1776 (1972) Poster

(1972)

User Reviews

Review this title
160 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
9/10
Excellent, and remarkably accurate to history!
cbruble21 December 2004
As a person who has gained a college degree in History, I first fell in love with this movie when I saw it as the stage play with the Broadway cast in my junior year in high school, in 1976. The movie is surprisingly accurate with direct quotations from key congressional members, such as Adams, Franklin and Jefferson as borne out in David McCullough's "John Adams." Yes, there were a few licenses taken with history such as the dramatic scene with Wilson,Dickinson, and Franklin when Wilson is forced to decide the entire question of independence on his vote. But it is these few licenses that bring out the true seriousness of the founding of our nation. One particular scene that I am glad was restored from Jack L. Warner's shameful caving in to Richard Nixon is the piece "Cool, Cool, Considerate Men." That piece clearly fleshed out the Conservative's viewpoint in Congress. William Daniels is perfect for the part of John Adams. His Boston twang (even though he was born in New York) is excellent. One cast change that I am glad they made is putting Blythe Danner in the role of Martha Jefferson in the movie version, in place of Betty Buckley. No offense to Ms. Buckley, I love her as an actress in her roles, but her voice comes across too nasal and strident in her singing of Tom's qualities. (I own the stage play LP to make this comparison) The rest of the cast is perfect. Donald Madden was excellent as John Dickinson, even if you can forgive his singing voice in "Cool, Considerate Men." I will always think of Howard Da Silva and Ken Howard as Ben Franklin and Thomas Jefferson, respectively. All in all, it is a movie that should be seen by everyone in their High School History or Civics class.
68 out of 72 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
I see fireworks,pomp and parades
laholly30 June 2005
I promised my mother that I would once again put this wonderful movie on the video player this week end. There is a wonderful comment in the book "Lets put on a musical" about the fact that half way through the story you wonder if you really do know how it is going to end!

William Daniels,is of course spectacular as John Adams,the linchpin of the show. Howard DaSilva and Franklin is just jaded enough(read dirty old man), and Ken Howard is delightful as Jeffrson. One person who was not in the stage production but is a definite asset to the movie is John Cullum as Rutledge.especially in his big solo number,Molasses to Rum.

A real treat for eyes and ears ,and a history lesson to boot.
42 out of 44 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Witty and Humanizing
kenbarr-ny8 September 2005
Warning: Spoilers
I have seen "1776" both on Broadway and on the screen as well as having acted in it as an amateur. The piece humanizes people we often look upon as flawless icons. Well, they did have flaws. The North's hands were stained with the blood of slavery as well as the South's. Delegates sometimes tended to represent their colony's interests over those of the collective group's. Today we fail to realize that independence from the mother country had never been successfully accomplished. If some had reservations, they had good reason. "1776" brings this out. In the song "Molasses to Rum to Slaves", South Carolina delegate Rutledge (John Cullum) reveals the complicity of New England in the triangle trade. In his showstopper "Is Anybody There?", John Adams (William Daniels) encapsulates the conflict between delegates while expressing his vision of a nation where all are free. Based on Adams' own writings, this song resonates long after the final scene.

The wittiness of this piece also endears it. One scene is particularly noteworthy, for it lampoons the New York Legislature with uncanny accuracy. Space forbids me to elaborate but any New Yorker, or anyone else frustrated with politicians, will enjoy it.

Although based on historical facts, "1776" entertains and helps us understand the real people to helped bring forth "..a new nation, conceived in liberty..."
28 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A Must See For Every American
DeanNYC4 July 2007
Sherman Edwards was a modest teacher of history when he got the idea of creating a musical telling of the tale of the birth of the United States. As it turned out, even though the story of the Declaration of Independence was one most every American schoolchild knew, there was a lot more to it than the signing of a paper and the ringing of a bell.

The Broadway version of "1776" became a sensation with audiences and went on to win the Tony Award for Best Musical of 1969.

During this era of film-making, the musical was still considered to be a draw for audiences, so it was natural to take this show and bring it to the big screen. And best of all, John Warner brought the bulk of the cast from the show to the film. William Daniels IS John Adams to a lot of people, and his portrayal of the feisty proponent for independence is one of the great performances of any "real life" character. Daniels is equaled by his fellow Congressional cohorts, Ken Howard as the author of the document, Thomas Jefferson, and the amazing Howard Da Silva as the good doctor, Benjamin Franklin.

To me, the most remarkable element is the facts of the story are pretty much accurate, the timing of the events, measured with a wall calendar, keeps the tension going as we count down to that particular date... July 1st, 2nd, 3rd...

But it's more than just the story of the founding of the country, it's a love story, or really two, with the Jeffersons Martha, played by Blythe Danner and the Adams pair, with the incredible Virginia Vestoff as John's Abigail who interacts with her husband only in his mind.

For a musical, it is something of a "warts and all" examination of the process, as the south refuses to sign a declaration that freed their slaves, as Jefferson had intended in the original draft. John Cullum brilliantly voices this discussion as the genteel South Carolinian, Edward Rutledge, in the hypnotic and haunting "Molasses to Rum." In fact, every song in the score is well thought out, clever, truthful and very entertaining!

Maybe this isn't *exactly* how the USA began, but, at least once a year, let's say it is.
51 out of 55 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
An Imaginative and Brilliantly Original Musical Gem...
Isaac585523 May 2007
1776 is the 1972 film version of the groundbreaking Broadway musical that chronicles the people and events that led to the writing and signing of the Declaration of Independence. The musical centers on soon to be second President, John Adams, who according to this musical was a tireless but obnoxious advocate for the thirteen colonies independence from Great Britain and it was his zeal for this cause that led him to being central to the creation of the Declaration of Independence. William Daniels brilliantly recreates his Tony-winning Broadway role as John Adams, the restless and ever-vocal spokesperson for Independence who would not be silenced. He receives solid support from Howard da Silva, who does a scene stealing turn as Benjamin Franklin, Ken Howard as Thomas Jefferson, John Cullum as Edmund Rutledge, and the lovely Blythe Danner as Martha Jefferson. Virginia Vestoff also recreates her Broadway role as Abigail Adams, John's wife who is presented as communicating with John through letters brought to life. The heart-pumping musical score features highlights such as "Sit Down, John", "He Plays the Violin", "Yours, Yours, Yours", "But Mr. Adams", "The Egg", "The Lees of Old Virginia", and the haunting "Molasses to Rum" (brilliantly performed by Cullum). One number, "Cool Considerate Men" was cut during the film's original release but has been restored to some prints. If you're a musical comedy fan with an open mind willing to experience something a little different, give this treasure a try.
26 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Dialogue and audience
udesai12 May 2003
Well, most comments here have already mentioned the great things about this movie (its music, acting, accuracy), so I just want to put in a word for something I *haven't* seen mentioned yet: the dialogue of the film. Nearly all the dialogue is directly taken from letters/speeches by the actual Founding Fathers, and whatever isn't direct quotes (such as the songs) is paraphrased. This is especially true for John Adams' dream sequences with his wife Abigail (one of the greatest love stories in history) The writers wanted to present Adams, Jefferson, Franklin, and the others as truthfully as possible -- and they succeeded!

A side comment: the film isn't just made for Americans. I recommended it to some of my friends in India, and they loved it. You don't even need to know anything about American history or the Declaration of Independence to "get" the movie -- it stands on its own!

Another amazing thing about this movie is its drama. You know from the beginning what's going to happen, but you're still caught up in the drama of the film.
13 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Average music - Excellent drama!
djansen2430 December 2011
One of the challenges in studying history is being able to identify with it. When reading a history book, you are presented with a sanitized version, a catalog of events that clinically detail the moments. But people respond to personal stories. That is why documentaries and memoir reading will always resonate with us far more. They attempt to help us get to know the people in history, why they did what they did. 1776 is a very good film despite its average and somewhat unmemorable music. It wisely plays the drama at center stage and relegates the musical numbers to the fringes. At its centerpiece are the debates over independence, debate over slavery, and especially the final vote and signing. You feel like you are in the presence of great and flawed men, understanding their minds in the midst of this tense period of history. That our founding fathers are also portrayed as tired and horny men pining to get back to make love to their wives who they haven't seen in months, just adds to the humor and I dare say realism. I could soooo see them behaving that way, guffawing and rowdy. And yet despite their carnal nature, their brilliance and cleverness shines through, particularly in Jefferson, Adams, and Franklin, who steal the show. If this could have been a straight up drama without the musical numbers, it could only have made a better film. Some of the songs are so unmemorable that they kill the film's pacing in parts. A real pity. That's why this gets a 7 instead of a higher rating.
7 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Reviewer Revels in 1776
Grafton8112 December 2002
1776 is a masterful representation of the emotion, logic and debate, leading to the critical creation and signing of the Declaration of Independence. It captures, beautifully and subtly, the moment the colonies crossed the line, one by one, to leave England's rule.

The writing is superb, and the direction is perfection itself. The music and lyrics add a bold exclamation point, for they range from funny to serious, simple to complex, in the richness of sound and appropriateness of placement.

Leading the charge is the cantankerous character of John Adams (William Daniels). It is nothing less than a remarkable and brilliant portrayal, probably one of the most difficult, and yet one of the best ever played. Daniels walks a very fine line, depicting the essence of a man who grates on his friends and foes, yet quickly pulls the audience to his side. You can't help but feel the desperation, frustration and passion of Adams, as he tries to persuade and pull reluctant and loyalist colonial representatives to his cause.

Frank Da Silva's Ben Franklin is equal to the challenge of the quality performance given by Daniels. Franklin is certainly the more popular figure among the characters, but nevertheless has many complexities, expertly brought out by the quality writing and Da Silva's fine skill as an actor of high caliber.

It is hard to write a review of such a fine film, without mentioning all the magnificent performances by a remarkably talented cast. It is far easier, and much more pleasurable, to simply view the film. Pay attention to the lighting and choreography. Watch the meeting room transform from a rather plain space, to one of intensity, as the room goes from static and flat, to lively and dramatic. It follows the mood of the film, as the issue of independence is moved from a side issue, to weave its way to the forefront. The oversized calendar reminds one of the ticking of a clock, as the days move inevitably to July 4th. And while we know the outcome of the events, it is too easy to be drawn into the process, and become captured by the suspense of those last six weeks leading to the formation of a new nation. The tally board, which records the votes of the colonies, also looms large on the wall. The movement from left to right, for and against independence, also adds to the suspense and drama of the film.

There are lighthearted moments, and witty banter, among the characters, as one would expect. But there are surprises too. And the viewer gets to see an amazing transformation of the irritable Adams to a much softer person, when he corresponds with Abigail. Please add 1776, with confidence, to your list of must-see movies. I think it is as fresh today as it was 30-years ago. It is time for a film re-release, or at least a revival on Broadway, but since such things rarely happen, do yourself a favor and rent or buy the movie. Personally, I think it was the finest of its kind. Can one rate it higher than a ten? Would that I could, for it deserves it. Kudos to the writer, director, and amazing cast. It was, for many, their very best performances, both behind the scenes and in front of the camera.
68 out of 76 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
More Is Less from Stage to Screen
wes-connors6 July 2012
In 1776 Philadelphia, thirteen colonies from the future United States of America consider declaring independence from Great Britain. Leading the charge in Congress are founding fathers William Daniels (as John Adams) and Howard Da Silva (as Benjamin Franklin). Deciding a "Declaration of Independence" is needed, they employ reluctant Ken Howard (as Thomas Jefferson) to pen the document. He has writers' cramp due to sexual inactivity, until beautiful blonde wife Blythe Danner (as Martha Wayles Jefferson) visits. Southern royalist Donald Madden (as John Dickinson) leads the opposition...

"1776" was a big hit on Broadway, running from 1969-1972. No doubt this was helped by thousands and thousands of classrooms making the play a field trip. Not only did it beat a day in the classroom, kids could also relate to a cast of long-haired revolutionaries who were blatantly depicted enjoying sex, drugs, and contemporary music; and, teachers could use the story as a tool. Most of the original's appeal is lacking in this motion picture adaptation, brought to the screen by veteran producer Jack L. Warner. Reportedly, he relented to then President Richard M. Nixon's editing suggestions...

The film is too long. President Nixon's trimming did not help...

The real problem was trying to enhance the stage version by over-producing. This is most obvious in the segments involving Mr. Daniels and first lady of the film Virginia Vestoff (as Abigail Smith Adams). However, Ms. Vestoff's Tony-nominated performance manages to shine through the fuzzy lens and sprawling field. Vestoff is one of four from the supernatural serial "Dark Shadows" in the cast; the others are fly-swatting David Ford (as John Hancock), shy Emory Bass (as Wilson) and Daniel Keyes (as Bartlett). The film's greatest strength is that it does preserve many of the stage performances.

****** 1776 (11/9/72) Peter H. Hunt ~ William Daniels, Howard Da Silva, Ken Howard, Virginia Vestoff
6 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Pretty solid on the historical accuracy part
macintyre4 July 2001
Great costumes, pretty good acting and a good way to attach personalities to the founding fathers when reading history. After the first viewing, I would recommend fast forwarding through the musical numbers. Adams was chubbier and balder in life, but that is just nitpicking. The movie makes a point of showing that the signing of the Declaration of Independence was just the beginning of a long struggle. It also shows just how fragile the relationships between the colonies were at that time. Definitely worth watching if you are into American history.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
"Our Lives, Our Fortunes, And Our Sacred Honor"
bkoganbing4 July 2009
Probably even before the musical 1776 finished its run on Broadway of 1217 performances from 1969 to 1972 this film was getting ready for release. The musical won a Tony Award for being the best in that category for Broadway and a pity it wasn't similarly honored by the Academy. All it received was a nomination for cinematography.

None of the score, excellent though it is by Sherman Edwards, was calculated to make the hit parade. The songs don't really stand alone, but they are part and parcel of the telling of the tale of the American Declaration of Independence. But what 1776 does is tell just how difficult it was to achieve a consensus for American independence even after we had been fighting the might of the British armies in the northern colonies for over a year.

Two of the men at the Second Continental Congress John Adams (William Daniels) and Thomas Jefferson (Ken Howard) became American presidents. Others there are more or less widely known, depending how deeply one has read into American history or paid good attention in class during school. I think most people would have more than a nodding acquaintance with Benjamin Franklin (Howard DaSilva). All three of these players came over from the original Broadway cast as did most of the film's players.

All of these people as Franklin said are the cream of their colony's society even if that society was built on human slavery. That the South's peculiar institution as they liked to phrase it came from the mother country is sometimes conveniently forgotten by critics of the USA. But slavery's existence was the biggest stumbling block towards building that consensus as 1776 graphically shows.

The founding fathers as we Americans call these guys are shown to be flesh and blood. Franklin who was the wisest one in the bunch deprecated in the film and in real life the demigod status that would attach to them. One founding father however does get a raw deal from 1776. James Wilson was not in the indecisive ninny who only craved obscurity. Emory Bass who also came over from Broadway played him that way because he was written that way. In fact Wilson who should have had the Scottish burr in his speech that was given to Ray Middleton's Thomas McKean, was a man of great distinction and learning. If he didn't shine at the 2nd Continental Congress, he more than made up for it at the Constitutional Convention. A lot of what is in the Constitution is there because of him. He was also one of the original members of the Supreme Court that George Washington appointed. Not at all like the fellow you see in 1776.

The ladies aren't ignored, Martha Wayles Jefferson appears in the flesh to give Tom Jefferson some relief from some tension he was having and is played by Blythe Danner. Virginia Vestoff plays Abigail Adams who only appears in William Daniel's imagination. It's fascinating to see Adams yearning for the wife, but still tending to business. When he became our second president, Abigail stayed in Braintree, Massachusetts which was their home and John spent as much time as he could with her and not really staying on top of things in Philadelphia and later in the new capital of Washington, DC. That's another subject for another film.

In fact watching these gentlemen reach the consensus for American independence is watching them reach said consensus, but also knowing how they all became some really bitter enemies later on after the nation's freedom was secured. I hope some who read this review and see 1776 will take the time and trouble to see just what happened with the rest of these people.

And if the film stirs your curiosity about how America was founded, than 1776 will be well worth watching.
35 out of 38 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Enjoyable and Tuneful
JackCerf5 July 2020
This product of a late 1960s sensibility (it came out in '72) has as its major joke that the Founding Fathers were as human as we are -- they ate gluttonously, drank to excess, went to the outhouse at inconvenient times, told dirty jokes, mocked and lost their tempers with one another, and had trouble making up their minds. It has as its secondary joke that Thomas Jefferson couldn't get his mind on writing the Declaration of Independence after six month of abstinence until it was arranged that he could have sex with his wife. It has several tuneful numbers, well sung by musical comedy pros. While Franklin (Howard daSilva), Adams (William Daniels) and Jefferson (Ken Howard) are the central figures, all of the supporting characters are vivid and strongly drawn. As Edmund Rutledge of South Carolina, John Cullum (best known for Northern Exposure) has a standout number, "The Triangular Trade," that denounces Northern hypocrisy about slavery and the slave trade. There are some minor anachronisms,but it is substantially true to the historical record. A pleasant two hours on the afternoon of a locked down 4th of July.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Not that great
inframan7 November 2006
I guess you have to give some points for the sheer courage of writing a musical around a history lesson but how about some decent music?

Is the cartoonish acting of Howard DeSilva meant to pique the interest of otherwise jaded children?

Is William Daniels' campy contemporary (for the time) acting style meant to appeal to a 1960s/70s demographic?

Do we need all the "in-jokes" about NY & NJ? (I can hear the blue-haired Broadway audience guffawing on cue.)

Sorry, I find the whole piece dated, boring & the acting far too strident for the screen
7 out of 34 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Hugely enjoyable
GusF4 January 2009
I don't usually like musicals but I absolutely loved this. The songs were entertaining, the dialogue very witty and the acting was of an extremely high calibre - a cut above most films in my opinion. I'm a big history buff and I studied early US history in college last year so I found the storyline, particularly the debates over the Declaration of Independence, fascinating.

William Daniels as John Adams stole the show. He was the best actor in a very strong cast and I was captivated from the very first scene. He has such a cool voice. (But no matter what he's done in his career, he's always be Mr. Feeny to me!) I've always admired the real John Adams to boot so he made an engaging protagonist. Howard de Silva as Benjamin Franklin was another definite highlight acting wise.
17 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Closest thing to the original production
johnmouse6 July 2005
Warning: Spoilers
I saw the original Broadway cast production and it was wonderful! The opening scene alone is worth seeing live on stage. After Adams' monologue, which he delivers on the stage apron in front of a closed curtain (the movie inserted the dialog between McNair & Adams in the bell tower), the house curtain literally flies up on the orchestra's downbeat. Wow!! I never saw a stage curtain open so fast.

Of the two video releases, the director's cut is by far the best. I'm glad they were able to reconstruct "Cool, Cool, Considerate Men" as it is a crucial piece within the musical. Several other original large cuts, also crucial in the story line, have been restored.

I never did understand, nor have I found any explanation, as to why they cut the remaining verses out of "Piddle Twiddle." I can only surmise that this cut was made before shooting.

My only complaint is in the orchestra track. In "Mollases to Rum to Slaves" the orchestration, or it's post-production, misses out on the deep bass drums. The climax was anything but climatic. It's a huge, powerful number (listen to the original Broadway recording).

The other place is in the finale. At the end, the orchestra is so loud, Secretary Charles Thomas is literally yelling the final role call. The movie does use the original closing, showing the signers' names; done with a scrim in the stage version.

Fantastic movie and well worth adding to your collection.
11 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A great film which every American should see!
harrymos28 January 2007
Warning: Spoilers
I love this film! I play it every Fourth of July to help me remember the true meaning of that important holiday to our nation.

The fifteen-minute segment when the Founding Fathers are discussing WHY we need to write a declaration of independence is very dramatic and very moving. The debate between Adams and Dickinson is particular helpful in pinpointing the reasons that the colonists felt we needed to break away from England.

I appreciate the extensive research done on this film and the true-to-life feel of the costumes, props, and scenery. It makes me feel like I am actually there with the real larger-than-life personages from our nation's history. I especially love Benjamin Franklin!

Every American who values the freedoms we enjoy in this country should see this wonderful and delightful film.
7 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
An entertaining, beautifully photographed, musical, historical drama, mostly light hearted, energetic film, part fact, part fiction
danjakubik-904433 July 2020
My review here is based upon a second viewing, July 2, 2020. Based upon the 1969 play of the same name. I first saw this film as a child when released back in 1972. "1776' received mixed critical reviews when first released, in contrast to the praise and success of the stage musical on which it is based. Many criticized the light tone of the film, considering the importance of the historical subject matter and historical inaccuracies. This is a drama and a musical film, with an overall light tone, about an important historical subject, not a documentary film. Notably the film takes a brief dark turn when the subject of slavery is discussed in the continental Congress and southern colony delegates walk out. The creative cinematography of the film duplicates some of the lighting techniques common to stage productions. Scholars will disagree over historical inaccuracies, of the film, however, there is the fact of dramatic license, which allows creative expression when consensus of agreement about historical facts is uncertain. For example, the actual number of delegates portrayed in the film is less than the actual number present. Also, liberties are taken regarding the personalities of key figures such as John Adams and Benjamin Franklin. The declaration of independence wasn't fully signed by all delegates until August 1776. I believe this film serves still well in the education of youth, to introduce a subject of historical importance. "1776" the movie, serves as a starting point, not the final say on the subject of the American declaration of independence.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A great musical...if you understand it
caspian197811 April 2005
Warning: Spoilers
Musicals are often looked at as foreign movies. Since most younger generations are not familiar with the musical genres of the 1930's and the 1970's, they don't understand the art form and style of communication / entertainment that the musical is. To screen this movie to a group of 7th graders, it will be a challenge to get them to enjoy let alone get "it". The entire cast is perfect. Each actor is their character. Although actors William Daniels and Howard Da Silva are known for other roles, here they are Adams and Franklin. 30 years since its premiere in cinemas, many of the actors are long gone. Many have been dead for a good ten years. Still, their performances live on for modern audiences to enjoy. More then that, it remains one of the better musicals made in a movie. Especially for a post 2001 audience, there are moments interesting to watch. The issues of protection, fear and terrorism are made clear, even for 1776. This remains a great film even though its audience is small.
53 out of 66 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Saltpeter, John!
bcolquho30 January 2005
I first saw this movie in the eighth grade back in 1976. The movie, based on the Broadway play, was made in 1972, with an all-star cast, including William Daniels as John Adams and Ken Howard as Thomas Jefferson. The movie, like the play, is about the signing of the Declaration of Independence, which was signed between July 4, 1776, and January 1781. The summary of this review, (see above, ^) is Abigail Adams' reply to a letter from her husband, John, who was in Philadelphia, attending the Second Continental Congress. Benjamin Franklin, Thomas Jefferson, and John Adams were the committee formed to write it. In the end, it was Jefferson who wrote it, and it was voted on by the full Continental Congress on July 4, 1776.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Big laughs, poignant moments, sweetest love songs.
AlAnn28 February 1999
Although at first, it's surprising to see a musical about the writing of the Declaration of Independence, the viewer is soon caught up in the politics and emotions of this important American event. It should be watched more than once, because it can be appreciated on several different levels. There are some of the biggest laughs, some of the most poignant moments, and the sweetest love songs you'll see in movies. Much of the dialog is taken straight from the documented letters and conversations of the principal characters, and we get to see them as real people with real worries and real feelings, rather than as the marble statues seen in the history books. This is definitely a must-see movie (and stage play, if you get the chance), and one you won't forget.
32 out of 40 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
"1776" for the first time
harold-nations29 June 2018
Somewhat amazingly, I just watched "1776" for the first time though I've known about it since basically it's inception. Oddly enough, I found it essentially unwatchable as a true musical, but very moving and extremely well done as a play. Many of the acting performances are truly outstanding, but only the great John Cullum can actually sing (of course he's a fine actor also). The version I saw on TCM also seemed extremely long. I will never see it on the stage, now.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
First rate musical despite the music - Great history lesson too
theowinthrop4 July 2006
Warning: Spoilers
Despite a few historical errors (one of which I will mention), 1776 is one of the best historical presentations on screen of the events leading to the creation of an important historical moment: the decision of the Continental Congress to go for American Independence by signing the Declaration of Independence. The film is based on the Broadway musical in which William Daniels and Howard Da Silva had starred.

The musical (Broadway show and movie) both concentrated on John Adams, the Massachusetts lawyer and delegate to the Congress (who eventually became an important diplomat, our first Vice President, and our Second President). Adams was a brilliant man, but blunt and insulting to get his points across. Like his cousin Sam (who is not a character in the musical, unfortunately, but was one of the most skillful rebel instigators of all times) John happened to be a realist. He had defended the British soldiers in the Boston Massacre, but he was a patriot who had seen what was going on in Massachusetts since 1765, and he was unimpressed by ideas of the restoration of colonial relations between the 13 colonies and England. Adams worked to get an edge in against the moderates (led by John Dickinson of Pennsylvania) who were mostly large property owners and felt the Empire was too great an institution to be thrown away cavalierly. Dickinson had little use for Adams or Massachusetts (he felt that was the only trouble-making colony and that Adams was impossibly rude - certainly not a gentleman).

But Adams found allies - Dickenson's rival in Pennsylvania Ben Franklin, Virginia's Richard Henry Lee and Thomas Jefferson, and Delaware's Caesar Rodney. But even with these allies, could he build the consensus that he needed to get independence? Through the musical numbers the main problems Adams faces are brought to the attention of the audience. He is lonely - he misses Abigail (his wife, Virginia Vestoff) and they have several duets based on their letters (she wants him to come home too). Jefferson can't work without seeing his wife Martha, and Adams sends for her (much to Abigail's annoyance - why not her?). The South does not like any suggestion that slavery has been forced on them by English trade methods, and that the institution is wrong. The final outcome of all the negotiation and compromise (some of which infuriates Adams) comes down to a single man who disappoints Dickinson.

Adams is played by William Daniels, who had the best role in his career and was lucky enough to duplicate it on film. A man of dry and slight appearance (perhaps perennially looking unhappy) Daniels fits the role of the dour, pessimistic, but witty Adams. Howard Da Silva is perfect as Franklin - charming and clever, and devilish in the conclusion in explaining why Adams must give in on the slavery question.

Ken Howard is appealing as the idealistic, young Jefferson - who shows a sly liking for Adams that will build to a famous friendship (only disrupted by party politics for ten years on the 1790s). He and Blythe Danner are cute as the young couple (they were just married in 1773). Danner has one of the best tunes in the show - "He plays the violin" - which deals with her affection for Tom (listen to the melody carefully, the last verse has a degree of foreboding about her early death in 1782). Howard, Da Silva, and Daniels have a funny song, "The Egg", about the birth of the United States, especially regarding the national bird (Franklin keeps pushing the turkey because it is a feisty bird and delicious). And note the song by the young soldier, "Mother, Look Sharp" which is ultimately tragic and chilling about death on the battlefield.

As Dickinson, Donald Madden is a fine foe to Adams - and ultimately an honorable patriot (despite his desire for keeping the British Empire together, he will join the army to protect his country). And John Cullum has the best song (my opinion) in the show - "Molassas to Rum to Slaves" where he describes the hypocrisy of the North about slavery by showing the triangle trade that enriched New England.

My only problem deals with one character - Judge James Wilson. He is the final key to Adams winning on independence, and is shown as an insecure figure who seeks anonymity. Wilson was no mediocrity, but a skillful legal mind who would play important roles in the creation of the U.S. Constitution and in the formative years of the U.S. Supreme Court (of which he was an Associate Justice). But aside from that the film is wonderful, and good entertainment for Independence Day.

Postscript: 07/05/2008 - Turner Classics showed the film last night as part of the Fourth of July Celebration. Apparently there is additional dialog that is useful in the film, and a nice additional song, "Cool Conservative Men" sung by Dickenson and Rutledge. If you want to get this film make sure to get the complete version of it.
13 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Remarkable light and somber numbers
clave10 April 2021
Even though the film is a bit tedious, two instances remain memorable. Ron Holgate's rendition of "The Lees of old Virginia" stands as a charming, funny and enthusiastic celebration of naïveté and optimism so contagious that becomes impossible to forget and joyful to hum. But without a doubt, "Molasses to run to slaves", delivered almost satanically by John Cullum, reveals the sinister backbone of a compromise that has haunted an enlightened creation for centuries. It's amazing and admirable how composer Sherman Edwards captured the essence of the experience of 1776 so brilliantly.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
An absolutely ungodly concoction, even to those who may hope to use the film as a training tool
moonspinner5513 November 2022
"1776", the American Independence musical-drama adapted by Peter Stone from his book for the 1969 Broadway production, doesn't really need an audience. It features speeches, debates, rebuttals and refusals of those rebuttals from its roster of personalities, and it seems quite satisfied being its own audience (I'm not sure where our participation fits in). The Continental Congress in Philadelphia debates American independence, led by William Daniels as the incredulous John Adams of Massachusetts (who continually bellows "Good God!"). It's Adams' pushing of the issue that causes dissension in the ranks, with Donald Madden as John Dickinson of Pennsylvania leading an anti-Independence faction while hoping for reconciliation with England. The hot-air in-fighting pauses every now and then to squeeze in one of composer Sherman Edwards' songs--the strangest of which, "Till Then", includes the lyrics:

"Our children all have dysentery Little Tom keeps turning blue Little Abbey has the measles And I'm coming down with flu They say we may get smallpox Madam, what else is new?" And concludes: "We've gone from Framingham to Boston And we cannot find a pin "Don't you know there's a war on?" Say the tradesmen with a grin Well, we will not make saltpeter Until you send us pins! Till then, till then."

Of the cast, the only one who seems to be having a good time is Howard Da Silva as Benjamin Franklin of Pennsylvania. Most of the other actors all sound the same, except of course for William Daniels (who, like Da Silva, was a holdover from the Broadway cast). Snarling and sniping like an angry rabbit, Daniels seems to shoot up on his performance, playing to the back rows, but one longs to be rid of him. With a budget of $4M, the picture did do business (with a gross of just over $6M), but it shuts even curious viewers out. One Oscar nomination: for Harry Stradling Jr.'s cinematography. *1/2 from ****
3 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed