"Murdoch Mysteries" The Murdoch Trap (TV Episode 2013) Poster

(TV Series)

(2013)

User Reviews

Review this title
7 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
9/10
Murdoch's nemesis returns
miles-3310814 November 2016
Warning: Spoilers
With Dr Ogden convicted of killing her husband and sentenced to death, Murdoch has very little time to help her. For an instant, he sees Gillies, with whom he has crossed swords twice before, in the courtroom, but then he seems to vanish, unseen by anyone else.

Murdoch and his colleagues, convinced that Dr Ogden has been framed, set about discovering how it was done. Murdoch finds convincing ways the evidence may have been forged, but this leaves the judge asking, entirely reasonably, how he can be sure that Murdoch did not fabricate all the evidence himself, in order to cover up a crime of passion. For once, Chief Constable Giles cuts Murdoch some slack, in order to try to find evidence to clear Dr Grace.

In the race against time that follows, Murdoch goes missing at the critical moment. From his position in a locked cell, what can he do to thwart the plans of his nemesis?

This was a superb episode, only slightly devalued by the idea that only one outcome would have been acceptable.

I feel that I must comment on the other reviews,because they present such a poor take on the episode that the impression they leave is gravely misleading. Ctyankee1 has just reviewed the wrong episode. In the other reviews, one reviewer complains that it would not have been possible to synchronise sound with pictures, but in fact both sound and picture technologies were available, and all that was necessary was to find some way to start the film and recording together, and it would certainly be possible to create a suitable switch circuit. One might argue that the producers should have let sound slip out of sync with the pictures, but that's really as severe as one might reasonably be. As for the relationship between Dr Ogden and Detective Murdoch, let's be realistic - the series is called Murdoch Mysteries, so the romantic plot line must be subsidiary. That's why it takes a while to play out.

I know I'm a fan of the show, but clearly there are others who are not. Watch for yourself, gentle reader, and decide who is telling more truth...
16 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Glaring inconsistency to resolve the mystery
wrdalton18 May 2018
Warning: Spoilers
The final problem to resolve was how James Gillies could have killed Darcy in his home at the same time he was killing Julia's alibi witness in another town miles away. The sensible answer would be that he contrived to kill the alibi at another time. But instead the producers invent a twist by which had the murder weapon fire and kill Darcy automatically when he opened the lid to a victrola playing Julia's voice. This would allow Gillies to be in a different town at the time, but fails to explain how he was seen entering Darcy's house just before the shooting by the next door neighbor, a fact previously explained by Gillies' own admission that he contrived to dress and look like Julia by wearing a latex mask shaped to her face and wearing it into Darcy's house. They undercut the solution to one mystery with the solution to the other one.
12 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Omnipotent Villains
wjspears16 December 2020
Warning: Spoilers
The last two episodes of Murdoch Mysteries ("Crime and Punishment" and "The Murdoch Trap") were terrible, and a genuine disappointment.

"Evil mastermind plots" typically require so many lucky breaks, so much coincidence, and so much suspension of belief, that they fall apart long before the end credits.

It has nothing to do with not being a fan of the show. I am very much of a fan of Murdoch Mysteries. I usually enjoy Murdoch's "MacGyver style" technology inventions even when they seem a bit far fetched.

But to add to what several reviewers have mentioned,.

Evil mastermind plots typically require writers to pile on one implausibility after another, (dubiously existent technology, clueless witnesses) in order to ratchet up the tension and move the plot forward.

Eventually it just becomes too much, and too annoying. Very disappointing ending to Season 6--a season I generally enjoyed quite a bit.
9 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
I'm just so frustrated. Writers, take note.
rainbowneko-582-36676624 April 2013
Warning: Spoilers
You cannot string along an audience, writers for seasons and seasons without the dynamics of relationships not changing.

Julia stringing along Murdoch for 6 seasons is too long. Get married, or ship her out. If there's problems with the marriage, I'd be fine with that.

I understand that she's an old maid and scandalous, but honestly...she's acting like a politician.

Only marked as a spoiler for peeps that didn't guess the outcome of Julia in this. The only good thing about this ep and the last is that Darcy's dead.
12 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
A terrible episode from a great series
keeray-69-74246611 October 2016
The episode I give 1/10 but the series I give 9/10.

The episode is so inaccurate regarding technology at the time (late 1800s). Using a black and white film with audio was almost impossible with the recording devices they had at the time.

Similarly using masks to disguise a person's identity is impossible unless you have a virtually identical bone structure. Therefore a man cannot wear a mask to look like a woman like the episode shows.

Normally the Murdoch Mysteries are fantastic but this episode feels like an American episode divorced from reality (even the pacing of the screenplay and direction).
9 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
This episode stretches the imagination a little too much....
tert729 December 2020
Warning: Spoilers
You would think this Cillian is a super genius Cillian with mission impossible type skills.... In 1900........a perfect mask.... I thought this show was at least rooted in some reality, showing cutting edge police techniques at the time. Or maybe a little ahead of time.... Silly putty was invented in the 40s I think... 1940s. ... But that's minor.... The masks, the video, the splicing the audio.... I thought this "villain" was run of the mill. Turns out to be super genius..... And of course Julia.... That's the real nemesis there....... Wish she would have gotten the noose there at the end.....

And why is it now that every show has framing episodes..... Always framing someone that could not have possibly done it, yet almost everyone that knows the person thinks that person is guilty. This show wasn't quite as bad, but still sentenced her to hang, and of course at the last second, freed. Yes the countdowns to 1 second before diffusing the bomb, the last second stays of executions...... Gets old. It's been done and doesn't fool anyone anymore.... It's actually more annoying than anything else... Cause we KNOW a main character in a show like this won't be dying.....
4 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Darcy Garland, Julia's husband is murdered
ctyankee11 May 2015
Darcy is murdered and lots of witnesses say they see Dr Julia Odgen his wife going into the building or in the neighborhood. It's strange how they call Julia his wife but they never address her as Dr Julia Garland once she gets married.

Anyway Murdoch gets involved and he is partial to Julia even though he says he does not want to be. They find the gun that killed Dr Darcy Garland and Murdoch finds Julia's prints on the bullet.

Chief Constable Gilmore picks on Murdoch and Inspector Brackenreid. Brackenreid tells him off good. Gilmore suspends Murdoch because he feels he is too close to the case and doing things behind his back he is not supposed to do.

Murdoch on his own talks to Julia to find out where she was the day her husband was murdered. Everyone knew they were getting a divorce and then Darcy backed down for spite because he could not get her back, he still loved her. Murdoch can't seem to get a straight answer from Julia about where she was the night her husband was killed. She gives some lame excuse about privacy and taking care of a woman that was afraid of her husband in another town. Murdoch goes to the town & house and the house does not look like it has been lived in.

It seem like she was set up to get her out of town when her husband was killed. The woman she was supposed to have helped does not exist nor does her husband.

Dr Julia Ogden gets charged with murder and goes on trial.
1 out of 28 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed