Ju-on: The Curse (Video 2000) Poster

(2000 Video)

User Reviews

Review this title
64 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
The first of the series is still the most effective
mw_director17 September 2003
Although the first two movies of the Ju-on series were super low-budget direct-to-video affairs, I find this first one holds its own next to -- and is in many ways still creepier than -- the 2002 theatrical box office smash.

This movie establishes the curse that stems from the murder of a young woman, Kayako, and her son, Toshio, by Kayako's jealous husband. The movie jumps around in time, playing scenes out of sequence in a way that is more interesting dramatically than if it had all been drawn out chronologically.

Takashi Shimizu relies upon generating an eerie mood, a nonstop aura of unease that permeates each scene, to creep audiences out, rather than by throwing gore and special effects at you in the way American horror films usually do. (In fact, the one CGI effects shot in this movie is its cheesiest; they just haven't got the budget to pull it off.) By the time we finally see Kayako crawling down the stairs, we've been put so ill at ease by one inexplicable, disturbing event after another that the first sight of her is bloodcurdling.

In all, Ju-on is a swell example of how to generate chills with next to no money but boundless imagination and talent.

8/10
42 out of 44 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
It Sounds Scary!!!
KipWellsFan27 October 2004
First off this is the movie that kicked it all off. It was followed by Ju-On 2 , Ju-On The Grudge, Ju-On The Grudge 2, and now the Sarah Michelle Gellar version The Grudge all directed by Shimizu. These movies have since become sort of a mystery due to the fact that very little people actually know there are so many of these movies and that there is an actual order in which they proceed. So I personally decided to buck that trend and watch them from the start. So....

Anyways this movie eerily begins off with a teacher played by Yûrei Yanagi who must visit the ominous home of one of his students Toshio whom has not recently been to school and who's parents have not been able to be reached. When he arrives at the house he discovers the boy is alone at home and his parents are out and about.

This is when the movie flashes back into an almost short story mode where it tells the tale of others who have lived and been in the house and what has become of them. One of the characters being played by Chiaki Kuriyama who has gone on to bigger and better things with Battle Royale and Kill Bill. This movie is confusing and made even more confusing by not being used to watching a movie with all Asian people and subtitles. But from what I've understood these people have all been cursed with The Grudge as is described in the beginning of the movie as

"A curse of one who dies with strong resentment

Accumulates in the place where the dead were while alive, and turns into "Karma"

He who comes in contact with the curse loses his life, and a new curse is born."

After these sequences are finished Shimizu once again returns to the main story of the teacher and his student Toshio. Where we quickly learn what has really become of Toshio's parents. EEK!

These short story like sequences are very frightening and creepy, and it wasn't the limited amount of gore that got me. It was the great direction and incredible use of sound to freak the s**t out of me. I've never really seen any American horror movies made like this one, and it's almost hard to explain even to myself how a movie with such an erratic and confusing timeline could still be so satisfying. Although maybe I'm just ignoring the fact that many of these confusements(is that a word, if it isn't it should be) will be explained in the sequels, which I now must absolutely see.
37 out of 41 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
The tiny-budget version of Ju-On: The Grudge
slowcando28 June 2023
I first watched Ju-On: The Grudge (2002) earlier this year and was blown away, I felt rare horror-chills throughout. It became an instant Top 10 Horror Film! A couple of years earlier I saw the american The Grudge 1 & 2: the first was nicely watchable but not scary. The sequel quite meh.

Now I'm on to my third version of the same story, tho' The Curse (2000) was released first. Unlike the american version I got a couple of scare-chills down my shoulders! Just not as often as its bigger-budget remake Ju-On: The Grudge. The lower budget and samey feel of the different sections make The Curse feel less substantial than the epic trippy feels of the 2002 version, the acting is also a level below. It's still superior to the american version.

Fair warning: there is a horribly-disturbing scene involving a baby near the end. It's not graphic in a gore sense (you don't see an actual baby), but it's hard to watch. Neither the 2002 version nor the american-remake had such a scene...it's just a bit much, frankly (i'm a parent of small kids so maybe a bit more sensitive).

Still, The Curse is objectively an impressive low-budget effort, but is only really worth watching if you've already seen the superior 2002 one, and are curious what the makers did before. It's essentially the same story.

I will watch The Curse 2 next, as it appears that Ju-On: The Grudge 2 is its own thing. Tho' not quite clear on that, and I don't wanna stumble on any spoilers by digging too deep.

It can get confusing to keep track, here's the Grudge films I've seen so far:

The Grudge (USA 2004) - 6/10.

The Grudge 2 (USA 2006) - 4/10.

Ju-On: The Grudge (Japan 2002) - 9/10.

Ju-On: The Curse (Japan 2000) - 7/10.

The 2002 one is essential, and should be watched first for maximum impact. If The Curse 2 and/or Ju-On: The Grudge 2 are close to that quality then I may be tempted to check out all of them (there's at least five more related films after these!).
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
You think our horror junk is scary? Juon's here to prove you wrong. Dead wrong.
curlyconnor28 November 2003
This is one of the scariest movies I've ever seen, and I've seen quite a few classics (F13'th, Halloween, Nightmare on Elm Street, Exocist, you get the picture). I'd already established, after seeing Ringu, that even a pretty tame Asian horror flick is probably scarier than most Western ones. Face it, they can just scare people better. But Juon, as short as it is, may very well win the cup for the scariest. This was a TV movie, and from what I can see, about the only effects they used were fake blood and Photoshop (you'll know what scene I'm talking about once you see it). This was because of the noticably low budget. But the effects they did have were put to fine use to provide the maximum scaring effect. The movie is about a Juon, which is a Japanese idea about a curse started when one dies a horrible death, and killing all who come in contact with it, creating more Juons. It is basically a series of 6 or 7 scenes about a Juon started in a house that spreads to everybody who goes in the house afterwards. The scenes loosely connect together, but you'll have to read between the lines until you can get Juon 2. Or you could buy both at the same time ;). At the end of the movie you know what happened on camera, but you don't know why. Audiences are forced to hypothesize, keeping in mind the idea of "Juons" that was introduced at the beginning of the film. While many sequels blow up their prequel's perfectly good resolution and open the story back up, the movie Juon never really has a resolution, so the sequel is so necessary that it was obviously planned to be a two-part excursion. When I say sequel, I'm not talking about the two theatrical releases, those are more remakes, I'm talking about the second TV movie. I just finished the first tonight, but I can't wait to see the second. Lots of gruesome images and things. If Ringu gave you chills, this is like Ringu on steroids.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
How the grudge began
Elvis-Del-Valle25 November 2023
Before Ju-On achieved worldwide fame, the franchise originally began with this film, which at the time was only released in Japan. Although it is a low-budget film that was only released on VHS, what lay in this film was something that would end up becoming a horror film phenomenon. The original genesis of the franchise begins in this film, where Kayako's mythology begins from the beginning. The stories told here present how it began, why and who were the first victims. It is a simple film that, despite not being in chronological order like the other installments that came later, can be understood well. Obviously, it didn't age very well due to the quality with which it was made. The special effects seem to be quite crappy. Even so, it is an enjoyable film and it is good to know it as it is the first original chapter of the franchise. Ju-On (2000) is undoubtedly a diamond in the rough that is worth knowing for having started the Ju-On mythology. My final rating for this movie is a 7/10.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Darn those pussies (as in CATS)
stamper6 November 2004
At this time The Grudge is big in America, a film with a GIANT connection to this one. Since I've found originals to be often equal to remakes I decided to give Ju-On a try. I must say that I was disappointed and not in about equal amounts. While there are quite a few thrills and the film keeps you interested for a long time, it has major disadvantages as well. There neither a beginning to the film (as in what happened to start the chain of events) and no real ending, making it almost safe to say that there isn't really a story. Another thing is, that the thing with the cats just does not get cleared up in the film. I mean, what the heck was that all about??? The last thing to annoy me in this film? In spite of choosing a creepy / funny ending after the last kill the director chose to add 5 to 10 minutes to the film in order to introduce the sequel. A film with lots of potential, it just doesn't deliver it all in the end.

6,45 out of 10 (with a 6 given upon voting)
11 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Super Dread
dbborroughs22 July 2004
With the release of the first theatrical film in the US hours away I decided to go back and start at the beginning of what spawned four films in Japan and a soon to be released American version.

This is less a haunted house story than a ghost story with something extra. The less you know the better, but perhaps saying that this is about an evil that flows outward from a terrible crime. Its told out of order, which in its way is tricky thing to do since here it requires that you give yourself over to it and stay with it on the journey its making. As I watched the early parts of the film I was uncertain about what I was seeing. It was good but I was almost ready to give up, except there was something gnawing at me to stay the course. I'm glad I did.

This is a film of slowly building dread and unease more than jump out of your seat scares. You leave the film not feeling right with the tension all up and down your back. I didn't want people to go upstairs, into rooms, or follow the trail of blood because I knew what was there, and it was horrible... ...well horrible in idea. The trouble is that because this was shot on the cheap some of the effects aren't that good. I'd like to describe them but I'll let you find out. Thankfully they don't ruin what is a truly creepy movie.

Frankly I'm terrified to see what the other movies bring.

9 out of 10.
20 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Terrible horror
alyssida20 November 2005
Warning: Spoilers
The movie was scary, short and great. I watched it with my friends and we scared so much.

All characters are awesome, very real and powerful. The plot of the movie isn't so clear as the cover tells, but the movie is full of ice cold scenes and freaky music. The end is weird, just cut from the middle. You need to see the 2nd part too, otherwise the movie is very slight.

Best part of this movie is when Kanna Murakami comes back home. She's all over in blood and looks so real.

Even it is very short, it is absolutely great and scary movie. It's a great version for the Grudge. I did enjoy watching this movie and I hope you'll enjoy it too! But if you don't like horror, this isn't for you!
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Wonderful fear that will remain with you
andrushcourt5 January 2005
I saw the US version in the theatre and wasn't very impressed. I guess it could have been the fact that I was in a ghetto theatre in the inner city with people yelling the obvious or the strange smell emanating from beneath the seats that reclined way to far past horizontal.

So, upon returning home, I watched the Japanese version. Since the US version took liberties to change the plot somewhat and over-explain every single detail of the movie, I was doubtful. True to form, the Japanese version was exquisite. The atmosphere created closely resembles the creepy feeling you get in a cursed house in Japan. The sounds and special effect sounds were some of the best. US horror films should emulate the lack of sound in spots to create tension as this film does.

Personally, this film caused me to glance over my shoulder every now and again expecting to see a little painted white Asian boy or a black cat lurking in the dark. This film is a must see for horror buffs and those that enjoy a good scare. The film starts with a horrific scene while the US version just has you confused from the very beginning. Great Movie.
27 out of 32 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Close but not quite an 8, Strong opener.
dcoke2530 November 2020
This is what I love about Japanese horror, when it's done right, they've really nailed the seemingly dead, "Gothic Horror" genre. Meaning if you're expecting a lot of jump scares that plague the films later on in this series, then you'll be disappointed.

It's been a while since I've seen it, but I remember the story and atmosphere being great in this film. The ghosts were human once, and they hold on to their humanity in the afterlife too. Just want to tell their story, but get offended if you get scared by them and tend to kill you, trapping your spirit in the house too. Which is a now clichéd Japanese trope, and is based off of Japanese demonology, but back in 2000, it was still kind of novel to me. There was one "jump scare" that really bothered me for the next few days, but it didn't feel like a wasted jump scare. It made sense and was earned. Luckily this is one of those horror movies that stuff happens in the background as the story plays out in the foreground and this is before music stings gave everything away.

This is definitely the best one in the Ju-On quartet, but the Grudge 1 is also pretty good. Curse 2 and Grudge 2 not so much. These work best as haunted houses, and the 2s' in the series decided to take the demon outside the house. I think the Curse 2 had an interesting justification for it, if I remember correctly. Good movie, holds up, atmosphere first and foremost. Also, light on the mystery. The mystery is in the motive, not in the "who-done-it".
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Ju-on -the Curse creep me little but Ju-on- The Grudge scared the hell out of me
atinder2 June 2012
I think Ju-on- The Grudge (2002) was amazing, it one of movies that really scared the living daylights of me.

I have seem Ju-on-The Curse once before, that was a while ago, i see 2002 remake few times. So I had to give this movie re-watch

This movie is short and it had some really good creepy tone throughout the whole movie and some very good chilling moments and i feel like this movie had bit more of story then 2002 remake, it had did so what of different plot, which I never really pick on my first watch.

I did not find it scary as the 2002 version but in this movie that Kayako saeki coming down stairs seem to feel a lot more scary in this movie, then 2002 remake, it raise the hairs on the back of neck.

The acting was great from most of cast there was one or two actors that could have done a better but they are still watchable.

I going give this movie 5 out of 10 __________________
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Ju on: The curse of all people who are angry.
Lady_Targaryen9 January 2006
Warning: Spoilers
''Ju On'' is a great movie, and after watching ''The Grudge'' I really have more respect for the Japanese version. I think this is one of the scariest movies I watched in all my life, and without showing any blood or disgusting organs like many trash films.All the story turns around the Saeki family:Takeo Saeki was jealous of his wife, Kayako,and brutally kills her and the young son, Toshio. Kayako was supposed to have an affair with another guy, and Takeo when discovered, imagined that even Toshio wasn't his son, making him to commit the horrible crime.Divided by parts each one with a different character, the story is very cool!

Ps: Who was scared by that horrible sound of Kayako?
11 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Uneven and unrefined, but more creepy and enjoyable than not
I_Ailurophile6 October 2021
What is clear right away as we begin to watch is just how humble the origins were of this well-known collection of films. Whether it's a matter of the equipment used, or a technique employed otherwise during production, the movie has the appearance of programming on a public access channel, or maybe daytime television. The technical aspects of the feature are just fine - image quality, sound effects, music, lighting, and so on. Yet their realization or integration definitely feels a little inorganic, or inauthentic, as details too obviously added in post-production. Especially compared to other, later 'Ju-on' entries that audiences may be more familiar with, 'The curse' is a bit of an oddity.

Then there's the content. The strength and elasticity of an individual viewer's suspension of disbelief is the sole factor determining whether scenes and their highlighted moments of disquiet are sufficiently unsettling as a horror film requires, or too ham-handed and ridiculous to be taken seriously. At that, some facets may be suitably disconcerting, while the next are over the top. This fluid dichotomy is a reflection as much of Takashi Shimizu's screenplay, and direction, as of the imperfect synthesis of the technical components with the seeming "live TV" presentation. Where 'The curse' succeeds in disturbing us, it excels. Where it falters, one rather struggles to suppress a cheeky grin. That said, so long as we're willing to accept the title on its level, it works more than it doesn't.

Just as the apparently low-budget nature of the film restricts its constituent parts to effectively rudimentary rendering, the cast is somewhat hampered by the directness of how their characters are written. I think the actors perform admirably, doing what they can with the parts. Yet one gets the impression that their contributions were less a result of what each player brought to days on set than of the specific guidance Shimizu provided for each scene. I do not mean that as a criticism for anyone involved - I think that's just the fruit borne from the essence of the movie's low-grade production.

Makeup, costume design, and admittedly baseline set decoration are quite fine, while editing and transitions are decidedly inelegant. Whatever one thinks of the content, scenes are written well, even as characterizations and dialogue are simply adequate. And then there's the plot. I appreciate the challenge to viewers to parse the non-linear assemblage of the feature's interconnected scenes. Considered both as a whole and in recognition of the film's style, I think the story is pretty solid. However, for my part I have a difficulty with the way various details are left unspoken or uncertain, or in some instances altogether omitted from the final cut. This is partly an effect of the consciously disordered sequencing, with some rounding minutiae being lost in the process, but I think Shimizu's screenplay also emphatically disregards total coherence of story beats in the same way he pointedly declines to show the conclusion of each successive element of horror. It's an interesting choice - not a wholly novel one, and not a bad one - but it requires an utmost deft hand to execute well, and here the application falls slightly short, to the point that some outside context may be necessary to cement the narrative for the viewer.

I had seen the 2004 American film 'The Grudge' way back when, and later also got to watch the 2002 Japanese feature, 'Ju-on: The grudge.' I was surprised to pretty recently learn just how many movies there are total in the franchise, and this is the first I've seen of the remainder. I don't know how committed I am to possibly watching the rest, but it felt important to see where the series began. I'm not disappointed. I quite enjoy this - it's just certainly an uneven ride.

In my mind the entertainment and chills to be had here are dependent on one's willingness and or ability to forgive the feature's deficiencies, both undeniable and subjective. It's not bad, but even at its best, nearly all the varied ingredients bear faults of one kind or another, to one extent or another. The qualities outweigh the shortcomings to result in a noticeably low-budget but satisfyingly sinister picture, and I'm glad I came across this and was able to watch it, though I don't begrudge anyone their disagreement. Ultimately, 'Ju-on: The curse' is a bare-bones, modest inauguration of a renowned series, and while its weaknesses do make engagement a little trying at times, the payoff is pretty well worth it. Don't go out of your way to find it, but this is a horror flick worth watching if you come across it.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Wow, very disappointing 3/10
robert_m_kaye7 September 2004
I was eager to view this movie; given that some people had commented on it being the scariest movie they had ever seen. I thought Ringu was fantastic, and was looking forward to more of the same.

However, Ju-on was a horrible film on many levels -- sure it had a creepy scene or two, but this is a film that you can put a one-minute reel/trailer together for and dump the rest of the movie.

Take an event that you could hear on your nightly news: a parent goes nutty and brutally kills his family and himself -- now add to the notion that this grisly murder creates some kind of embodiment of evil psychic energy-spirit that seeks to end any life with which it comes in contact. This frames what this movie is about. The story of Ju-on is told as a series of very thinly connected scenes (a bunch of short stories), shown out of order. The theme remains constant, in that if you come in contact with the spirit, you die.

The problems with this movie are many, there is no character development, and when the audience doesn't care about the characters, they don't get sucked in, and they don't care when said characters meet their demise. This whole movie is a collection of 5 minute short stories where a character is introduced, they somehow connect them to the house/spirit, then they die. Over and over, same thing.

As I stated earlier, Ju-on has a theme, but is missing a plot. Since the movie is a narrative about the evil spirits and the scenes change every 5 minutes, you'd think it'd be a great opportunity to go all out to maximize the scariness, but this movie is actually quite boring. There are a couple creepy moments, but nothing downright scary.

The biggest complaint you'll have if you watch it is the time-line bounces around so much it discombobulates you from the movie. It doesn't help that the characters are so briefly introduced, and a few of them look alike and are wearing the same outfit, so you can expect an enhanced feeling of frustration as you watch it trying to figure it out; Who just got killed? The girl? Her sister? Her brother's girlfriend?

Ju-on isn't really a haunted house movie, it isn't really a supernatural slasher (ala Freddy Kruger/Jason), it isn't really a straight horror movie; but has some of each these elements. The movie Fallen (1998, Denzel Washington) is an example of more successfully combining these themes.

I wouldn't have been happy paying $10 to see this movie, catch it on cable if you can, if not, wait for the inevitable Hollywood remake.
7 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
"Meow..."
CJGlowacki8 September 2004
Made for Japanese television, "Ju-On : The Curse" has one almost fatal flaw.

It was shot on video, not film. Personally, I can't stand the sight of video. Everything about it screams amateur night. Even when it is used to evoke a more realistic mood, it still comes off as someone else's cheap home movie.

Be grateful then that director Takashi Shimizu choose the format for obvious budget constraints, and not so he could bounce around like your Uncle Ted at a backyard barbecue. It may have worked for "The Blair Witch Project", but here it would have been simply disastrous.

This film only works because of it's mood. A mood created by still shots and slow pans. The mise-en-scene alone allows you to forgive the limitations of the video format. Director Shimizu clearly knows how to compose a shot, and gets some of his biggest scares by leaving the horror in the background - sometimes even out of focus. And lest I forget to mention that most of the movie takes place during daylight hours - a real rarity for the horror genre. As the characters explore the home of the "cursed", they willingly approach the darkness instead of being enveloped by it.

As for the story, it is a disjointed mess. I love films with a varied time structure. Flashbacks, flash forwards, Rashoman-like views - I'll watch and enjoy them all. In this movie, however, it serves no purpose other than to confuse the viewer. The only reason I could think of for playing the scenes out of order was that the killings that spurned the curse were more climatic than the ones that followed.

In the end, more questions are raised than answered, and the final shot is predictably confusing. But for those seeking closure, you can check out part 2 and hope they make a part 3 to tie up that ending.
3 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Big on atmosphere, short on plot
JoeytheBrit19 April 2006
Big on atmosphere but woefully short on plot, Ju-on is typical of the breach that divides Asian and western expectations of the horror genre. The Japanese seem to be more intent on creating an arresting image that will stir a feeling of dread in the viewer, while western audiences demand more visceral fare which until recently they received in the form of stalk and slash franchises. With the current trend for Hollywood filmmakers to westernise successful Japanese horror pics we seem to be seeing a merging of two styles. Curiously this seems to be turning western audiences away from the type of Japanese films that have initiated the trend, judging from many of the comments on this page.

The level of praise received by films such as Ringu seems baffling when considered with a western frame of mind that tends to see horror as cheap throwaway movie-making that should make us jump at shadows but should never try to make us think. The Asians seem to have an entirely different view of the genre. They like to create an aura, a feeling of dread, that might not have the viewer jumping with fright but which will have them thinking about what they've just seen for days afterwards. In short, they make horror films for adults and not for teenagers.

Ju-on, already treated to a Hollywood makeover, is a prime example. The plot is almost non-existent, and comprises of a series of vignettes linked by that hoariest of old horror devices – a haunted house. A cuckolded husband once murdered his wife, young son and cat, and they now haunt the small house in which they were killed. Anyone who enters the house is eventually claimed by those who have fallen victim to its curse before them, and each vignette shows how they meet their fate. While such a storyline could quickly become dull because of its repetitious nature, this film manages to pack in enough unsettling images to overcome the fact that we pretty much know what is about to happen.

The spectre of the small boy is particularly disturbing, whether glimpsed crouching beneath a restaurant table, or seen through the glass doors of a lift on each floor it passes. The fact that the potential victim it is stalking doesn't see his face peering in at every level makes the effect all the more disturbing. It is these touches – and not an excess of gore – which make for truly unsettling and memorable horror films. All that is needed now is a little more plot to complement the atmosphere
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Overall mediocre, still a must-see.
studboyslim27 January 2005
Warning: Spoilers
This film was not great. It was a direct-to-video film, expect no better. Having said that, there are several reasons why any Juon fan MUST SEE this movie. First of all, there's Yûrei Yanagi of the Ring series fame. Though his performance is not exceptional, his mere presence brings the film out of the gutter. Other highlights include getting to see the original scenes that were borrowed almost shot-for-shot for the American re-make. This film also goes into more depth about Kayako's family's back-story. My favorite scene, which I liked so much I rated this movie a 7 in spite of it's faults, is a scene including Takeo and a dead fetus. The most mention this scene got in any of the theatrical releases is the acknowledgment that Takeo died unexplained in the streets. This scene alone is worth watching the movie for. It is one of the best death-scenes I have ever seen. Maybe I'm being over-enthusiastic, but dammit, I really liked it! In conclusion, don't buy it if you don't want to, but see it. It's not optional. Watch this film or Kayako will come and eat various important parts of your anatomy. Parts you will miss....
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Extremely creepy.
HumanoidOfFlesh14 February 2004
"Ju-On" has to be one of the creepiest horror films I have ever seen.Essentially the ghost story,it tells four interconnected stories that are all tied to the same house and the events that happened there.The film is extremely moody as it has almost dream-like atmosphere.The manifestations of spirits in "Ju-On" are so sudden and bone-chilling that it will surely make your skin crawl.Personally I think that the idea of the blood curse of the house(the grudge)is well-developed and the acting is decent.It's nice to see also Chiaki Kuriyama as a schoolgirl Mizuho Tamura.So if you are a fan of creepy Japanese horror you can't miss it.Highly recommended.
18 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
When it comes to evoking horror, less is more
Rogue-3211 September 2005
I saw the remake (The Grudge, the one with Sarah Michelle Gellar) of this movie last week and wasn't that impressed although I did think the overall atmosphere was effectively creepy. Last night I saw the original, Ju-on, and I have to say it was a lot better - more satisfying overall, with artful touches such as the episodic structure and the subtle interaction between the characters. Both films were directed by Shimizu, but the American version had a different screen writer, which explains why so many of the scenes were overdone. Shimizu understands minimalism obviously, the old less-is-more theory, which isn't generally understood or practiced very much in American-financed movies. I would love to see the sequel, Ju-on 2, and I'm reading that there's a Ju-on 3 in the works as well, plus a Grudge sequel; if Shimizu plays his cards right, he can spend the rest of his career delving into this story, prequels included.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Maybe the most frightening movie I've ever seen.
Alwehr5 September 2004
First i was disappointed to see that it was a TV movie i had bought, but after 10 minutes of watching it i didn't give it much of a thought. This movie is simply just entertaining from beginning to end. There is no limit to the imagination of creepiness in this movie, all thanks to my new favorite horror director Takashi Shimizu. The fact, that its like Shimizu has thought " I would like to make a movie that scares the s*** out of everyone and then to hell with everything else" really makes me raise my thumbs up and bow in the dust for the man. This Flick is on my top 3 list of the scariest movies ever, together with "The shining" and "Salems lot". If i had seen this one when i was 13 i would have been horrified for stairs years to come (just like i was horrified for windows without curtains for about 5 years, after seeing "Salems lot"), thats for sure.

Note: You don't have to use blood for a movie to be scary. The Japanese have realized that, why cant the Americans???

The reason that i didn't give this movie 10 out of 10 is because i find it hard to keep track of all the names (maybe because I'm not Japanese?)and i miss some answers in this riddle of a ghost story. And yes, i HAVE seen the other 3 in the series. And no, you Don't get much more insight, just more confused. They are still some excellent horror movies though, especially Ju-on: The grudge 2. But the first one is still the most scary.

I gave it 9 out of 10. Enjoy! ;o)

Ps. If anyone knows movies as scary as the above mentioned, please write me the titles so i can continue my search for the scariest horror movie ever.
13 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Don't go in the house.
Pjtaylor-96-13804415 March 2022
'Ju-On: The Curse (2000)' is a J-horror that focuses upon a house that seems to contain some sort of curse that causes everyone who visits to meet the same grisly fate. The film is split into six segments which are presented non-linearly, turning the affair into a bit of a puzzle that challenges its audience to mentally rearrange its sections to create a cohesive timeline. It's an interesting way to present the material, but the disjointed structure does lead to a sense that the flick is simply a series of short films stitched together. Still, its underlying plot prevents the piece from feeling totally incohesive. It's essentially a non-traditional take on a traditional tale. The stop/start structure causes some small issues when it comes to pacing, though, and this reduces audience engagement. As does the fact that most of the movie is just one step above fine. There is a decent sense of dread throughout the piece and each segment does a good job at building tension before it reaches its climax. Most of those climaxes occur off screen, so they often don't hit home as hard as they perhaps could. The film is generally a bloodless affair that focuses on atmosphere and creepy imagery over overt gore. Because of this, its more explicit moments are all the more effective. The most horrific sequence doesn't even involve anything supernatural and it isn't even as graphic as it initially seems. Despite that, though, it genuinely is upsetting. It acts as the penultimate scare in the penultimate segment, a segment which is easily the highlight of the entire affair. It's moments like these that make the movie worth watching. Thanks to its distinct structure, callously hopeless concept and one or two fantastic set-pieces, this is definitely worth a watch if you're into the genre. It isn't consistently compelling, but its highlights more than make up for that. 6/10.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Creepy ... It was Scary!
HorrorLuv_R19 June 2005
This film is another indie flick that I recently had the opportunity to view. I can say that it was truly creepy and eerie in so many ways! I don't want to ruin it for anyone, so I won't elaborate on the scenes! However, this movie actually scared me! My hat is off to Takashi Shimizu for making this film with the tight budget restraints that he had to work within! He definitely pulled off a winner! However, when it was redone for the American audience in "The Grudge" it lost a lot of it's creepiness and dark ambiance. You can't remake horrific perfection. This is the one movie that started it all! Ringu, The grudge .. all followed. Takashi is an amazing director. Creating an eeriness that you feel from the beginning, and having you biting your nails throughout the entire flick - he makes you want to hide into the arm of the person your viewing this movie with, or sulk down and peek out of a pillow! I do enjoy a good scare, and today's movies lack just that. I look forward to seeing more of his films! If you get a chance to see this film, do so - horror fans --- you'll appreciate it!
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Horrifying, relentless, and unbelievable
opiemar17 May 2004
Ju-on: the Curse is absolutely the scariest movie ever made. I found myself gasping out loud at times. Forget cheap scares, forget the need for special effects. Forget even the need for a dark setting. Most of the scenes are in broad daylight, yet they will nearly scare you to death. I've seen a lot of horror movies, but I can easily say that nothing compares to this one. Takashi Shimizu has mastered the art of bringing terror to the screen. If there really were such a thing as ghost, really mean, really vengeful ghost, this is what they would be like. I should note that Ju-on the Curse is really two movies, Curse I and II. The second has some overlapping material, but adequately compliments the first. If you want to be frightened, really really frightened, this is the one to watch.
11 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Really horror the first sight, little sense the second
megryan20059 January 2005
I have hardly seen a pure horror movie. I think it is somewhat non-sense. Some seemingly pure horror movies have some philosophy that is rethink worthing and maybe beyond your comprehension when you first see it. I always think that the mental horror of the spectators motived by horror movie directors should have some relationship with some kind of humanity or respect shown to humanity. A horror movie that depresses great humanity or try to alter our view about life and death instead of embodying our potential humanity or advocating the virtue of human being(distinguished from ghosts or evils) is easy to approach to superficiality. Ju-on is almost the summit of horror feeling but may not be the summit of the spirit of horror movies. All above is my own opinion. I don't like a kind of movie without any ending of its plot but definitely the ending of our thinking. An excellent movie never need an explicit ending or conclusion, that also means spectators' thinking and rethinking should never end. After seeing this movie, I can memorize little sparkle in its plot designing. We must admit this movie is full of elements of any kind of horror and these elements have been hard to be creative. In this facet, this movie is appealing enough. I still think philosophy and humanity can be our direction of horror movie. After all the most bloodcurdling is not bound to be the best.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Impeccably boring
qiowisj17 February 2007
I anticipated Ju-on with high hopes before viewing it. The American remake, The Grudge, was so awful that I thought the Japanese original had to be a better undertaking. I was sadly wrong.

From the first frame one feels the low budget quality of the picture. This by no means signals mediocre cinema, just take a look at Takashi Miike's Visitor Q. But, in this case, the poor production values put a real hinder on the film's scares. The atmosphere never attained that sense of dread that I relish so much in a good horror movie. Instead, the scenes just lulled me into a quasi-sleepy state, with a few jumps interspersed here and there. Added to this is generally bad acting by the cast.

Try to avoid this one, there are so much better J-horror titles to choose.
1 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed