7
29 April 2007
Emperor Nero is one of the Roman emperors with a "mad" reputation not the only one with such a reputation in Julio-Claudian line. This episode which decides to begin the series with his life-story instead of linear sequence of events, is interesting and in the beginning paints a sympathetic picture of the Emperor which starts darkening mainly after he bloodily wreaks vengeance to a group of wealthy senators who attempted to overthrow and assassinate him. Then the Emperor becomes a caricature something between a super-gangster and a sexual pervert. Difficult to believe that such men existed but having in mind movies made about modern equivalents such as Idi Amin for example one may believe that such things happened- after all the series is based on ancient sources -I imagine Souetonius in the present case.I am an agnostic as far as the possibility for us moderns to recreate the Roman past based on ancient sources and I have stated my belief in a message in the I Claudius debating space. People that accuse the series for inaccuracy about the lives of personalities dead two thousand years ago are overestimating their knowledge since facts can not be established about periods much closer to our own.I found the combination of documentary narration and fiction very attractive and could not overlook the hint about the deviousness of the senators which is a recurrent theme in the series.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed