The Falling (2014) Poster

(2014)

User Reviews

Review this title
71 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
A clunky mystery with few noteworthy aspects.
Sergeant_Tibbs17 October 2014
One of the London Film Festival's handful of world premieres, The Falling had naturally generated buzz as it's a film funded by the BFI, which is quite unusual for them. Unfortunately, while it has its merits, it doesn't quite live up to expectation as a whole. That said, the limited budget is impressively spread out with a solid cast including Game of Thrones' Maisie Williams and convincing 1960s production and costume design. The creativity of director/writer Carol Morley is less striking. It's a film interested in starting a lot of tangents without finishing them, or instead giving us underwhelming payoffs. It's built on the backbone of an odd mystery, one it's uninterested in resolving, but interested in escalating.

Set in a 1969 girls school, when the promiscuous student Abbie, played by Florence Pugh, accidentally gets pregnant, she begins to suffer from fits of fainting seemingly at random. Her best friend Lydia, played by Williams, deals with the consequences after the epidemic spreads across the school with girls fainting out of control. The film appears to be a story about the friendship between Lydia and Abbie, but it fractures off into different directions, some more engaging than others. Most dramatically is exploration into Lydia's past, or rather, how she came into this world. Her relationship with her agoraphobic mother, played by Maxine Peake, is a key aspect of the film and one of the few things that eventually pay off in a satisfying way, if a disturbing one. It needed some more development beforehand to feel fully fleshed out, but the delivery of it in the third act is the film's greatest strength.

While kept deliberately ambiguous, it appears that the fainting is somewhat of a punishment for early sexual behaviour (which incidentally appears to mostly be instigated by Lydia's brother, played by Joe Cole). There's no charm in its apparent disdain and shaming for the young girls' urges and it doesn't feel like a thought thoroughly argued through enough. It's most interesting for the way the authority figures react, which is in complete denial that anything is wrong, even when Lydia is on her knees in the hallway. Even so, characters don't react the way people would react to others fainting, though perhaps it's supposed to hint about how it's become so tiresome. It contributes to the uneasy atmosphere of the film with its dreamlike eeriness.

It is quite rewarding to see Maisie Williams in this type of environment for a change. It's clear that she's making the most of it and trying her best to feel natural, but she doesn't quite have the conviction to make it work just yet. In time she'll be a great actress. It just feels as though Morley has misjudged what the film was trying to do for the most part, thematically and tonally. It does have some good aspects and interesting tidbits, existentialism that's valid if unremarkable, but as a whole it brings nothing new stylistically to the table and is often too uninspired in execution. It has a bizarre sense of humour that doesn't quite gel with its thoughtfulness and mystery. Solid production for the budget, interesting and engaging moments here and there, but The Falling is misguided from the script's initial intentions direction.

6/10

Read more @ The Awards Circuit (http://www.awardscircuit.com/)
38 out of 56 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
All over the place
Leofwine_draca1 November 2015
THE FALLING is a film detailing an outbreak of fainting at an all-girl school in 1969. Such events are well-documented in real life and often have the authorities and various specialists puzzled, although it's widely acknowledged that they're psychosomatic in nature. So there's potential here for an interesting storyline.

Unfortunately, the storyline of THE FALLING is all over the place. For the first half hour it's a typical tale of teenage angst and friendship. Things take a darker turn with the introduction of incestuous sub-plots and the like, but then they become ridiculous with the well-choreographed fainting spells. Subliminal imagery abounds, alongside some hinted-at supernatural aspects, but it all adds up to far less than the sum of its components. What's the message here, anyway? What's it all about?

I previously saw director Carol Morley's docu-drama DREAMS OF A LIFE and that was a similar film in that it had an interesting premise but sub-standard execution. Plus, Morley doesn't seem to be very assured at getting good performances out of her actors, and the acting is of a distinctly wishy-washy standard here. I love Maisie Williams in GAME OF THRONES, but she seems unsure of herself here and sometimes just feels like Arya in a school uniform.
23 out of 32 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Somewhat underwhelming
philipfoxe27 April 2015
Always best on IMDb to ignore the entire crop of 5 starred reviews. They are either deliberate plants to puff the film or starry eyed peeps of little discrimination. I really wanted to like this film. More than decent cast; great location; credible period (late 60's) After 20 minutes I was struggling to keep my eyes open. Several people in the audience just got up and left. Can't quite put my finger on it. It kept hinting as social 'issues' but nobody actually verbalised them. Lots of serious thesps giving deep and meaningful looks, but never saying anything. And why do directors think everyone in the 60s chain- smoked....at assemblies! They didn't!
41 out of 67 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Falling Flat
cooperm-262641 June 2015
Warning: Spoilers
I had the (dis)pleasure of seeing Carol Morley's The Falling during an evening with my housemates. Having read a brief summary of the plot of the film, as well as having viewed an online trailer several months in advance, I was intrigued, if somewhat confused. Neither the synopsis nor the trailer gave much away concerning the storyline. Now, having seen the film in its entirety, I can safely say I'm none the wiser. If anything, I'm much more confused.

The film focuses on schoolgirl Lydia's (Maisie Williams) almost obsessive, lesbianist relationship with Abbie (Florence Pugh), a fellow student, who falls ill after having slept with Lydia's brother. Following her death, Lydia begins to show similar symptoms and collapses numerous times before the teaching staff. Before long, all the other girls follow suit, resulting in an epidemic that the tutors swiftly attempt to sweep under the rug. Meanwhile, Lydia's agoraphobic mother (Maxine Peake) remains disturbingly unresponsive to her daughter's behaviour until the film's final moments.

Throughout, the film raises several questions, like 'what's causing this epidemic?', 'why is Lydia so deranged?' and 'why is Lydia's mother afraid to leave the house?' But the biggest question on my mind whilst watching the film was 'what's the point in this tripe?' As you can probably tell, this is one of those pretentious, moralistic and metaphorical films that is supposed to maintain some kind of underlying meaning or social commentary. The problem is that it's never made clear what this commentary actually is. Is Morley saying that early sexual activity is wrong? Or is she providing a commentary on the restrictive educational system of the late 1960s? Or both? Or neither? God only knows. What's more, a number of questions remain unanswered. For example, one of the girls, Titch, remains immune to the so-called epidemic, but it's never explained why. In addition, Lydia's bizarre romantic and sexual relationship with her brother (yes, this actually happens – as if Morley couldn't have made the film any weirder) doesn't seem to serve much purpose. I'm half-expecting someone to respond to this by arguing some deeply profound metaphorical jargon to the contrary. Don't bother. It's controversial for the sake of being controversial; pure garbage.

As some other reviewers here have already noted, the acting and cinematography are mostly of a high standard; Maxine Peake is no less than outstanding in her role, making her the film's only truly convincing character. The other characters are burdened with weak, horrific and sometimes laughable dialogue and cheesy faux-horror movie acting. Scenes in which the group of girl-friends are seen linking arms, chanting Abbie's name and dancing in a circle, are particularly excruciating, not to mention somewhat comedic, as are the fainting scenes, of which there are too many to have any impact; it just comes across as ridiculous. Why Lydia constantly feels the need to perform some interpretative dance piece before collapsing is anybody's guess. Despite this, the young cast's acting abilities are far from abysmal, but with no logical narrative or decipherable plot, this is hardly enough to save the film from falling flat on its face. It's slow, it's repetitive, and laden with shameless attempts to be controversial and innovative. The fact that this film has critics in awe is extremely worrying, and it makes me wonder whether people know what makes a good film anymore.

On a vaguely positive note, the title is appropriate. There is, indeed, a great deal of falling that occurs in this film. In fact, any fans of seeing people repeatedly fall over for no discernible reason are in for a real treat. Unfortunately for the rest, you may risk falling asleep.

3/10
73 out of 98 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Blander than it should be
paul2001sw-16 February 2017
When a charismatic classmate dies, her school-friends start to suffer from a mysterious mass fainting fit. Is it supernatural, grief or just a cry for attention? The headmistress (well-played by Greta Saatchi) just wishes it would all go away. It's a nice concept, but the film seems too obviously sympathetic to the girls, without really letting us inside their heads. Oddly, they don't seem to be so freaked out by their condition. Also, the soundtrack is absurdly intrusive, and deflates rather than enhances the natural atmosphere. And there's just a little too much in the way of extraneous plot - budding sexuality, a troubled mother - daughter relationship - to truly build the sense of claustrophobia which would be needed to make the film a success. Overall, it's just a little bit blander than one might have hoped.
12 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Powerfully bad
Vivbot20 April 2015
Warning: Spoilers
What's truly depressing about this film is how many female roles it offered, and how all of them conformed to vapid, tired stereotypes about femininity: women as emotional, irrational, kooky, governed by hysteria and the moon, nature, water - victims of their own bodies which are there to get them raped (which in this film life-destroying, as cliché dictates), pregnancy (which literally and inexplicably kills one character in a regrettable case of 'fridging') or Victorian fainting sickness. It tries to be confrontational in its treatment of female coming of age but has created a vacuous surface-deep depiction that offers girls up as wan little nail-chewing nothings fit for being looked at only, preferably in school uniform. Script dismal, acting heroic considering this. Ghostly recaps of dialogue from five minutes earlier in the film show the director's underestimation of her audience, which might explain why all other elements of theme and plot are equally heavy handed. A coy film that tries to shock with metaphors for female self-pleasuring - when actually a long w*nk at home would have been a much better use of time.
35 out of 59 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Entertaining film that could have been better
t-dooley-69-38691630 August 2015
Set in the 1960s at an all girl school we meet Lydia (Masie Williams) who has a best friend in Abbie. They have it all as friends and a love of nature centring around an old oak tree. They have a mixed bag of teachers who seem to adhere to Victorian values and modesty principles – that is despite the burgeoning 'summer of love'.

Then tragedy happens and Masie starts to have fainting fits – very soon the phenomenon spreads and she seems to be at the centre of it. Throw in a mum with issues (Maxine Peake) and a bit of the Occult, forbidden sex and deep rooted paranoia and you have the makings of a rather good story.

Maxine Peake is billed starring here, but she is not really on screen for a great period of time; Greta Scacchi as the dowdy Miss Mantel is though pure excellence in a performance dripping with understatement. I have seen comparisons to 'Picnic at Hanging Rock' and even the events around Salem and the subsequent Witch trials. However, I think such comparisons may lead to expectations that may not be met. It is though a film that had a great idea and I think it could have been taken much further as it sort of peters out; despite that it is still on I can recommend.
8 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Don't waste your time
jangreenhill125 April 2016
Warning: Spoilers
****MASSIVE SPOILER***

(The film and this review is spoiled and terrible)

I saw trailers for this film last year and thought, this film looks like the sort of thing I'd like. The cinematography appeared ethereal and dreamy. The cast was interesting and I thought I'd found another independent gem for my collection of pseudo intellectual DVDs and blu-Rays I leave lying around to show how clever I am.

This film is weak. Area Stark is vapid and stares off into space a lot. Maxine Peak is good, she's literally the best thing in this film. The film is not scary, don't be fooled by the trailers into thinking this film has some sort of supernatural haunting quality. It's literally a film about two girls, one is slutty, the other one isn't, and then the non slutty has really gross sex with her brother and her mum catches them. So I guess they're both slutty. Oh and there is some fainting at school. Then non slutty brother sexer gets expelled (maybe she was excelled before the sex? Who cares, it doesn't matter) The end.

So yeah, spoilers, but I've really just saved you two hours of your life that's you'd never get back, k.
26 out of 44 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Flawed but worth watching
dr_clarke_218 December 2021
Warning: Spoilers
The Falling was the second feature film directed by Carol Morley, best known prior to this for her drama-documentaries including Dreams of a Life. Released in 2014 to some acclaim, the film is set in a girl's school in 1969 and provides a heady brew of sexual awakenings, mystery and, erm, incest.

Morley also wrote The Falling, which follows Lydia Lamont, a schoolgirl who develops a crush on her friend Abbie. When Abbie has fainting fits and eventually dies, it kick-starts an epidemic of fainting fits within the school, which even affects one of the younger teachers. With the other teachers assuming the fainting girls to be faking and doctors at a loss, the audience is kept guessing as to what is really going on for most of the film, with some reviewers even banging on about supernatural elements, which the film does not in fact have, and it eventually turns out that the fainting are caused by an outbreak of hysterical contagion unwittingly started by the damaged Lydia.

This all works quite well, but Morley fumbles the ball somewhat, with the film's denouement proving slightly melodramatic, fuelled as it is by Lydia having incestuous sex with her half-brother Kenneth, whom Abbie slept with before she died. Although she thought he was her full brother, until her furious mother reveals that Lydia was actually a product of rape by a stranger. Morley attempts a brave examination of these bold themes, but it all feels a bit like an over-egged pudding, and it doesn't help that the second half of the film drags interminably at times.

Nevertheless, there is much to admire here. It's a very good looking film, with excellent mise-en-scéne from Morley, who honed her skills on short films and her previous feature film Edge as well as on her documentaries. Agnes Godard's striking cinematography lends the film a dreamy, art house vibe, although Tracey Thorn's score - whilst nice - slightly undermines things since it doesn't quite fit the period or the mood. The young cast members are very good, generally managing to do a good job of fainting convincingly, with Maisie Williams - fresh from Game of Thrones - giving an excellent performance as Lydia. Florence Pugh is also very good as Abbie, whilst then-rising star Joe Cole gives a charismatic but believably awkward performance as Kenneth. Maxine Peake is very convincing as Lydia's emotional distant mother Eileen.

Morley's characterisation is occasionally sketchy, but workmanlike: Greta Scacchi's formidable Miss Mantel is a bit of a cliché, but a believable one who turns out to have secrets in her past that she is ashamed of. There's a lovely scene when she and the Principal, Miss Alvaro, note that they girls have no idea how misunderstood middle aged women feel and end up in fits of giggles. There's a nagging sensation throughout The Falling that it isn't quite as good as it could and should have been, and it's probably overrated. Nevertheless, it has much to recommend it and is definitely worth watching.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Painfully pretentious.
martin-807-4522704 May 2015
Warning: Spoilers
Saw The Following last night. ***SPOILERS***

I was really excited - British director, great trailer, great poster and a pretty good cast.

However it was truly awful and a real insult to film makers. In the credits there were so many development people, BFI, BBC, so many producers and so many different bodies I couldn't believe that something so weak could have been produced.

I was also amazed at the incredible repetition of cut away shots, the same shot of the moon three times, the same shot of the tree, all the cuts aways clearly shot on the same day at the same time and then the most feeble direction I have ever seen. No vision, no direction, no cinematography, shot like a TV movie, nothing we haven't seen here before.

It was clear that the director does not know where to put a camera to get the best shots, and the very weak framing shows that the cinematographer didn't have a clue OR was trying very hard to re-invent the wheel and give us a challenging window on the world. Oh please. This has been done to death since 1910.

Clearly they had struggled in the edit to make the story work from the scenes they had shot, and used ever GCSE film making cliché from 'flash frames' to cut away to shagging that I would expect 1st year students to use in 1972. Yet critics are saying it is brilliant "A new Auteur."

I think critic's lack of understanding of how a film is actually constructed, made and shot, leads them to see things that a real film maker would just say, "oh they have cut to that shot because they've lost focus on that shot, or the eye line is off, or they haven't got enough coverage, or this shot is dead."

The premise was so good, the concept sound, but the execution was truly dreadful the director/writer clearly did not know what to do with the source material and drew no conclusions and no interesting plot lines and the bit about incest was just terrible.

The fact that this is in the top 5000 films at the moment just shows what damage the critic and distributors do to cinema and cinema audiences.

If you speak to anyone who actually makes movies non of them will give this a high rating.

I try so hard to support British films, and this tries my patience so hard.
32 out of 61 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
This film won't be for everybody but I really enjoyed it
Tweekums6 February 2017
Warning: Spoilers
Set in a small all-girl school in 1969, this film is centred on pupil Lydia Lamont who is virtually inseparable from her best friend Abbie Mortimer. Lydia is not too impressed when Abbie announces that she has started having sex. It soon emerges that Abbie is pregnant and the girls discuss what she should do but then Abbie collapses and dies. Not long after that Lydia faints at school; she isn't the last girl to faint; soon most of the pupils are collapsing as well as a young member of staff. The school authorities have no idea what to do; are the girls all faking it? Is it a case of mass hysteria? Or is there a medical cause? While this is going on Lydia starts to explore her own sexuality and ultimately learns why her mother hasn't left the house for sixteen years.

After hearing some very positive reviews I was a little surprised to see the film's low score and poor reviews here… having seen the film I was less surprised. Personally I thought it was really good but can understand why others wouldn't. If you want an explanation for what is going on you will be disappointed. Writer/director Carol Morley does a great job creating a disturbing atmosphere; nothing really scary happens but there is a general sense of unease and a feeling that something could happen. Sixteen year old Maisie Williams does a brilliant job as the troubled Lydia; it helps that she is the same age as her character. The rest of the cast are impressive too; notably Maxine Peake as Lydia's cold, almost indifferent mother. Overall I thought this was something special, one of those films one keeps thinking about after it has finished, so would certainly recommend it to anybody looking for something rather different; it certainly won't be for everybody though.
19 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
OMG - What a TOTAL let-down
begoozam3 August 2021
In all truth I came by this film due to the fact that I was actually a boarder at the school where this was filmed! Spent 5 years there (MANY moons ago), and ultimately the school closed, so me and a ton of other former-pupils were doing the rounds to watch the movie and see our old school!

I then noticed that Maisie Williams and Florence Pugh were in it, so had SOME degree of expectation.

As an ex-Director myself, I can whole-heartedly say that this was the worst directing I have ever seen. Period! The shot selection and scene setting (of which there was almost none) was frankly dreadful and in truth - amateurish.

The story itself lacked ANY sense of position, location, scene setting, plot - I could go on...

It is totally beyond me what the BFI were thinking when they agreed to fund this piece of simply utter rubbish.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Very good
creer-720-4615375 February 2017
I thought it was very good - it's a slow atmospheric movie in the British movie tradition of Nic Roeg. Reviews here complain of unanswered questions but that's only if you don't pay attention.

I did think it was a private school, but seems not - a private school of the 1960s would be more the environment where repression and hysteria are confined, only to spiral out of control.

It did lose pace in the last quarter, though concluded with a strong scene. Acting was excellent from all the main parties.

I'll certainly look out for her next film. Ludicrously I'm now required to add more lines to make my review more interesting - a pithy review of the salient points is far better than a lengthy ramble.

As other's have said above the mother figure was the least satisfactory - being a class conscious Brit there was a clear disconnect between the mother's Southern England rural accent and the daughter's well spoken accent - was it meant to be a grammar school? I don't know.. otherwise the late 60's was very well drawn.
4 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
An absolute cringefest
darren-153-89081027 April 2015
Warning: Spoilers
Having watched the trailer this looked like a very interesting movie.

I was also a big fan of the directors previous work, Dreams of a Life.

What starts out as a coming of age movie turns into a complete farce with some of the most cringe worthy scenes i've seen in recent years. And I'm not talking about the incest scenes. I seen A Serbian Film so this was tame compared to that. I'm talking about the fainting scenes. Just simply embarrassing. As for the 1960's Tales of the Unexpected dancing I was trying not to laugh. How on earth did anyone read this script and finance it?

Some of the visuals are pleasing with beautiful spring like colours. Unfortunately this isn't enough to save it from being one of the worst movies of 2015.

If you're looking for an interesting movie with a retro look and feel I suggest going for The Duke of Bergundy. Don't waste your money on this mess
19 out of 37 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Garbage
85122212 May 2016
Greetings from Lithuania.

Oh my god, i can't believe that i just applauded by the end of the movie. First time in many many moons, i have applauded not for that it was a good movie, but for that it Finally ended. What a terrible, boring, uninvolving, self pretentious "The Falling" (2014) is. I'm always open to any kind of movies, but only if it is made interestingly and is involving. The story can be biggest nonsense, but if it is made with some skill that glues you to the screen, i'm in for a ride. "The Falling" had nothing that could kept my attention during it's exhausting 1 h 37 min run. This movie dragged beyond anything i've recently watched. The story was so ... bizarre that i barely made though this painful movie in a week, limiting my watch for like 15 min a day - this piece of garbage should be used as a torture devise to terrorists to blow their minds.

Overall, "The Falling" makes me angry, that movies like these are being made at all. There is anything that resembles anything close to a compelling motion picture. The only thing that saved this garbage from vote 1 were a quite good songs used in this movie. Listen the soundtrack, and avoid this piece of trash at any cost.
19 out of 40 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Unique and difficult
Torchampester12 September 2015
Warning: Spoilers
Art is one of the most complex things to understand, right? I watched it twice so I could conclude that it is indeed understandable if you look through the underlines of dialogues and silent scenes. I must warn you that it's very difficult to watch and mainly see what the movie wants to show and/or make you think about. Very intense scenes.

I believe that this movie was a huge critic to the standards about women and our sexuality, fears and vulnerability. Although it all happens around 1960, the film implies yet nobody is willing to say or accept the truth about what's wrong with the world we live in. They all would rather ignore what's real and embrace the fake. The epidemic faints came from Mass Psychogenic Illness (MPI) and it's a very rare condition. I don't recall of any similar movie. Very innovative. I liked it. Worth a watch if you're a enthusiast.
4 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
With total honesty
violina_angel13 September 2015
Warning: Spoilers
((Warning this piece contains a spoiler)) I have just watched this film and I am quiet confused. I just could not understand the whole story. It started a mystery and ended so. It started with a fine flow until things begun to get me really lost with the story. I did not really feel that there was actually a story-line. I kept waiting for the scene where someone actually tells me what was wrong in there?! It is one of the movies that keep the audience wondering because it has many scattered messages and problems that are never solved at the end. However, I loved how the friendship of Abbie and Lydia was pictured, so intense and real. This part got me very convinced and I was expecting Abbie and Lydia to have gone through the mystery and solved it together…alas. . However, I loved Florence Pugh's performance in this film. I felt like after she died, the whole story died with her. Maisie Williams's could have done better because at some parts, her acting made the situation even more confusing….and strange. The visuals in the film were amazing and the music as well. I am upset because I was waiting so badly for this movie to be released.
11 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A private reverie
nancyldraper4 January 2020
This is not a commercial film. It is a concept film, the parents, the same person, are both writer and director. There is no room for any other. The cadence is that of a lover calling out to its self. Born by the talents of exceptional actors. But its private world is inhospitable to the onlooker. The pace is excruciatingly slow and self absorbed, the hope is that the audience will be lulled into the same reverie of the lover. But many will be alienated in the process. I was one who stayed to the end just out of curiousity but beyond exceptional performances I found little there to justify the observation. I give the film a 6 (self-absorbed) out of 10. {Drama, Mystery}
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Please Read: The Truth.
andrea-6810019 August 2015
Warning: Spoilers
Being a filmmaker I have watched tons of films in my time. Some being amazing in everything that they achieve, while others flop at every turn. The Falling happens to be the latter. Its baffling how this god awful film was written let alone commissioned. Set in 1969 in an English all girls school it follows the spread a 'fainting spell'. What ever the hell that is? Its not even remotely interesting and its misdirection just adds to it pathetic existence. What's even worse is that includes a scene of INCEST which was just plain sick. The thing that really gets me is that it had so many assets at its disposal, £750,000 not to mention the great Cinematography from Agnes Godard as well as some brilliant acting by Maisie Williams, Greta Scacchi and Maxine Peake. What we have here is a case of Self Indulgent Pomp by Carol Morely. This is quite ironic considering her other films like the Alcohol Years and Dreams of a Life which were gritty and real. I can't even begin to comprehend what she was thinking when she was writing the screenplay. All I know is its probably one of the worst films I've ever had the displeasure watching.
13 out of 32 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
OK, so it's boring
mysticnox26 September 2015
Maisie Williams is a good actress but the film is slow moving and almost nothing really happens other than closed minded people not wanting to talk about the realities of life.

That being said, there is an actually problem and it's not with the film itself but rather with those that have watched it and how clueless the conclusions seem to be.

1. The reason Lydia is acting the way she is is obvious. Because her semi lesbian relationship was in the process of disintegration when the other girl died after cheating on her. She doesn't know how to deal with it so she begins acting out. She is, after all, only a child.

2. The fainting spells are also rather obvious. They are real for some of the girls and not for others. They have been picking at the wall in one of the rooms. Obviously there must be mold or something in the crack. It could also be lead poisoning given the time period. And then they are sticking their fingers into each others mouths or their own. It's quite obvious that some of them have ingested something that will harm them.

3. Not all of them die, so there is another issue. Abigail was pregnant. There is a blood toxicity that can happen while pregnant. When I was little my best friends mum was confined to bed for months while she was pregnant because this almost killed her. She ended up in the hospital for almost a month. This, combined with what might be in that wall, is likely the cause of Abigails death. Given that technology wasn't nearly as sophisticated at the time this movie takes place, they may not have known what caused it.

The movie may be boring but thinking through the answers shouldn't be so difficult.
3 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
The Falling Review
AnthonyMeg12 January 2019
Warning: Spoilers
If you are not into psychological movies then watching this will be a total waste of time, because the dullness within this movie reached a high level ,even for mystery enthusiasts this will be a distressing watch because all this movie about is the aftermaths of a singular student's death, and how other fellow students begin to imitate her recent behavior before she died like alot of fainting which explains the title the falling or the fainting to be more accurate.finding the answer to why they doing it and what came over them is the key to the mystery .
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Disgusting and offensive
sfennell-4964924 March 2015
Warning: Spoilers
There are two sex scenes shown graphically in the film - one with a 15 year old girl and a 20 something man, one with the same man and his 15 year old sister. The latter went on for about 2 minutes, as multiple audience members left. I wish I had gone with them! The director, in a Q&A after the film, explained that the incest scene was the girl trying to connect with her brothers previous sexual partner (her best friend). She also said that we shouldn't always discuss incest in such a weird way(!).

The rest of the film was bizarre and made little sense. I'd highly recommend avoiding this one!
17 out of 47 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
A visually stunning and multi-faceted mystery drama.
rosiealaska3 February 2015
In 1969, Lydia (Maisie Williams) and Abbie (Florence Pugh) are two best friends at an English girls' school, but their peace is shattered when Lydia is taken over by a mysterious illness. Her behaviour becomes erratic and uncontrollable, and as a result, her emotionally distant mother (Maxine Peake) becomes increasingly disquieted. As the illness spreads throughout the school, it begins to take its toll and tear the tight-knit group apart, and the cause of it seems to lie deeper in the minds of the girls than anyone could ever have expected.

Williams and Pugh are enchanting as Lydia and Abbie, and the supporting cast, including Greta Scacchi and Monica Dolan, give the film a perfectly executed sense of perception. Peake, too, gives an astounding performance, stealing the scene with every word she utters.

Carol Morley's direction creates a lingering uneasiness about the film, which contrasts eerily with the stunning landscape of the English countryside. The story is layered with intertwining details that increase the enigmatic charm of it without crossing the fine line into pretentious melodrama.

Despite, at times, being directionally unclear, the film's dream- like quality brings all of the elements of the production together to form a visually stimulating mystery drama. This haunting tale of mass hysteria is a masterpiece that only proves Morley's promise as a feature film director.
50 out of 87 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A story about a daughter trying to bridge gap between her mother.
ephraimcassion24 June 2017
Warning: Spoilers
If you can avoid the trailer, I think it will be more enjoyable if you go in cold. If you've seen the trailer it is misleading. It's not about an epidemic at an all-girl school with a conspiracy to cover up. At it's core I think The Falling is about two things a generational gap between the females in this movie and their inability to communicate.

The older women are from a generation where they endure their hardships (in this movie very tragic ones), don't speak of it and try to move on with life the best they can. The new generation are in a more liberated time. The world went through a lot of social change in the 60's and 70's. So they are more open about their problems and share sometimes too much which is embodied by Abbie. But the girls in this movie are girls. They are very intelligent, they think they know it all but are still confused about things. Even though the younger generation are living in a more liberating time there are still dealing with repression but they have to navigate this new world alone. When they try to reach out to the adults they are unable/unwillingly to help. Not out of maliciousness I think but just don't know how. The women in this movie are not the dumb adults that are always in movies. They see what is going on with these kids but are failing them. When they do intervene it comes to late.

One quote that embodies this is by the headmistress. She tells a teacher how the students feel so misunderstood but have no clue about how it's like to be a middle age women.

As for the mystery of the movie. Why are these girls fainting. The movie gives two answers with proof for both. In my opinion it's a mixture of both. For critiques of the movie. At times the fainting of the girls seemed way to choreographed and not natural. Some of music is ill placed. Some shots are confusing, they are meant to show us things but lack context or go too fast. I found the movie enjoyable but I wanted more out of it.
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
another awful, boring, vacuous British 'film'
trpuk19685 September 2015
I think I'm going to give up on 'British film' altogether because I can count on the fingers of one hand the number of decent British movies I've seen in the last ten years. Kill List, Wuthering Heights, Duke of Burgundy, Children of men, Never Let me go, Brothers of the Head. OK, OK it's up to six.

This is just awful. I remember feeling annoyed that I'd paid over ten pounds to see carol Morley's Dreams of a Life in the cinema when watching it at home on a small screen wouldn't have made any difference to the interest of the documentary, it certainly didn't need a big screen. However it was an impressive enough documentary to make me want to watch this.

The Falling is about nothing. It's cliché ridden and it doesn't even convey the late sixties properly. A decent film maker would have, along with their cast, watched some sixties films and got them to speak, got the intonations and the accents right. People spoke in a different way fifty years ago but in this film they talk like they do nowadays? By ending a sentence as if it's a question? With that rising intonation of the voice? Also, like most British films, it doesn't have a big enough budget so we have a school that only seems to have about nine students. With the result that the mise en scene is just unbelievable.

Anyway I lost ninety minutes of my life watching this which I'll never recover and advise you avoid doing the same. I won't repeat what other commentators have said - this film goes nowhere and is an incoherent mess of clichés. That it got National Lottery funding says a lot about the UK taxpayer funded gravy train that is the British Film Institute. Not to mention the BBC who also bear responsibility for this wreck.

Stick with the DVDs of Powell and Pressburger or Nicholas Roeg and avoid anything else with the label 'British film'. British and film is a contradiction in terms.
11 out of 28 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed