Review of Hamlet

Hamlet (1948)
Sweet Prince???
10 September 2003
Gorgeous cinematography and music wasted on a flawed play.

Not only is the writing bad, the plot is shapeless and incoherent and pointless. Hamlet is supposed to embody doubt, yet he kills without compunction. He fatally stabs that old man by mistake, without suffering any legal, social or emotional consequences, and the stabbing isn't even subsequently recalled in any manner. And that old man elicited not a few titters from me, as he constantly moved around, rushing up stars like a man half his age. And he says things that don't fit in the play: "To thine own self be true. Neither a borrower nor a lender be". Here are samples of The Bard's terrible writing:

If it be, why seems it so particular with thee? Then you saw not his face. Courses through the natural gates and alleys of the body.

Take this from this if this be otherwise. Oh cursed spite that ever I was born to set it right.

And why does Hamlet give that peroration to his actors? It is pointless. And why is that peroration so similar to the stilted speech of the old man who says "to thine own self be true"? And why is Hamlet called "sweet prince" after he kills several people? It was interesting only from a historic perspective.

To be is not to be, that is the answer.
0 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed