'Man Wanted' was another film that could have been a lot more. Have a lot of appreciation of pre-code films and am always amazed at how much many manage to get away with. Kay Francis was always watchable and have seen some great performances from her where she does light up the screen. William Dieterle to me was an inconsistent director, but he did make some great films (including one of the best versions of 'The Hunchback of Notre Dame').
Despite all that promise, 'Man Wanted' disappointed. Or at least to me it did. And this is not being said with pleasure or malice, to me this did have potential to be good for all the above and also because the premise is not a bad one. Is 'Man Wanted' a bad film? Not to me, absolutely not. It is absolutely a watchable film and it takes a lot for me to say that something is unwatchable. Considering its potential though, to me 'Man Wanted' could have been a lot better.
There are definitely good things. The stunning photography being one. Very stylish and sumptuous, and at times almost expressionist. The art direction is also striking. Nice use of music, which is not constant or intrusive. There are some impressive moments in Dieterle's directing, especially visually. A lot of thought was put into the visual side of things and there is atmosphere.
Francis has a character that plays to her strengths and she has a lot of fun with it, without over-compensating. Andy Devine is suitably earthy and Una Merkel, despite having an annoying character, has some sparkling moments.
Sadly too much doesn't work. While there are some good moments to Dieterle's direction, there are some points where it is too routine and not as involving as it should be. The script does have some nice witty pre-code lines, but generally could have been sharper and more acid-tongued. Compared to a lot of pre-code films in the early-30s, the script didn't seem that daring or bold.
David Manners, who more often than not to me came over generally in his roles as competent but rarely wowed, seemed rather bland as a character near-impossible to feel anything for. The story needed a lot more spark than what was here, it took too long to get going, it was not always very eventful and it and the script just ran out of gas too early. There is not much new here at all and despite the running time being brief there just wasn't enough content to fill it, meaning that to me the film felt rather thin.
In conclusion, worth a one-time watch but underwhelming. 5/10
Despite all that promise, 'Man Wanted' disappointed. Or at least to me it did. And this is not being said with pleasure or malice, to me this did have potential to be good for all the above and also because the premise is not a bad one. Is 'Man Wanted' a bad film? Not to me, absolutely not. It is absolutely a watchable film and it takes a lot for me to say that something is unwatchable. Considering its potential though, to me 'Man Wanted' could have been a lot better.
There are definitely good things. The stunning photography being one. Very stylish and sumptuous, and at times almost expressionist. The art direction is also striking. Nice use of music, which is not constant or intrusive. There are some impressive moments in Dieterle's directing, especially visually. A lot of thought was put into the visual side of things and there is atmosphere.
Francis has a character that plays to her strengths and she has a lot of fun with it, without over-compensating. Andy Devine is suitably earthy and Una Merkel, despite having an annoying character, has some sparkling moments.
Sadly too much doesn't work. While there are some good moments to Dieterle's direction, there are some points where it is too routine and not as involving as it should be. The script does have some nice witty pre-code lines, but generally could have been sharper and more acid-tongued. Compared to a lot of pre-code films in the early-30s, the script didn't seem that daring or bold.
David Manners, who more often than not to me came over generally in his roles as competent but rarely wowed, seemed rather bland as a character near-impossible to feel anything for. The story needed a lot more spark than what was here, it took too long to get going, it was not always very eventful and it and the script just ran out of gas too early. There is not much new here at all and despite the running time being brief there just wasn't enough content to fill it, meaning that to me the film felt rather thin.
In conclusion, worth a one-time watch but underwhelming. 5/10