Strange Evidence (2017– )
1/10
Clickbait in form of a TV series
7 November 2017
Warning: Spoilers
This documentation series shows "unexplainable" footage with experts trying to explain it. Could be interesting, but... it's not.

The first "case" is a man bursting into flames out of nowhere. His pants' front pocket to be exactly. The footage gets shown at least 20 times (I think that's even a huge understatement) with the usual "watch what happens next" blabla. My first thought was that the man must've had some electronic device in his pants and the battery just had an electrical short. After eternities of experts talking about how baffled they are and being clueless what could have caused this, trying out different scenarios with experiments, they FINALLY come to the conclusion that it most likely was a battery that exploded in his pants. All this time the same securitycam footage gets shown again and again and again and again aaaand... again. THEN they finally bother to reveal that he had some kind of vapor/e-cig in his pocket... Well, thank you.

So instead of making a 10 seconds clip like "A vapor had a short and exploded in someones pocket" they decided to waste everybody's time and fill 10 whole minutes with exactly nothing. Not. Worth. Your. Time. SCIENCE Channel?? LOL!
53 out of 57 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed