No, The Story of Late Chrysanthemums is not a bad movie, not at all. In fact, it is quite good. However, it is hardly perfect. This is an Alcestis-like story about a wife, Otoku (Kakuko Mori), who sacrifices herself for the sake of her husband. The man is a young actor, Kikunosuke (Shotaro Hanayagi), who is living in the shadow of his famous father. The name earns him respect and praise, but only when he is present. When his back is turned, nobody hides the fact that they think he's terrible, and he knows it. Otoku, the wetnurse of his brother, is the first to give him honest criticism. The two fall in love and attempt to marry, but Kikunosuke's father and the rest of his family won't allow him, a man of noble birth, to retain the name if he should go through with it. He does it anyway, and spends many long years suffering as a nobody. Meanwhile, Otoku works at keeping things going; she even begs acting troupes to give her husband a job. Kikunosuke doesn't appreciate her enough, but, then again, she is selfless to a fault. She becomes downright annoying as the picture progresses: always whining, and, after every major bit of dialogue, she has a coughing fit. Let me ask those who overpraise this movie: did anyone not see the ending coming from the first ten minutes? Mizoguchi made many films that were similar in theme, but not nearly as irksome, and his actors were nearly always better. Still, the man's cinema is evolving rapidly, and his direction is downright beautiful. The cinematography flows like poetry. I like it more than I let on above, but I really do want to urge my fellow internet critics to hold the same standards to Kenji Mizoguchi that you would to any other director. 8/10.
Review of The Story of the Last Chrysanthemum
Why does Kenji Mizoguchi get a free critical pass on every film he directs?
8 July 2004
Warning: Spoilers