The Fatal Flying Guillotines (1977) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
7 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Grisly, old-school kung fu action
Leofwine_draca11 July 2016
Warning: Spoilers
As an action-packed kung fu offering which works as a visual spectacle and nothing else, FATAL FLYING GUILLOTINE is a perfect's evening entertainment. From the opening fight scene against a horde of martial arts monks to the nihilistic finale against the guillotine-slinging master of evil, this film is all about action, action, and more action, with little in the way of plot or character to get in its way. The basic storyline involves some rival emperors cheating each other and a mad old man living in a field who wields a mean pair of flying guillotines and those fool enough to challenge him. Yes, the old plot contrivance is back in the air again, although sadly not so colourful or over-the-top here.

Carter Wong is the square-jawed hero who begins the film seeking a cure for his dying mother. Said cure is written inside a holy book belonging to a horde of secretive monks - to borrow the book, he must defeat the leader in unarmed combat. I'm glad I don't have to go through that routine at my local library! After plenty of well-choreographed martial arts action, Wong secures the book only to discover that it has been swapped by a nefarious baddie, resulting in the death of his mother. He goes on a rampage of revenge to find the man responsible.

Meanwhile, a couple of armies keep sending their best men into the "Valley of Doom", where the Guillotine Master resides. Before reaching him they must traverse a cave labyrinth beset with hidden traps and killer evils. Finally after tons more fighting, where everybody ends up killing everyone else, Wong finds himself up against the guillotine master himself in a finale that tops everything that has come before it. Utilising some cheap but highly imaginative - not to mention effective - forms of camera trickery, we see close-ups of the guillotines as they circle through the air, only to clamp down and slice the heads off the unsuspecting victims. Forget SLEEPY HOLLOW - for a real frenzy of decapitation and bouncing bonces, check out this movie first.

The wooden Wong has always made for a strangely appealing hero character and he acquits himself well with the material here. His fighting is strong and very physical and he doesn't have to say much, either. Chen Sing gloats evilly and wears a fake wig and beard as the vengeful bad guy, also proving his worth in the kung fu field with some very fierce fighting. The fights are colourful and well-choreographed, there are flying people for no reason (great stuff) and the film as a whole is well-directed and entertaining. Just don't go in expecting a classic, because you won't get one. Instead this is old-school period action as it was meant to be.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
You won't lose your head over it, but it's still fun.
BA_Harrison19 December 2020
Martial artist Shen Ping (Carter Wong) needs to get his mitts on a rare medical almanac in order to cure his dying mother; to do so, he first has to defeat the Buddhist monks who guard it. Shen-Ping loses his first fight with the monks, but his second attempt is successful; however, on his way home with the book, he is attacked by a hooded stranger and is thrown over the edge of a cliff.

Somehow, Shen-Ping survives his fall, and returns home to prepare the medicine to save his mum. Unfortunately, the initially successful treatment causes her to cark it soon after. Furious, Shen Ping returns to the temple to have it out with the monks; while there, he identifies his attacker, a rebel monk who had switched the book for a forgery during their cliff-top scuffle. The nasty monk stole the real almanac to give to the 4th prince, who intends to use it as a bargaining tool to recruit Shen Mo Chao (Sing Chen), practitioner of the lightning strike, a martial arts technique that uses the legendary flying guillotine: a metal hood, fitted with a rotating blade and guided by a rope, that decapitates opponents.

From here-on in, things get a tad confusing, suffice to say that lots of people lose their heads on the way to the inevitable showdown between Shen Ping and Shen Mo Chao.

Baffling plot developments aside, The Fatal Flying Guillotines is a reasonably entertaining slice of old school kung fu, with plenty of energetic fighting (including crazy wire-work, She Ping taking flight towards the end) and a decent amount of gory violence: it's not just heads that get severed, eyes are gouged, and one poor soul is impaled on a large, sharpened wooden stake. While not as bat-s**t crazy as the hugely entertaining Master of the Flying Guillotine (1976), which is hard to beat for sheer entertainment value, The Fatal Flying Guillotines is still a lot of fun for those who can't get enough of kung fu cinema's most ridiculous weapon.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Apparently a cheap knock-off of another cheap martial arts film.
planktonrules16 April 2009
1975's MASTER OF THE FLYING GUILLOTINE is an amazing and wonderful film to watch. This isn't because the fighting is particularly inspired or because the film makes any sense at all. It's because the film is so silly and so over-the-top that it is a camp classic--bad, but enjoyably bad. The film stars a blind guy who has a Frisbee-like device on a chain that chops off people's heads as he expertly throws this at his foes! Who cares that the physics are impossible or that the film features such silly things as fighters with 12 foot long papier-mache arms or that the guy was blind! It's just a ball to watch from start to finish--and one of my favorite "bad" films and great to see with friends.

Because of this film, I was eager to see THE FATAL FLYING GUILLOTINES (1977), though sadly it turned out NOT to be a sequel but a bit of a knock-off--taking many of the ideas from the original but neglecting to make the film as coherent or watchable. Sure, it's silly fun, but it never comes close to MASTER OF THE FLYING GUILLOTINE in entertainment value. Like the original film, there are these weird flying devices that sever heads, but they are quite different--with circular saw blades and almost a mind of their own. There also is no blind guy but instead are a bunch of baddies who really have no depth nor does the audience understand exactly what's occurring in this English-dubbed version, as the plot is completely incomprehensible. However, at the same time, some of the martial arts action is very good. While not up to the high standards of most Bruce Lee or Sonny Chiba films, the action is worthwhile despite the ludicrous and often confusing plot.

Overall, this is a film that martial arts fans may like (despite its many, many, many, many shortcomings), but also one that others will probably turn off or laugh hysterically at instead of enjoying the action because the film is just so ludicrous. BUT, most importantly, it never comes close to being as funny or watchable as MASTER OF THE FLYING GUILLOTINE. Too bad.
3 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
An inferior knock off of the classic
ebiros220 June 2009
Although there's Flying Guillotines as part of the title of this movie, it has no connections to the original Flying Guillotines (1975) and its sequel Flying Guillotines II (1978). The two originals are masterpieces of kung-fu movie and still stands out as a classic. This is a much inferior copy of the original, and even as a regular kung-fu movie, it's below average.

First of all, this movie doesn't have much acting. It's one senseless fight scene after another, and flying guillotine doesn't even play a major part in them. Story is about some Shaolin monks who are tracking down some villains who've took off with a sacred book, and an evil prince who owns part of this book is part of the plot. The same evil prince has plans to lure the monks in and use the flying guillotines on them.

There are four movies with Flying Guillotine as part of its title. This in my opinion is of least quality. The design of the flying guillotine in this movie is different from the other three indicating that this movie was produced by a different entity from the other three.

The movie has no chemistry asides from being unintentionally funny due to poor production.

Best skip this and watch the two originals.
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Watch those spinning blades!!
InzyWimzy2 July 2002
Carter Wong plays a noble hero on a quest for a book of healing which leads him seeking ultimate vengeance! The pacing is good in this film and there are a lot of fight scenes to keep the movie going. The flying guillotines look wicked and the main villain has no problems using them. Although the story isn't strong, the action is fun and draws you to the very end (which I felt could've had a sequel).

Campy and dark, this is great ol skool kung fu!!
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
flying guillatines???
Nadal;-)28 May 1999
you got your bearded old guy, the laughing bad guy, you know the score, the classic old style kung fu film its got some great kung fu but the special effect that try to be modern don't come off as anything other than pants. This film is uninspiring and if the writers had been as inventive with the plot as they had been with the title, then they could have been onto a classic, as it is, this is just another old style martial arts flick
1 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Bad ending, good idea
EvilBunnee28 July 2002
This movie had such a good concept to start with, however, in the end, it all falls apart. Between the evil prince trying to take over China, the son who wants to avenge his mothers death, and the Buddhist temple Monks wanting to stop the evil Shen, this story got very confusing. Believe me when I say that this movie has a few great fight scenes, however, they do NOT make up for the fact that it has such a terrible ending!
0 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed