Intruder (III) (2016)
3/10
the acting was decent, the plot? not so much
16 June 2018
Warning: Spoilers
I'm giving this a rating of three because the acting was pretty good; they did good with what they had to work with and there were times I genuinely sat there in shock/fear in what would happen next. But that's one of the problems with this film; nothing did happen. Also, I loved Oswald. He's a very handsome cat. The guy is literally in her apartment for DAYS and all we see him do is just walk around and make himself comfortable. He's even petting the cat when he walks by. It just baffles me that he stays in her house for all of these days and doesn't kill her in the same fashion he did the first woman. I just don't understand the point of kidnapping Elizabeth to just kill her? Why didn't he just do the job when he had every chance in the world to do it? Now let's move on to Elizabeth. she somehow doesn't notice things he does. He eats her food, drinks her milk, and URINATES on her dishes in the sink. He even kills her boyfriend and hides him under the bed. HOW does she not smell the dead body? it just doesn't make sense that she wouldn't notice any of this.... but then again all she did was drink wine and take showers, so maybe she was so busy that she didn't have time to notice any of it. And the thing that confused me the most is the fact that the cat let him pet her when he had the hood on and was sneaking through her house, but hissed at him when he came to "give her the lost wallet". I honestly wouldn't recommend this movie unless you've got nothing better to do. I definitely wouldn't watch again.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed