A previous reviewer hit the nail on the head with one question: "where are the critical questions?"
Perhaps I raised my own expectations too high, but this felt far too much like tabloid journalism. Interviews felt coached to deliver one liners and spin stories that create an atmosphere of "I want to believe" rather than "could we prove/debunk this?"
Any scientific interest is reduced to pseudoscience in an atttempt to prop up the assumptions being made, so all hope is lost if you really want to learn something new or interesting about near death experiences or the possibility of life after death.
If, on the other hand, you do just want to kill an hour hearing people's dramatic experiences, you could enjoy the first episode.
Perhaps I raised my own expectations too high, but this felt far too much like tabloid journalism. Interviews felt coached to deliver one liners and spin stories that create an atmosphere of "I want to believe" rather than "could we prove/debunk this?"
Any scientific interest is reduced to pseudoscience in an atttempt to prop up the assumptions being made, so all hope is lost if you really want to learn something new or interesting about near death experiences or the possibility of life after death.
If, on the other hand, you do just want to kill an hour hearing people's dramatic experiences, you could enjoy the first episode.