I have a pretty big grey area when it comes to rating sci-fi movies, as I know it can be a difficult genre to work in with many critics. That being said I really don't understand how this particular movie gets an IMDb rating anywhere over 2.
The acting is terrible. Plain and simple. That is taking into account the fact that there is a lot of monologue instead of dialogue. Unnecessary monologue with just long shots of blank expressions as a result that is supposed to mean... something? If emotion was intended, it was not acted out.
Script... What script? The entire movie seems to be a string of individually shot scenes with very little, if any, overarching story or progression.
Visual effects would be a low budget type if this movie was shot in the 90s. But this is 2018 people -- come on!
I'm pretty sure this "production" wouldn't even pass as an art/media academy student project. How anyone git it pushed through into an actual movie production is completely beyond me. I'd give it a 0/10 if I could, but a 1/10 will have to do.
The acting is terrible. Plain and simple. That is taking into account the fact that there is a lot of monologue instead of dialogue. Unnecessary monologue with just long shots of blank expressions as a result that is supposed to mean... something? If emotion was intended, it was not acted out.
Script... What script? The entire movie seems to be a string of individually shot scenes with very little, if any, overarching story or progression.
Visual effects would be a low budget type if this movie was shot in the 90s. But this is 2018 people -- come on!
I'm pretty sure this "production" wouldn't even pass as an art/media academy student project. How anyone git it pushed through into an actual movie production is completely beyond me. I'd give it a 0/10 if I could, but a 1/10 will have to do.