Review of Shrek

Shrek (2001)
5/10
Could have been, but wasn't.
10 December 2001
Before getting around to viewing Shrek, I waited until much of the hype and product tie-ins faded. (This took a bit of time. Luckily, I was able to see Final Fantasy and Monsters, Inc.)

On the surface, it seemed to have the potential to stand out in a less-than-exciting year. The films creators assembled a core of quality actors to provide voices, the music sounded familiar, it looked like the animation was top notch, and it even had a catchy name.

I have to say I was mostly disappointed. Mostly.

Shrek attempted to work on many levels at once, but as usually happens with films that try to be all things to all people, it was never able to sustain any momentum. It seemed to randomly appease parts of its target audience. There also were major shifts in plot direction during the course of the film.

The plot was simplistic and predictable, the characters under-developed and disposable, and the music placement questionable at best. It's as if they amassed several of the basic elements that create good films, threw them into a giant pot, and hoped the stew tasted good. I'd hate to think that this much effort was wasted.

This being said, I suppose it was the best animated-parody-comedy-musical-romance-action-fantasy-parable-family movie of the year.

I guess it was unfair to see a Simpsons episode prior to viewing.

I am glad, however, that it was the greatest film many people have ever seen. Quite a Blockbuster moment to be sure.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed