It's not just a boring movie. It is a repetitive film, but all his cinema is repetitive. He does not know when the sequence has ended and continues.
The problem, for me is that the director himself does not know what he wants to tell and so it is difficult to tell.
The actors are sometimes seen acting, but there are times when you do not see what happens and so it is difficult to see how they act.
The photograph says nothing. Apart from being a cold movie, but not by the light, it is a distant movie. He does not tell us anything.
The director, lead, for my taste, without being clear what he wants to tell is difficult to do. It repeats the sequences, lengthens them, bores and only knows how to make plane sequence, although it does not count anything and although the camera this badly put, that usually is normal.
It's another film by this director, so special
The problem, for me is that the director himself does not know what he wants to tell and so it is difficult to tell.
The actors are sometimes seen acting, but there are times when you do not see what happens and so it is difficult to see how they act.
The photograph says nothing. Apart from being a cold movie, but not by the light, it is a distant movie. He does not tell us anything.
The director, lead, for my taste, without being clear what he wants to tell is difficult to do. It repeats the sequences, lengthens them, bores and only knows how to make plane sequence, although it does not count anything and although the camera this badly put, that usually is normal.
It's another film by this director, so special