The version of IRON MASK that I saw is a silent film with the intertitle cards removed and dialog/narration by Douglas Fairbanks as well as incidental sounds and music (added later—during the sound era). He did, despite rumors, have a very nice voice and was perfect for the role of narrator. I would have much preferred to see the movie in its original form, as viewing it this way was a bit odd. It was like watching a silent and having someone talk throughout—acting out some of the parts and describing the action. Many of the descriptions (such as "the dice are kind" as D'Artagnon wins at playing dice) are completely unnecessary and detract from the film.
This sort of reissuing of a silent with narration and sound is not unheard of, as Chaplin did this with THE GOLD RUSH. About 20 years after its initial silent release, Chaplin re-released it with his narration and a musical score he wrote himself. Many complained about this as a bastardization of the original, but I actually like both versions about equally—they are indeed classics. I assume Chaplin got this idea, in part, from the re-release of IRON MASK.
The film begins with some irrelevant scenes where the four Musketeers get into trouble and have fun. When the actual important part of the story begins, Louis XIII is excited because his wife just had a son! He is thrilled to have an heir. But, unexpectedly, shortly after the baby's birth, the Queen gives birth to another boy—an identical twin! Cardinal Richelieu and his sidekick begin their scheming—and their rival, Rochefort, finds out their plans. Richelieu's plan is to have the other child raised as a commoner along the Spanish frontier—why, exactly, he's doing this is unknown. It's interesting that in this version, Rochefort is a scoundrel much like Richelieu is in later ones—as in later versions (such as the Louis Hayward and Richard Chamberlain films) Rochefort was a good guy and worked with the Musketeers for France's best interests and Richelieu was a scheming jerk. Here, the roles are reversed and the entire story is changed. Instead of removing a bad king (Louis XIV) and substituting a good twin brother, the plan of Rochefort is to get rid of the good one and install the more malleable and evil one in his place.
Years have passed and Rochefort has gotten a hold of the twin—turning him evil and selfish. On the other hand, the Prince has grown into a decent guy and able ruler—due, in part, to the able tutelage by D'Artagnon. Rochefort plans to have the evil twin substituted in place of good King Louis XIV. Who will win this battle of wits? Watch it for yourself and see.
Like most of Fairbanks' other silents, this one in which he starred was a high-budget film—with great sets and costumes. Considering he was the biggest swashbuckling star of the era, this isn't surprising and it looks great. While the story is a bit jumbled as well as hurried in the process, it's a pretty good movie—though I strongly recommend you try to find the original version if you can—Fairbanks just talks too much in this one and you lose some of the beauty of this well-acted film.
This sort of reissuing of a silent with narration and sound is not unheard of, as Chaplin did this with THE GOLD RUSH. About 20 years after its initial silent release, Chaplin re-released it with his narration and a musical score he wrote himself. Many complained about this as a bastardization of the original, but I actually like both versions about equally—they are indeed classics. I assume Chaplin got this idea, in part, from the re-release of IRON MASK.
The film begins with some irrelevant scenes where the four Musketeers get into trouble and have fun. When the actual important part of the story begins, Louis XIII is excited because his wife just had a son! He is thrilled to have an heir. But, unexpectedly, shortly after the baby's birth, the Queen gives birth to another boy—an identical twin! Cardinal Richelieu and his sidekick begin their scheming—and their rival, Rochefort, finds out their plans. Richelieu's plan is to have the other child raised as a commoner along the Spanish frontier—why, exactly, he's doing this is unknown. It's interesting that in this version, Rochefort is a scoundrel much like Richelieu is in later ones—as in later versions (such as the Louis Hayward and Richard Chamberlain films) Rochefort was a good guy and worked with the Musketeers for France's best interests and Richelieu was a scheming jerk. Here, the roles are reversed and the entire story is changed. Instead of removing a bad king (Louis XIV) and substituting a good twin brother, the plan of Rochefort is to get rid of the good one and install the more malleable and evil one in his place.
Years have passed and Rochefort has gotten a hold of the twin—turning him evil and selfish. On the other hand, the Prince has grown into a decent guy and able ruler—due, in part, to the able tutelage by D'Artagnon. Rochefort plans to have the evil twin substituted in place of good King Louis XIV. Who will win this battle of wits? Watch it for yourself and see.
Like most of Fairbanks' other silents, this one in which he starred was a high-budget film—with great sets and costumes. Considering he was the biggest swashbuckling star of the era, this isn't surprising and it looks great. While the story is a bit jumbled as well as hurried in the process, it's a pretty good movie—though I strongly recommend you try to find the original version if you can—Fairbanks just talks too much in this one and you lose some of the beauty of this well-acted film.