I'm a huge Creature-Feature fan, so when I heard about this movie I was immediately intrigued but after seeing the first ratings my expectations were limited a bit, but I was still excited to watch the movie. The movie really takes its time before something significant happens. A couple drives to a secluded cabin in the woods, which the husband received after the death of his mother. As soon as they arrive they check the place out and after some time they hear noises from a nearby tank. Then the movie progresses with short and dark shots of the creature and lots of growling and crawling noises. This goes on for some time before the first off-screen kill happens. Towards the end however you get to see the creatures in their full beauty, which are made with practical effects and that's always good. In general I think the creature design was good and made me curious about their origin. Some characters definitely had severe plot armor which is always an annoyance and there are several stupid decisions throughout the movie but these things are nothing new in most horror movies and since I'm a sucker for Creature-Features, I definitely had a good time with this movie. If you manage to survive the rather boring first half of the movie I think you are going to enjoy the third act even though this movie is definitely no masterpiece. Watch out for the mid credit scene. [5,9/10]
68 Reviews
Mediocre at best...
geekoutmetal27 April 2023
Warning: Spoilers
What a waste of an interesting premise. The child parts are written terribly and the actor has no idea what to do witht eh terrible directing.
I was waiting in the third act for the mom to die. Please I just want to see it happen, but couldn't be bothered to wait around for the last 15mins to finish.
With a better writer taking the same premise and tweaking it, it could have been more interesting and scarier.
The creatures were interesting but again not much effort was made to make it anything other than walking fish.
I gave up at the end with the kid in the car. How does the creature open the car windows? And why does the kid keep screaming one minute in fear and then sounds perfectly fine the next moment.
Oh, and the cops gun just happens to have landed next to the family car door and mom picks it up like its meant to be there.
Anyway, what made me turn off my brain was how does someone just turn up to a house decades later and then just go to sleep in a house that is so rundown after all those decades, and yet its liveable.
I was waiting in the third act for the mom to die. Please I just want to see it happen, but couldn't be bothered to wait around for the last 15mins to finish.
With a better writer taking the same premise and tweaking it, it could have been more interesting and scarier.
The creatures were interesting but again not much effort was made to make it anything other than walking fish.
I gave up at the end with the kid in the car. How does the creature open the car windows? And why does the kid keep screaming one minute in fear and then sounds perfectly fine the next moment.
Oh, and the cops gun just happens to have landed next to the family car door and mom picks it up like its meant to be there.
Anyway, what made me turn off my brain was how does someone just turn up to a house decades later and then just go to sleep in a house that is so rundown after all those decades, and yet its liveable.
The Tank Stank!
totalovrdose18 July 2023
The Tank (very original name) provides little in the way of new ideas to the creature feature genre. For everything the movie does right, there are so many things that it does wrong. In fact, let me make the same recommendation a character in the film does - run - as far away from this film as possible.
The film introduces us to Ben (Matt Whelan), his wife Jules (Luciane Buchanan) and daughter Reia (Zara Nausbaum). Apparently, they have fallen on hard times, though the film never shows them struggling financially, what with a lucrative pet store and all. But, luck is on their side and in walks Amos (Mark Mitchinson), who works on behalf of Ben's late mother's estate, who says that a long-lost property in her name is to be passed down to him. Well, it seems like the family set off that same afternoon to check out the residence. Now, when I travelled to China, I packed two suitcases. This family are planning on moving into a new dwelling, and they haven't even a single bag. Interesting. But, luck is on their side (again), and not only is the property fully-furnished, but generally well-maintained too! Funny, how a thirty-year-old property, untouched by man, has not been reclaimed by nature.
Now, a glaring issue right off the bat is the film does little to establish the family as a group of loving people. They never eat or cook together. They never go to the bathroom (not sure there even is one). Other than Jules reading a bedtime story to Reia, the trio could very well be a group of strangers that live together. The same issue is applied to the setting - characters talk about 'gas stations' and 'police departments' and ' towns', but never do we see any of these, the film using only four sets (pet shop, (a tiny section of) forest, house, tank), which makes it difficult to identify with the world or its characters. A further shame, is the house is set atop of a beautiful peninsula, bordered by forest, though never is this setting used to maximum benefit.
Returning to the new home, it's equipped with a near endless supply of fuel (we're told it's running on empty, but this is a non-issue), and a tank that connects to a natural spring (though never does the film explain how the water goes from the tank to their faucets). The tank in question seems to run the entire length of the property, and it does not take long for the family to find something in there - a seemingly rare species of, well, salamander, I guess - but with teeth. Of course, the family are unphased (there is a lot that unphased them to be honest). From their first evening at the house, the family begin experiencing strange occurrences, to which Jules says 'I saw a monster' and Ben says 'I see nothing'. Jules says 'I want to leave' and Ben literally says 'we can't' - the same cliche conversations that have been played out a billion times before are employed so characters make dumb decisions for the convenience of the plot.
It is here that the mystery of what happened to Ben's family becomes a main staple, and is actually one of the better aspects of the film. The missing pages of a journal fuel Jules to want to know more - and know more she will, when she, an hour into the film, opens a locked room to which she had the keys for. The. Entire. Time. This convenience is just another of the many that plague this movie, which is also not limited to; blocked roads that become magically passable in the next scene; police who need to be contacted in person, but are then contacted with a portable radio not five minutes later; characters who are told to shush, but then scream louder than the atomic bomb so the monster can hear them; characters who know the creature is amphibious, but only use this knowledge to their benefit when the story tells them to - the list goes on.
Speaking of, it is right after the film reaches the 60-minute mark, that we are fully introduced to the 'monster'. Director Scott Walker clearly thinks he has something that would make Godzilla blush with envy - the problem - he does not. This is one of those times where less is most certainly more. Don't get me wrong - if you squint, the creature could *almost* be mistaken for the alien in Ridley Scott's 1979 masterpiece, while the inclusion of its breath against glass is a nice touch too. When it opens its mouth for the first time, the effect is...fine...at least until you realize that it's basically a gigantic anal sphincter (tell me I'm wrong?!) Moreover, it is all too obviously a person in a suit - and not even in a so-bad-its-good way - you really get the feeling the filmmakers are proud of these effects, and the question needs to be asked - what made them so confident? The same could be said for the glaring errors - example, a creature breaks through a car window, and one scene later, the window is fine. Did anyone check this and say 'hang on, I think we may need to change this.'
As the film drags towards its inevitable finish, Ben, who is originally shown to be a bit of a handy-man, becomes plainly useless, and Jules is revealed to be some kind of dragon slayer - where a bite from a monster badly wounds Ben, Jules shakes it off like Xena Warrior Princess and keeps going - unlikely (especially when you consider how other characters are torn limb from limb - on that note, kudos to the gore department). Too much of the finale is filmed in cramped quarters, like the filmmakers are deliberately trying to stop you from seeing the sound-stage, and between this and Jules' invulnerability, the film's tension is dialed down to minus eleven. I kept expecting the film to do more - maybe guide me into a false sense of security before pulling the rug out from under me - but that was giving the film way too much credit. The Tank is content being a D-grade, cliche, creature feature, and though that might have been fine fifty years ago, we have older monster movies that have aged so much better than this one ever will.
The film introduces us to Ben (Matt Whelan), his wife Jules (Luciane Buchanan) and daughter Reia (Zara Nausbaum). Apparently, they have fallen on hard times, though the film never shows them struggling financially, what with a lucrative pet store and all. But, luck is on their side and in walks Amos (Mark Mitchinson), who works on behalf of Ben's late mother's estate, who says that a long-lost property in her name is to be passed down to him. Well, it seems like the family set off that same afternoon to check out the residence. Now, when I travelled to China, I packed two suitcases. This family are planning on moving into a new dwelling, and they haven't even a single bag. Interesting. But, luck is on their side (again), and not only is the property fully-furnished, but generally well-maintained too! Funny, how a thirty-year-old property, untouched by man, has not been reclaimed by nature.
Now, a glaring issue right off the bat is the film does little to establish the family as a group of loving people. They never eat or cook together. They never go to the bathroom (not sure there even is one). Other than Jules reading a bedtime story to Reia, the trio could very well be a group of strangers that live together. The same issue is applied to the setting - characters talk about 'gas stations' and 'police departments' and ' towns', but never do we see any of these, the film using only four sets (pet shop, (a tiny section of) forest, house, tank), which makes it difficult to identify with the world or its characters. A further shame, is the house is set atop of a beautiful peninsula, bordered by forest, though never is this setting used to maximum benefit.
Returning to the new home, it's equipped with a near endless supply of fuel (we're told it's running on empty, but this is a non-issue), and a tank that connects to a natural spring (though never does the film explain how the water goes from the tank to their faucets). The tank in question seems to run the entire length of the property, and it does not take long for the family to find something in there - a seemingly rare species of, well, salamander, I guess - but with teeth. Of course, the family are unphased (there is a lot that unphased them to be honest). From their first evening at the house, the family begin experiencing strange occurrences, to which Jules says 'I saw a monster' and Ben says 'I see nothing'. Jules says 'I want to leave' and Ben literally says 'we can't' - the same cliche conversations that have been played out a billion times before are employed so characters make dumb decisions for the convenience of the plot.
It is here that the mystery of what happened to Ben's family becomes a main staple, and is actually one of the better aspects of the film. The missing pages of a journal fuel Jules to want to know more - and know more she will, when she, an hour into the film, opens a locked room to which she had the keys for. The. Entire. Time. This convenience is just another of the many that plague this movie, which is also not limited to; blocked roads that become magically passable in the next scene; police who need to be contacted in person, but are then contacted with a portable radio not five minutes later; characters who are told to shush, but then scream louder than the atomic bomb so the monster can hear them; characters who know the creature is amphibious, but only use this knowledge to their benefit when the story tells them to - the list goes on.
Speaking of, it is right after the film reaches the 60-minute mark, that we are fully introduced to the 'monster'. Director Scott Walker clearly thinks he has something that would make Godzilla blush with envy - the problem - he does not. This is one of those times where less is most certainly more. Don't get me wrong - if you squint, the creature could *almost* be mistaken for the alien in Ridley Scott's 1979 masterpiece, while the inclusion of its breath against glass is a nice touch too. When it opens its mouth for the first time, the effect is...fine...at least until you realize that it's basically a gigantic anal sphincter (tell me I'm wrong?!) Moreover, it is all too obviously a person in a suit - and not even in a so-bad-its-good way - you really get the feeling the filmmakers are proud of these effects, and the question needs to be asked - what made them so confident? The same could be said for the glaring errors - example, a creature breaks through a car window, and one scene later, the window is fine. Did anyone check this and say 'hang on, I think we may need to change this.'
As the film drags towards its inevitable finish, Ben, who is originally shown to be a bit of a handy-man, becomes plainly useless, and Jules is revealed to be some kind of dragon slayer - where a bite from a monster badly wounds Ben, Jules shakes it off like Xena Warrior Princess and keeps going - unlikely (especially when you consider how other characters are torn limb from limb - on that note, kudos to the gore department). Too much of the finale is filmed in cramped quarters, like the filmmakers are deliberately trying to stop you from seeing the sound-stage, and between this and Jules' invulnerability, the film's tension is dialed down to minus eleven. I kept expecting the film to do more - maybe guide me into a false sense of security before pulling the rug out from under me - but that was giving the film way too much credit. The Tank is content being a D-grade, cliche, creature feature, and though that might have been fine fifty years ago, we have older monster movies that have aged so much better than this one ever will.
My Mind Went Numb
Tweetienator28 April 2023
If you survive the first 40 minutes or so (of introduction) without falling into Morpheus's gentle and comforting arms, you get a pretty standard "horror" flick with some monsters, lots of stupid decisions, in the end I rooted for the beasts. The Tank tries to be something like The Descent but can't compete on any level - production, story, thrill, acting, everything is inferior to The Descent. The premise of The Tank is not that bad, maybe even interesting, but the execution is, well, just boring. Recommendation: if you want to really waste some time (like I did), maybe with the notion that you are immortal and you have a lot of time to waste, put The Tank on your menu, if not, watch something else.
As Basic And Unimaginative As It Gets
sumtim3s00n25 April 2023
Warning: Spoilers
Family, go place, monsters. Not one interesting character, numerous ridiculous decisions or scenarious that make NO sense. Monster creature's costume makes it difficult to move for the actor inside it so the ENTIRE film they either move slow or stand still and make growly growly hiss hiss sounds trying to appear frightening.
Which lasts for about 2 seconds and then you begin to notice pretty obviously those are an actor's arms and legs sticking out due to the typical elbow bend and knee bend when a person is on all fours trying to crouch / crawl forward.
All in all zero depth or development to everything, the story, characters or creatures combined with unimaginative, dull and silly story.
Its just unfortunate and frustrating that a bunch of people get a chance to create a film, to have means to create something good, a proper entertaining flick. I dont know where the process broke but its insulting to the actors and anyone involved who wanted to make something good and watchable,potentially something that would stand out.
Which lasts for about 2 seconds and then you begin to notice pretty obviously those are an actor's arms and legs sticking out due to the typical elbow bend and knee bend when a person is on all fours trying to crouch / crawl forward.
All in all zero depth or development to everything, the story, characters or creatures combined with unimaginative, dull and silly story.
Its just unfortunate and frustrating that a bunch of people get a chance to create a film, to have means to create something good, a proper entertaining flick. I dont know where the process broke but its insulting to the actors and anyone involved who wanted to make something good and watchable,potentially something that would stand out.
It's about a tank...you'll see a lot of it
ms_owl9 May 2023
The news teased the viewers with an upcoming old school practical fx creature feature. Well, technically it is, but what we, monster movie fans, love about the genre is when you actually see the creature a lot. The Tank is terribly slow paced and only after one hour of dull conversations and flashbacks some limited action starts.
The monster: awfully generic and it's given a bit more screen time than in the trailers.
The writing: the plot is driven by dumb, absolutely illogical decisions of the characters.
True monster flicks fans will be disappointed.
If you're curious anyway, fast forward the first 60 min and don't expect much.
The monster: awfully generic and it's given a bit more screen time than in the trailers.
The writing: the plot is driven by dumb, absolutely illogical decisions of the characters.
True monster flicks fans will be disappointed.
If you're curious anyway, fast forward the first 60 min and don't expect much.
Incredibly standard
Tor-Steinar15 August 2023
Warning: Spoilers
There is a monster in the backyard. Daughter sees it. Parents tell her its just a nightmare. Brave, ignorant husband tells his wife se is hysterical and seeing things, but upon seeing it himself goes for brave version into the monster's lair. Lots of screaming and growling. Now everyone understands. Daughter is taken, mother goes for the rescue, finds daughter and tells daugter she HAS to trust mummy while mummy goes to find the monster.
Utterly boring script, 100 percent predictable. And in the end; mother and daughter are safe, but mother tells daughter «to stay here in the dark woods while I leave you here alone. I have to find your father. I love you darling.»
Utterly boring script, 100 percent predictable. And in the end; mother and daughter are safe, but mother tells daughter «to stay here in the dark woods while I leave you here alone. I have to find your father. I love you darling.»
The best part of this movie were the monsters, we love a good use of practical effects.
kmkevinn-6473324 October 2023
50/100 marks from me. Started off really well. Interesting concept and cinematography. But then just went the way of current Hollywood. The male character just incompetent and couldn't do anything, not even smart enough to ever bring a weapon or a knife with him to try and fight the creature. I did however enjoyed the score but wish my audio change editing was better.
That being said everything else was not great. Contrary to most of the other reviews I was actually kind of feeling the beginning, but the continuity in this film ruined the whole thing for me. Also I understand that people don't always make the best decisions in horror movies but god was this hard to watch during the climax.
The Tank had an interesting premise. The idea was semi-original. The setting was beautiful and creepy at the same time. Some decent tense moments. Overall, an ok scary movie to pass the time.
That being said everything else was not great. Contrary to most of the other reviews I was actually kind of feeling the beginning, but the continuity in this film ruined the whole thing for me. Also I understand that people don't always make the best decisions in horror movies but god was this hard to watch during the climax.
The Tank had an interesting premise. The idea was semi-original. The setting was beautiful and creepy at the same time. Some decent tense moments. Overall, an ok scary movie to pass the time.
Not that bad
mbnn30 April 2023
Warning: Spoilers
The first 40 minutes are pretty good, you get some backstory, pretty ok acting, good job of building the tension and great scenes.
The creatures are also not bad at all, sort of a Alien meets lizard kind of thing. The face of the creature looks a bit weird and the sound it makes is also pretty good, it's a shame they didnt include more in the face.
However for some reason the last 20 minutes of the movie feel like the characters are once again making stupid decisions and well... from there it spirals.
It's worth a watch if you like a bit of horror . I was hoping for a bit more like the descent but,... all in all not bad.
The creatures are also not bad at all, sort of a Alien meets lizard kind of thing. The face of the creature looks a bit weird and the sound it makes is also pretty good, it's a shame they didnt include more in the face.
However for some reason the last 20 minutes of the movie feel like the characters are once again making stupid decisions and well... from there it spirals.
It's worth a watch if you like a bit of horror . I was hoping for a bit more like the descent but,... all in all not bad.
What the fudge happened to Archie?
TheMightyGForce30 April 2023
Warning: Spoilers
Is his final appearance lying on the editing floor? Did he take the cop's car and will catch up with them later? Did he decide to stay and get some surfing in?
One minute he's there: and then we hear the mother shouting for him to get in the car: but we don't see him again.
I'm wondering whether he was killed, but it didn't go over well with audiences, so they cut the scene.
Anyway - that aside - the movie had potential, but for some exceptionally ridiculous decision making. Even for a horror movie.
For example, the dad's plan to 'draw' the creature back into the tank, right after he saw the cop being dragged off by the creature: when he climbed into the tank he immediately saw the cop's body floating around in the water, so the monster was obviously back in the tank ... so why continue with the plan?
So many other overly-frustrating situations, which usually make horror what it is .... just can't get over their disregard for Archie!
One minute he's there: and then we hear the mother shouting for him to get in the car: but we don't see him again.
I'm wondering whether he was killed, but it didn't go over well with audiences, so they cut the scene.
Anyway - that aside - the movie had potential, but for some exceptionally ridiculous decision making. Even for a horror movie.
For example, the dad's plan to 'draw' the creature back into the tank, right after he saw the cop being dragged off by the creature: when he climbed into the tank he immediately saw the cop's body floating around in the water, so the monster was obviously back in the tank ... so why continue with the plan?
So many other overly-frustrating situations, which usually make horror what it is .... just can't get over their disregard for Archie!
to be watched in the dark...only...
ops-5253528 April 2023
Well this was some fun out of good old fashion monster horror generics from the 1980's, made on a survivable budget and a limited cast. The sets and choice of locations in the arcadian coastal shores of oregon really attracts my mind, and the ur-forests may hide inhabitants still unknown to man...
its an intense thrill, well filmed and the use of light and shadow is merely perfect, cast delivers, and the exploration like story sits well in the cinema seat, the ULO gives you the vibe of the thing horror, and the musical score carries the fright very well.
So put on your horsegoogles and head on into the tank, a good rooster for the traditional beast horror. A recommend from the grumpy old man.
its an intense thrill, well filmed and the use of light and shadow is merely perfect, cast delivers, and the exploration like story sits well in the cinema seat, the ULO gives you the vibe of the thing horror, and the musical score carries the fright very well.
So put on your horsegoogles and head on into the tank, a good rooster for the traditional beast horror. A recommend from the grumpy old man.
A generally solid and enjoyable creature feature that has some issues
kannibalcorpsegrinder29 June 2023
After his mother's death, a man and his family head to the property they've just recently inherited and set about trying to repair it while they move in, but when they realize that a deadly creature is living on the property inside of a local water well must try to stop it before it escapes.
Overall, this was a pretty solid if troubling genre effort. Among the films' better elements here is the rather fun setup that allows this one to generate a fun overall feature. The familiar setup of the family coming into the property through an inheritance is all fine enough despite that overreliance on the trope, providing the key to get them out to the location while being unaware of the creatures' presence while there's a lot to like beforehand about them discovering the state of the house and surrounding property. With the discarded, decayed look and general unused state it's shown, there's a fine atmospheric touch featured here that goes along with the hints of the creatures' existence seen in brief glimpses or series of howls in the distance. This provides the launching point for a pretty decent slate of attack scenes with the released creature. As the slew of flashbacks starts to clue us to the real point of its history and connection to the house, there's a nice base-work laid for the later attacks which come off rather well. With the first encounters taking place in the surrounding woodlands before centering on the exploits within the tank where it's found to live, these all give off a rather creepy atmosphere with the darkness and isolated location bringing about some enjoyable encounters with the real estate agent, an unlucky police officer, and a later quest to try to stop it inside the tank. These are kept frantic and tense with the practical effects shining nicely enough to give the film some worthwhile points. There are some big issues here that do hold this one back. One of the main issues here is the rather staggered pacing that makes it a chore to get through the first half here. With so much of this part of the film focusing on the family arriving at the property, learning of the condition it's in, and trying to get the place suitable for them to stay, it takes an incredibly long time before the creature starts to attack even if we know it's there through several brief bits of it snarling or growling in the distance. This also leaves the film with little time to explain what they are or where they came from as the creatures' origins are a complete mystery with no hint as to what they are or what they're doing on the property so this aspect can be slightly frustrating. The other big factor here is the films' seeming reliance on stupidity to keep the characters in danger far longer than necessary. Rather than immediately warn others of the creatures' existence once the remains of a victim have been found, the whole incident is wiped away and forgotten about much like the other scene where a character is there to witness an attack but chooses not to do anything. The outcome of that sequence also features a police officer failing to report in or have back-up sent when that occurs is another clearly infuriating sequence with very little logic shown to take place. As well, there are also bits where investigating issues with the house caused by the creatures is done simply to put themselves at risk, and when combined with some unnecessarily dark scenes brings about its big drawbacks.
Rated R: Graphic Language, Graphic Violence, and children-in-jeopardy.
Overall, this was a pretty solid if troubling genre effort. Among the films' better elements here is the rather fun setup that allows this one to generate a fun overall feature. The familiar setup of the family coming into the property through an inheritance is all fine enough despite that overreliance on the trope, providing the key to get them out to the location while being unaware of the creatures' presence while there's a lot to like beforehand about them discovering the state of the house and surrounding property. With the discarded, decayed look and general unused state it's shown, there's a fine atmospheric touch featured here that goes along with the hints of the creatures' existence seen in brief glimpses or series of howls in the distance. This provides the launching point for a pretty decent slate of attack scenes with the released creature. As the slew of flashbacks starts to clue us to the real point of its history and connection to the house, there's a nice base-work laid for the later attacks which come off rather well. With the first encounters taking place in the surrounding woodlands before centering on the exploits within the tank where it's found to live, these all give off a rather creepy atmosphere with the darkness and isolated location bringing about some enjoyable encounters with the real estate agent, an unlucky police officer, and a later quest to try to stop it inside the tank. These are kept frantic and tense with the practical effects shining nicely enough to give the film some worthwhile points. There are some big issues here that do hold this one back. One of the main issues here is the rather staggered pacing that makes it a chore to get through the first half here. With so much of this part of the film focusing on the family arriving at the property, learning of the condition it's in, and trying to get the place suitable for them to stay, it takes an incredibly long time before the creature starts to attack even if we know it's there through several brief bits of it snarling or growling in the distance. This also leaves the film with little time to explain what they are or where they came from as the creatures' origins are a complete mystery with no hint as to what they are or what they're doing on the property so this aspect can be slightly frustrating. The other big factor here is the films' seeming reliance on stupidity to keep the characters in danger far longer than necessary. Rather than immediately warn others of the creatures' existence once the remains of a victim have been found, the whole incident is wiped away and forgotten about much like the other scene where a character is there to witness an attack but chooses not to do anything. The outcome of that sequence also features a police officer failing to report in or have back-up sent when that occurs is another clearly infuriating sequence with very little logic shown to take place. As well, there are also bits where investigating issues with the house caused by the creatures is done simply to put themselves at risk, and when combined with some unnecessarily dark scenes brings about its big drawbacks.
Rated R: Graphic Language, Graphic Violence, and children-in-jeopardy.
A Completely Avoidable Situation.
meddlecore27 June 2023
It's not that The Tank is a completely horrible film.
The acting is rather decent.
The monster is kind of cool (at least it's not horribly rendered with CGI).
And it has a dark and foreboding atmosphere.
The basic premise here, is that a giant storm, in the distant past, washed a bunch of axolotls (or other such amphibious creatures) from the ocean, into the septic tank of a house in a remote community...causing them to mutate into carnivorous human-eating salamanders (or, possibly, reptiles)...as a result of their exposure to human excrement.
At least that is what is implied...I think.
However, it's rather hard to get around the ridiculous logic on which the story is based.
First and foremost, the way the father finds and enters the tank- which supposedly awakens/releases the beast- is absurd.
Literally noone goes to a new place...sees an overgrown grate...and is overcome with the curiosity to lift and enter it.
It's just not plausible, or believable.
And comes off completely forced.
Not to mention, axolotls don't even live in the ocean...and if they did get washed into a septic tank (by some freak course of nature)...that doesn't really meet the criteria of them becoming "land based" creatures.
On top of that...not only is the whole first half of the film incredibly basic...it's also rather boring.
With the introduction of characters (outside of the family) coming off as equally forced as the father entering the septic tank in the first place.
Plus, the way the monster first appears, also doesn't make any sense- as it seems to be some sort of supernatural force, as opposed to an actual flesh and blood creature.
I guess, if you can suspend disbelief- and ignore all the logical inconsistencies around which the story is based- you can garner some enjoyment from watching the film...despite it's mediocrity.
You just have to accept that it is all some sort of divine cosmic intervention, to bring karmic justice upon a family that dabbles in the trafficking of endangered species (for the purpose of the pet trade).
At least they put a little imagination into it...by taking some of the world's cutest creatures...and transforming them into terrifying monstrous beasts, hellbent on the destruction of humanity.
So...there's that, at least.
But I can't help but think that this was a completely avoidable situation.
3.5 out of 10.
The acting is rather decent.
The monster is kind of cool (at least it's not horribly rendered with CGI).
And it has a dark and foreboding atmosphere.
The basic premise here, is that a giant storm, in the distant past, washed a bunch of axolotls (or other such amphibious creatures) from the ocean, into the septic tank of a house in a remote community...causing them to mutate into carnivorous human-eating salamanders (or, possibly, reptiles)...as a result of their exposure to human excrement.
At least that is what is implied...I think.
However, it's rather hard to get around the ridiculous logic on which the story is based.
First and foremost, the way the father finds and enters the tank- which supposedly awakens/releases the beast- is absurd.
Literally noone goes to a new place...sees an overgrown grate...and is overcome with the curiosity to lift and enter it.
It's just not plausible, or believable.
And comes off completely forced.
Not to mention, axolotls don't even live in the ocean...and if they did get washed into a septic tank (by some freak course of nature)...that doesn't really meet the criteria of them becoming "land based" creatures.
On top of that...not only is the whole first half of the film incredibly basic...it's also rather boring.
With the introduction of characters (outside of the family) coming off as equally forced as the father entering the septic tank in the first place.
Plus, the way the monster first appears, also doesn't make any sense- as it seems to be some sort of supernatural force, as opposed to an actual flesh and blood creature.
I guess, if you can suspend disbelief- and ignore all the logical inconsistencies around which the story is based- you can garner some enjoyment from watching the film...despite it's mediocrity.
You just have to accept that it is all some sort of divine cosmic intervention, to bring karmic justice upon a family that dabbles in the trafficking of endangered species (for the purpose of the pet trade).
At least they put a little imagination into it...by taking some of the world's cutest creatures...and transforming them into terrifying monstrous beasts, hellbent on the destruction of humanity.
So...there's that, at least.
But I can't help but think that this was a completely avoidable situation.
3.5 out of 10.
The creatures looked like from 80s
Neptune1651 May 2023
Warning: Spoilers
So there is a monster in the tank. They know its there, yet they keep going in the tank. Smart, how in the world could they leave all those animals without paying somebody to run the store to "take a long trip" up the coast to this place with them bouncing checks. Terribly boring and unremarkable. A movie where you don't see the monster for the first half and eventually become unimaginative with its monsters in the second half. Focusing too much on the story of the family and the horrid silver-blue flashback of the dad's mother wastes the potential of this creature feast. A lot of roaring, flashbacks, running around, people falling asleep, the dad going up and down in the underground water tank like he's trying to set a world record or something and barely 15 minutes of monsters doing ABSOLUTELY nothing is literally what you'll get from the movie The Tank.
Jules, you spoke Latin.
nogodnomasters16 May 2023
Warning: Spoilers
We have a quick 1946 opening of the film where a guy goes into a water tank and has trouble getting out. Fast forward to 1978 pet store run by Ben (Matt Whelan) and Jules (Luciane Buchanan) Adams in Oakland. Here we get some basic background information on amphibians. The house with the water tank is inherited by Ben who did not know anything about it. The family which includes a daughter (Zara Nausbaum) drives up to Oregon to check out the property which is very remote. A realtor fills in the clever backstory of the land making the case for a creature being on the property. The creature slowly makes its way into the story, always going after visitors first before the family must fight for their lives.
The California family drove up to Oregon from California in their car that already had Oregon plates. Did we miss a scene? Special effects not too bad. The story did drag on.
Guide: F-word. No sex or nudity.
The California family drove up to Oregon from California in their car that already had Oregon plates. Did we miss a scene? Special effects not too bad. The story did drag on.
Guide: F-word. No sex or nudity.
If you're going to be unoriginal at least put a unique spin on it
jtindahouse15 May 2023
How are movies like this still being made? Movies that offer absolutely nothing new or creative in any way. I get that there are only a finite amount of ideas for a story out there, but even if you're doing something that has been done before you can at least put your own spin on it. 'The Tank' is as bad as films get.
I don't want to be too harsh on this film, so I'll just list a few of the things I didn't like without going into too much detail. I thought the creatures weren't very impressive visually and they conveniently only attacked when it was necessary to the story. Otherwise they would just sit there making gargling sounds. Also the film puts a child right in the middle of the story who is extremely annoying and also guarantees the safety of certain characters. There is nothing that kills the tension in a horror movie more than kids.
The dialogue is bland and completely lacking in creativity, the movie doesn't know how to build tension in a scene, the setting isn't scary and the acting is poor. I did not like this film. A generous 2.5/10.
I don't want to be too harsh on this film, so I'll just list a few of the things I didn't like without going into too much detail. I thought the creatures weren't very impressive visually and they conveniently only attacked when it was necessary to the story. Otherwise they would just sit there making gargling sounds. Also the film puts a child right in the middle of the story who is extremely annoying and also guarantees the safety of certain characters. There is nothing that kills the tension in a horror movie more than kids.
The dialogue is bland and completely lacking in creativity, the movie doesn't know how to build tension in a scene, the setting isn't scary and the acting is poor. I did not like this film. A generous 2.5/10.
Where's the dog???
eliza700138 October 2023
Warning: Spoilers
It was an ok movie. It made me anxious for a lot of it, so that's fun for a scary movie. The creatures were interesting. But they moved kinda slow, so you could definitely avoid them. Also they could have just sealed up the door of the tank? Like put something heavy on top.
But whatever I didn't really care about the human characters, I cared about their poor dog who was missing for a few scenes and nobody was concerned? Then he showed back up and again nobody cared. Then at the end he gets out of the car with a creature and he is never shown again. Where is he? Why didn't they care? How can they be pet shop owners and have no regard for their own pet? Did he die? 0/10 rating for the fate of poor Archie who deserved better owners.
But whatever I didn't really care about the human characters, I cared about their poor dog who was missing for a few scenes and nobody was concerned? Then he showed back up and again nobody cared. Then at the end he gets out of the car with a creature and he is never shown again. Where is he? Why didn't they care? How can they be pet shop owners and have no regard for their own pet? Did he die? 0/10 rating for the fate of poor Archie who deserved better owners.
Unwatchable, let me count the ways.
zack_gideon28 April 2023
This movie hits everything that makes a movie unwatchable. Let me count the ways:
1. Bad writing. Uses explanatory foreshadowing so we all know what's going to happen. And dialogue that seems like it's not real, and puts the actors into an unwinnable situation.
2. Bad flashbacks. That add little to no value to the plot and just waste time.
3. Muddling and pointless first 45 minutes. Good luck making it past the utterly pointless first 45.
4. No one to root for. I don't care about anyone in this movie. Literally, don't care.
5. Basic simple plot. You've seen this same plot 100 times, so what's the point.
Don't bother watching this movie. It's literally pointless. I'll give it 1 star for some good lighting.
1. Bad writing. Uses explanatory foreshadowing so we all know what's going to happen. And dialogue that seems like it's not real, and puts the actors into an unwinnable situation.
2. Bad flashbacks. That add little to no value to the plot and just waste time.
3. Muddling and pointless first 45 minutes. Good luck making it past the utterly pointless first 45.
4. No one to root for. I don't care about anyone in this movie. Literally, don't care.
5. Basic simple plot. You've seen this same plot 100 times, so what's the point.
Don't bother watching this movie. It's literally pointless. I'll give it 1 star for some good lighting.
Creature feature done right...
paul_haakonsen28 April 2023
Well, color me impressed.
I had the opportunity to sit down and watch the 2023 horror movie from writer and director Scott Walker, and of course I did so, given my interest in the horror genre. I hadn't heard anything about "The Tank" prior to watching it, so all I knew was that it was a horror movie of sorts.
The storyline in "The Tank" is pretty straight forward, not to mention riveting and entertaining. Writer and director Scott Walker managed to put together a rather enjoyable script for the movie, and it is something that looks and feels like a good, old fashioned creature feature. And it was that accomplishment that really worked for me. Plus the fact that writer and director Scott Walker also managed to grandually build up the suspense and dread throughout the course of the movie, slowly but surely piling up the layers.
The acting performances in the movie were good. It was a relatively small cast ensemble, and thus more pressure were on the cast to carry the movie, and they did that with grace. I was especially impressed with the performance of leading actor Matt Whelan (playing Ben), because his performance in the movie was really good and realistic.
Visually then I have to say that I was rather impressed with the effects in "The Tank". The creature designs were really interesting and looked good and realistic. The sounds, however, felt sort of out of place for such amphibious creatures. But hey, I get it, it makes the creatures seem all the more frightening and menacing.
If you enjoy a good old fashioned creature feature, then give "The Tank" a go. I was genuinely entertained by the storyline and surprisingly impressed by the overall outcome of the movie.
My rating of "The Tank" lands on a seven out of ten stars.
I had the opportunity to sit down and watch the 2023 horror movie from writer and director Scott Walker, and of course I did so, given my interest in the horror genre. I hadn't heard anything about "The Tank" prior to watching it, so all I knew was that it was a horror movie of sorts.
The storyline in "The Tank" is pretty straight forward, not to mention riveting and entertaining. Writer and director Scott Walker managed to put together a rather enjoyable script for the movie, and it is something that looks and feels like a good, old fashioned creature feature. And it was that accomplishment that really worked for me. Plus the fact that writer and director Scott Walker also managed to grandually build up the suspense and dread throughout the course of the movie, slowly but surely piling up the layers.
The acting performances in the movie were good. It was a relatively small cast ensemble, and thus more pressure were on the cast to carry the movie, and they did that with grace. I was especially impressed with the performance of leading actor Matt Whelan (playing Ben), because his performance in the movie was really good and realistic.
Visually then I have to say that I was rather impressed with the effects in "The Tank". The creature designs were really interesting and looked good and realistic. The sounds, however, felt sort of out of place for such amphibious creatures. But hey, I get it, it makes the creatures seem all the more frightening and menacing.
If you enjoy a good old fashioned creature feature, then give "The Tank" a go. I was genuinely entertained by the storyline and surprisingly impressed by the overall outcome of the movie.
My rating of "The Tank" lands on a seven out of ten stars.
Average creature feature with excellent special effects but a dull script.
Vivekmaru4511 August 2023
All of my life I've seen horror films. Along with science fiction and fantasy, these are my staple. I've seen more than three decades of movies and TV shows.
This film's premise is about a creature that has adapted to stalking its prey in absolute darkness. The creature has spawned and is expanding its territory. Ironically the creature's next prey are human beings, themselves invaders of the animal kingdom. This seems almost like a documentary, the way I've explained the creature and its habits.
The movie is about a family of three moving into the owner's parents house that was left abandoned for many years following an accident.
Soon they discover they are not alone, and something sinister is stalking them that lives under their house.
Verdict: average acting, above average real special effects not CGI, good sound-effects and photography. But the script and direction is questionable. Don't expect a solid climax to a film like this with a bad script. The movie's ending leads me to believe possibly a sequel is on the way, not that I'd be intrigued enough to see it.
More classic creature movies: The Silver Bullet(1985), The Monster Squad(1987), Killer Klowns From Outer Space(1988) and Tremors(1990).
Thank you for reading this review and as Mister Spock always says: live long and prosper.
This film's premise is about a creature that has adapted to stalking its prey in absolute darkness. The creature has spawned and is expanding its territory. Ironically the creature's next prey are human beings, themselves invaders of the animal kingdom. This seems almost like a documentary, the way I've explained the creature and its habits.
The movie is about a family of three moving into the owner's parents house that was left abandoned for many years following an accident.
Soon they discover they are not alone, and something sinister is stalking them that lives under their house.
Verdict: average acting, above average real special effects not CGI, good sound-effects and photography. But the script and direction is questionable. Don't expect a solid climax to a film like this with a bad script. The movie's ending leads me to believe possibly a sequel is on the way, not that I'd be intrigued enough to see it.
More classic creature movies: The Silver Bullet(1985), The Monster Squad(1987), Killer Klowns From Outer Space(1988) and Tremors(1990).
Thank you for reading this review and as Mister Spock always says: live long and prosper.
Great movie
prolazniknamernik29 April 2023
Great movie.
The script is very good and the actors generally did a great job.
I like the conceptual creation of the animals and that they are presented as an undiscovered species.
The drama of the family with the past and the new threat is quite well integrated.
Exaggeration only exists during the conflict between the main actors and the creatures, because everyone got away with it quite easily, while the secondary characters did not.
However, I certainly applaud the fact that the family made it out alive in the end.
I recommend The Tank for viewing as a refreshing novelty in the horror genre and raising the quality of horror films.
The script is very good and the actors generally did a great job.
I like the conceptual creation of the animals and that they are presented as an undiscovered species.
The drama of the family with the past and the new threat is quite well integrated.
Exaggeration only exists during the conflict between the main actors and the creatures, because everyone got away with it quite easily, while the secondary characters did not.
However, I certainly applaud the fact that the family made it out alive in the end.
I recommend The Tank for viewing as a refreshing novelty in the horror genre and raising the quality of horror films.
Fun creature feature
payupyou24 June 2023
Found this film to be a fun creature feature reminiscent of films I grew up watching.
The actors did a good job portraying what I recollect as a typical family in the 70s. Their development seemed well thought out although there wasn't a tremendous amount of time developing them, we still learn enough about them in the first part of the film to gain some interest in their journey.
The settings I found to be quite nice - without a spoiler, each set had unique and believable qualities and that helped keep my interest. The sound effects were pleasant and seemed true to life.
A child of the 60s and big fan of all the horror genre and subgenre, I enjoyed this film as it brought back memories of films I grew up watching, and it restored a little hope that new "monster movies" haven't left the screen for good!
The actors did a good job portraying what I recollect as a typical family in the 70s. Their development seemed well thought out although there wasn't a tremendous amount of time developing them, we still learn enough about them in the first part of the film to gain some interest in their journey.
The settings I found to be quite nice - without a spoiler, each set had unique and believable qualities and that helped keep my interest. The sound effects were pleasant and seemed true to life.
A child of the 60s and big fan of all the horror genre and subgenre, I enjoyed this film as it brought back memories of films I grew up watching, and it restored a little hope that new "monster movies" haven't left the screen for good!
The Stinky Tank
109YearsOld28 April 2023
What kind of dad would go into a stinky tank deserted for decades, and repeatedly go in there to inspect with the stinky water level up to his chest?
What kind of cop sits still like a senile old man while watching the creature slowly crawl towards him? Well, this is probably the reason why the dad runs away after watching the cop dragged away by the creature, because the cop (a black dude again, why?) deserves it? Yeah, I know, it is in the 70s but hey, BLM, no? Moreover, the dad is not interested to grab a shotgun from the law enforcement vehicle before running away - Hello?? Anyway, later he tells his wife the cop is just dead. Cool story, bro.
What kind of mom would go into this stinky water tank to fight the creatures for no good reason? Need I say more?
You just don't care for the boneheaded couple, scratching your head why the creatures wouldn't finish them off in the most wicked ways, this is the only way to boost the movie rating as far as I'm concerned. But wait, someone here says the creature suit is too tight, good point. One Star Max Rating. Be warned.
What kind of cop sits still like a senile old man while watching the creature slowly crawl towards him? Well, this is probably the reason why the dad runs away after watching the cop dragged away by the creature, because the cop (a black dude again, why?) deserves it? Yeah, I know, it is in the 70s but hey, BLM, no? Moreover, the dad is not interested to grab a shotgun from the law enforcement vehicle before running away - Hello?? Anyway, later he tells his wife the cop is just dead. Cool story, bro.
What kind of mom would go into this stinky water tank to fight the creatures for no good reason? Need I say more?
You just don't care for the boneheaded couple, scratching your head why the creatures wouldn't finish them off in the most wicked ways, this is the only way to boost the movie rating as far as I'm concerned. But wait, someone here says the creature suit is too tight, good point. One Star Max Rating. Be warned.
Starts strong but basically implodes in the final act
psychofox-885114 June 2023
Warning: Spoilers
For the most part, I really enjoyed The Tank. The brooding build-up, the sense that something is wrong, we're really well done.
Aside from a few forgivable and forgettable missteps in the first two-thirds of the film, this was a thoroughly enjoyable caper. The acting, though not Oscar-worthy, was strong, the direction and cinematography was tight, and events bubbled along at a satisfyingly mysterious and suspenseful way.
As I said, there were a few missteps. The nature of the creature and the methods the characters will use to defeat it are both over-obviously signposted very early on, but these are minor criticisms.
When the creature is finally revealed, I was pleased to see that is was, as far as I could tell, CGI-free. Yes, it seems to be a person in a costume, but it's a convincing costume! Far preferable to lacklustre CGI.
However, shortly after this, the film enters it's final act, and everything goes out of the window. The characters begin making really stupid, illogical decisions that clearly won't end well and, while I get that these are people facing something unimaginable, their choices just don't add up.
We're being hunted by bloodthirsty monsters and I hear something banging at the door? I'll open it to see what it is.
I'm setting a make shift bomb out of highly unstable chemicals and my flashlight has gone out? I'll just use a lighter (despite the fact that there's clearly enough light to see by anyway and - what's this? My torch starts working again as soon as I've finished!) The dialogue also takes a sharp downturn towards the end, peppered with clichéd phrases and unbelievable melodramatic sentiments.
In the final scenes, all reason is lost. That creature on the car roof is suddenly, somehow inside, despite all of the doors and windows being closed and unbroken. I'm not kidding, the scene seamlessly goes from the monster looking through an unbroken windscreen to apparently crawling through a frame with no glass.
It really feels like the first two thirds of the film were made by a director and team with passion, but they just handed everything over to someone else to finish towards the end.
It's a shame because, as I said to start with, this movie really started strongly and only lost its way in the final portion. I've rated it a five because there are the makings of a decent film here and I refuse to base my whole review on the final act.
Such a missed opportunity. I think the filmmakers have talent and I hope they continue, I just hope they can see the flaws in this film and improve on them in future.
Aside from a few forgivable and forgettable missteps in the first two-thirds of the film, this was a thoroughly enjoyable caper. The acting, though not Oscar-worthy, was strong, the direction and cinematography was tight, and events bubbled along at a satisfyingly mysterious and suspenseful way.
As I said, there were a few missteps. The nature of the creature and the methods the characters will use to defeat it are both over-obviously signposted very early on, but these are minor criticisms.
When the creature is finally revealed, I was pleased to see that is was, as far as I could tell, CGI-free. Yes, it seems to be a person in a costume, but it's a convincing costume! Far preferable to lacklustre CGI.
However, shortly after this, the film enters it's final act, and everything goes out of the window. The characters begin making really stupid, illogical decisions that clearly won't end well and, while I get that these are people facing something unimaginable, their choices just don't add up.
We're being hunted by bloodthirsty monsters and I hear something banging at the door? I'll open it to see what it is.
I'm setting a make shift bomb out of highly unstable chemicals and my flashlight has gone out? I'll just use a lighter (despite the fact that there's clearly enough light to see by anyway and - what's this? My torch starts working again as soon as I've finished!) The dialogue also takes a sharp downturn towards the end, peppered with clichéd phrases and unbelievable melodramatic sentiments.
In the final scenes, all reason is lost. That creature on the car roof is suddenly, somehow inside, despite all of the doors and windows being closed and unbroken. I'm not kidding, the scene seamlessly goes from the monster looking through an unbroken windscreen to apparently crawling through a frame with no glass.
It really feels like the first two thirds of the film were made by a director and team with passion, but they just handed everything over to someone else to finish towards the end.
It's a shame because, as I said to start with, this movie really started strongly and only lost its way in the final portion. I've rated it a five because there are the makings of a decent film here and I refuse to base my whole review on the final act.
Such a missed opportunity. I think the filmmakers have talent and I hope they continue, I just hope they can see the flaws in this film and improve on them in future.
Maybe it is just me. But i found it enjoyable
kingnectuluh12 May 2023
I went into the movie without any knowledge of what it could be. So without any expectations i started it.
It had a pretty slow start. But still interesting to see it evolve. I always love to see unknown monsters and mysterious sounds in movies. Good scaring moments throughout the movie. So i have to say it was surely good to watch if you have a vivid imagination.
Overall it is not one of the best horror movies i have ever seen. But if you have nothing to do, this is a great one to see with some friends and some snacks and drinks. Or maybe a new friend that you met and want to have a chill evening.
It had a pretty slow start. But still interesting to see it evolve. I always love to see unknown monsters and mysterious sounds in movies. Good scaring moments throughout the movie. So i have to say it was surely good to watch if you have a vivid imagination.
Overall it is not one of the best horror movies i have ever seen. But if you have nothing to do, this is a great one to see with some friends and some snacks and drinks. Or maybe a new friend that you met and want to have a chill evening.
See also
Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews
