Having a cool title and premise does not excuse a filmmaker from those making decisions that weaken their movie. Overzealous editing, camerawork, and lighting are no substitution for judicious storytelling or direction; cheap jump scares are altogether gauche. Scene writing and plot threads still need logical through lines from A to B, or at least through B to C, to tie a picture together. I'm given to understand that director Steven C. Miller wanted to make a darker feature than the intended television premiere would allow, and also that he took inspiration from mid-century genre flicks. I can see glimpses of both these elements in his thinking - in some of the practical effects including blood, gore, and props; in the narrative advancement that drops kernels of supernatural horror piecemeal as the tale comes together. Unfortunately, the end result doesn't particularly measure up in any capacity: despite all due earnestness in the production, 'Scream of the banshee' mostly just falls flat.
I don't think anyone's efforts were outright bad; I see the hard work that was put into this. I see what Miller wanted to do. But in one way or another every contribution just ended up being misguided. While practical effects look great, digital creations are, shall we say, less than seamless. The first time we see the titular creature it looks fantastic, but the special makeup and costume design somehow seem increasingly inauthentic as the length draws on; why change what didn't need to be? Andrew Strahorn's cinematography and Miller's editing are technically proficient, but exercised to wrong ends, trying to artificially heighten the horror violence but instead only overcooking it. Ryan Dodson's score is enjoyable in and of itself, but is employed in ways here that make it seem over the top. The production values are weirdly inconsistent; from one scene to the next the fundamental image before us might bear a different look and feel - sometimes exactly on point, at other times bearing the appearance in different ways of having been filmed in front of a green screen even for simple exterior shots, if not having been computer-generated outright. Miller's intent as director was true, but he takes cues from other genre flicks of the early 2000s, including TV movies, that severely reduce the best potential. The cast give the best performances they can to realize the material, but the combined effect of every other facet is to force them into a corner that strips away nuance and tact. Poor Todd Haberkorn seems to have suffered the most in this regard.
For all this, however, Anthony C. Ferrante's screenplay is surely the chief weakness. There are some genuinely good ideas in the writing, but by and large Ferrante's work is sadly a scattered mess. Characters should have been more than just empty shells; dialogue is mostly terrible, and sometimes cliched. In both these regards, I feel bad for Lance Henriksen, because his part has the dubious distinction of representing the worst writing of anything in the whole feature. Scene writing (and Miller's realization of it) is too often ham-handed and overdone, sometimes testing the limits of good sense or suspension of disbelief (example, watch for an early scene in which three characters obliviously walk past something on the floor). Like an old house that needs to be remodeled, the plot has good bones - yet the meat between those bones is in desperate need of revitalization. Some individual story beats are questionable; threads between beats and scenes are sometimes thin and falling apart. There is, after all, a complete story told herein, but it struggles to feel cohesive or even coherent as a substantial amount of Movie Magic is involved to weave everything together. It's a lot to try to take in.
I don't altogether hate 'Scream of the banshee.' I see what was put into it; I see what it could have been. As it stands, however, nothing quite fits together; the efforts of all involved are just slightly mismatched from what they should be. I wish Ferrante only the best, and I trust that he has grown in his skills as a writer since this was made, but his screenplay needed significant rewrites. I don't absolutely regret watching this film - I'm just disappointed. Good ideas; no major success in any fashion. My kindest regards to all who had a hand in this, and I hope to see more of what they can do elsewhere. 'Scream of the banshee,' however, is just not the fun horror romp it might have been.
I don't think anyone's efforts were outright bad; I see the hard work that was put into this. I see what Miller wanted to do. But in one way or another every contribution just ended up being misguided. While practical effects look great, digital creations are, shall we say, less than seamless. The first time we see the titular creature it looks fantastic, but the special makeup and costume design somehow seem increasingly inauthentic as the length draws on; why change what didn't need to be? Andrew Strahorn's cinematography and Miller's editing are technically proficient, but exercised to wrong ends, trying to artificially heighten the horror violence but instead only overcooking it. Ryan Dodson's score is enjoyable in and of itself, but is employed in ways here that make it seem over the top. The production values are weirdly inconsistent; from one scene to the next the fundamental image before us might bear a different look and feel - sometimes exactly on point, at other times bearing the appearance in different ways of having been filmed in front of a green screen even for simple exterior shots, if not having been computer-generated outright. Miller's intent as director was true, but he takes cues from other genre flicks of the early 2000s, including TV movies, that severely reduce the best potential. The cast give the best performances they can to realize the material, but the combined effect of every other facet is to force them into a corner that strips away nuance and tact. Poor Todd Haberkorn seems to have suffered the most in this regard.
For all this, however, Anthony C. Ferrante's screenplay is surely the chief weakness. There are some genuinely good ideas in the writing, but by and large Ferrante's work is sadly a scattered mess. Characters should have been more than just empty shells; dialogue is mostly terrible, and sometimes cliched. In both these regards, I feel bad for Lance Henriksen, because his part has the dubious distinction of representing the worst writing of anything in the whole feature. Scene writing (and Miller's realization of it) is too often ham-handed and overdone, sometimes testing the limits of good sense or suspension of disbelief (example, watch for an early scene in which three characters obliviously walk past something on the floor). Like an old house that needs to be remodeled, the plot has good bones - yet the meat between those bones is in desperate need of revitalization. Some individual story beats are questionable; threads between beats and scenes are sometimes thin and falling apart. There is, after all, a complete story told herein, but it struggles to feel cohesive or even coherent as a substantial amount of Movie Magic is involved to weave everything together. It's a lot to try to take in.
I don't altogether hate 'Scream of the banshee.' I see what was put into it; I see what it could have been. As it stands, however, nothing quite fits together; the efforts of all involved are just slightly mismatched from what they should be. I wish Ferrante only the best, and I trust that he has grown in his skills as a writer since this was made, but his screenplay needed significant rewrites. I don't absolutely regret watching this film - I'm just disappointed. Good ideas; no major success in any fashion. My kindest regards to all who had a hand in this, and I hope to see more of what they can do elsewhere. 'Scream of the banshee,' however, is just not the fun horror romp it might have been.