Small spoiler of episode 4. I find it interesting people are complaining about the show because the first three episodes are rehashing what occurred leading up to the trial and about the man's character. This docu series isn't really focused on this man is guilty as much as it is here is what Netflix presented and how what they presented isn't the entire story. For example Netflix edited audio footage of a phone call made between police suggesting that Avery was the only suspect like the police were after him. In episode 4 they play the audio in full. Netflix audio was "He wants us to go back over and reinterview Avery again." The full audio was "He wants us to go back over and reinterview Avery and Zipperer again. Okay. Yeah Zipperer's not going to be real happy." And there is other things that Netflix blew past or edited to fit the narrative they wanted to portray. Its very interesting. When they do side by side comparisons of what Netflix shows and the real audio including things like cutting out key information that provides context to a statement made just to make it look like Avery was targeted by police and is innocent. I would also state he may be innocent i don't know this is the first i have ever even heard about this case ive never seen the Netflix show (but im going to after i finish this series) im not here to pass judgment on the guy i just find the Netflix manipulation fascinating.
Review of Convicting a Murderer
