Review of World's End

World's End (2010)
1/10
What a waste of film stock--and my time
16 October 2010
This is Phillip Kim's very first screenplay. If there is any justice in the world it will be his last.

I wasted 101 minutes on this turkey. Don't make the same mistake.

Two-dollar budget, one-dollar characters, confused, contradictory and abysmal script and a director who couldn't direct traffic on a Sunday morning. Not an original idea in it. Either the investors didn't read the script, or they *read* the script and figured it was a great tax write-off.

The movie has two, flawed, premises: The world will soon run out of oil--which proves typist Phillip Kim, (can't truthfully call him a writer), spends too much time reading comic books instead of scientific journals--and that a world-wide cancer wiped out the female population, (Frank Herbert did that far, far better in "The White Plague"). The fact that there are a number of females in the film--most of whom say and do nothing and don't really need to be there--shows that the typist couldn't stay on track with his own inept plot.

Skip Downstream--better yet, *toss* it downstream--and watch the better post-apocalyptic movies this disgrace has ripped off: A Boy and his Dog. Logan's Run. Mad Max. The Postman. Even Waterworld is a far better film.

Did I mention this movie is bad?
4 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed