Dinner at Eight (1933) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
115 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
9/10
A starry showcase (and all but grand exit) for consummate scene-stealer Dressler
bmacv17 August 2004
Among the great actresses who have helped to illuminate the silver screen, Marie Dressler may be Chateau d'Yquem – a grand premier cru, in a class all her own. As aging star of the theatuh Carlotta Vance, a living relic of the 'Delmonico' era in New York, she walks away with an immortal movie, as entertaining a contraption as the studio system ever confected. And she does it effortlessly, despite some very tough competition – the most lustrous talent MGM could summon in the worst year of the Depression, and maybe the best it was ever able to gather together in the many constellations it assembled.

Dressler heads a large ensemble cast, with several distinct but interlocking stories, all leading up to (but never quite making) a posh dinner party at the mansion of Billie Burke, wife of shipping magnate Lionel Barrymore. Desperately trying to snag (the unseen) Lord and Lady Ferncliffe – moldering aristocrats she once met at Cap d'Antibes – Burke bullies and badgers everybody she can think of to seat a swank table. Worrying about nothing so much as how 'dressy' the aspic will be – it's the British Lion molded out of a quivering gelatin – she's oblivious to the human dramas whirling around the people on her guest list.

For starters, her husband is not only seriously ill but close to bankruptcy, to boot. Down in his nautical offices on The Battery, he's paid a visit by an old (and older than he) flame, Dressler; a bit down on her luck herself ('I'm flatter than a pancake – I haven't a sou'), she wants to sell her stock in his company. Another visitor, one of the sharks circling around to feast on his bleeding empire. is Wallace Beery, a loud-mouthed boor whom Barrymore nonetheless cajoles Burke into inviting, against her snobbish sensibilities. Beery, a politically connected wheeler-dealer, has problems of his own, namely his wife Jean Harlow. She lounges luxuriously in bed most of the day, changing in and out of fur-trimmed bed jackets and sampling chocolates while waiting for her doctor-lover (Edmund Lowe) to pay another house call under the pretext of tending to her imaginary ailments.

Burke's and Barrymore's young daughter, meanwhile, conceals a clandestine affair with 'free, white and 45" marquee idol John Barrymore, a washed-up drunk whose grandiose airs can't even fool the bellboys he sends out for bottles of hooch (a storyline in the screenplay, co-written by the also alcoholic Herman J. Mankiewicz – from the George S. Kaufmann/Edna Ferber stage hit – that can't have been comfortable for the similarly afflicted Barrymore, who's even referred to in the movie by his emblematic sobriquet 'The Great Profile').

Those are the major strands of the story, but there's even more talent on board: Louise Closser Hale as Burke's pithy cousin; May Robson as the cook in charge of the ill-starred aspic; Lee Tracy, as John Barrymore's exasperated agent; and, deliciously, Hilda Vaughn as Harlow's mercenary maid.

The goings-on range from the farcical to the tragic, and for the most part, the cast does proud in coping with the often drastic shifts of tone (true, some episodes carry more weight than others, some players less inspired than their colleagues; it's an episodic movie, at times dated, from the infancy of talkies when scenes were not a snappily edited few seconds but prolonged and often stagy).

Still, in this starry cast, Dressler shines brightest. A Canadian gal who started in the circus, she worked in vaudeville, theater, and, in the last few decades of her life, in Hollywood. Despite her girth and the delapidations gravity had worked on her face, she's never less than transfixing. She tosses off the requisite comedy as effortlessly as that oldest of pros that she had become, yet can draw the camera to her deeply kohled eyes when she imparts some very bad news and turn it into a few seconds of threnody. (Only Barbara Stanwyck commands so boundless a range, which we have the luxury of observing over several decades of her career; what survives of Dressler dates only from her few last years.) Dressler would make but one more movie before her death, but it's chivalrous to think of Dinner At Eight as her grand exit.

As Dinner At Eight winds down, the aspic never makes it to table, nor do some of the expected guests. But life plods on, if capriciously and unfairly. Burke, at the end of her tether, utters a plangent cry that sums up man's impotence against the cruelty of fate: 'Crabmeat...CRABMEAT!'
92 out of 105 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
VIPs, past and future.
FilmSnobby14 March 2005
Warning: Spoilers
Talk about an all-star lineup. I'm referring to the WRITERS of *Dinner at Eight*. Get a load of this list: George S. Kaufman and Edna Ferber, who wrote the original stage play; Francis Marion and Herman J. Mankiewicz, who wrote the screenplay; and Donald Ogden Stewart applying garnish (and varnish). These names are even more impressive than the cast-list: Brothers Barrymore, Jean Harlow, Billie Burke, Wallace Beery, et al. All under the direction of George Cukor in a film produced by David O. Selznick for MGM, which at the time (1933), was run by Irving G. Thalberg. "Old Hollywood" enough for you?

Of course, you'll have to make allowances for the primitive mise-en-scene -- after all, talkies had been around for only a few years when this movie was made. The new innovation of sound was considered a more than fair compensation for the loss of the visual pyrotechnics introduced by the great silent directors like Griffith. Therefore, movies from this particular era look boxed in, stuffed with talk, talk, and more talk. Luckily in this instance, the talk is generally interesting, almost always witty, and attuned to the idiosyncrasies of the various characters. Finally, the whole piece is shot through with that certain world-weariness that comes from creative artists attempting to assess, and say goodbye to, the end of an epoch. Let me expand a bit on that. Consider three of the characters: first, there's Marie Dressler's former stage actress, a sort of grande dame Sarah Bernhardt type, now old and corpulent, keeping a merciless eye on her finances, wistfully recounting the glories of the long-past era of Delmonico's and horse-drawn carriages on The Broad Way. There's her long-time friend (and former beau), Lionel Barrymore, a sclerotic magnate of a shipping empire. His heart and his business have both seen better days. And finally there's John Barrymore (the Barrymores don't play brothers in the movie; in fact, they never share a moment of screen time), a washed-up, has-been, 47-year-old movie star of the silent era, living in a posh hotel room he can't afford, haunted by the memory of fame and three ex-wives, pestered by a 19-year-old girlfriend who won't allow him to drink himself to death. These characters are the most obvious symbols of an era that has passed . . . but even Billie Burke's nervous socialite, with her humorously single-minded pursuit of the perfect dinner party, represents a melancholy reflection of What Used to Be. When her husband Lionel confesses to her that his shipping business is going broke in the new age of airplanes, we know that dinner parties will be the least of her worries in the near future. There's a Depression on, you know. And modernity -- the current, heartless variety -- is hot on everyone's heels.

The movie sets these relics against the crass New Breed, typified by the most unlikely husband-and-wife team in the history of movies: Jean Harlow and Wallace Beery. While Beery goes about the business of destroying Lionel's business, Harlow lolls around in bed wearing fur-trimmed gowns, noshing chocolates. Even their maid is a disrespectful blackmailer, demanding from Harlow "hush-jewelry" to keep from mentioning Harlow's adulteries to her husband. But somewhere between having an affair with her doctor and clawing her way into "respectable" society, Harlow manages to find her own core of decency: she keeps that pig of a husband on the (relatively) up-and-up. The movie's writers don't ENTIRELY give up on the new generation. Harlow is even reading a book -- a NUTTY kind of a book, but it's a positive sign nevertheless.

Dressler's double-take after hearing Harlow confess to reading a book is, of course, world-famous. Everyone remembers Dressler's punch-line, too. But too few pause to think of what Harlow describes her book to be about: a society in which machines do all of the work for us, a society in which machines will virtually replace us. And thus this brings us back to theme of the passing genteel age and the coming new age, with its attendant ugliness parading under the banner of "progress". Yes, Harlow will never be replaced, as Dressler points out. But who among us is Jean Harlow?

*Dinner at Eight* is probably the snappiest dirge, the wittiest elegy, ever produced by Hollywood. It was made in an era when actual artists worked in that L.A. suburb -- unlike the automatons running the show today. As such, it's prophetic about the art-form to which it belongs, as well. 9 stars out 10.
43 out of 50 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
One of the great sophisticated pre-code comedies
AlsExGal25 December 2009
"Dinner at Eight" is a 1933 film that still holds up when viewed by today's audiences. How odd that it wasn't even nominated for an Academy Award. This could be because it is quite similar in form to "Grand Hotel", which won the Best Picture Oscar the year before. It really is more of a comedy/melodrama than pure comedy, since there is much tragedy unfolding during the movie. Aging star Carlotta Vance (Marie Dressler) is broke, silent film star Larry Renault (John Barrymore) is "washed up" and a hopeless alcoholic, and Oliver Jordan (Lionel Barrymore) is in danger of losing his shipping business. While these people are all struggling, the only characters that are doing well are the reptilian Dan and Kitty Packard (Wallace Beery and Jean Harlow). Dan Packard is a self-made millionaire with no ethics, and his wife is a gold digger with eyes for another man - her personal physician. The lives of the players all intertwine in ways that are unknown to them, with the depression-era message being that the rules of life have changed in ways that had never occurred in the U.S. before. The vice of the opportunistic social-climbing Packards is rewarded, while the well-heeled of yesteryear, playing by the rules of the past, have nothing but their memories and faded finery left to comfort them.

Of course, there are plenty of comic moments. Billie Burke's performance as Mrs. Jordon is hilarious as her prime concern is that her carefully planned dinner party is coming apart before her very eyes. She comes across as a kinder, gentler Marie Antoinette when she acts like the accidental destruction of her centerpiece dish, a lion-shaped aspic, is the end of the world. Although many have said that Jean Harlow steals this picture, and her talents do shine through, I think Marie Dressler's comic touches really help make the film. For example, when a forty-something secretary mentions that she saw Dressler's character perform "when she was a little girl." Dressler replies that the two must get together some evening and discuss the Civil War. Dressler also makes the very last scene of the movie. As everyone is going into dinner, she finds herself in conversation with Harlow's character. First off, she does a hilarious double-take when Harlow mentions she's been reading a book. Next,Harlow tells Marie Dressler how this book she has been reading says that machinery will soon take over every profession. Marie Dressler looks Jean Harlow up and down as only she could do and says "My dear I don't think you need to worry about that."
18 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Deeeeelicious!
Bucs196030 March 2004
When you gather together the great stars of the early 30's, give them a great script, a great director and let them have their head, you get "Dinner at Eight". This is a delightful film which bridges the gap between comedy and drama. Granted, it is a little dated but that it only a minor inconvenience to those of us who love this movie.

You would be hard pressed to find another actress who could play the part of Carlotta Vance with such panache as Marie Dressler.......she is magnificent. She may give the best performance in the film but she has stiff competition from the rest of this star-studded cast.

I find John Barrymore's performance particularly good as it seems to mirror his own career and problems with alcohol. Arranging himself in the right light to capture the great profile one last time is poignant. I am not a Wallace Beery fan but he is spot on as the vulgar, grasping business man with wonderful Jean Harlow as his slutty wife. She is a treat and of course, no one can forget her exchange with Dressler at the end of the film when she announces that she was reading a book! The lovely Billie Burke, who made a film career out of dithering society women (although she was a former Follies beauty and wife of Flo Ziegfeld)is a delight. Lionel Barrymore plays it pretty straight as her long suffering, tragically ill husband. Edmund Lowe passes muster as the philandering doctor and the rest of the supporting cast is as good as it gets.

They don't make 'em like this anymore. It's a movie lovers paradise!
96 out of 103 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
An All-Star Classic
Ron Oliver12 February 2000
A flamboyant old actress with memories of lovers long dead. An alcoholic actor desperate for one more chance on the stage. An Oklahoma tycoon and his below-the-tracks, tough as nails wife. A philandering doctor and his faithful wife. They're all invited to meet tonight at the mansion home of a dying industrialist and his flighty, society-obsessed wife for DINNER AT EIGHT.

Following the great success of GRAND HOTEL in 1932, MGM & producer David O. Selznick embarked on producing an even greater all-star triumph. They succeeded. DINNER AT EIGHT takes a first class list of performers at the top of their form (Marie Dressler, John Barrymore, Lionel Barrymore, Wallace Beery, Jean Harlow, Billie Burke) and seamlessly, if a bit implausibly, weaves a plot full of comedy & tragedy which allows each star to strut their stuff.

Dressler was Hollywood's top star at this time and she is wonderful, fingering her jewelry - each piece a remembrance of an ancient romance. She has only one scene with gorgeous Harlow and that comes at the very end of the film, but it's a classic.

The rest of the cast is a wonderful grab bag of talent: peppery Lee Tracy, elderly Louise Closser Hale, gentle Jean Hersholt, as well as Phillips Holmes, Edmund Lowe, Karen Morley, Madge Evans, Grant Mitchell, Elizabeth Patterson, May Robson, Herman Bing.

Take a moment to consider Edward Woods, playing Eddie the bell boy. The year before at Warner Brothers he had traded roles with James Cagney in a little picture called PUBLIC ENEMY. Cagney became an instant, huge celebrity. Woods continued to play bell boy roles...
83 out of 91 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Five course dinner
jotix1003 December 2005
This film followed MGM's great success of the previous year, "Grand Hotel", as it afforded the studio a showcase for some of its talented stars. "Dinner at Eight" is one of the classic plays of that era, having been written for the stage by George Kaufman and Edna Ferber. The screen adaptation of the play is by Herman Mankiewicz, Frances Marion and Donald Ogden Stewart, some of the best writers the movies ever had. The film, under the impeccable direction of George Cukor makes "Dinner at Eight" one of the classics of the American cinema.

"Dinner at Eight" is a comedy, at heart, but there are elements of drama in it, as well. On the one hand, it offers easy laughter for the viewer, but it also has a dark aspect in its dealing with alcoholism and adultery. The film, like its predecessor, offers several story lines that keeps us interested in the different relationships the film presents for us.

"Dinner at Eight" boasts one of the best casts ever assembled for a movie. Marie Dressler, who is seen as Carlota Vance, was one of the best actresses working in the movies at the time. Lionel and John Barrymore had been seen together in "Grand Hotel" and both play pivotal parts in this film as well. The effervescent Billie Burke is one of the best things in the movie. Ms. Burke was one bright star whose contribution to the success of the films she appeared in was a guarantee for the people behind any project.

Wallace Beery plays the boorish and influential industrialist Dan Packard, a man to be reckoned with. Jean Harlow portrays his wife, the low life Kitty, who was two-timing Dan. In a way, Dan and Kitty seem to have been the prototypes for Garson Kanin's "Born Yesterday" because both characters bear a certain similarity in both films.

The supporting members of the cast are impressive. Edmund Lowe, Lee Tracy, Madge Evans, Louise Closser Hale, May Robson, Jean Hersholt, Karen Morley, and the rest, aside from giving good performances, leave their own mark in the film.

A great cinematographer was behind the camera for this movie: William Daniels. His amazing work is one of the best in any of the pictures he photographed. Mr. Daniels knew how to direct his camera to get the most out of these talented actors one sees in "Dinner at Eight" Of course, this is a film that bears the David O. Selznick signature, for it was he who decided to transform the play into a motion picture and he succeeded in doing it. Most of the creditor must go to director George Cukor, who was truly inspired in making "Dinner at Eight" a movie that has endured the passage of time.
45 out of 53 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Script for a Jester's Tear
1930s_Time_Machine24 August 2022
If like me, you're more familiar with the early 30s Warner Brothers movies when Daryl Zanuck was at the helm which focussed on how the poor struggled with - and usually overcame the deprivations of the Great Depression, Dinner at Eight will take you a while to get used to. You might think it's not for you but you should stick with it - it's worth it.

Rather than finding Joan Blondell doing anything she can to avoid starvation or James Cagney turning to crime to feed his family, this film is about how the rich ultra-privileged cope with the economic disaster. Whilst their situations are not life or death choices, they're just as devastating for them - or they think they are.

When compared with what was happening to millions of working and ex-working people, the awful tragedy of Billie Burke not having an aspic lion ready for the dinner's centre piece may sound absolutely trivial - which of course it is - but this film shows how such pointless trivia is ruining her life. It's very clever.

It is a clever film (based on a clever play) but perhaps not that easy for us in the 21st century to engage with. Despite some descriptions it's not a comedy, it's not easy viewing and after the first half hour it would be easy to switch off thinking that it's over-hyped and boring but don't - keep with it. It's one of those films that sticks around in your head days afterwards because it's actually very good. Considering the talent and expense that went into making this that's not surprising. MGM pulled out all the stops with this and it really shows. Surprisingly even Jean Harlow shows that she can actually act!

Essentially it's theme is 'rich people are suffering too.' It focusses on a small group of 'privileged people' preparing for a big society dinner party but nobody is whom they seem. Some are living in a fantasy world they've invented and can't survive outside of it. Some have clawed their way up from the gutter to the top of the ladder only to find out that they're now teetering on the edge of a fragile precipice but to keep their social position, to maintain the facade which they need they must keep going even though they know their only option is to plummet down the ground. It's about a false world of vulnerable unhappy people figuring out (or indeed giving up on) how to cope with their futures. That sounds a miserable premise for a film and indeed it's not the most cheerful of movies but the witty script and professional direction make all these characters very real, multi-dimensional and personable. Of particular praise is John Barrymore playing a former superstar actor now virtually a destitute and penniless has-been, slowly killing himself with cheap whiskey. Because this role is essentially his own life by 1933, his performance is poignantly tragic and very moving.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
An all star cast in an all star movie
TuckMN13 January 1999
Dinner at Eight is one of the consummate movie buff's movies...

It has romance, glamour, wit, charm, intrigue, interesting characters and a great story.

The agonies that Mrs. Oliver Jordan (the incomparable Billie Burke [Are you a good witch or a bad witch?]) must go through to stage what is supposed to be a simple dinner party will leave you laughing, sympathizing and grateful you are not her.

Jean Harlow is at her most beautiful. She radiates an overt yet somehow innocent sexuality that shows why she became a major star so quickly.

Marie Dressler proves why she was so heralded. Her acting cannot be called subtle -- but it is always effective.

After watching this film you will wonder if people ever really did live this way. Strangely enough, I believe they probably did.
42 out of 52 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Good,but the comedic elements I was expecting aren't there.
SmileysWorld23 September 2010
When I think of comedy films from the 1930's,I tend to think of mile-a-minute Marx Brothers or Laurel and Hardy like romps.That's not what you get with Dinner at Eight.This was surprising,due to the fact that film placed 85th on the AFI's 100 Years,100 Laughs list some years ago.I'm not saying it is a poor film.Anything but.It's extremely well acted,well presented,and it does have it's humorous moments,but there are some depressing elements to the film as well that make me question why anyone would call it a comedy,let alone why it would make such a list.In the end,I would recommend it,but don't go in expecting a rip roaring slapstick film.You'll only be disappointed in that regard.
7 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Millicent Jordan's Dinner Party
lugonian22 April 2005
DINNER AT EIGHT (Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, 1933), directed by George Cukor, MGM's second attempt with an all-star production following the success to GRAND HOTEL (1932), is a remarkable as well as memorable movie that has benefited from repeated viewings over the past years. As with GRAND HOTEL, DINNER AT EIGHT was adapted from a stage play (by George S. Kaufman and Edna Ferber), and reunites some of its GRAND HOTEL performers, including John and Lionel Barrymore, Wallace Beery and Jean Hersholt. Unlike GRAND HOTEL, DINNER AT EIGHT is one of the best movies ever assembled to not receive a single Academy Award nomination. Even though it would be difficult to pinpoint which of the major stars might have been worthy of that honor, a Best Picture nominee would have spoken for the entire cast. In the usual manner of all star productions, of the major leads, all introduced with each face framed in a dinner plate, the one whose name comes first is the one with either the least amount of screen time or the one whose character enters late into the story. The star in question is Marie Dressler, a top-name at the time, leaving a big impression with her limited performance, and yet, it is Billie Burke as Millicent Jordan whose presence is felt throughout mainly because it's her dinner party.

The story begins with Millicent Jordan (Burke) a New York social wife, announcing her upcoming dinner party she's arranging for Lord and Lady Ferncliffe, and the people she intends to invite. As with the stage production, the movie plays out in numerous acts: (a) "The Jordan Home": Introductory scenes focusing on Millicent (Burke), her husband Oliver (Lionel Barrymore), head of a declining shipping company, and their troubled daughter, Paula (Madge Evans); (b) "At the Office": Oliver is visited by once acclaimed stage actress Carlotta Vance (Marie Dressler), with whom he had loved in his youth, as well as one of the invited guests; and Dan Packard (Wallace Beery), a middle-aged promoter whom Oliver hopes could save him from his financial difficulties; (c) "The Battling Packards": As a favor to Oliver, Millicent reluctantly telephones Kitty (Jean Harlow) and invites the low-life couple to her dinner. Kitty, spoiled and lazy, wants nothing more than to break into society and meet the right kind of people. Being home all day doing nothing, Kitty secretly carries on a love affair with her family doctor, Wayne Talbot (Edmund Lowe), while her husband goes away on business, a secret known only by Kitty's maid (Hilda Vaughn); (d) "The Matinée Idol": In need of an extra dinner guest, Millicent invites matinée idol Larry Renault (John Barrymore), a friend of the family in town staying at the Versailles Hotel. Unknown to Millicent, her engaged daughter Paula is secretly Renault's mistress; (e) "Dr. Talbot's Domestic Problems": Scene involves Kitty's doctor and his illicit affairs with his patients, as discussed between him and his understanding wife (Karen Morley). which concludes with a visit from gravely ill Oliver who is diagnosed with heart disease; (f) "Back to the Jordan Home": While Millicent is interacted between scenes involving the dinner guests, this segment involves Millicent's own domestic problems with her hired help as well as the news about her guests of honor departing for Florida, leaving Millicent to locate substitutes as the guests of honor; (g) "Final Showdown for the Packards": In their home getting ready for the function, Dan and Kitty come to a showdown revealing how they actually feel about one other, with all their secrets coming out; (h) "Renault's Tragic Performance": Renault turns down the one act part as a beachcomber in a forthcoming play offered to him by an important producer (Jean Hersholt). Believing he is still important to the theater, Renault's trying and upset agent (Lee Tracy) brings the drunken actor to reality by telling him his career has ended long ago. Later, after the management asks him to leave the hotel, Renault agrees, thus, giving his one last "performance" to take place in the room; (i) "Dinner at Eight" The gathering of all the party guests at the Jordan home, with some resolutions resolved, concluding with the most celebrated exchange between Carlotta and Kitty.

Categorized as a comedy, with the exception of some cleverly written dialog, DINNER AT EIGHT is anything but a comedy. In truth, it's actually a stylish dramatic story centering upon the troublesome lives of Millicent Jordan and chapters involving her invited guests. The most interesting, as well as tragic, is John Barrymore's as Larry Renault, and how his character closely foreshadows his own life, as a habitual drinker, a fading actor with ex-wives, now in financial ruin. He is even addressed to as "The Great Profile" by his agent (Tracy). What's even more ironic is that Marie Dressler and Jean Harlow, who closing scene is classic, each would be dead not long after the release DINNER AT EIGHT, leaving their legacies behind them. Besides the leading players, others in support include Phillips Holmes, Louise Closser Hale, May Robson, Grant Mitchell and Elizabeth Patterson, all giving capable performances under Cukor's excellent direction. No underscoring whatsoever, with the exception of "I Kiss Your Hand, Madame," which is themed during the opening credits, and orchestra playing at the final minutes of the function, DINNER AT EIGHT appears to be a motion picture that has surpassed the 1932 Broadway play.

Distributed on video cassette as far back at the 1980s, and later on DVD, DINNER AT EIGHT, which makes a good double bill along with GRAND HOTEL, frequently plays on Turner Classic Movies. While there has been a 1989 made-for-television remake which premiered on Turner Network Television, with everything brought up to date, the main course on the menu today continues to be the unsurpassed 1933 appetizer. (****)
29 out of 38 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
This Dinner Is Served Lukewarm
evanston_dad7 August 2006
MGM, inventor of the all-star big-budget soap opera extravaganza, sought to follow up their smashing success, "Grand Hotel" (1932), with another high-power ensemble film, and turned to this popular stage play for the material.

If "Dinner at Eight" is ultimately not as satisfying as "Grand Hotel," it's because director George Cukor does not take as cinematic an approach as Edmund Goulding. In "Grand Hotel," the camera went sweeping around the vast interior of that film's magnificent set, and the viewer comes away from that movie remembering images as well as characters. Cukor takes a much more stagebound approach with his film, and visuals are too hampered by small and static sets. Even the actors perform as if on stage, pausing at their entrances for applause they would have received had they been performing in front of a live audience. And even though the cast is comprised of the best MGM had to offer at the time, it doesn't gel like the cast in "Grand Hotel" did. Lionel Barrymore uncharacteristically seems to be on shaky ground; Billie Burke and her fussy performance are more distracting than funny; and Jean Harlow and her on-again-off-again Southern accent are all wrong. One can't help but imagine what Ginger Rogers could have done with the Harlow part if only Rogers had been a big enough name when this film was released. Only Marie Dressler truly delights, so much so that whenever she isn't on screen, you fidget waiting for her to come back.

As for the material itself, the play takes on some strong themes but handles them awkwardly. The set up seems to go on forever -- an hour into the film, I felt like the movie was still introducing characters and main plot threads. The ending has a hurried quality, as if the screenwriters decided they had spent all of their time on plot set up and couldn't afford any for actual resolutions. If the film is faithful to the play, the play must have been a fairly minor one.

So, certainly not a bad film by any means, and worth seeing for some of the most famous names in the early '30s, but it doesn't surprise me that the movie hasn't had the longevity of "Grand Hotel."

Grade: B
11 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
One of the Best Comedies M-G-M made During the 1930s
EightyProof4511 November 2003
The movie Dinner at Eight is one of the best comedies ever made in Hollywood. Any reviewer who has claimed that it isn't a comedy needs to re-examine the picture. Although undeniably dark in its tone, the film is undeniably hilarious, especially when certain actors are on-screen. It could be called a dark comedy, even a black comedy, but a comedy it is nonetheless. There are eight `above-the-title' stars in this picture.

Billie Burke, except for the scene in which she discovers her husband is ill, is a parody of the society woman. Every line of hers, emphasizing her scatterbrain-ness and her lack of priorities, reeks of hilarity. Her role is pure comedy.

Lionel Barrymore, playing a sickly business tycoon, has a less comedic role. His opening lines about `Australian mutton' are hilarious. The way he watches his wife planning the party is also quite comedic. His dramatic moments juxtapose alongside his wife's to create some of her funniest moments. His part is almost split down the middle between comedy and drama.

Wallace Beery, portraying a ruthless, uncouth business man, is hilarious. His vulgarity contradict everything Mrs. Jordan views as ideal. He screams, yells, and has a violent temper. And, boy, is he funny to watch. Anyone who tries to label his performance as anywhere near dramatic should have his or her head examined. He gives the funnies male performance in the film. The role is almost all comedy.

Jean Harlow, as his slutty, common, vixen-of-a-wife gives the finest comedic performance of her entire career. She snarls, changes her voice in different conversations, manipulates, and lies, all to comedic perfection. Just the sound of her voice, saying the most outrageous dialogue to boot, triggers the laughs. This is the most comedic role in the picture.

John Barrymore, as an aging silent matinee idol, is the film's most dramatic performance. Although he has some comic moments (very few), and some ironic and satirical actions (when he kills himself, for example, he positions the light perfectly to capture his profile), for the most part, his scenes give the film their most dramatic moments. The performance is about 90% drama.

Edmund Lowe, playing a doctor-cum-playboy having a tryst with Harlow, has his part split down the middle. He is often funny, never reaching the sheer hilarity of some of the others, but, also, never quite elevating to the heights of histrionics either. His views on extramarital affairs are pretty funny, but when he has to tell a patient of impending illness, its drama. The fact that he specializes in `bedside manner' is just funny, and his first embrace with his `patient' is a scathing critique of corrupt society. Just as Lionel Barrymore's role, Lowe's is split fifty-fifty, right down the middle.

Lee Tracy, as John Barrymore's agent, is simply hilarious. His vocal fluctuations were his trademark, and the part seems tailor-made for him. Although he has many dramatic moments, he is very funny most of the time. His reactions and gestures are wonderful. In all, this part is about 60% comedy, 40% drama.

Marie Dressler, as a grand dame of the 1890s, is priceless. She all-but steals the picture from her co-stars. Sprinkled among her part are dozens of comic innuendos and perfect double takes. She is perfect and absolutely hilarious at all time, with the exception of the one scene in which she must explain to a young woman that her lover has committed suicide. The rest of the time she goes traipsing about making a perfect spectacle of herself, and she is the greatest asset to the film, acting-wise. Her part is 99% comic, except for that one scene.

The supporting actors, particularly Louise Closser Hale and Grant Withers, are comedic perfection. With the exception of the scenes in John Barryore's room at the Hotel Versailles, almost every supporting role is meant to be funny. The sets and costumes poke fun at the times too, and in the last analysis, the picture is a dramatic comedy, but a comedy bien sûr!
27 out of 41 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
SAVE ROOM FOR DESSERT...!
masonfisk7 August 2018
An early film from George Cukor from the 30's. More a filmed stage play than a piece of celluloid. The character appearances are more like stage entries than camera set-ups but what can you do when the early days of cinema were the beginnings of a learning curve of what could be done rather than what could not. Anyway, a dinner date is coming up & the various ho-polloi of the New York upper-crust are meeting for a meal. Various story lines are told w/o anything resembling depth & the cast is more than up to snuff for the cause. Wallace Beery & Jean Harlow are fantastic as the bickering couple, we get 2 Barrymore's (John & Lionel, Drew's grandfather & great uncle) & the priceless Marie Dressler who steals the show as a once grand dame of the stage now having to deal w/actual life.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Surprisingly Bad
Well I was sort of shocked at what an un-entertaining film this is. I usually love these 1930's "it's the Depression but everyone in this film owns evening dress" movies, especially the ones that were released pre-Code. And there are some nice performances from Misses Harlow, Burke and Dressler. But the tone of the picture is -- well to call it uneven would be a compliment -- some scenes are farce, some are dramatic, some are tragic and others to be honest are just a bore -- together they just make for a big mess. At best it's an interesting study in how Hollywood was still struggling to come to terms with this medium - particularly with the advent of sound and the need for real scripts with more complex stories than were the norm in silents. I don't know that I'd say it's not worth seeing, but I wish I'd gone into it with much lower expectations.
14 out of 28 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Highly enjoyable
Camera-Obscura28 June 2006
"Darling, I've got Lord and Lady Ferncliffe [...] You remember the Ferncliffes from London, do you darling?"

"Yes, yes.. and how dull they were, eating mutton."

I just love it! This lavish all-star MGM-production still is great entertainment. Some of it's notions are somewhat dated perhaps, but with this team behind - and in the film - nothing can go wrong.

A portrait of various strata of New York society, the clash between the newly riches and the old elite, the Old and New World, the battle of the sexes (between Wallace Beery and Harlow), Gotham in a nutshell. Nothing is "really" happening, the same as its "twin brother" GRAND HOTEL and essentially it's a filmed play (based on the play by George S. Kaufman and Edna Ferber), but with this cast there are no complaints. You don't hear anyone complaining about David Mamet's GLENGARY GLENN ROSS's filmed play, do you? Jean Harlow, "the Blonde Bombshell", as the deliciously vulgar wife of Wallace Beery, the new man in town, trying to connect with the New York elite and Washington politicians. John Barrymore is fantastic as a once famous actor from the silent era, who cannot accept the fact that his career is over.

To me the film is just a perfect time capsule of so many typical topics of the era: the depression, the transition from silents to talkies, the continuous transformation of the upper crust of New York society, the traveling by ocean steamer to Europe... It's actually a very rich film, no matter how fluffy it might look (in the case of Jean Harlow's wardrobe quite literally). And when given a treatment like this, the top-notch cast, good writing, gorgeous sets under the supervision of David O. Selznick and George Cukor, it's a feast for the eye.

Camera Obscura --- 9/10
29 out of 35 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Not a Goof
fiat090317 December 2006
You report as a goof that Carlotta Vance (Marie Dressler) first tells Oliver Jordan (Lionel Barrymore) that she sold her stock to a Mr. Baldridge but moments later says it was a Mr. Bainbridge.

When Vance first tells Jordan the name, she has to look at the check to get the name. When Jordan is on the phone, she states the name as she remembers it and the two differ.

The change in the name is not a goof but a wonderfully done Dressler moment showing that her character, after downing a large glass of whiskey, neat, that she is more than a bit addled.

It was so marvelously done that she fooled even the IMDb staff!

Hurrah, Marie. Well done!
8 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Such perfection in casting, direction, photography, artistic passion and entertaining to boot!
mark.waltz9 April 2014
Warning: Spoilers
How can you praise a movie so much and not find anything wrong with it? That is the situation for "Dinner at Eight", the film version of the George S. Kaufman comedy/drama that covers the lives of people involved in a high society dinner party in Manhattan in the early 1930's. Billie Burke's Millicent Jordan is so excited that she has gotten the wealthy British Ferncliffs to come to dinner. But as soon as she gets the good news, everything else seems to go wrong. The kitchen staff is fighting, her daughter has romantic problems, and the guests she wants can't come, so she has to invite the guests she doesn't really want only because they are business associates of her husband's.

Burke is married to wealthy businessman Oliver Jordan (Lionel Barrymore) who is having health issues. When his old flame Carlotta Vance (Marie Dressler) shows up for a visit, she too is invited, although she's a bit insulted when Oliver's secretary (Elizabeth Patterson) recalls seeing her on stage when she was just a little girl. "We must have a talk about the civil war some time", Dressler snaps, eyeing the obviously middle aged woman up and down in aghast fury. "Just you and I". With those huge sad eyes and that imperious presence, Dressler looks as if she ended up being re-incarnated as the St. Bernard in the T.V. series version of "Topper", and here, she steals every moment she's on, whether offering advice to Burke and Barrymore's daughter (Madge Evans) or taking her own pooch to task for being naughty on a hotel carpet.

Then, there's the Packards, Dan and Kitty (Wallace Beery and Jean Harlow), "new money" as Burke would refer to them as, and just as tacky as they appear to be. Kitty is obviously a philanderer, and Dan is too busy to even seem to care. He's working on a take-over of Jordan stock and when this is revealed to Oliver, his health begins to decline even more. Drunken actor Larry Renault (John Barrymore), in an ironic choice of casting, is desperate for work, but turns down a small supporting part in a play presented to him by his frustrated agent (Lee Tracy). In love with Evans but not wanting to saddle her with being down on his luck, Barrymore makes a drastic decision that will certainly have a massive effect on Burkes' plans.

If there had been Oscars for supporting performances in 1933, Billie Burke would have won for her role of the selfish, demanding Mrs. Jordan who goes haywire and finally has a breakdown as her plans all fall apart. She goes off on a tirade so delicious that you can't believe that this is Glinda the Good Witch and all of those dizzy socialites she later played spouting. In smaller performances, May Robson, Louise Closser Hale and Grant Mitchell shine. The direction by George Cukor is superb. In the just over two hour running time, everybody has something delicious to do, and in that time, you will find so many thrills, you will want to return to dinner again and again.
9 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Badly Dated
abooboo-24 February 2001
More a loosely constructed vehicle for the considerable acting talents of once revered but now mostly forgotten stars such as John Barrymore and Marie Dressler, than a satisfying piece of early sound film-making in its own right. The first half is shamelessly long-winded and exposition heavy, consisting of needlessly drawn out conversations between ACTORS who are ACTING, rather than helping to tell any cogent or credible story. The second half is a little livelier, thanks mostly to one frantic monologue from Billie Burke, and the scene stealing of Lee Tracy, as well as Barrymore's sudden, tragic transformation from movie idol to washed up drunk before our eyes. The studio's intent clearly was to round up an all-star cast, fling something together and let them do what they did best as performers. That may have been a must-see gimmick at the time, but today it merely comes off as a high rent, two hour episode of "The Love Boat", as the storyline is little more than a thin excuse for the stars to parade about and strut their stuff. That is evidently enough for some hardcore film buffs, but not this one.
11 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Dinner With The Jordans
bkoganbing13 February 2008
Dinner at Eight is MGM's screen adaption of the George S. Kaufman-Edna Ferber play of the same name that went immediately to the screen upon completion of its 232 performance run on Broadway. None of the cast from Broadway made it to Hollywood, but MGM put together one stellar cast of its own.

The central figure in this American drama of manners is Billie Burke who plays Mrs. Millicent Jordan, society woman whose sole concern is seeing that a formal dinner she's given comes off just right. All around her including her own family and the lives of her guests are in crisis. Her husband, Lionel Barrymore has health and business problems. Those business problems are being caused both the Depression and Wallace Beery who's trying to take over Barrymore's family shipping business. Of course Beery's concerns are domestic, his wife Jean Harlow's been carrying on with her doctor, Edmund Lowe who in turn has got nurse Karen Morley on the side as well.

Also on the Jordan domestic front, Barrymore and Burke's daughter Madge Evans is about to throw over her fiancé Phillips Holmes because she's gotten herself involved with a has been actor with a substance abuse problem, John Barrymore. Through all of this Burke flounces her way through like a female version of Clifton Webb's Elliot Templeton from The Razor's Edge whose sole concern was gossip and making sure his clothes properly fit.

Rounding out this cast and in fact first billed is Marie Dressler who plays an old musical comedy star who Lionel as a youth crushed out on big time. She's a wise old bird, probably could give some good advice if more people would confide in her. This was Dressler's next to last film and they don't get better than this. She's got the final and best line of the film when she comments on Jean Harlow's prospects for the' future.

Frank Capra wanted Dressler to play Apple Annie in his first real hit film, Lady for a Day earlier in the year. The part went to May Robson who is also in the movie as Billie Burke's cook. It was interesting to have them in the same film, I only wish they had a scene together.

The best performance in the film goes to John Barrymore who probably drew from his own self destructive impulses to create the character of Larry Renault. He's an over the hill motion picture actor who apparently only Madge Evans loves any more. No one will put up with his king size ego when they're accompanied with king size benders. John Barrymore created a whole group of self destructors in his career, several films of which I've seen recently like Counsellor at Law, Beau Brummel, and Grand Hotel to accompany Dinner at Eight. Barrymore is nothing short of brilliant. See how he goes to pieces when his press agent Lee Tracy finally tells him he's washed up and Tracy's washed up with him.

George S. Kaufman and Edna Ferber are a pair of unusual collaborators. Both members of the famous Algonquin Round Table, Dinner at Eight is unusual for both. The usual Ferber saga about empire builders is certainly not Dinner at Eight. Lionel Barrymore's empire is already built and its tottering. And Kaufman's satire the kind you find in works like I'd Rather Be Right and The Man Who Came To Dinner is muted here to a large degree.

This was George Cukor's first film under his new MGM contract where producer David O. Selznick brought him when they both left RKO. It was an auspicious debut for Cukor. Cukor got spot on performances from his cast.

Dinner at Eight is dated however, still excellent. People just don't put on tuxedos for dinner any more, today's audience might find that strange. But it was a more elegant time.
8 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Comedy with surprisingly dark undertones
marissas7514 January 2006
"Dinner at Eight"'s all-star cast, glossy production values, and lifestyles-of-the-rich-and-famous setting suggest that the movie might be nothing more than an entertaining romp. Remarkably, though, it consistently engages with the darker side of life. It's one of the few 1930s movies I've seen that takes into account the Great Depression and the ever-present risk of financial ruin. It also deals quite maturely with adultery, illness, and aging.

The movie follows a week in the lives of a number of New Yorkers who have been invited to a dinner party hosted by Oliver and Millicent Jordan (Lionel Barrymore and Billie Burke). While sometimes the plot is a little melodramatic, its serious undercurrents make it more realistic than other movies of the era, and a good social commentary.

That's not to say, though, that "Dinner at Eight" isn't funny. The humor arises from the characters, rather than the situations (this is not a screwball comedy!). Marie Dressler as an aging grande dame of the theatre, Jean Harlow as a vulgar and ambitious young wife, and Billie Burke as the sublimely frivolous hostess all have great fun with their somewhat stereotypical roles, finding fresh gestures and intonations that make them very amusing. John Barrymore is also excellent as a proud but washed-up matinée idol; in his last scene he is simultaneously funny and moving.

"Dinner at Eight"'s only flaw (but it's a big flaw) is that it still feels like a filmed play. Most of the vignettes go on for too long after they have made their point, and could use some trimming. If that had happened, there might have been room for an additional subplot (found in the play) about a love triangle between the Jordans' butler, maid, and chauffeur. This triangle is mentioned briefly in the film, but it would be nice to see it play out, especially because it might provide more social commentary about class distinctions.
5 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Brilliant Comedy Turns to Pathos and Goodness
secondtake24 June 2009
Warning: Spoilers
Dinner at Eight (1933)

Brilliant Comedy Turns to Pathos and Goodness

It's easy to love this movie, and easy to dismiss it. If you don't respond to the stiffly filmed (camera on a tripod) movies of this time (and not all of them are like this) you'll struggle with the tableau-on-a-stage effects here. But if you think of it as theater, with its requisite focus on "acting" in all its exaggerations and subtleties (both), you'll see some amazing writing and performances in what is one of George Cukor's best directing efforts. I really think this is a brilliant film, and if it lacks the visual drama, the interesting lighting, or the naturalistic feel you expect, give it another try, and take it on its own terms. You might be really glad.

First of all, I think the best performance of all is Lionel Barrymore's. Sure, coming in a close second is the pathos filled drama made vivid (and tear-jerking) by his brother. The scene with John Barrymore as the washed up actor as he kills himself is one of cinema's great moments, I think, and I sound like I'm exaggerating, but watch how it unfolds, without sound, and without pretense, until he fades away, his profile carefully positioned so that when the door is opened on his corpse, that is what everyone will see. Beyond even that, though, and working with less emphatic material, Lionel, as the businessman struggling with the full weight of the depression, parries all the woes and the friendships as he suffers his brush with mortality. His understatement is perfect. He makes the film more than a sensation.

His wife, played by Billie Burke (of Wizard of Oz fame, as the good witch), is brilliantly frivolous. Watch how she actually makes her absurdity fluid and alive. And most of all, watch how by the end her love for her husband crystallizes, not in some sea change, but in a believable minor shift--canceling the performance, refocusing on the moment. But not giving up dinner, not after all that has preceded.

Some people love Jean Harlow for her role as a ditzy tart, and I have a problem with women portrayed as idiots (even if they have a razor sharp side to them), and so Harlow grates on me a little. She does act with verve, and you can tell she's a lot of fun. Not so her husband played by Wallace Beery. I'll leave his bombast alone. But the third caricature in the movie is the brilliant, brilliant, need I repeat, brilliant Marie Dressler, playing an aging woman who has both her history and her wisdom to delicately trail behind her. Her interactions with the would-be tartlet, the young woman (and daughter) foolishly (and understandably) in love with John Barrymore, are treasures, from start to finish, especially at the end. Don't mistake Dressler's over-sized expressions as hamming it up. There are people almost like that, and it projects on the screen really well.

When all is said and done, the multi-layered plot here wraps together with clever ease, and by the time the movie ends, right at eight o'clock (yes, dinner is served after we are done watching), there is this feeling of complete satisfaction. (It may not be coincidence that one of the screenwriters, Herman J. Mankiewicz, also famously helped with Citizen Kane.) Life has its dramas and traumas and humors and disappointments. But it works out somehow, in a different way than we intended, surely, but because of the good will and smart reactions of the best of us.
6 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
I stick by my words
caspian19784 January 2002
This is not a comedy! I'll say it again to those who read between the lines and ignore the facts. Even for the year it was made, this is not a comedy. People who believe this film is a comedy are the same people who think the Last Temptation of Christ is an Easter movie. This is not a comedy. Even to your far left "black comedies" this is not a movie you would want to watch because it is funny. Then again, let me also state, that this was a good movie for its time. Yes, its a classic, yes it will stand the test of time. But No! No! This is not a comedy let alone of the top ten 100 comedies of all time. It is a movie that laughs at the classes. Kind of like a Charlie Chaplin film with sound and without a funny comic like Chaplin. It is a 30's off beat drama about the struggles of a class system that has nothing better to do but have dinner at 8. What do you think........
8 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
I was surprised by how dark and sad it was sometimes!
eminkl13 December 2019
A high society wife plans a fancy dinner party in honor of some visiting royalty. The film basically takes a look at the lives of most of the invited guests one week before the party. Even though they're all technically in the upper-class, they all have their own problems: professional, financial, personal and a combination of all three. This film has superb acting and a very witty screenplay. Probably one of the best ensemble of actors put together on-screen with most of them absolutely shining especially Marie Dressler, John Barrymore, Wallace Beery and Jean Harlow. It is a comedy and it is often very, very funny but I was surprised by how dark and sad it was sometimes! Thank you to the person who recommended this to me.
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Jean Harlow as the ultimate Platinum Blonde
frankde-jong4 March 2021
A comedy build around a dinner party. Something like "La regle du jeu" (1939, Jean Renoir) or "Gosford Park" (2001, Robert Altman).

The great depression is looming large over the movie, in spite of the fact that it is a comedy. Everybody has seen better times and everybody would like to use the dinner party to investigate new business opportunities.

Jean Harlow is the most memorable figure of the movie to me. She really is the predecessor of Marilyn Monroe!
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
A great movie in its day which now seems dated
Dunham1627 May 2012
The classic 1933 setup could not be grander. George S. Kaufman and Edna Ferber wrote a Broadway depression drama, here translated into a black and white film centering on the lives of the people invited to a formal dinner which the wife isn't capable of pulling off, and for which the husband doesn't exactly have enthusiasm. The one liners about the old rich losing everything in the depression, to believe all is over, are magnificent. The film is a milestone in the number of high paying stars the producer was willing to hire in the early days of the talkies -John and Lionel Barrymore, Wallace Beery, Jean Harlow, Billie Burke and Marie Dressler. While everything clicked gloriously during the premiere year, 1933, the millennium finds both the photography and the editing VERY dated and more the sense of the major characters developing their backstories and depression dilemmas as sequential short plays, one after the other having nothing to do with each other, than a storyline per se. It seems more like watching a series of fabulous old clips featuring this or that famous star in this or that realistic loss of self and wealth situation, but not anything which the modern audience might suggest approaches "a play with a story".
4 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed