Documentary on the origins of the song "the lion sleeps tonight". The first known recording is in South Africa, from musician Solomon Linda. The documentary details how Rian decides to write a piece on the songs origins and uncovers that the family has not received royalties. He then helps the family go through the legal proceedings to claim rights from Disney. They eventually settle, but then some controversy over the amount and their access rise.
10 Reviews
Unjust still never settled
missy-7354523 May 2019
Warning: Spoilers
As I watched this documentary, I cried. This man tried to help and get justice, unfortunately greed will always prevail. There was very little justice, just enough for those that did help the family and Rian, to say be quiet we gave some we took some. Royalties were apparently not fully paid, given the amount the song had made overtime and it's usage in many ways, even still today. Never should there had been a gag order agreed upon. Full disclosure, everything transparency, from the start , is how it should have began and ended. If you truly want to help people you do it out of kindness,love, and what's right. Not how much you will profit from it. Sadly more profited from this than the family, and is not one bit shameful about it, in fact you can say entitled they believe they are. Especially a movie company whose millions, billions are brought in by parents paying the monies for them , their children, and families to enjoy the movies they put out. So disturbing to know they didn't give more , nor make it an actual life time trust .
Informative and revealing
Kingslaay22 October 2020
I had no idea how much history was behind 'The Lion Sleeps tonight' and its original Mbube. The roots of this and the history are quite fascinating and tragic. I found it remarkable how simple facts still had a complicated outcome. Solomon Linda wrote the song, the proceeds should go to his family. Ironic how laws and systems go against justice and reparations. A simple barter system of giving the loaf back to the person you took it from would yield a better result. Heartbreaking when others benefit from someone's work and they receive the short straw.
Lion Lies
Lejink24 September 2022
So I've finally made my way to the end of all the music-related documentaries Netflix made in 2018 under the banner "Remastered" and I personally found most of them to be interesting and informative.
This episode was by far the longest but it did have a rather tortuous story to tell. We all know the song "Wimoweh" a.k.a. "The Lion Sleeps Tonight", indeed it's twice been a number one hit in the U. K. by Karl Denver in the early 60's and Tight Fit in the early 80's and also a chart-topper in America by the Tokens in the early 60's and before that in the early 50's it made the top 10 by the Weavers, after the song was first picked up and publicised there by the U. S. folk artist Pete Seeger.
I must admit it's not a tune I've ever much cared for but with its later inclusion in Disney's blockbuster movie (twice!) and stage musical "The Lion King", obviously there should have been considerable publishing royalties due to the original writer of the song.
Now if you had asked me who wrote the song I would have guessed it was an old traditional attributable to the very prolific Mr or Mrs Anonymous, but no, the fascinating story is told of the song being actually written by a South African singer called Solomon Linda in 1939 when it was called "Mbube", with the lyric in fact referring to the struggle of the black majority against apartheid.
Later in the early 60's, an American lyricist called George Weiss wrote some Anglicised lyrics to the song, laying claim to the sole songwriting credit in the process and footage is shown of this particularly smug and smarmy individual actually stating he wrote the tune too.
However, it was only in the 90s when South African writer Rian Malan, working for the US Rolling Stone music magazine, penned an article investigating the origins of the song, that he uncovered the story of Solomon Linda and started the dispute on behalf of Linda's heirs for years and years of backdated royalties they had barely received.
Eventually, after he has co-opted the assistance of a prominent South African lawyer and most importantly a copyright specialist, a legal case against Disney on behalf of the family was finally successful in 2005 and saw Linda's three surviving daughters (a fourth died while the case dragged on), who as we have seen, still live in close to abject poverty in South Africa, receive a settlement, although under the terms of the agreement, no figures were to be divulged of the actual amount paid out.
And there you go, as someone says, an almost Disney-like happy ending you would have thought, but no, the three sisters now claim they received only a comparatively small amount with the bulk of the award being taken by lawyers and experts.
Underpinning the whole story of course is the exploitation past and present of native black South Africa by the white man although here it's clearly not quite as simple as that.
It's only natural to feel sympathy for the three surviving sisters, especially when they seem to be still living in the same impoverished state today as before, and this presumably after they've received their payment. But then counterclaims are made that they squandered their inheritance which is when things get really muddy. In a subtitle at the end, a figure of $250,000 is mentioned as having been paid to each sister, which I personally wouldn't have thought was chump change.
In this film, the story is told from the viewpoint of Malan who despite his undoubted good intentions does come across as a rather sanctimonious individual, keen to play the martyr and expiate the sins of apartheid in exchange for doing this good deed.
I'm not really sure in the end if anyone comes out of this programme very well apart from the original Mr Linda, but this sure was an interesting combined detective story and morality tale. My only complaint would be the centring of the story on the journalist and also that it perhaps took a little long in the telling, but this otherwise was an unknown story the background to which I'm now happily aware.
Unfortunately for me the bitter aftermath is that I can't get the damned tune out of my head now!
This episode was by far the longest but it did have a rather tortuous story to tell. We all know the song "Wimoweh" a.k.a. "The Lion Sleeps Tonight", indeed it's twice been a number one hit in the U. K. by Karl Denver in the early 60's and Tight Fit in the early 80's and also a chart-topper in America by the Tokens in the early 60's and before that in the early 50's it made the top 10 by the Weavers, after the song was first picked up and publicised there by the U. S. folk artist Pete Seeger.
I must admit it's not a tune I've ever much cared for but with its later inclusion in Disney's blockbuster movie (twice!) and stage musical "The Lion King", obviously there should have been considerable publishing royalties due to the original writer of the song.
Now if you had asked me who wrote the song I would have guessed it was an old traditional attributable to the very prolific Mr or Mrs Anonymous, but no, the fascinating story is told of the song being actually written by a South African singer called Solomon Linda in 1939 when it was called "Mbube", with the lyric in fact referring to the struggle of the black majority against apartheid.
Later in the early 60's, an American lyricist called George Weiss wrote some Anglicised lyrics to the song, laying claim to the sole songwriting credit in the process and footage is shown of this particularly smug and smarmy individual actually stating he wrote the tune too.
However, it was only in the 90s when South African writer Rian Malan, working for the US Rolling Stone music magazine, penned an article investigating the origins of the song, that he uncovered the story of Solomon Linda and started the dispute on behalf of Linda's heirs for years and years of backdated royalties they had barely received.
Eventually, after he has co-opted the assistance of a prominent South African lawyer and most importantly a copyright specialist, a legal case against Disney on behalf of the family was finally successful in 2005 and saw Linda's three surviving daughters (a fourth died while the case dragged on), who as we have seen, still live in close to abject poverty in South Africa, receive a settlement, although under the terms of the agreement, no figures were to be divulged of the actual amount paid out.
And there you go, as someone says, an almost Disney-like happy ending you would have thought, but no, the three sisters now claim they received only a comparatively small amount with the bulk of the award being taken by lawyers and experts.
Underpinning the whole story of course is the exploitation past and present of native black South Africa by the white man although here it's clearly not quite as simple as that.
It's only natural to feel sympathy for the three surviving sisters, especially when they seem to be still living in the same impoverished state today as before, and this presumably after they've received their payment. But then counterclaims are made that they squandered their inheritance which is when things get really muddy. In a subtitle at the end, a figure of $250,000 is mentioned as having been paid to each sister, which I personally wouldn't have thought was chump change.
In this film, the story is told from the viewpoint of Malan who despite his undoubted good intentions does come across as a rather sanctimonious individual, keen to play the martyr and expiate the sins of apartheid in exchange for doing this good deed.
I'm not really sure in the end if anyone comes out of this programme very well apart from the original Mr Linda, but this sure was an interesting combined detective story and morality tale. My only complaint would be the centring of the story on the journalist and also that it perhaps took a little long in the telling, but this otherwise was an unknown story the background to which I'm now happily aware.
Unfortunately for me the bitter aftermath is that I can't get the damned tune out of my head now!
A wonderful weaving of modern history around a song
roblaingjoeblog10 October 2020
This is the second Netflix's ReMastered series I've watched. The first was the Johnny Cash story "Tricky Dicky and the Man in Black" which I gave 10/10 to, and I'd give this one 11/10 if I could.
Disclosure: I'm an acquaintance of Rian Malan and Rob Allingham (I'd like to say friend, but we only bump into each other irregularly) and only became aware of this fantastic documentary via finding the above one on Johnny Cash.
I'm also acquainted (not in a friendly way) with some of the executives and other shysters put in the spotlight here. As Rian explains, this is an ambiguous tale with no clear heroes (other than the deceased composer) or villains, so not an easy story in which to pick the goodies or baddies (except if, like me, you've had personal experience with some of these crooks, but even then we're talking generations down the line.)
Long story short, this is a documentary I can't recommend highly enough.
Disclosure: I'm an acquaintance of Rian Malan and Rob Allingham (I'd like to say friend, but we only bump into each other irregularly) and only became aware of this fantastic documentary via finding the above one on Johnny Cash.
I'm also acquainted (not in a friendly way) with some of the executives and other shysters put in the spotlight here. As Rian explains, this is an ambiguous tale with no clear heroes (other than the deceased composer) or villains, so not an easy story in which to pick the goodies or baddies (except if, like me, you've had personal experience with some of these crooks, but even then we're talking generations down the line.)
Long story short, this is a documentary I can't recommend highly enough.
Pay The Linda Sisters
koatprdns12 October 2021
If Owen Dean was not a professional in that area, why was he responsible for setting up that trust and who must have then advised him? Where was the government's invoice from Owen Dean Assoc. And the reciprocal movements? At the very least, what was the percentage of the settlement that was to be paid?
All these questions need to be asked and answered.
No trust in The Linda Sisters' name can be acted on without their full knowledge of the accounting. Hence not set up correctly and therefore never just. Pay up Disney.
All these questions need to be asked and answered.
No trust in The Linda Sisters' name can be acted on without their full knowledge of the accounting. Hence not set up correctly and therefore never just. Pay up Disney.
Greed
stantims28 November 2019
Warning: Spoilers
This documentary provides a good background on the origins of a popular song. It's a story about greed, but the "victims" are the most greedy of all. The premise is that Solomon Linda wrote and performed a song, and he received no credit or royalties for it, and others made money from Linda's work.
It's not clear Linda even wrote the song component, Mbube. For all anyone knows, he heard around campfire in the bush, and then was the first to record it.
Then, there are the various attorneys being accused of ripping off Linda's estate, and not paying royalties due. There is some indication of this.
Then, there's the anglicized version, Wimoweh, which is derivative of the original.
Then, there's the famous version, The Lion Sleeps Tonight, which offers lyrics. "Mbube" just means "lion", according to multiple sources in the movie, so I think we can be sure that the tune doesn't became famous with the lyrics: lion, lion, lion, lion...
The do-gooder journalist tries to right things for the poor daughters of Linda, who themselves did nothing to earn the money, and then they, new attorneys and the journalist do not go after everyone whoever made money on the song, but Disney, because they used it in a successful movie and have deep pockets to go after. (Does Disney even use the song if they know that it would be royalty-bearing? Would they have used the original tune or the commercial version with lyrics that were not Linda's?)
In the end, the journalist discovers he's been duped, for all his ill-conceived intentions. Poor daughters? Nope. Just inheritance mongers off the blood, sweat and tears of others.
It's not clear Linda even wrote the song component, Mbube. For all anyone knows, he heard around campfire in the bush, and then was the first to record it.
Then, there are the various attorneys being accused of ripping off Linda's estate, and not paying royalties due. There is some indication of this.
Then, there's the anglicized version, Wimoweh, which is derivative of the original.
Then, there's the famous version, The Lion Sleeps Tonight, which offers lyrics. "Mbube" just means "lion", according to multiple sources in the movie, so I think we can be sure that the tune doesn't became famous with the lyrics: lion, lion, lion, lion...
The do-gooder journalist tries to right things for the poor daughters of Linda, who themselves did nothing to earn the money, and then they, new attorneys and the journalist do not go after everyone whoever made money on the song, but Disney, because they used it in a successful movie and have deep pockets to go after. (Does Disney even use the song if they know that it would be royalty-bearing? Would they have used the original tune or the commercial version with lyrics that were not Linda's?)
In the end, the journalist discovers he's been duped, for all his ill-conceived intentions. Poor daughters? Nope. Just inheritance mongers off the blood, sweat and tears of others.
I don't know what a couple of other reviewers watched
taraangel-4096031 May 2020
I watched this from start to finish. I'm actually disgusted with what 2 of the reviewers said. They have said that the daughters of Solomon Linda did things that they did not do. "In the end, the journalist discovers he's been duped, for all his ill-conceived intentions. Poor daughters? Nope. Just inheritance mongers off the blood, sweat and tears of others." NOT TRUE. "It's not a happy ending as the man who started the effort to right the wrong eventually comes to realize that Linda's family has not dealt honestly with him." Also NOT TRUE. It seems to me that the Linda sisters had the majority of their money stolen by lawyers. In the end, out of a large settlement from Disney, each of the 3 daughters received LESS than $250,000 over the life of the deal. The things these other reviewers said were not true, and were not in this documentary. Don't believe every review you read. I learned that tonight.
Hmmmmmm
alice-enland29 May 2019
Warning: Spoilers
Decades ago, a South African, Soloman Linda, lived during the era of Apartheid. He had musical talent and came up with a chant that if you squint your ears sounds like the a-weem-oh-whep that begins The Lion Sleeps Tonight. None of the lyrics in Lion were written till much later. There is no doubt that Linda's chant was sold to music companies who expanded on it, made money, and failed to pay Linda's family the royalties they deserved. This doc is a long and winding road which traces the determined efforts of people to see that justice is done. It's not a happy ending as the man who started the effort to right the wrong eventually comes to realize that Linda's family has not dealt honestly with him. A lesson in what have you done for me lately?
The Road To Destruction Is Paved With 'Good Intentions'.
IcyTones23 September 2020
It's a play on words. The Sisters claim their father couldn't read or write. The documentary entertains us with the idea that Solomon Linda's signature on any contract or documentation found, was falsified by others.
It's an interesting documentary that is being marred by 'the blame game'. When things go wrong or don't work out the way we had anticipated, our thoughts become disenchanted. The journalist who wanted to right a wrong in South Africa became disenchanted because his 'Good Intentions' had dissisipated.
It could also be a case of 'Six Of One & Half A Dozen Of The Other' - ie: There are no winners or losers. Time-Spent', means no-one can really be blamed or held accountable for 'The Linda's' predicament & no-one can really lay claim to being the source of origination. The case has gone as far as it could without hearing from the man himself - 'Solomon Linda''. who is now deceased.
I think everyone got greedy on the premise that there was money to be made & a case to be answered - and maybe there is - just not now. The investigations reached a 'stalemate' in 2019.
Disney? Disney just 'settled' to relinquish & secure its future ties with other associates. In Movies, a Charles Dickens or William Shakespeare play gets to keep the same title if it's an adaptation of the original, but if it's a 'remake' or the character's are 'loosely based' on a Dickens or Shakespeare play, the title changes - I guess because of copyrights. In Books 'Reprints' can add, subtract or update info. In Technology 'Updates' can change the layout of a computer programme or change how it operates.
'Mbube'? 'Wimoweh? 'The Lion Sleeps? Title changes puts a whole new 'Spin' on authenticity.
It's an interesting documentary that is being marred by 'the blame game'. When things go wrong or don't work out the way we had anticipated, our thoughts become disenchanted. The journalist who wanted to right a wrong in South Africa became disenchanted because his 'Good Intentions' had dissisipated.
It could also be a case of 'Six Of One & Half A Dozen Of The Other' - ie: There are no winners or losers. Time-Spent', means no-one can really be blamed or held accountable for 'The Linda's' predicament & no-one can really lay claim to being the source of origination. The case has gone as far as it could without hearing from the man himself - 'Solomon Linda''. who is now deceased.
I think everyone got greedy on the premise that there was money to be made & a case to be answered - and maybe there is - just not now. The investigations reached a 'stalemate' in 2019.
Disney? Disney just 'settled' to relinquish & secure its future ties with other associates. In Movies, a Charles Dickens or William Shakespeare play gets to keep the same title if it's an adaptation of the original, but if it's a 'remake' or the character's are 'loosely based' on a Dickens or Shakespeare play, the title changes - I guess because of copyrights. In Books 'Reprints' can add, subtract or update info. In Technology 'Updates' can change the layout of a computer programme or change how it operates.
'Mbube'? 'Wimoweh? 'The Lion Sleeps? Title changes puts a whole new 'Spin' on authenticity.
See also
Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews
