Bucky Larson: Born to Be a Star (2011) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
70 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
2/10
I blame the writers.
planktonrules17 March 2019
Currently, "Bucky Larson: Born to Be a Star" is number 59 on IMDB's infamous Bottom 100 List---the 100 lowest ranked major releases of all time. While I wouldn't consider this one of the worst in my opinion, I can see exactly why the film was hated by so many. The writing simply is awful....with not even a single laugh in the movie even though it's supposed to be a comedy. Instead of humor, the film resorts to crudeness. Crude CAN be funny....such as the cute film "Stepbrothers". But crude with no humor whatsoever is simply annoying and boorish....and this film has that in spades.

Bucky (Nick Swardson) is a guy from Iowa who is intensely stupid as well as possessing teeth like Bugs Bunny.....a joke that wears thin very quickly. After discovering that his parents used to be porn stars, instead of being repulsed or embarrassed, he thinks it's cool. So, his folks encourage him to trek to California to be a part of the porn industry. Hillarity SHOULD ensue...but it doesn't.

Unfunny, very crude and ample evidence that Adam Sandler (yes, THAT Adam Sandler) should not write films. Overall, an unfunny and disgusting film that held no interest at all to me as I tried to watch. I could mention all the various offensive things featured in the film...but I am pretty sure IMDB would not allow me to mention them.
5 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Bucky Larson: Born to Suck!
sethmlanders17 February 2016
I'm a huge fan of Adam Sandler's films and for the most part, I like Nick Swardson. However, this was very bad. I don't have anything against movies with sexual content or gross out stuff, it just has to be funny. After watching this, I know that Nick Swardson was NOT born to be a lead.

He gives us a semi creepy performance and all the jokes fall apart fast. For example, he says "Miles is getting an eight ball, I don't wanna play pool" or something like that. Just stuff that makes you cringe. The whole movie lacks an actual story, it's just a bunch of bad penis jokes and "point and laugh at the freak" jokes as well. A lot of great actors wasted (Christina Ricci, Mike O'Connell, Don Johnson) and the humor doesn't work here. It tries too hard to mix sentimental and mean-spirited stuff, which both fail. When Bucky gets a roommate, the dude (Kevin Nealon) is such a jerk that you wish he hung himself and left the poor guy alone.

The entire film is predictable and Stephen Dorff looks like Bret Michaels, which isn't a good thing. I smiled several times but didn't laugh at all. I don't understand why they couldn't put more effort into it. Making Bucky into a wimp who can't even perform correctly in these adult movies just shows you the thought that went into making it. Skip this one, you'll be glad you did!
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
WOW...not much to say really. Kevin Nealon was great...and some nudity...um...yeah...just WOW. Not good at all. I say D+
cosmo_tiger4 January 2012
"I'm the son of two movie stars...that's like a super-duper movie star." Bucky Larson (Swardson) is working as a bagger at a grocery store when he gets into a fight with his manager. Depressed, he goes to his friends house to watch a "nude" movie. When he sees his parents on the screen he finds his destiny. Going in I saw the reviews for this (2.2 out of 10 on IMDb, 33 out of 100 on Rotten Tomatoes) and I am usually skeptical of bad reviews. Like most good ones they tend to exaggerate how good or bad a movie is. This is did not. This is awful. A few funny parts mixed in with the same joke over and over and over. The best part of this movie hands down is Kevin Nealon but he is not in it enough. I will say that I have seen worse, but this is a movie that people will watch out of curiosity and may regret it. Overall, not the worst comedy I have seen, but without Nealon it may have been. I give it a D+.
3 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
How did this piece of mammoth excrement ever get made?
stratusk125 September 2011
See that $20 bill in your wallet? Wipe your ass with it instead of paying to see this movie. You will receive more amusement watching a feces-stained Jackson swirl around the bowl than watching this gross-out piece of water buffalo diarrhea.

Not even an immature 13 year old will find this film amusing. It uses the same three jokes the entire movie: Bucky has buck teeth, he shoots semen at the mere sight of a naked girl, and he has a tiny penis covered with a bush of hair. Boom, that's it. That's the movie.

Game over man, game over.

If I could give this film zero stars, I would. Not even Stephen Dorff can save this penguin excrement.
107 out of 148 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
This should have NEVER been born.
twilliams7619 January 2012
There is very little to say about Bucky Larson: Born to Be a Star other than "I hated it ... I hated ALL of it!" The film is not funny and it is repellent.

I cannot criticize it for being about porn because Boogie Nights was exclusively about the world of porn and I think it was one of the BEST film of the 1990's. Boogie Nights treated its characters as flawed human beings searching for acceptance and a feeling of belonging -- Bucky Larson's characters are all supposed to be laughed at and there are just too many times throughout the movie which had me wanting to rush to the bathroom to vomit as 89% of the film is stomach-churning.

This should pretty-much END the career of anybody involved and I am actually surprised that Adam Sandler's name is attached as both a writer and a producer of this trash (Sandler also gave us Jack and Jill and Just Go With It this year -- the latter film is only saved b/c of the over-the-top performance of the unlikely physical comedienne Nicole Kidman -- so I question whether or not his days are numbered?).

An unfunny-to-me Nick Swardson (Just Go With It, 30 Minutes or Less, Blades of Glory) -- who's career is mostly stand-up comedy -- stars as the grotesquely buck-toothed Bucky Larson (who must've been born with buck-teeth?) who believes he is destined for a glorious career in porn after discovering his parents were au natural (meaning: unshaven, un-waxed, un-spray-tanned, un-fit etc) porn stars of the 1970's. Bucky leaves behind an insulting-to-mid-westerners existence in Iowa (only found in the movies -- he didn't attend high school because his town didn't have one ... whatever), the RIDICULOUSLY-accented Bucky (that is NOT an Iowa accent ... but let's throw-out another stupid laugh at the expense of the heartland) heads to LA where his dreams can come true.

Bucky luckily meets a nice, big-hearted waitress (Christina Ricci - Sleepy Hollow, Penelope, Monster ... and after this is it any wonder she seeked out employment on television as Pan-Am is Oscar-caliber compared to this!) at a random diner who befriends him, finds him a place to live (with crazy-jerk roommate Kevin Nealon - "SNL", "Weeds", Just Go With It) and sets him in the right direction of finding work. Don Johnson (Tin Cup, Machete ... who's short-lived career rebirth must be over) is porn director Miles Deep who sees something "special" in Bucky and decides to exploit the freak (it's explained in the film ... but I don't recommend watching this to figure out the "freak-tag" that has NOTHING to do with his teeth!) and Stephen Dorff (who's stellar "comeback" with the excellent film Somewhere must have been a fluke!!) plays a jealous porn-star rival.

As vulgar and repulsive as this film is, there is surprisingly little flesh on display. It would be difficult to pick-out the worst part of this film as that would pretty-much be the whole thing. Just as impossible would be finding "the best" part. This film isn't bad because it is offensive -- we've had Bridesmaids and two Hangover films -- it is just terrible bad. What works with those 3 films is that they are "equal-opportunity offenders" ... this one -- NOT so much. It is rank and rancid and beyond mere words for criticism. I NEVER want to see something like this again.
35 out of 53 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Worst Movie Ever
J_M_Kiff14 September 2011
Awful. Dreadful. Total waste of time and film. Do not see this movie. I work in a movie theater so I get to (have to) watch EVERY movie that comes out, and this is without a doubt the absolute worst movie I have seen in a long long long time. I could not find even one redeeming quality in this movie. This film should be the death-knell of not only Nick Swardson's entire career, but Adam Sandler's "Happy Madison" production company should be banned from making any more movies until Sandler publicly apologizes for this horrible horrible waste of film. The dialogue sounds like it was written by three horny middle-school boys, the acting was strained and half-hearted, the plot was spoon-fed predictable. Some movies are "so bad they're good." This isn't one of those movies. This movie is just bad. Worse. Worst.
61 out of 115 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
One of the worst films I've ever seen.
yarden8351 October 2012
When I first went to see this movie I had rather low expectations, I thought this would be something fun to pass the time with, nothing fancy.

I have seen some bad movies in my life but I can safely say that this is one of the worst movies (if not the single worst one) I've ever seen. The jokes were really stale, and they somehow managed to move things really fast but in a long and boring way.

This was one and a half hour of pure torture and I do not recommend it, not one bit. I rarely make a review for a movie and even more rarely do I give only one star, but this film deserved it. Just don't waste your time on it.
22 out of 40 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
THIS Movie made me cry
emmanuelking198 January 2012
This movie was digusting and unfunny for most of the part. This movie is about a red neck,bucked tooth,goofy kid name Bucky who dreamed of being a pornstar in California after realizing his parents were famous pornstar during the 1970's.He soon became famous for his really small microscopic penis.

The worst part was that this movie had a lack of storyline.It had no climax.It wasn't exciting. It was goofy and it made my grandma cry also.She had only 2 hours left to live and she watch this movie leaving her only 25 minutes left of enjoying her life.

lease save your money for a better movie than this.
37 out of 74 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
goofy people are funny...
MLDinTN16 June 2012
that is what I got out of this film. Bucky Larson is about the goofiest character one could come up with. I also think some of these reviews are too negative. Sure, it wasn't great, but it also wasn't the worst film of the year. There's just something funny about watching messed up people in movies.

Bucky Larson has 2 bucked teeth, making him look like a rabbit. He also has a 70s hairstyle and bad accent. He gets the idea to be a porn star after finding out his parents made porno movies. So, he movies to LA, meets a cute waitress, and makes his dreams come true. The faces he makes while making his dreams come true are funny. It's so silly, you have to laugh.

FINAL VERDICT: A decent adult, crude comedy.
13 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Truly a hidden gem
zetok-746139 March 2022
Critics are absolutely insane. This movie starts off funny and the laughs never stop. It's literally in the same category as Billy Madison. I don't understand where the hate comes from. You're not going to get some highbrow script, but they deliver nonstop entertainment for the sake of being a silly movie. Acting is on point.

Just like Your Highness, ai have no idea what people are disliking other than to hop on the hate train. Literally one of the few films I put high up on the list of Must Watch and I've seen a TON of movies. I've seen more films than the casual viewer. I'm what you would call a cinema buff. You just have to appreciate the movie for what it is and you either get it or out don't. This movie is awesome, people. Don't listen to the haters.
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Not As Bad As People Are Saying
Stu10275 January 2012
I really can't understand why there is so much animosity towards this movie and in particular, towards Adam Sandler. This film isn't art. It isn't subtle. It wraps it's humour around a brick and smashes you in the head with it repeatedly. But that's what I expected. I watched this film because I wanted a laugh. And I got that. There are some genuine laugh out loud moments in this movie IF it's your sense of humour. If it isn't, then why are you watching it? Sandler isn't exactly world renowned for his subtlety or his sensitive handling of subject matter. He has a team of friends around him who obviously get together over a few drinks and spin out some ideas that make them laugh. I like that about him. And I always get the impression that everybody making one of his movies has a real laugh doing it. And that's what I'm after when I'm watching one. Honestly, some people on here need to have a good look at themselves and wonder exactly why it is they are watching movies they know they aren't going to like. I for one hope he keeps churning them out because when I have a bit of time to kill, I can think of worse ways to do that than watching one of Adam Sandler's movies.
74 out of 119 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
tisk tisk Mr. Sandler
Ynotmod13 September 2011
Simply put not a good movie. Nick really put me back on this film, with bad writing and really bad acting this flick could not hold my attention. I believe this was a twenty minute short film that was drawn out. In some scenes it seemed as if they added pointless situations to pass time. Bucky's roommate wasn't funny and was a huge buzzkill. This movie had a lot of promotion which put my hopes higher than the result, a lot higher. If you cant tell already i didn't enjoy myself. Adam Sandler has made an excellent array of comedies in his career but lately it appears he has lost his touch. Maybe we'll truly know when his new film Jack & Jill premiers. Till then.
14 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
One of the worst comedies ever released!!!
ManBehindTheMask6318 January 2012
I like Nick Swardson. His show "Pretend time" on Comedy Central is hilarious and he's usually good in supporting roles ("Grandma's boy" & "Just go with it"). But wow, did this movie suck. "Bucky Larson" is flat. The jokes aren't funny and the acting for the most part is uninspired. Don Johnson was the highlight of the film and Christina Ricci did what she could but there are no redeeming qualities in this film.

I went in with low expectations because of the bad reviews and word of mouth, and yet I was still disappointed. This film deserves to be in the bottom 250 on IMDb. With the talent that was involved in the project and the premise of a porn comedy, "Bucky Larson" should have been funny. But instead I found myself wishing it was never made. I feel sorry for the chumps who paid $10 to see this garbage in theaters.
36 out of 51 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Bucky Larson was a bad movie that was funny
bahamutwing12 January 2012
This movie follows a simple formula with the premise of a love him or hate him actor cast as an unlikable hero. Perhaps you've noticed this formula in Borat, The Waterboy, or Joe Dirt. At it's heart the movie does a decent job portraying unbelievable characters in unbelievable situations. So much so that the movie has an absurd aura that ends up begging the audience to not take it seriously. With that aside I myself focused on the jokes and little things I did enjoy. I laughed several times (especially at Kevin Nealon) and found a few other things to be entertained by. At first glance the movie is garbage, however like the aforementioned titles, this movie is funny beyond that and will probably age well. Remember what people were saying when Joe Dirt first came out?
7 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Not to be taken as seriously, as others have done.
smirnofred15 January 2012
Reading all the bad reviews didn't really sway me from watching Bucky Larson... and in all honesty I'm glad I did watch it.

It may not have been the funniest film I've seen, but its certainly not the worst comedy I've seen either. To the people who thought it was 'so bad to rate a zero' (but still found the time to come and leave a review about it!), I'd say they must have lost their sense of humor momentarily... or maybe they just have an inner fear of laughing at something that's meant to be silly; and if so they really shouldn't be watching comedies in that case.

....anyway; In my opinion Bucky Larson does sit low on the Happy Madison scale, around the same mark as 'I now pronounce you Chuck and Larry', 'Paul Blart Mall Cop' and 'Dickie Roberts'... so expect some good laughs but nothing more.

So I give Bucky Larson a solid 5/10 (which is good these days on the IMDb!).
8 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Born to be a thought
StevePulaski19 January 2012
I admire Swardson's defense for this film because I imagine it was an unbelievable challenge to market. Here we have a character, unseen anywhere else, played by a second rate actor who hasn't quite made a household name yet. To market an unknown character with antics like the ones present in this movie isn't as much hard as it is devotion. To go through with a project of this magnitude means you must have a lot of faith in the material.

In Bucky Larson: Born to Be a Star, there is no faith, hope, wit, soul, or even a sign that this was taken to a remote extent of seriousness. All the actors seem to be laughing at their own joke shamelessly - nearly all of them equally unfunny and sad. Adam Sandler hit a landmark year in 2011. Not only did he work on four movies this whole year, he starred in two of them. Out of the four released, Just Go With It, Zookeeper, Bucky Larson, and Jack and Jill, three of them you can simply look at the film's poster and decide if you want to pay to see it. They're films that almost don't even care that they're bad.

I've seen four films where Nick Swardson plays one of the lead actors or a supporting actor. Three of them easily dismissible, and one that wouldn't be considered mediocre if he was carefully extracted from the film entirely. He simply is not funny. I think it's honestly the material that makes him unfunny. I've seen scattered clips of his standup and he is slightly funny. Maybe he works better when he writes his own lines. Yet, that can't be. This was co-written by Swardson himself, who I assume wrote most, if not, all of the dialog for his character. Maybe he works best with himself and himself only locked in a sound-proof room where he can be alone with his thoughts.

Adam Sandler and his Happy Madison Productions company have now just given me one of the least ambitious comedies I have ever seen. This movie doesn't even feel like it's trying to be funny. It seems to be a series of cheap shots taken at a character that was made for that one purpose. Why not make a character who has some likability? Nope. Go straight to the drawing board and come up with a desperately unfunny character with no shining qualities, give him a desperately unforgiving plot to work with where he can get himself into lame, uninspired situations, and to top him all off, make him the most gullible, pathetic title character in the last few decades of film.

The fact I'm using the phrase "least ambitious" for a comedy film reminds me of a group of films in the last years that have also stopped trying. Parody films. They have been drab, tiresome works of dreck, glazed with immaturity and held together by such a simple, lackluster plot it almost doesn't matter. It becomes a competition for how many pop culture references can we throw into one film.

The same thing sort of occurs in Bucky Larson. It's a competition to see how many unconvincing gags we can put this pathetically embarrassing protagonist in. The story centers around a misfit with an annoying overbite named Bucky Larson (Swardson). Upon discovering his parents are ex-porn star legends, he travels to Hollywood, hoping that since he is the son (hopefully) of two icons he can make a living as one as well.

Let me say there is nothing funny about a man-child who pulls down his pants in front of a camera, grunting, moaning, and screaming before ejaculating. Absolutely, positively nothing funny about that scenario. Yet the film does it three, if not four times within its ninety minute runtime. If it's not funny the first time, it definitely won't be the second, the third, or even the forth time around.

Bucky Larson: Born to Be a Star didn't upset me as much as some would think. It actually was rather typical of Happy Madison. We've seen this goofy, oddball style before. But that is no excuse for a terrible movie. The jokes are terribly flat, the lead character we are expected to sympathize with is wretched in his presentation, the setups are typical, the writing is labored, and we are offered nothing new in the terms of layout or formula. It's a movie experience of deplorable, unforgivable quality.

Starring: Nick Swardson, Christina Ricci, Don Johnson, and Stephen Dorff. Directed by: Tom Brady.
5 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Amazing!
karolinakid18 June 2021
This movie is amazing! There is nothing else to say.
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Bucky Larson: Born to Be a Star was funny and stupid all in one.
My_Opinion-245-9208015 January 2012
I thought Bucky Larson: Born to Be a Star was funny and stupid all in one. To clarify when I say stupid, I mean stupid funny. It is a rare feat when this combination in a comedy is pulled of but it worked well here. Yes, some of the humor was off or one could even say stupid without the funny, however for the most part this was a better then average comedy.This movie made you laugh because of the above mentioned absurdity of the subject matter. The acting was solid for a comedy and I really thought the jokes the writers inserted were spot on. Kudos to the director for keeping this a light subject it worked well in my opinion.
25 out of 43 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A Stunning Cinematic Achievement
Pycs12 September 2011
Based on the edge-of-your-seat trailer and the early Oscar buzz, I had extremely high hopes for this film. Easy to say, I was not let down.

From the awe-inspiring cinematography to the tour-de-force performances from the A-list cast, it's nearly impossible to classify this movie as anything less than a masterpiece.

The emotional climatic twist left the entire nearly everyone in the theater in tears, myself included. Never before had a film had such a powerful impact on me. It truly has changed the way I look at the world.

Mark my words, this will soon become a timeless classic required by film schools across the country. This is not one to miss.
64 out of 130 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Move along! Nothing funny to be seen here! Move along!
Netjer-y-khet2 January 2012
Someone wrote, "This is not one to miss."

Oh, yes it is. The bestial opening scene says it all. Give this drivel a wide berth. It's not even worth stealing from a warez site, let alone spending a penny on.

Someone else wrote, "if you don't know how to be goofy and fun then stay away." This movie is neither goofy nor funny. There is goofy and funny, and there's stupid and funny, but this load of bunkum is just stupid, period. Humour is scarcer than rocking-horse droppings. Watching the south end of a north-bound cow in motion is funnier.

Whoever chose to label this godforsaken trash as a comedy needs far more than a sense of humour transplant. I mean, really, what kind of self-respecting person would consider putting their name to this total wreck?

Don't answer that. Just know that P.T. Barnum was right; "There's a sucker born every minute." One or more suckers sank ten million bucks into this dogs' breakfast.

On the plus side, watching the movie is better than getting a slap in the face with a wet fish.

1/10 - Double fail. Not funny. Not goofy. Just downright pathetic.
6 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Nothing Funny About This Piece of Idiocy
villard1 January 2013
Scientists say that nature abhors a vacuum. But a comedic vacuum has managed to survive inside the mind of Adam Sandler and his co-creators.

This film doesn't stop at the bottom of the barrel for its sheer stupidity, but lands about three floors below the barrel. It is miscatagorized as a comedy because there's absolutely nothing funny about it.

The oddball lead character – who looks like the love child between Prince Valliant and a beaver -- is as annoying as nails on a chalkboard. The CIA should use outtakes of him for torturing confessions out of terrorists.

The film's ongoing orgasm/ejaculation shtick is utterly tasteless and just makes you queasy. This is the most pathetic waste of celluloid I've seen in a very long time.

This box office flop must have come straight out of one a Sandler's pubescent wet dreams.
4 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
my notes
FeastMode24 June 2019
Abysmal. i am embarrassed to have had this as a 3.5 before, no idea what i was thinking. i was reluctant to re-watch it, but thought ppl were too harsh on it. i... don't.... understand. this is cringe-worthingly bad. frequently. so much of the comedy was forced and shockingly random like the bad family guy flashbacks. bucky was annoying. the love story was laughably out of place. this movie fails on every level. i think i laughed 3 times (2 viewings)
3 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
I dare you not to watch this bad excuse of a comedy movie
KadeemG6118 January 2012
So, Bucky Larson wants to be a porn star, eh! What makes you think you are a porn star? Enjoying the limelight of horny girls everywhere or just a pitiful Happy Madison production? Tom Brady (not the football star, just the man who made bad Rob Schneider movies) I don't know about this guy, but for some reason a terrible movie is a terrible movie. It made me think of a rerun of Zach and Miri Make A Porno on Cinemax After Dark or Hugh Hefner's runaway bride disaster. For those of you Adam Sandler fans, make sure you don't buy any movie with the words "Happy Madison" on it. The script, cast, even a Pauly Shore comeback can't save him from being a failure of box office bombs and the list goes on and on. Try looking at a list of great pornstars like Sasha Grey and Jenna Jamison. That'll get your head pumping. "Bucky Larson" is so bad, even "Grandma's Boy" made Grandma a nice big piece of sugar cookies.

Bottom Line: This is one of the worst obese films of 2011 and as I could recall to Bucky Larson, I should re-name my title "Bucky Larson: Born to Suck Every Adam Sandler movie and let my critics throw Subway sandwiches at me." Nick Swordswan, you deserved a Razzie for that and Worst Picture.
3 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Save yourself 1.5 hours. Unless you watch everything.
nickwilliamharding18 January 2012
I read another review and it painted my idea of this movie pretty clearly. But I will put it into my own words.

While I will admit there are like 4 lines in the movie that made me laugh hysterically (mostly Kevin Nealon parts), the movie itself is disaster. There is no way to explain the outright awfulness of it, but I will try.

It's hard to believe that such an amazing cast would even SHOW UP for this movie. Bottom line. And yeah, Nick Swardson is usually hilarious.. but come on. The character Bucky Larson is the most unlikeable character I've ever seen in a movie, and I've seen thousands by now. And that alone makes the plot unbelievable.

I suppose there is a whole, "even guys with small dick's deserve love and can get a hot girl" message there somewhere, but its clouded by stupidity, and its never very moving, because there is just NO CHANCE Christina Ricci would ever touch "Bucky Larson" - Stephen Dorf has a line in the movie "Am I in the Twilight Zone?" That is the only place where the story of this movie would ever be even remotely believable.

And to make matters worse, there is ONE conflict and it happens in the last 10 minutes of the movie. The rest is literally climbing action. There's no climax. It is seriously the worst movie I have seen in years.

Don't bother. The Hangover 2 (so horrible as well) was better than this movie, and I think I laughed more here... That's saying something about the script/plot of this movie. It's just a disaster.

1/10.
3 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Vey iz meer.
bivens_joe5 January 2015
Lookit, I like Nicky Swardson as much as anyone, but, this movie f**king blew. That that I have to type out 10 lines in order to submit this review is understandable, but at the same time, it pisses me off because I intended on forgetting about this bad film as soon as I finished my review of it.

What can I tell you? While I have to animus toward Adam Sandler, I feel that if he doesn't apologize to me personally for creating this horror show, I may have to snub him, should we ever meet. My email is available through IMDb. Let's go. Make this right.

OK, so I guess that wasn't enough lines, still. Grrr. Is this enough?
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed