Peter Mangs - en seriemördares hemlighet (2024– ) User Reviews

Speculations going wild.

[jacobjohansson-50807 · 3/10 · 23 February 2024]

Well. This is definitely an interesting case and an interesting perpetrator. However, wild documentaries, speculating around additional murders... well, it definitely goes too far.

"Hey, look here. Peter was in Florida during a period where a random woman with drug issues were murdered. It must've been him... because no other criminal lives in Florida, passing the bridge to Key West during a period of X weeks... riiight?".

Unfortunately this one is a bit slow and way too speculative. And of course, like any documentary such as this one, speculations around additional crimes rarely ever results in anything.

A growing problem...

[philip-00197 · 2/10 · 4 March 2024]

There is a trend of recent - one of some bewilderment that; raises some concern for the "documentary format" in general and is, to say the least, irritating.

Apparently it is OK to: Have some crackpot idea that needs validating. Trying to confirm this theory and when there is no proof that any of it has any validity whatsoever - go ahead and make a documentary anyhow. Not only that but then drag it out over several episodes while leading on that there is some kind of reveal coming up.

There is apparently a "mad man" at work here and, judging by what this documentary presents,it is not obvious who it is. This is a train wreck of a documentary - at least with regard to the topic is supposedly covering. If you, on the off chance, are interested of a glimpse into the mind of its maker, John Mork, you may consider this a treat.

Slow and speculative

[jorsve · 2/10 · 17 March 2024]

It feels like this whole 3 part series should have been made into a 45 minute episode of some other show. Wild speculations, long drawn out tangets that doesn't lead anywhere, and the ending is as satisfying as stepping in a puddle of water while wearing only socks.

The writer/story teller seems more like a groupie than anything else. "Peter is so well spoken, so intelligent, such a great musician", etc. Not that I think he shares peters views but he definitely is a bit too into Peter.

To sum it up: Wildly speculative, uninteresting and unlikable story teller, drawn out, teasing things but never delivering. Avoid and spend your time on something else. This isn't worth watching.