This series shows how biased telling slants a story in the most severe way. This is not about junk science at all. The 1st 2 episodes are about attorneys and detectives twisting data to fit their perception - there's nothing wrong with the science; in fact the true evaluation scientifically is what freed the elder widow. In Cadaver Dogs, the episode's producers omitted the corroborating facts that support the idea that D'Andre killed Bianca and then covered it up. They keep saying ' because the dog barked' as if that is the sole reason he was convicted. But minimal research reveals it was a team of cadaver dogs who picked that car out of hundreds on a huge lot, and then found the car-seat that had been intentionally placed several yards away from the car. 3 dogs, not 1. As someone who is not only a dog lover but who knows and respects military and police dogs and how intense and focused their training is, this episode thoroughly aggravates me. They're trying to say cadaver dogs are junk science based on this twisted presentation that, for some reason, hopes to paint DeAndre as the innocent victim. I just have no idea where Netflix was going with this series. All of the facts point to DeAndre having accidentally murdered Bianca - and had the audacity to put her dead body in her car seat, with her eyes wide open, and have her cousin kiss her goodbye before leaving to school. That is a man who deserves to be in prison. I'm just floored at the obviousness of the deception in this particular episode. I'm not gonna watch any more of this junk Netflix. In fact I think I'm completely done with anything produced by Netflix.
Review of Exhibit A
