As a military history buff, particularly of World War Two, and being familiar with excellent non-fiction and fiction works in print from great authors such as John Toland, Richard Franks, and William Manchester dealing with the end of the Pacific war, MacArthur, and the occupation, I really wanted to like this movie, just for its subject matter alone. But I was significantly disappointed with this film in several key respects.
Warning - several of the following points will involve spoilers: 1) The fictional love interest involving General Fellers significantly detracted from the plot, the flow of action (with its constant flashbacks,) and the seriousness of the film. It added nothing but unnecessary and confusing drama, including the silly "Japanese lover" appellation given to Bonner by a competing staff MacArthur toady.
2) I am sorry, but I was not impressed at all with Tommy Lee Jones's portrayal of MacArthur, which was actually just yet another portrayal of Tommy Lee Jones by Tommy Lee Jones ... as he does in nearly all of his film roles. The actual "American Caesar" MacArthur was nothing at all like TLJ's southern drawling cartoonish portrayal of the man, which transformed MacArthur into a two-dimensional caricature of the patrician American general. No American actor in a film yet, including the late Gregory Peck, has ever accurately captured the persona of one of the most accomplished, egotistical, intellectual, visionary, infuriating, devoted, yet enigmatic military leaders in our national history.
3) Collapsing the entire investigation of Hirohito's role in starting the Pacific war into 10 days only served to add fake urgent drama to the setup ... it was both untrue (the actual timeline was about 5 months) and reflected a purely political viewpoint that was not matched by the facts or motivations of key players at the time.
4) It was all well and good for General Fellers to conclude that nobody could determine with certainty after the fact what Emperor Hirohito's complicity was in the start of the Pacific war. That could have been a compelling finding ... but exploring that issue in at least some reasonable detail, instead of the airy dismissal given at the end of the film, as applied by the Fellers character (no doubt to make up for lost time from wasting most of the film's screen time on those silly flashbacks to the fake love affair with the Japanese teacher) completely detracted from the serious issues that the film was supposed to address. This matter deserved an in-depth investigation in late 1945, and an in-depth treatment in this film as well.
5) The acting by the Japanese characters seemed fairly well done (in contrast to TLJ, and Matthew Fox's wooden portrayal of Fellers), but the Japanese characters themselves were far more deserving of exploration than this film provided. Particularly, the most telling insight was offered by the Lord Privy Seal Kido character ... i.e., his statement that the Emperor was really just a ceremonial religious figurehead before, and during the war, who only rose to the occasion in August 1945 to exert the Imperial Will. That is, his demand that his war cabinet agree with him to accept the Allied surrender terms. The drama with which this scenario was infused was almost completely ignored in the film. The film did in fact depict the attempted military coup just before the surrender, but it did not bother to describe who was actually conducting the coup and what they intended to accomplish, and exactly whom the plotters intended to assassinate.
That the Emperor was not really in charge of Japanese imperial policy in the late 1930s and early 1940s was, of course, completely counter to the Western notion of an Emperor's role and authority. Yet that concept and fact, along with the fact that the Emperor finally forced his will upon the militarists in charge of the regime, was the lynch-pin of the film's reason for being, and for MacArthur's decision regarding the prosecution of Hirohito.
All in all, this film disappoints almost entirely, including dramatically, factually, and thematically. Realistically, a proper treatment of what was involved even just in MacArthur's decision whether or not to prosecute Hirohito deserves at least a mini-series level of treatment, not a less-than-two-hour film.
Warning - several of the following points will involve spoilers: 1) The fictional love interest involving General Fellers significantly detracted from the plot, the flow of action (with its constant flashbacks,) and the seriousness of the film. It added nothing but unnecessary and confusing drama, including the silly "Japanese lover" appellation given to Bonner by a competing staff MacArthur toady.
2) I am sorry, but I was not impressed at all with Tommy Lee Jones's portrayal of MacArthur, which was actually just yet another portrayal of Tommy Lee Jones by Tommy Lee Jones ... as he does in nearly all of his film roles. The actual "American Caesar" MacArthur was nothing at all like TLJ's southern drawling cartoonish portrayal of the man, which transformed MacArthur into a two-dimensional caricature of the patrician American general. No American actor in a film yet, including the late Gregory Peck, has ever accurately captured the persona of one of the most accomplished, egotistical, intellectual, visionary, infuriating, devoted, yet enigmatic military leaders in our national history.
3) Collapsing the entire investigation of Hirohito's role in starting the Pacific war into 10 days only served to add fake urgent drama to the setup ... it was both untrue (the actual timeline was about 5 months) and reflected a purely political viewpoint that was not matched by the facts or motivations of key players at the time.
4) It was all well and good for General Fellers to conclude that nobody could determine with certainty after the fact what Emperor Hirohito's complicity was in the start of the Pacific war. That could have been a compelling finding ... but exploring that issue in at least some reasonable detail, instead of the airy dismissal given at the end of the film, as applied by the Fellers character (no doubt to make up for lost time from wasting most of the film's screen time on those silly flashbacks to the fake love affair with the Japanese teacher) completely detracted from the serious issues that the film was supposed to address. This matter deserved an in-depth investigation in late 1945, and an in-depth treatment in this film as well.
5) The acting by the Japanese characters seemed fairly well done (in contrast to TLJ, and Matthew Fox's wooden portrayal of Fellers), but the Japanese characters themselves were far more deserving of exploration than this film provided. Particularly, the most telling insight was offered by the Lord Privy Seal Kido character ... i.e., his statement that the Emperor was really just a ceremonial religious figurehead before, and during the war, who only rose to the occasion in August 1945 to exert the Imperial Will. That is, his demand that his war cabinet agree with him to accept the Allied surrender terms. The drama with which this scenario was infused was almost completely ignored in the film. The film did in fact depict the attempted military coup just before the surrender, but it did not bother to describe who was actually conducting the coup and what they intended to accomplish, and exactly whom the plotters intended to assassinate.
That the Emperor was not really in charge of Japanese imperial policy in the late 1930s and early 1940s was, of course, completely counter to the Western notion of an Emperor's role and authority. Yet that concept and fact, along with the fact that the Emperor finally forced his will upon the militarists in charge of the regime, was the lynch-pin of the film's reason for being, and for MacArthur's decision regarding the prosecution of Hirohito.
All in all, this film disappoints almost entirely, including dramatically, factually, and thematically. Realistically, a proper treatment of what was involved even just in MacArthur's decision whether or not to prosecute Hirohito deserves at least a mini-series level of treatment, not a less-than-two-hour film.