Review of M

M (III) (2018)
1/10
Distanting collage of scenes in a work of art which essentially is not a film
29 February 2020
Warning: Spoilers
Essentially M is just an artwork, a collage of moving images without an inner logic, neither plot. It is cheap, distanting and boring as a film, but to some it may be an artwork to interpret in different ways. It's not very promising if everything had been self-produced, self-acted, self-directed, self-written. When something's too important to the creator, it cripples everything usually.

It goes without saying that today technology has become so cheap, that any kind of film can be cheaply produced up to the technical quality (image & audio) of the real cinematic features. That means an avalanche of art films that don't have the traditional qualities which used to make a film good.

Someone's going to love this anyway.
7 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed