We know he committed the murders. It's not a question. The only question was whether or not it was premeditated and/or if it was under the circumstances of sleepwalking. That being said, very little time is spent on the science of sleepwalking. It's just a repetitive cycle of the same beats and same dialogue over and over again. There's little to no focus on the victim. It's about the killer, from the killer, by the killer. And the most irritating part of it all? They continue to splice in an interview they did with a random psychologist that had never met with anyone involving the case. They were purely speculating and postulating from afar. It was so condescending and unnecessarily elitist. She spoke as if she had a deep insight but she sounds exactly like YouTube comments do. Just with more flowery language.
Don't watch. Honestly YouTube videos on this case are better.
Don't watch. Honestly YouTube videos on this case are better.