Oh, sure, this movie has flaws, but I liked it a lot.
Lex Barker was a very handsome, muscular Tarzan, and he moved very well.However, the grunts and broken English phrases that worked so well with Weismuller's stoic, wooden presence seem quite odd and out of place coming from an actor with Barker's chiseled features and classic good looks. On the other hand, as my friend Dave Sindelar pointed out, it's a lot easier to believe that Barker's Tarzan is the son of an English Lord. In any case he was a pleasure to watch in action.
There were some minor missteps: The chief of the "bad guy" tribe (who wanted to buy guns to conquer the peaceful Ashuba ruled by Dorothy Dandridge) looked utterly ridiculous in his head-dress, which circled his entire head and made it look as if he were peering out of a fur-lined toilet seat for the duration of the movie. The actor deserved a better costume design than this. Also there was also a completely weird and gratuitous and badly staged fight scene with what appeared to be some carnivorous jungle plants that had nothing to do with anything else in the movie. And the other miscue that stuck in my mind was the odd decision to inter-cut Tarzan's final fight at the end of the movie with the villainous gun runner Radijek with scenes of Cheeta swallowing a gold watch and burping. That effectively neutralized any suspense and excitement they may have been trying to generate.
The big problem with "Tarzan's Peril" is that the movie lacked a sense of urgency or real forward momentum. Not a lot happens, to be honest. But the production values are good (the producers made pretty good use of the live footage shot in Africa) and the two big fight scenes are well done, and the actors do a pretty good job inhabiting their characters.
If you have to watch a Tarzan movie for some reason, this would be a pretty good one to pick.
Lex Barker was a very handsome, muscular Tarzan, and he moved very well.However, the grunts and broken English phrases that worked so well with Weismuller's stoic, wooden presence seem quite odd and out of place coming from an actor with Barker's chiseled features and classic good looks. On the other hand, as my friend Dave Sindelar pointed out, it's a lot easier to believe that Barker's Tarzan is the son of an English Lord. In any case he was a pleasure to watch in action.
There were some minor missteps: The chief of the "bad guy" tribe (who wanted to buy guns to conquer the peaceful Ashuba ruled by Dorothy Dandridge) looked utterly ridiculous in his head-dress, which circled his entire head and made it look as if he were peering out of a fur-lined toilet seat for the duration of the movie. The actor deserved a better costume design than this. Also there was also a completely weird and gratuitous and badly staged fight scene with what appeared to be some carnivorous jungle plants that had nothing to do with anything else in the movie. And the other miscue that stuck in my mind was the odd decision to inter-cut Tarzan's final fight at the end of the movie with the villainous gun runner Radijek with scenes of Cheeta swallowing a gold watch and burping. That effectively neutralized any suspense and excitement they may have been trying to generate.
The big problem with "Tarzan's Peril" is that the movie lacked a sense of urgency or real forward momentum. Not a lot happens, to be honest. But the production values are good (the producers made pretty good use of the live footage shot in Africa) and the two big fight scenes are well done, and the actors do a pretty good job inhabiting their characters.
If you have to watch a Tarzan movie for some reason, this would be a pretty good one to pick.