Keloglan vs. the Black Prince (2006) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
10 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
1/10
Awful.... Don't...
ulnoyman15 April 2007
Contemporary Turkish cinema produces 20-30 movies every year (not counting straight-to-video or TV stuff) and about half of them are good, decent movies worth watching. Mehmet Ali Erbil generally is the lead in the other half.

As a golden rule, never watch a movie with Mehmet Ali Erbil. He is not a good actor, has no comedic talent beyond fart jokes, and no sense of appropriateness or decency. He apparently has a following who enjoys to see his torturous TV shows, and ready to pay for more of that crap in movie theaters.

Also, never watch a Turkish comedy that tries to emulate the American ZAZ movies of the 80s. They invariably suck because of poor writing coupled with bad casting.

Finally, to be specific for the ones who are late to take the hint, never see this movie. Actually, forget that this movie existed...
72 out of 77 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Bad
morsalyangoz1 February 2006
What's the worst movie you've ever seen in your life? Just lie back and think about it. Do you think it's really bad? No! Forget about it. If you really wanna see a bad movie, you have to watch this. Trust me, you'll wonder how a human being can make such a stupid thing. If you have a few extra bucks in your wallet to spend and the only thing to do with this money is watching this movie, just throw the money into the garbage can and walk away. Now, you can ask why do I talk so negative about this movie. I'll tell you why. We have a 50 year man, with wrinkles on his forehead, acting as a teenager. A belly dancer, who do not have any idea about acting, playing as a princess. I'll describe her performance with just one word: "miserable". And the script?!?!? It seems like written by a 10 year old boy. What can I say? Keep away!!!
54 out of 65 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Bad is not right word...
abachu_909 August 2007
First of all, Petek Dinçöz is not actress. She is not singer neither. So, why she plays in this movie? Actually the answer is money. If Dinçöz play in this movie and introduce parts of her body to us and for "art",our wise people will not watch the movie. Yes, they are watching Dinçöz, directors and producers are happy, we, poor cine-maniacs, are sad and mostly angry...

Anyway, lets look bright side, nope, there is not bright side, actually, there is no side neither only bad side, no bad is not right word this film is sucks...

One more think Plese Mr. Erbil, don't act, please
32 out of 39 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Total Disappointment
kotens20 August 2006
Before I have seen the movie, I thought that it was gonna be a fun movie but I am totally disappointed. The movie sucks!!! It was a terrible terrible version of SHREK with no script at all. My guess is that the script writer saw the movie SHREK and want to make a Turkish copy of it. But I guess he forgot to write the script!!! Why can't they make an original movie??? I don't even know how they find financial support for the movie. There were very good actors with a little appearance and almost no lines. Instead of watching this movie, go find to do something else. Believe me whatever you choose, it will be better than seeing this movie.
29 out of 37 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
this film is awful
bunlu-129 January 2006
although main character mehmet ali is a talented actor, he has chosen the worst and easiest way to act in this film. he thinks that this is the right way to reach out to millions but no, not in this film and the last 5 films he has done. i think this is another film which is made just to earn money and pay for his gambling habit. if he goes on to produce these kinds of awful movies, he will be out of business soon. the other main character ozcan deniz is another poor educated actor. his performance was also awful. this movie is supposed to be a comedy but in fact it is just a mess. this guy mehmet ali is doing a comedy show at prime time in one of the Turkish TV networks, and he is making FUN OF DISABLED PEOPLE. this is the way he takes his business seriously. mehmet ali can do anything else than art just for money. i am so sorry for such a loser.

baris unlu
48 out of 67 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
have you ever watched anything worse
bariserdogan198121 November 2009
I haven't. It's just a waste of time. From time to time this Mehmet Ali Erbil man comes from nowhere with such stupid movies and takes away all the enthusiasm of the hard working cinema lovers. I definitely hate this man, his movies, and everything about him. Don't try to rationalize his behavior. What he does has no meaningful explanation. He is a very clever man who thinks that we are all stupid. He makes very easy money out of us. He is correct in some way. His narcissistic behavior is encouraged by the Turkish people. I don't believe that anybody at the age of 18 would laugh at him. For the rest he should be avoided.
14 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Reel Look: Keloglan vs. the Black Prince
JosephPezzuto30 December 2016
Warning: Spoilers
"Yes, Keloglan you may be bald but you're a human being." The film I am reviewing today, from of which holds both places on IMDb's Bottom lists, is Turkish. And 'Keloglan vs. The Black Prince', of which is supposed to be a spoof comedy, is a bad one at that. But you have to give props to the director and actors for at least attempting to tell a legitimate story while spoofing a variety of fairy tales. Though 'Keloglan' is modeled roughly from the zany antics and anything-goes momentum concerning any movies done by Zucker-Abrams-Zucker, (or, in IMDb Bottom 100 terms Seltzer- Friedberg style), it is actually the first Turkish film and comedy that I have ever seen before. I have no idea how this film compares to other Turkish comedies or rather what Turkish people find amusing regarding cinema. Contemporary Turkish cinema produces twenty to thirty movies every year, not counting straight-to-video or episodes from television shows. (This movie apparently got a release in the Netherlands, but that's about it.) I couldn't even find a Wikipedia page on this movie, and on IMDb the synopsis for this fiction-based flick simply states: 'Keloglan fights the black prince to serve justice'. Holding a 1.8 rating out of 10, how does this foreign fractured fantasy farce hold to an American spoof comedy? Let's take a look.

We first see our main character named Sirmaoglan (Mehmet Ali Erbil), of whom is generally the lead in the other half of Turkish movies worth skipping due to his lack of comedic talent. He apparently has a following of whom enjoy watching his torturous TV shows of which he hosts. Here he plays a middle-aged man making his way before the court of the Sultan and the queen by dancing with a procession of beautiful women servants. The Sultan (Turkish actress and comedian Aysen Gruda) and the queen have, after much thought, summoned Sirmaoglan to tell him that they want to give their daughter Princess Cankiz (Petek Dinçöz) to him in marriage, because there is no one more handsome, charismatic and with such beautiful hair such as his. Yes, Sirmaoglan is Turkish for Goldilocks, in all of his thick, wavy and flowing, flaxen follicles (obviously a wig). The Black Prince and obvious antagonist (Özcan Deniz, of whom I gather is quite the Turkish heartthrob), plots to eventually foil Sirmaoglan's plans. Four years later, we fade and again see Sirmaoglan, now under the moniker of Keloglan (roughly translating to 'bald boy) due to an encounter with a poorly-animated CGI dragon in trying to save a princess those years ago of which had scorched his scalp. He is suicidal, no longer seeking the will to live on without his sunny tresses, having only now a flute to his name. He and his friend Cankusoglu (Bülent Polat) both head off to the Sultan. Once arriving, he gives them a new task: to bring to him the belt from the waist of a giant for his daughter's hand, as well promising one hundred bags of gold. Meanwhile the Black Prince, stands at the head of a table of villains. He wants to conduct a tale where the bad guys are the main characters, getting the praise in the end due. And this came out a year before 'Shrek the Third'. We then cut to a peasant girl and the film's love interest Balkiz (Ahu Türkpençe), washing her clothes and her lustful-looking lingerie in a river alongside other young women. We then learn that she secretly loves Keloglan. She wants to attend him and his friend on their sojourn, but he calmly dismisses her, saying how he still only wants to die as he rides off on his donkey. Balkiz, later incognito as a mustachioed lad named Tüysüzoglan (no hair), appears and tells them that he would like to join them if he can assist them in their direction. Oblivious, they allow this as the trio go off on their quest. Near the conclusion, Keloglan actually grows some...hair that is, as a couple strands of it finally emerge from his follicle-challenged chrome dome after his duel with the Black Prince post crashing his wedding. Ecstatic, he resorts back to his original name as the film ends in a Turkish/Bollywood- esque dance number to Gloria Gaynor's 'I Will Survive'...sung in Turkish.

Writer-director Tayfun Güneyer relies heavily on anachronism-based humor the Seltzer-Friedberg team purloined from comic legend Mel Brooks, but goes light on the gross-out. Comedy rehashed from comedy rehashed from comedy is repetitive and not only gets old really fast but is old and unfunny already when taken from the source material and their unfunny predecessors even before that of which, as the final result, never provided the least bit of levity to begin with. There are sporadic instances in the film that were somewhat worthy of a smile, being its redeeming quality, with moments when the Black Prince goes through his airport metal detector in his castle already late for a meeting to a river dancing Robin Hood (Alp Kirsan) and his Merry Men (an obvious Brooks reference). The funniest part when our trio of heroes boil a genie alive in his own magic lamp, unknowingly mistaking it for a random teapot during a rest stop.

From paying homage to Shakespeare's 'Twelfth Night' to 'Taxi Driver', this isn't the worst spoof I've ever seen, but my first foreign one at that. The humor isn't cutting edge, but I can see kids getting a laugh out of it. Though 'Keloglan' was made a decade ago, it still wasn't as mind- numbing vacuous as American spoof comedies were during 2006 ('Date Movie' for example) and for those even made today. Mind you this is only the first of a handful of Turkish turkeys on both of the IMDb Bottom lists that I have still yet to review. Why couldn't I have just watched 'Yol'?
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
What on earth were they thinking?
danmax21 January 2008
Warning: Spoilers
WTF? This movie was just plain weird. It is about a bunch of people trapped in the living room of a wealthy guy, but there is really no apparent reason why they're trapped in there. Then, some sheep with their eyes covered, and then a bear. A BEAR? Are you kidding me?

Were they just trying to spend someone else's money, or a government grant, or something? If that is the case, great. If not, watch real movies, like any Tyler Perry, or some early Sean Mc Namara (Bratz).

The worst scene involves a massacre over some big stair steps at some weird beach, and a baby cradle falls down. Is that bizarre or what?

Until next time.
7 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
A silly, Turkish, Bollywood style adventure, well worth a watch.
a-twetman7 March 2013
It's silly, it's quirky, it's Turkish and I like it.

You cannot take this movie seriously, if you do, you will find it lacking in several areas: Shrek did a much better fairy tale parody, there are other adventure movies out there that are more exciting, the acting is sub par, and the special effects are pretty bad.

Much of this is probably due the film being Turkish, as such it has very little of that Hollywood grandeur, but it also has very little of that Hollywood smugness, which is actually a merit compared to American counterparts such as the horrendous Epic Movie. In Keloglan, the jokes do not interrupt the plot but instead flow with it, not to mention, they are actual jokes, not just references to better movies. Further more, the actors play it straight, like it was a serious film which makes the jokes more subtle, and ultimately funnier. Congrats Turkey, you have mastered the art of parody.

Despite the jokes being nicely woven into the plot, the movie is, like I said, rather badly made. However if you see it for what it is, a Bollywood style, fairy tale parody adventure flick, full of silly moments, it is actually pretty good. It does meander about a bit too much near the end but other than that I find it really rather enjoyable.
4 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
A quite sufficient fairy-tale parody needn't to be a classic
angel_saciel4 June 2006
The previous commenter seems to have either not understood what the movie was about or has an awful humor. However, this movie won't win any prizes, but if you take it as a comedy which parodies the style of fairy tales, it is quite entertaining. From the first moment on you KNOW it's a parody. The hero is "tragic" has a sidekick, aims for the princess, there is a black prince who "always looses" and, romance, beasts, giants, and many things to laugh above.

Who thinks this movie was serious is a pity and won't have much fun with it, but if you take it as the popcorn-cinema it is, you will have fun.
6 out of 28 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed