Please Baby Please (2022) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
6 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Looks great!
BandSAboutMovies15 August 2022
Warning: Spoilers
Amanda Kramer's (Ladyworld) new film takes place in 1950s Manhattan - maybe not our version of that time and place, but a neon world of music and dance - where Arthur (Harry Melling) and Suze (Andrea Riseborough) - he's a clarinetist, she's a housewife - witness a murder committed by a gang of rough trade greasers in leather known as the Young Gents. That act of violence sparks previously unknown emotions and feelings of sexuality in both of them.

"Everyone wants to be Stanley Kowalski," Suze says at one point. This movie lives up to that promise, creating a world where the gang movies of the 1950s are real-life, complete with more fashion and queer content than any movie of that era would dare (well, sometimes in subtext).

A film festival referred to this movie as "A Streetcar Named Desire by way of John Waters."

That's a high mark to rise to but this movie goes for it.

Kenneth Anger might be pleased to see that his influence continues, while certainly jealous of the budget. And oh wow - Demi Moore in a pantsuit, animal print coat and silver high heels, living in a blue fantasy world apartment as a kept woman?

Watch this and prepare to swoon.
10 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
An Aggravating Movie
evanston_dad11 November 2022
I can't imagine I'll be more aggravated by another performance this year than I was by Andrea Riseborough's in this movie.

I'll never complain about a movie trying to give us something we haven't seen before, so credit where credit is due. But this film is a misfire from top to bottom. Set in a hyper-artificial world that reads like a love child between John Waters and David Lynch, the film is full of anger, frustration, and sadness about being forced into social norms that don't fit. I like the concept on paper, but this movie is intolerable. Nobody felt like a real character, nothing happening felt like it had any urgency, everything felt exaggerated and arbitrary. Riseborough is the worst offender -- why deliver a line like a normal human being when you can instead grimace and mug and throw yourself on the floor for no conceivable reason. But nobody comes out of this movie unscathed. The only scenes that featured characters having actual conversations of any substance sounded like gender identity podcasts.

It was like this movie was trying from the outset to be a cult classic, not understanding that cult classics can't be manufactured. I very much disliked it.

Grade: D.
28 out of 47 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Vaudevil terrible
figueroafernando20 June 2023
Warning: Spoilers
Legitimate b-series for style, with quite a budget de iure. Yes, there's wordiness and queer pride but also vaudeville kitsch, indeed, with a hodgepodge of hackneyed opinions revolving around phallocentric opposition and gender strife but with the depth normally found in a reality show. You have to enjoy Riseborough in serious plots, like that TV episode of Black Mirror, it's very good, without doing what was asked for this role, overacting; Is it a coincidence that the second scene of the play begins when the conversation is halfway done?: "I want to hit, hit, hit someone until I knock their teeth out...", but under what premise would Susan have started to elaborate on all of that ( except for a room with syringes or a sniffing table and music by Marylin Manson taking into account that in the first scene we witnessed the street murder by punks but it felt so dramatic as if in a variation of Michael Jackson's "Bad" music video. To 10-F's neighbor Maureen, doesn't that feel like a bit of plot embellishment, Demi Moore's entrance, teen-level co-talk, same thing when Suzane and Ida discuss how to get respect for a woman or men gang members "find you later, don't you find me"?' LOL. I don't feel Artur's sexual conflict with Teddy is very realistic, maybe it's the dialogues or the work in its cohesion. I left the second star for the video at the end to two paintings.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Please Baby Please...
erinkat9317 December 2022
I absolutely adore this movie. It is so thoroughly, delightfully queer in every sense of the word. It so perfectly blends the cinematic influences it's drawing from (obviously Anger and Fassbinder, but also cult camp classics like "Absolutely Beginners" and "Crimes of Passion") while also being utterly singular. Andre Riseborough has been getting a lot of the attention for this movie, and she's great in it, but Harry Melling is absolutely killing it in this film. He so inhabits Arthur's internal struggles with his masculinity and sexuality in a way that feels startlingly authentic. The final dance sequence is my favorite moment from a movie this year, and maybe in the past few years. Absolute queer joy personified.

This movie is "not for everyone," but what percentage of cinema really is "for" anyone?
14 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Not one of the best LGBTQ+ films I've seen.
PeppyPig7725 May 2022
This film was a failed, poorly executed, pretentious and amateur attempt at being different and avant-garde á la Kenneth Anger/David Lynch/John Waters/West Side Story with the elements of the queer culture and woke politics.

PROS:

  • The underrated-yet-top-notch and stellar performances of Andrea Riseborough, Karl Glusman, Cole Escola and Ryan Simpkins.


  • The beautifully appealing and well-designed visuals/art direction and costumes/makeup.


  • The haunting-yet-elegant original musical score.


CONS:

  • The overhyped and unconvincingly awful performances of Harry Melling and Demi Moore due to miscasting.


  • The painfully obvious and downright abysmal dialogue.


  • The very tedious, redundant and chaotic nature of the entire plot, storyline and screenplay.


  • The anachronistic and nonsensical elements of 1980's-style harshly bright neon lights and dramatic dry ice smoke in a 1950's setting.


  • The film itself being reduced to an annoying and boring college lecture of a gender studies course with an even painfully obvious agenda of wokeism and degeneracy of far-leftist dogmas.


  • The poor play of lighting and darkness throughout the entire film.


  • The rather nonexistent and confusing message of the story.


All of these cons as mentioned above just rob all the thrills, humor, fun, credibility, excitement, adventure, spirit and entertainment of it which makes it less interesting and memorable to watch. Overall, this film was very subpar and will be easily be forgotten as it will only appeal to a certain niche which will apparently become an obscure cult classic. It was all pretty image, but no true substance. Get woke, go broke!

Even Shiva Baby and But I'm a Cheerleader as LGBTQ+ cult classics, fared a lot better, had interesting storylines, had dramatic and convincing plots and overall, were perfectly executed than this film. Just my two cents, coming from a non-binary/gender-fluid person like myself.
24 out of 64 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Brilliantly made, shrewdly written, superbly acted, emphatically artful - this is outstanding!
I_Ailurophile28 March 2023
I immensely enjoyed Amanda Kramer's previous full-length films, 'Ladyworld' and 'Paris window,' and I've very much been looking forward to this from the time I first became aware of it. With a few very recognizable actors on hand there was a part of me that thought maybe this movie would be slightly more straightforward or conventional, but as it turns out, this is no less offbeat, and possibly matches or exceeds the previous titles in that regard. It's terrifically well made, with a superb and somewhat whimsical sense of aesthetics, and the script - well, what can I say except that this is delightfully weird, and curiously engrossing for the fact of it. It's safe to say that this will appeal to a decidedly select audience, only those who are receptive to the most odd, obscure, and outlandish of offerings; even for those most prepared, it might take a while when watching to truly start to understand what Kramer is doing. For those who are looking for such fare, however, 'Please baby please' is an outstanding, idiosyncratic experience that's well worth checking out, and a fabulous credit to all involved.

It seems to me that this to some degree echoes the quirky "performance art" ethos of 'Paris window' and perhaps more so the considerable stage drama slant of 'Ladyworld.' There are particular characters that are followed throughout these ninety-five minutes, and distinct plot threads weaving the whole together. Yet Kramer and co-writer Noel David Taylor present us with a series of discrete scenes that, despite such ties and a definite progression, feel like piece by piece treatments of the emphatic unifying vision and themes. The premise seems plain enough, but the picture is much more oblique and far-out in practice as it explores the shifting sands of sexuality, gender, identity, and the dynamics thereof; norms and expectations on personal, interpersonal, social, and cultural levels of associated behavior and psychology; and the limitations imposed upon or leniency granted based on all such facets. Oblique, far-out - and, I should say, frankly brilliant in its unorthodox approach to these notions. With this firmly in mind, while the overall story is softly bewitching, and the characters strange and complicated as written, where the screenplay is concerned it's the scene writing that's strongest of all, assembling the tableau like a mosaic comprised of greatly detailed miniature paintings instead of tiles of solid colors. Every idea broached, and the ways in which they're broached, are equal parts bizarre and striking, fiercely intelligent and ferociously biting in how they directly relate to discourse in real life.

Kramer's direction, orchestrating every shot and each wonderfully unique, imaginative, smart scene, is altogether exceptional. She's a filmmaker who clearly possesses a shrewd intellect and far-ranging sight, and she uses these gifts to give us features of underhanded gravity and undeniable, atypical artistry. This extends just as surely to the instruction she imparts to her cast, who across the board give tremendous, rather eccentric performances that really feel from one to the next like something far removed from the usual for anyone involved. My commendations to Kramer and casting director Eyde Belasco, for the ensemble here is truly, gratifyingly diverse: established star power, up and comers, and fresh young things; a broad representation of age, race, gender. It's difficult to possibly name a favorite among all those appearing here as everyone freely gives themselves over to the exemplary fancy of the title, but as much as Andrea Riseborough and Harry Melling prominently stand out, with Karl Glusman only half a step behind, this might be the best thing that any of them have ever done, and that's saying a lot. This also seems an appropriate place to spotlight the stupendous original music of Giulio Carmassi and Bryan Scary. For, like Callie Ryan's score for 'Ladyworld' or Ben Babbitt's work in 'Paris window,' Carmassi and Scary's compositions lend incredible, vibrant, lasting flavor throughout the length. The themes do so very much to enrich the viewing experience, to the point that I'd quite like to add the music to my own collection if I could; add in Marty Kudelka's playful and fetching choreography, and the ways in which the actors themselves feed into these components, and 'Please baby please' is marvelously rewarding.

And still we're not done, for this is to say nothing of the fantastic work of everyone behind the scenes. The production design and art direction burst with vivid hues; every set is a cinephile's dream. Basic lighting is warm and inviting; Patrick Meade Jones' cinematography is careful, precise, and very easy on the eyes. Benjamin Shearn's editing is just plain terrific. And in still other regards - costume design, hair, makeup, stunts, effects: from the first to the last, this is stunningly sharp in its craftsmanship, creative, and high-flown, if not altogether ingenious.

Ironically, for what 'Please baby please' has to impart about its subject matter in its own sideways fashion, those who would most benefit from the substance (stodgy, conservative, cisgender, heterosexual, and mostly men) are probably the least likely to enjoy the movie even outside of that brainy core. There's no mistaking how joyously wild this is in its embrace of artful spectacle, nor how left-field its storytelling. This is a film fundamentally built with an eye for somewhat divergent or nonconformist visuals, and a like sensibility toward communicating its thoughts. Relatively select is the audience that would honestly engage with this in the first place, so the likelihood is minimal of the feature's most important content greeting the ears of those who need most to hear it. This is no flaw of Kramer's piece, mind you; that's just the way it is. As far as critiques go, though, I would maybe note that every now and again the writing seems to waver a little between pure spectacle, objective conveyance of plot, and sheer theatricality, coming off as marginally imbalanced in the process. There's a lot that this production aims to do, and while I think far and away that it's highly successful, it's possibly not 100% on target. Then again, it's close enough that in my mind the difference doesn't even matter: it may not be absolutely perfect, but the grand luminosity of its strengths pointedly outshine its minor subjective weaknesses.

Now, I get it. Given everything that this is and represents, the ideas it plays with, the nature of the presentation, the extraordinary approach toward almost every facet of the production - I don't expect it to ever gain traction. When the term "cult hit" is applied retroactively applied to a title the implication is of a comparatively small but measurable following; Kramer's reach is sadly not nearly as great as she deserves, and this 2022 film is so peculiar and specific as far as individuals' tastes and preferences that I regret to think it will never reach the numbers necessary to attain that descriptor. I firmly believe 'Please baby please' is exquisite, clever, and dazzling, but I also recognize that it will call to only a niche viewership. Be all that as it may, however, I can only reflect that I'm very impressed. Based on Kramer's prior efforts I had quite lofty expectations in the first place, and still I'm blown away by how bright, slick, and all-around entertaining this picture is. For my money the filmmaker has once again knocked it out of the park, and arguably exhibits demonstrative growth in her skills compared to a few years ago. It's hard to know who I would recommend this to save for those open to the most far-flung possibilities the medium has to offer, but all I know is that I'm endlessly pleased by how good 'Please baby please' is, and I can't wait to see what Kramer does next.
9 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed