world-building. The plot barely moves *at all* save for a few minor interactions which, again, could've easily been cut down to 30 minutes. The show so far is full of long pauses between every single spoken sentence which are supposed to add to some form of perceived atmosphere, but mostly only succeeds in dragging out every scene way past the point of boredom, painfully drawn-out scenes of systemic oppression and flashbacks which attempt to display the characters' confusion, fear and despair as the world changes around them, yet fails to do so convincingly.

The people posting positive reviews of the first couple of episodes must've either been drunk while watching them or only rate them based on the show in its entirety rather than the episodes themselves. I hope the pace picks up asap , or I'll die from old age before a week passes in the show's timeline.
8 out of 52 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Women are not property
vivianla29 September 2022
Warning: Spoilers
I have read the book and this is my first time watching a full episode. June's partner is Luke and they have a daughter named Hannah. They were caught in Maine and June was brought to a classroom where women were dressed all in red and wearing white caps that covered their side profiles.

Janine, a woman who was brave enough to make snarky comments, gets her right eye taken out as punishment. Women in this world are breeding cattle, you don't need an eye for that. Moira and June try to calm Janine down in the bedroom where she is completely nude, talking crazy to herself. June is brought to Officer Waterhouse's home where she is to be their handmaiden. She is told to do grocery shopping and meets Nick, the driver who is shovelling. His muscles are prominent and June wonders if he is lonely. He was not appointed a woman because of his lowly status. Serena, the Commander's wife, is obviously upset that her husband has to have sex with another woman. June is called for and lays in between the legs of Serena as the Commander thrusts slowly and surely into her. He holds on to the bed posts as he comes. Serena has tears falling from her eyes after and tells June to leave. June also has tears in her eyes as she lays in bed and says she can feel the Commander's cum coming out of her. She gets out of the home in her white undergarments, breathing in the night air. Across from her Nick watches her and she only realizes her mistake when she looks up and sees him. Thinking she was going to be taken away, she is anxious after this.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
No. Please do not watch this.
I have just finished episode 4 of Handmaid's Tale, so I thought I would take a moment to reflect on the first four episodes of the show. I will specifically focus on this first episode in this review.

This show is straight up terrible. If you want to save an hour of your day, do not watch this show. The main actress is very painful to watch and she has a personality blander than a piece of white bread. The "sexual tension" that this show is famous for is nothing more than awkward silence with practically no purpose. I constantly found myself looking towards my phone for salvation from the boredom. The journey that Offred goes on is one of suffering and inefficient decision making. If you want adventure, drama, espionage, and "sexual tension" done right, go watch Game of Thrones. This show will disappoint and leave you wondering why you ever started it in the first place.
17 out of 151 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Top ten worst shows ever!
charles-boecher27 April 2018
Don't wast your time trying to understand why this show is bad, or why it's ok to watch, if you get through the first episode you might want to check with a psychiatrist. This is why Award shows like the Oscars are so out of control now. This show has an 8.6 rating! Do not be deceived!
16 out of 242 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Good acting and well-written... but christianphobic?
felipegz5 August 2018
The idea for this series is very original, but I founded 'christianphobic'. Seriously in this 'modern' society there are people who think Christians see women in that way and that will be a perfect world for a Christian? It is an exaggeration. Direction and acting is okay.
9 out of 118 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed