Wunderland (2018) Poster

(2018)

User Reviews

Review this title
91 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
4/10
Epic Fail
spayton-221 September 2018
I get that this is a low-budget attempt at depicting a topic that has been very well done in the past (Battle of the Bulge, Band of Brothers). I don't get "why this story"? It didn't add anything to any previous Battle of the Bulge film or insight. The uniforms may have been true to the period, but they were far from true to the battle... not a stain, not a spot on them, it really detracts from the believably of the film. They all look like they just stepped out of the local dry cleaners. The Battle of the Bulge went on for 5 weeks. They slept in fox holes, and endured rain and snow. There was nowhere to get your uniform pressed and cleaned.

The battle scenes were horrendous, people just walking around like nothing is happening even when their being shot at. No one takes cover, no one shows any urgency. Wounds are unrealistic as well, and there is no real "story". The viewer is supposed to assume they know everything about the famous battle. Character buildup was also extremely thin. It's been a week since I saw this movie, and I can't remember a single character's name.

Effects... bad, but no worse than USS Indianapolis. The bigger issue is it seemed like an excuse to rent a few WWII German artillery, and drive it around in the forest. All that could be forgiven if there was any plot or story, but there just wasn't. Seemed like a college film project, at best.
12 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Only the end credits are redeeming.
viggen-924245 February 2020
The movie may want to tell some war stories from the battle of the bulge, but the characters are more than stereotypical and the acting is horrible. The only redeeming factor are the end credits where there are around 10-12 written stories of several individual soldiers accomplishing acts of bravery, acts of valour and duty way beyond any call of duty. Only these small written stories actually make you feel something when you read them. I know the director tried to gather these stories into one movie and with the right director and right script it could have been a succes.
6 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Seriously!!!!
adonnellytd20 February 2018
Warning: Spoilers
Wunderland..... more like wonder why I bothered.... ok.. so i'm no expert on reviews and this is my first, so forgive me if I go astray. I must agree with most of the reviews here concerning Tom Berenger.. for him to appear in this so called "movie" was a huge mistake, he must have been desperately in need of money to even consider this. First of all for this to be such an epic battle the movie in my opinion is far too short at 85 minutes (considering the whole production of this it maybe at least 60 minutes too long). I have sat through cheap budget movies before but this man o man was one of the worst. The acting was terrible and don't even get me started on the fake snow.... One minute they are walking in snow and you can see their breath and then in the next scene they are driving across a field with no snow on the ground while snow is falling. I use the word "snow" very loosely here as you can tell 100% that the falling snow is fake and is digitally input in to the scene (very badly). You also see some kind of "red flash" move across the sky in one scene which I still don't know what it was supposed to be. I have given it 2 stars only because I like Tom Berenger and he was the only reason I even looked at this movie and to see him go from movies like Sniper to this "rubbish" is a real shame....

Sorry Tom but this one was a big mistake.... I could go on and on but I think you get the point... You're wasting your time if you watch this movie.... best avoid it..
26 out of 34 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Can't Stress this enough....DO NOT WATCH THIS
richardcooper-964678 June 2018
Warning: Spoilers
I don't write reviews generally but, this time, I think it needs to be said.

This film is poor, so so poor, and in the interests of giving a reason why, I shall point out all the issues here in:

1. Continuity- Scene 2 ( 2 soldiers walking in 6-8 inches of snow which cracks so loudly that it makes dialog difficult to hear) the problem is not the audio but the fact that 2-3 minutes later there is no snow on the ground. this left me feeling like I was watching a poor 2nd rate B movie. The fact the a two hundred and twenty second rate SFX program was used to add snow to a scene bereft of snow is utterly laughable.

2. The mix and match composition of the German units is an offense to Military advisors everywhere. There were Panzer Grenadier troops mixed in with leibstandarden troops (never happen), the half track commander was wearing Cavalry/Armored piping but the 1/2 track was traditionally crewed by infanteers, he also looked like a geography teacher and not a harden member of the SS Panzergroupen.

3. The American MP at the first check point was armed with a German MP40, this was frowned up on by regular units and they did use the enemy weapons when it was called for but you would never find a sentient of military law carrying one, laughable and poorly researched. I thought this was a double cross and expected him to open fire on the yanks as soon as their backs were turned. shame this didn't happen as i wouldn't of wasted 1:30 hours watching this rubbish.

4. Same scene as the MP; Lt Cappa approaches the check point and is given a steer by the dodgy MP toward his own company positions. Cappa approaches the position from the front which means: a, the MP is in front of the forward friendly positions (not a good place to be) b, Cappa has the tactical awareness of a cabbage (more than possible) or c, the military advisor was sick on the day of shooting.

5. They are at the cutting edge of the Battle of The Bulge, they were heavily shelled for days and were subject to intense Sniper fire yet: The trees are all standing and undamaged and the cast amble around the scenes like Snipers hadn't been invented yet!

6.Capt Daniels sites his Command Post on the front line, NO NO NO. its further back and contained in the overlapping arcs of fire provided by the company fox holes. Jerry would of captured that in 1/2 hour using just his boy scouts and a asthmatic, over weight, child minder

7. CGI Tanks, all incorrectly referred to as Tigers ( most were panthers, and other variants but were referred to as Tigers) they floated in to view, fired without noise and advanced without out infantry support. Panzerfaust cannot stop a Tiger VI but it did in this film! ( more on Panzerfaust later)

8. No development of relationship between protagonists. Sgt Rock attempts humor in every line and it misses the mark so much. He was working with a script designed for a School drama group and fails to draw a single laugh from me, in fact, he comes across as bitter and satirical. He wasn't trying to do either of these things.

9. No back story for any character leaving me not caring whether they lived or died, not cheering them on and not caring. I wish they had died so I didn't have to sit though this tripe.

10. 7.62 MM rounds from a BAR could penetrate a half track but a Panzerfaust could not! really! I just watch it knock out a Tiger VI but it cant penetrate a lightly armored 1/2 track. poorly advised yet again.

11. Berenger, Sad to see a icon of 80/90's movies stoop so low as to demand a pay check for being associated with this drivel. Things must be bad if the anti hero of Platoon is doing War films of this ilk, I will gladly pay him never to do this again.

12. Setting: I could be anywhere, it didn't feel like war torn Belgium, it didn't feel like sentries were freezing to death standing up and it didn't feel exciting.

13. Acting: Wooden, Dialog was poor, script was poor, screen presence was poor, CGI poor

14. Cappa steals a vehicle from the GERMANS to get back to his own lines, ITS A FRIGGING AMERICAN JEEP!

15. the final advance was a frigging joke, you have a MG with hitting power at 3/4 of a mile and yet you wait until the blood thirsties are 6" away before opening fire. you deserve being overrun Luke and sent to Colditz

In short the director and main "actor" Luke Schuetzle has not produced a fitting memorial to the brave men who gave all in the forests around Bastogne. He has missed the point, wasted a chance to create a hell of a story and failed to deliver the hybrid of 'Band of Brothers' and 'Saving Private Ryan' which he tried to. Instead he gave us a project that he should never of been lead actor for, which he has forced to its poor conclusion and which he has spoilt with his over zealous efforts. It's a shame because Warpigs was quite good really. This , however, is terrible.

Stay behind the camera luke, direct by all means but don't write scripts, don't do the casting, DO spend money on SFX, learn your subject and most of all think about who your doing this for. its not me, its not you, its not your studio, its not your financial backers....its for the heros of The Bulge.

The honors at the end were in poor taste considering that you had just made a very poor representation of their final hours. Although it was the most interesting part of the whole film.

The whole thing should be taken out into the snow and shot in the back, buried in a unmarked grave and found 100 years later, put on display in a museum as 'artistic failing circa 2017' then relegated to the walls of the disabled toilets in a gastro pub.

the.end
49 out of 52 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Ouch! This movie insults your intellect.
Hammer-Rocks8 June 2018
If you were expecting a modern day remake of the 60's "Battle of the Bulge" movie, sadly you will be left mightily disappointed.

The movie lacked atmosphere, nor did the director manage to covey the dangers, desperation, and fear from this battle. Considering this battle was supposed to be the largest and bloodiest battle the US fought in Europe in WWII, the movie made it look very tame, and almost calm by comparison.

It also portrayed the Germans to be stupid and disorganised, if going by how the movie's unrealistic battle scenes showed the Germans fight.

I think this movie is just an insult to the soldiers who fought there.

Save your time and watch something else.
26 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Oh my....
gustavvp19 February 2018
This is my first review ever..

Came into this movie not expecting much and attracted that Tom was in it. But boy should I have lower my expectations even further. Yes uniforms/wardrobe props look good. But not to blame the acting too much, they did what they could but with director and writer not making it easier for them.. the conversations the clichés of platoon life is laughable, the combat strategies and the nonexistent will to live given the positioning of germans and response to an ambush... Well next time maybe the director should do something that does not contain any kind of group dynamic as he struggles to make it seem real, seen lots of movies with bad acting but still the content made it better, in Wunderland its the opposite.
58 out of 69 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
what a joke
dannyfalin13 July 2018
I just loved the tiger tanks hovering above the snow. didnt know they have hovercraft tigers in the day... Worst effects ever. Lousy acting. Very inaccurate location and tactics.. Tom shouldve stopped after sniper 2....
11 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Say What ??? .... This director never watched a GOOD war movie obviously
brirobdu-122 January 2020
Warning: Spoilers
I waited for a battle, OK....it finally came........the Americans waited until the Germans were about 20 yards away before firing at a large contingent of SS Troops...............never would have happened........then I noticed NO Grenades !!! Not a single grenade was thrown by either side...........yet that was the American infantryman's quick answer to overwhelming odds......FYI: In the Ardennes, the Americans may have been spread thin, but they had firepower, outside the forest the Germans had tanks...............this movie misses it all........but Tom Berenger tries to make it work.........he should have directed it after being in Platoon etc........Hollywood has lost it !!!!!
6 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
What a pile of crap
coxyr22 February 2018
Did anybody actually watch the final product before releasing it? One minute it's snowing (fake and computerised rings of white just going down different places on the screen - just repeated), then there's no snow and it's sunny. The film lasts 1hour & 11minutes, which is time you will never get back. The most interesting part is all the text after the credits at the end, but most people would have turned it off by then.
27 out of 36 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Misses the target by 10,000 miles and never looks back
stugtiger15 January 2018
I went into this movie not expecting much and boy was I right the acting is terrible and really ruins this movie, the uniforms where good but don't expect much more than that. Don't let the other comments fool you it is a extravagant disaster, steer well clear of this movie, it is sad to see Tom, take part in such a laughable movie. Since when did any soldier having the rank of major fight in combat like this movie attempts to show. I stopped watching 15 mins and felt at ease afterwards there are far superior movies out there that actually have a decent story and realism such as Miracle at St. Anna or Downfall.
46 out of 65 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Amateur atmospherics
bigbadvuk19 July 2018
I want to leave everything else aside, but what completely threw me off was the amateur look of snowfall, tracers and in general special effects :(

I could go on for another 2 pages about story, characters and drama, but there is no point...
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Enjoyed this Movie
mtline-7075726 February 2018
When one watches this movie you need to keep in mind that not all war movies are the same and the focus of the movie depends on who made the movie, how it was made and who is watching it? Make sense...of course not but in a nutshell keep an open mind. Is it about war? Yes some of it is. It is about bonding and camaraderie? Yes of course, it highlights how officer have to make tough decisions in very stressful and violent situations. I enjoyed the movie and being ex military in the 3rd Infantry Division you do tend to pick things out BUT I could do that in just about any military movie I have seen especially from WWII to date.

Without being too specific I spotted armor and infantry tactical strategies which confused me a bit but other than that I did enjoy this movie. War is ugly and this movie does not miss that point.

Tom Berenger was excellent and it was nice to see him back in a military role. This movie is for sure worth the rental!
14 out of 41 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Battle of the low budget Bulge worth the watch with an open mind!
grahamdavidson00727 February 2018
Wunderland is a film based in a time frame around the Battle of the bulge which itself was the last major German offensive campaign on the western front.

The film itself is based around a platoon defending against the German aggressors in the Ardennes Forrest in Belgium.

Directed by Steven Luke, it also stars Tom Berenger famouse for Platoon, Sniper and Born on the 4th of July - so he comes from good war movie stock - sadly his role in the film is limited, which may be a reflection on the small budget this film had, The budget must have been tiny, as you see the various troops roam around a 'could be anywhere' landscape with only several vehicles per side and some really cheap/Free(sic) special effects which is basically a snow filter layer on top of the video footage. Talking about snow and the period of the film, it is based at Christmas 1944 during one of Americas most brutal battles where they lost around 20,000 American soldiers, and the ice and snow had a tremendously huge impact on this period, foxholes could not be dug, tanks and traks struggled to traverse the land, infantry were frozen, malnurished and struggled to fight - not of this was strongly represented in this film, and for those looking for a casual war film you will have already stopped watching as the filtered snow effect was something you would see on a youtube amateur video rather than a historic war film depicting a story of bravery.

That being said, and armed with some historical knowledge I enjoyed the film - despite the actual footage being terribly short- and I would encourage people to watch it with an open mind and after doing some research.

Once the film has ended there is something on the scroll that 99% of people will never see - following the credits and lasting around 10 minutes, there are around 8-12 written stories of bravery of individual soldiers accomplishing Acts of bravery, and valour way beyond any call of duty and it is these historical, war and battle winning acts that make the film, and its evident on reflection the writer and director tried to use these examples in the storytelling of the film. I do wish the memorial stories had been voiced over and were added chronologically, but reading these certainly invoked a lot of emotion and its commendable that these untold stories are brought to light.

On a side note, the memorial stories would make a great 2hr chronological anthology film about the battles in the Ardennes -any budding director out that feeling enthused to make a film like that - please add me to the cast!

A film worth watching with an open mind, let down by a crippling budget 7/10
13 out of 30 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
No money wasted of a script
paul-9552830 August 2018
What a diabolical movie, there must be a whole twenty sentances spoken during the entire tedious 90 or so minutes. If you like the sound of gunfire accompanying absolutely no story then this is the film for you! Personally I'd rather watch paint dry.
8 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
One of the worst
scuba-6479327 February 2018
Fake snow, no snow,bad acting, this is one of the worst movies I have EVER watched and I'm74. Its also my first review but I felt that I must warn those tempted.DONT! The review that says the 1hr 11mins that this film wastes is gone forever is spot on. Zero stars
30 out of 36 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
One american bullet kills three Germans at once
poj-7974212 July 2018
One american bullet kills three Germans at once - and so goes on for several dozen minutes.
8 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Sophmoric Attempt at Movie Making
seekrieg12 October 2018
Consider myself somewhat well versed on WWII history and felt that had a little research time been utilized by the script writer perhaps falling back on old tired clichés might not have been so necessary. This forced actors that were poor to begin with seem even worse! The addition of Tom Berringer to the cast seemed only to attempt to add credibility to this film. It wasn't enough to carry the movie forward.

The potential for this movie to have excelled compared to its actual final product rates this movie a disappointment by almost any measure.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
What battle?
tsushima-1187128 January 2019
This was a showcase for two actors and a few in a 'supporting cast'. It bears no resemblance to the actual event, and it would leave a viewer unfamiliar with the war thinking that the repetitious firefights were all the battle was about. Where was the 'Bulge?' Recommendation? Watch the 60s version with Robert Shaw.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
What is this?
johnadamsmoviecritic17 February 2018
Why is it that Tom Berenger, insists on doing movies that are terrible. When I was growing up I use to watch sniper 1,2,3, all of which are amazing but for some reason he does awful movies now, I mean it must be the money. Anyways its really sad to see him go down this path the good ole days are gone now we are forced to sit or lay down on the ground, while these people make up the history of the war to fit their own ego.
26 out of 42 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Why did anyone bother to make this?
bbaldwin712 March 2020
If you thought the 1965 Cinerama epic, "Battle of the Bulge" was BAD (and it was, in spades), wait until you attempt to sit through this turkey. Clearly, the writer didn't understand a single scene he wanted in the script, and the director was just as lost trying to interpret or give it any thematic point-of-view. It is one meaningless cliche after another and torture to sit through for all of 75 minutes. Battles are often a logistical mess, film's about them should attempt some clarity and a reason for all the carnage and sacrifice. It's beyond belief that someone can be handed a reported $3.5 million (admittedly a low budget, but still all wasted money) and end up with something as bad as "Wunderland". In the end, this film represents only a battle between the "filmmaker" and his bulging ego.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
A waste of time
sandino_owen28 October 2019
The production should have hired a military advisor
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
You won't be needing anything else
carlosmidence22 August 2020
It was Friday nite around 10h30, felt so tired and couldn't sleep... Ten minutes of this, including credits, and I woke up the next day after a tight sleep...
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Small Budget & No Problem for me!
Luke-820-5860826 February 2018
Set on the backdrop of the very first days leading up to the Battle of the Bulge, Wonderland, follows Lt. Cappa and his soldiers of the Second Infantry Division as they are ordered to a quiet sector of the battle field-- The Ardennes forest. But as History has taught us, The quiet Ardennes does not stay quiet for long. On December 17th, The Germans plow through the Ardennes in a major offensive attack, sending allied armies into a frantic retreat. The story revolves around Cappa's orders to hold the line and slow down the Germans advance, buying more time for his comrades to reform a defense.

In my own opinion, this is a triumph for war movies. It's just as intense as any war movie, but doesn't contain all the blood and guts our society today gives us. It has enough to convince the audience that it's all real and then brings you into the atmosphere by the fantastic acting. Tom Berenger(Platoon, Sniper) is fantastic in his portrayal of a US Army Major McCulley. It was great too see him in a historic war movie again and it is where he belongs.

This is also a low-budget film, which helps you appreciate it even more because there are no signs of that small budget. This is just as intense as pretty much any war movie you will ever see, but you don't have to worry about it being too violent or bloody. It's just as compelling because it puts you inside the eyes of the soldiers themselves. I hope that all who have access to see this movie take advantage of it because this is a side of cinema that isn't seen often.

it is fun to see the use of actual period correct US & German tanks and vehicles. The small use of CGI vehicles (mainly German tanks) are on par with what a small budget war movie is able to creat, and lets be honest, how easily is it to find multiple German tanks from WWII?

If you enjoy a good war Movie, then this film is for you and you will enjoy it!
14 out of 58 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Accomplishes what it set out to do
wbill-9944030 January 2018
This isn't Saving Private Ryan so if that's what you're looking for then avoid it. It's a low budget period film set during the Battle of the Bulge. Overall it's a decent production. The uniforms, sets and attention to period detail are outstanding for a film of its budget. The acting is on par with any low budget film. No Oscar winning performances here but they do their best. It was great to see Tom Berenger as the Colonel. His scenes aren't extensive but he delivers on those that he has. CG is pretty shaky, but again, on par with what you'd expect from a film like this. Overall it's a decent movie made on the cheap.
16 out of 49 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
If only they had waited for real snow!
alanmarsden21 February 2019
Warning: Spoilers
If they had changed the title to reflect the actual incident on the first day of the battle of the bulge where a platoon of 18 US soldiers held off 500 Germans this could have been a good movie! If they could have filmed it with real snow on the ground, really cold temperatures, real overcast conditions which prevented allied planes being in the air. If only they had given Tom Berenger more to do in the film to earn his salary rather than to con people-sorry I mean sell the movie. If only they had shown the Germans as veterans of 5 years of war, who knew how to fight. If only they had given the actors better lines (Did Sergeant Rocky really expect a medic to appear to tend to his fallen comrade when they were separated from their unit?). If only....!
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed