It seems the unholy, crappy trinity is now complete; The Amityville Horror, The Haunting in Connecticut and now the Haunting in Connecticut 2 Ghosts of Georgia. Right off the bat, what the hell does Connecticut have to do with Georgia Ghosts, because other than the title and quite possibly some of the original investigators resided in Connecticut this case had nothing to do with the New England state.
Then just as it was done with the previous aforementioned movie titles, this movie was fiction except with the insertion of the Wyrick haunting details. So if you are a paranormal fan, do not except to learn the exact details of this now famous (or infamous) haunting. The same thing was done to the Haunting in Connecticut, using just enough true information to legally label it with based on a true story. Something tells me the young man plagued in the first movie did not cough up a mega-sized booger.
Once again Hollywood and it's cronies have ripped apart the truth about these cases for the collection of revenue. Bad, bad Hollywood.
Then just as it was done with the previous aforementioned movie titles, this movie was fiction except with the insertion of the Wyrick haunting details. So if you are a paranormal fan, do not except to learn the exact details of this now famous (or infamous) haunting. The same thing was done to the Haunting in Connecticut, using just enough true information to legally label it with based on a true story. Something tells me the young man plagued in the first movie did not cough up a mega-sized booger.
Once again Hollywood and it's cronies have ripped apart the truth about these cases for the collection of revenue. Bad, bad Hollywood.