"Doctor Who" The Angels Take Manhattan (TV Episode 2012) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
37 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
10/10
Hello, I Must Be Going
boblipton29 September 2012
Warning: Spoilers
Companions come and go in DOCTOR WHO. The only real fixed point in space and time is the Doctor. We always knew the day was coming when Amy Pond and Rory Williams would leave. I don't think anyone thought it would be so heartbreakingly sad and so exalting at the same time.

Throughout most of the history of Doctor Who, time travel has usually been a plot device to get the Doctor and his companions from one adventure to the next, like switching narrators in Boccacco's Decameron. Only rarely was it central to the story itself and then it usually was used for paradoxes.

Then Steven Moffatt wrote "The Girl in the Fireplace" for the second series of the revived show and invented the Weeping Angels for "Blink". When he took over as the show runner, we began to see time in a bifurcated fashion: as a fixed dimension in the universe and as as a sequence of events in a person's life. Oh, perhaps that was the point of the confusing welter of events in Terry Nation's "The Chase", but it was never pursued until Moffatt began to build multi-season arcs. For most people, time ran in its fixed course and Tuesday always followed Monday. For others, it consisted of a widely separated series of events that snarled into itself and somehow existed in many ways at the same moment, like Amy Pond. Sometimes it ran backwards and forwards in a manner that made little sense to the outsider, like River Song.

Moffatt has turned Doctor Who into a series of mystery stories, with the solution of the mystery being the teasing out of the timeline of the individuals from the big ball of timey-wimey stuff, with the weekly monster and occasionally saved world thrown in as a bonus. Some fans hate it. Me, I love it. For Moffatt, time is sometimes the hero, sometimes the villain, but always a character that must be dealt with. As a man in his fifties, it's something I appreciate.

For the last story of the Ponds, Moffatt and his staff have pulled out all the stops. We have Alex Kingston as River Song back to say goodbye to her parents. We have the Weeping Angels, Moffatt's scariest monsters, and we have the city of New York, with the cast in the city to do some shooting. There are some lovely shots of Central Park around Belvedere Castle and of Times Square.

It's a great episode and I'm glad that Karen Gillian and Arthur Darvill, the actors who play Amy and Rory, get to go out in such a superb piece of television. It's up to us to wish them well and hope they get more chances to play good roles. For everyone in the cast, crew and audience, it's time to move on.
74 out of 100 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
City of Angels & Demons...
Xstal26 December 2021
Flowing back to 1938, an angel changes Rory's fate, stealing 74 years of his life force, he's lucky to find a River's course. Soon all the gang are assembled here, but the TARDIS finds it hard to adhere, with Angel concentrations high, their liberty reaches for the sky. The weeping demons have found a jail, it's walls and rooms built to assail, a factory of perpetual theft, where you never leave and have nothing left. An unfitting farewell if you're stranded here, enough to encourage an emotional tear, but tangents new are beckoning, and more often than not, that's not a bad thing.
11 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Farewell Last Centurion and Amelia Pond
iGobbledygook1 August 2013
Warning: Spoilers
S05E01 - S07E05

Doctor Who was never same when it resumed in season 5. They introduced two companions for the Doctor which was new for me.

Story-lines were made around Amy & Rory; and Doctor was dragged into their lives. For me, it was other way around with these companions.

This episode was almost perfectly written to give farewell to a girl (who waited for 12 years) and a boy (who waited for 2000 years). It was brilliant to bring Weeping Angels back since they were the ones to separate them before too.

I had no other words other than these, It's really sad to see them go.
18 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Stunned!
dark_scionproductions29 September 2012
Warning: Spoilers
Ever since we first saw the level of writing that Steven Moffat brought to the whole Whovian Mythos, we've been stunned. He's created brand new and very terrifying enemies for the Doctor with the Vashta Nerada and the Weeping Angels, both sets of episodes ('Silence in the Library' and 'Blink') are on my personal favourites list alongside classics like 'Rememberance of the Daleks', what does this have to do with 'The Angels Take Manhatten' you ask? Well, I personally believe that Moffat has done something here that can be seen as possibly his best work in Dr Who, and it should instantly be on a Whovian's list of great episodes. The story, as we've all known is how Rory and Amy leave the Doctor, as the recent years have never really had his companions freely leave the Doctor(save for Freema Agyeman's Martha), with Rose and Donna they've done things to help and had the consequences hit them for it (it can be argued that most of the Doctors Companions have been collateral in his epic fights) does Moffat go the way of Davies? Nope, from the start of the episode the tension is building, we see shots of statues in the beautiful New York and know the Angels are back, it was thrilling to feel the tension build as we know Rory has been kidnapped by the Angels and thrown back in time, a thing that-until now, has meant we see the death of that person immediately afterwards. What Moffat has done brilliantly here is to pull the rug out from under us, you think you'll see a 30-something kid of Rory's appear and tell Amy that her Husband re-married and had a wonderful life? No, we get to where Rory is and find him looking at himself dying inside a pen for Humans that allows the Angels to constantly feed on their 'lost days'. From there Moffat scales up the tension with the Doctor stating that he's powerless to stop Rory living and dying as a captured slave for the Angels, then the masterful scene where Amy and Rory decide to try and make their own destinies by both jumping off the building to stop the whole event from ever happening. In a word:Stunning! This episode is by far the very best of the whole 5 thats been so far, notable scenes that I really loved were the Statue of Liberty becoming an Angel, the horribly creepy Smling Angel(Yes, we finally get one smiling and its scary as hell) and the wonderful scenes between the Doctor and River and Amy and Rory talking about marriage, though most new fans won't know this, there was (hopefully) a line in this episode that might be foreshadowing for the answer to the question (god I hope the BBC doesn't do it again-old fans will know what I mean) all-in-all this is going in my faves of all time along with the other greats of the whole series. Roll on 2013!!
34 out of 55 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Thrilling
AleksandrBelenko8 September 2019
Amazing episode. 1930´s aesthetic, interesting plot, and most important expanding on weeing angels´ lore in a best way. Best episode with these villans since Blink. The endig is overhelming.
11 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Farewell Amelia Pond (and Rory)
Tweekums30 September 2012
Warning: Spoilers
For all The Doctor's talk of 'spoilers' in the past there can be few viewers watching this episode that hadn't heard that it would be the last to feature Amy and Rory... which of course lessened the impact of the ending. I still really enjoyed the episode but wish the BBC had at least kept the knowledge of their departure to saying it was 'some time during the seventh season' if they didn't think it could be kept a total secret.

The episode opened with an interesting prologue; it featured none of the regular characters; instead it showed a 1930s New York private investigator who takes on the case of statues that move. A lead takes him to a hotel room where he finds an old man. The man is the detective; shortly afterwards he is sent back in time by one of the Weeping Angels.

After the opening we see Amy, Rory and The Doctor in Central Park; The Doctor is reading a trashy detective story out loud; which irritates Amy somewhat. Rory then pops off to get some coffee but something strange happens; he finds himself back in the '30s... with River Song. Even stranger The Doctor realises the book he is reading mentions Rory's arrival in the '30s and even mentions them. If Amy is to see her husband again they will have to go back to the '30s and face the Weeping Angels once again.

After a great season opener there had been a few weaker episodes; thankfully this one was great... I'd have been really disappointed if Amy and Rory had left in an inferior episode. Once again the Angels were creepy in a way that gave me goose-bumps for the first time since there original appearance in 'Blink'; equally chilling was The Doctor's pronouncement that anything they read later in the book was unavoidably going to happen given the final chapter's ominous title. The story was well paced with plenty of scary moments all of which lead up perfectly to the finale when Amy and Rory are lost to The Doctor; it isn't a tragedy but the sort of bitter-sweet ending that may cause a few tears to be shed.

It was sad to see Karen Gillan and Arthur Duval leave the series as I though they did fine jobs as Amy and Rory; I am rather pleased though that it was made clear that The Doctor could not go back to see them... it is best that once a companion has departed they stay departed otherwise it just lessens the impact of their loss.
27 out of 43 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Season 7.1: Plays for the easy episodes and family viewing – works as light entertainment but nothing more (MAJOR SPOILERS)
bob the moo8 October 2012
Warning: Spoilers
I have always watched Doctor Who but for me this means that I watched the stuff from the Sylvester McCoy era and onwards – not really the periods that fans consider to be classic. I'm sure at some point I'll go back through the early episodes – after all, I just watched the original Quatermass and was very impressed, so time doesn't affect the quality of good ideas. Having said that, I'm sort of glad that I'm not a Doctor Who fan with the classic episodes because it must be hard to see what the show is doing now. Personally I have still enjoyed the way Doctor Who has gone because to me it has always been nothing but Saturday evening light entertainment for the family.

This season (or half-season) continues this trend and, if anything actually goes back to being more and more accessible and focused on the moment. Gone is the messy season long plot of the last season or two and, in fairness, given that none of them ever really came together logically or in ways that really satisfied so no great loss there. Instead what we have are specific episodes which only need to really work within the context of that episode and no more than that. This it can mostly do and there wasn't really an episode I didn't like in this first part of the season – certainly nothing as bad as the Doctor, Witch, Wardrobe Christmas Special anyway.

So, the half season produces some solid entertainment by bringing out great creatures (angels, daleks) for reasonably good turns, while also having some good stuff with dinosaurs (on a spaceship) and small black cubes on earth. Even the episode I didn't really care for (the gunslinger one) at least had a bit of meat in the plotting. Sadly none of the episodes really get better than being OK and family friendly (ie aimed towards being accessible for kids at all times). The big finale is of the course the removal of Amy and Rory from the show – an event that some appear to have gotten quite emotional over but for me personal is not a problem as it has been a long time coming. This episode really sums up the weaknesses of the show as a whole because it doesn't really have any consistent tone or impact; absolutely it has good bits that work but it also has silliness, moments that lack even internal logic and moments that are meant to be emotionally impacting but lack it. So, for example, Rory dying stopped being emotional after the 3rd or 4th time so the Pond's exit from the show was actually pretty lacking in emotion considering how long they have been in it.

Part of this lack of punch though is also down to the acting. Gillan is the main problem – she is very limited. Playing the feisty redhead is no problem, but she cannot "feel" things without making it feel forced and unnatural. The only thing consistent about her performance through the seasons has been her inability to step up to the emotional plate when the script gives her the chance; so it was in The Girl Who Waited and so it is here. Darvill on the other hand continues to be good and it is ironic then that the scripts often give him so much less to do. Smith is a solid Doctor for the direction of the show but he doesn't have the gravitas on tap the way the previous two did – Tennant in particular could find a darkness within himself but also make it seem like it was something always there; with Smith it just seems fleeting and a bit more like temper than darkness. He does the silly stuff and light-entertainment family stuff just fine, but no more than that this season (again surprising considering the Pond's leaving).

Overall what this first half of season 7 leaves is the feeling of a show that is focused on hitting the market as hard as possible and getting as much as it can from it. The stand-alone episodes seem to work better than the intertwined ones, but this is mainly down to how messy the season-long plots used to be, plus it does mean that each episode is a new day – so there is no audience buy-in to help "forgive" a weaker episode, it stands or falls on its own. I mostly enjoyed this half season though, and the clearout of characters will mean that this light-entertainment feel can be free of baggage and clutter in the second half. I still long for intelligence and genuine impact in the stories but the show isn't looking for that anymore and I'm not sure the cast are even up to it – I'll watch it as Saturday night telly for the family, a show that stands out from the game shows and talent shows around it, but not one that would survive outside of this environment for long if it was plunked down where "proper" television lives.
32 out of 54 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Goodbye Ponds.
laraoswald24 February 2016
Warning: Spoilers
After "The Power Of Three" that made it obvious that Amy and Rory wouldn't have long to live anymore, this was the ending of their story. In the beginning of the episode, everybody is quite happy, River makes a "surprise" appearance and they try to fight the Weeping Angels once again. While it seems that everything is good in the end, the episode makes a huge turn after Rory sees his own gravestone even though it should be gone. That's the moment in which you hold your breath and your heart beats faster. Rory turns around and disappears. I think this is an amazing example of how the mood of an episode can change in a few seconds. While I already had tears in my eyes when Amelia panicked, I completely lost it at "Raggedy man, goodbye." I think this is one of the best scenes in the whole show and it's one of the best episodes in general. It includes everything a good episode needs. Brilliant.
10 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
People thought 'Doomsday' was sad ...
doctorwhofan9629 September 2012
Warning: Spoilers
I usually like to pick at Doctor Who episodes to find faults, e.g. how come the Statue of Liberty didn't move when neither Amy and Rory were looking and no one else was there? Despite this i rate it 10/10 purely because of the brilliant plot, excellent script and phenomenal acting. Steven Moffat has once again provided Whovains and viewers a brilliant episode, i might actually say his best ... maybe beaten by 'Blink' but all the same absolutely fantastic. Karen was amazing, i was in tears as soon as that tear rolled down Amy's face when Rory wanted her to push him off the roof. Then they lived and i was happy after crying at their dramatic fall, and then Rory got touched by an Angel and i realised that they weren't just going to leave, this time the companions would die (in a way). An added point, the Statue of Liberty as an Weeping Angel, what an idea, i loved it the moment i saw it and the opening title started, and the Weeping Angels were already Moffat's best creations and my favourite enemy. Overall a huge 10/10 for 'The Angels Take Manhattan' i was looking forward to it when the series started and it din't disappoint at all.
21 out of 41 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Out with a bang
pjgs20028 June 2016
Warning: Spoilers
The Pond's/Williams' final episode is one of the most emotional and tense episodes of Doctor Who ever. Returning director Nick Hurran did a fantastic job with this episode, as with Asylum of the Daleks. The farewell scene was executed flawlessly, but the rest of the episode is as tense and scary as it is dramatic. In my opinion, The Angels' Take Manhattan is the Weeping Angel's best episode- they are truly scary in this episode. The music was fantastic, also. If I had to point out a part that I didn't agree with, it would be that the Doctor should be able to rescue the Pond's in a different location, he didn't have to stay in New York. Otherwise, the Angels Take Manhattan was an excellent episode of Doctor who.

Note: Chris Chibnall (future showrunner) created a scene for the end of the episode that wasn't shot. If that scene is a good example of what Chibnall can bring to Doctor Who, then we're in great hands. Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XWU6XL9xI4k
7 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Exceedingly good, but
Maylar1 October 2012
Warning: Spoilers
This particular episode, for me, had only one truly big flaw: it followed "The Power of The Three". And in that episode, we learn how much Doctor really depends on having both Amy and Rory close to him and how Rory's father depends on Doctor to keep them both safe.

Well, to follow that episode and that message with the, if not death, then disappearance of these characters for good, is by me a huge flaw in the complete series timeline.

That said, I consider this to be a very good episode, with here and there lacking that certain "something" most of us was expecting to see, I believe.

Into its favor, this episode has a certain flavor of "unusual" even for this series (for which I think the interesting use of filters and wide shots can be "blamed" in the first place).

I personally like the back and forth moments, that keep the viewer on his toes...one moment things are progressing in the desired order, the very next there are as bad as they can be. Maybe Moffat used this here a bit more than usually, but I liked it. Hope never leaves the viewer until the very end and when it does, it does in style. Moffat is known as "no one ever dies" writer and stays faithful to that title here, as well.

Which didn't stop him from removing not only one, but two of much beloved characters from the series. Which, I think (and only speculating) is only the innuendo for removing River and regenerating Doctor by the end of this season (something I will regret with passion when it happens, but is beyond the subject of this review).

The episode has an interesting idea and brings up the new concept of angels and their behavior, telling the viewer more about their nature. It also has one of the most interesting cliffhangers ever made on television, right in the first few minutes. I won't tell you what this is, if you haven't seen the episode, go and check it out. You won't be disappointed.

There's few very emotionally heavy moments, but here I find the episode a bit lacking, in comparison to some other episodes. I'm not quite sure why...perhaps, it is just a matter of editing and quick jumping from shot to shot. Matt Smith is (I firmly believe, whatever some fans opinions might be) an excellent actor and I could easily picture him giving much more than he gave here. Why that wasn't given or used, I can't comprehend. But Doctor giving up on both Amy and Rory with one angry cry isn't enough for me. The complete ending gives me much of a "meh" feel from precisely Doctor.

Perhaps, it was meant to show us how Doctor is starting to come into terms with losing his companions. The parting wasn't worse than some partings in the original series...I just think that we, people of the 21th century, kinda needed more. But I might be wrong or to subjective at this.

For me, the shiny star of this is River. She was...River. And again for me, that was enough to carry much of the episode. She's a character with no weakness but one and since that one is Doctor himself, any fan would forgive. But seriously, her strength is once again underlined. If you like River, you would love that...if not, bad luck.

In general, this episode has it all: action, emotions, horror, suspense, humor. For some reason, it still does not develop perfectly as it could have. But it is still much above the average episode (which says plenty) and is one of the "must see", surely. Not only because of the ending, but also because it has much to give, despite the occasional flaw or two.
12 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
I can't even believe how emotional this gets
silikonchips27 May 2021
Warning: Spoilers
I'm an American and watched Who back in the 80s on PBS. It was different and whimsical and quirky. It was often funny and occasionally horrific, such as the ending of the Five Doctors. And my favorite Doctor was Pertwee. I also absolutely love that they kept continuity in the reboot with the original show.

The loss of Adric was sad, but the ending here is stunningly effective and sad. And it's one of the most effectively emotional scenes I've seen in any show or movie ever.

As a much more mundane observation, I am amused that the new Who, while having ongoing arcs, is much less of a serial than the old days, despite most of me tv having a serial format.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Worst of the Weeping Angel stories
warlordartos11 April 2021
Warning: Spoilers
Now it could have been a lot worse but the mistakes in this episode also mean it could have been quite a bit better. The biggest problem being Angels not moving, when clearly no one is looking at them.

Other problems were The Statue of Liberty being an Angel, Angels somehow being all types of other statues in the first place, the sonic screwdriver being used to measure how tight an Angel is holding River because that makes total sense, Them falling off the building sideways and then somehow being right-way up to hug (do you know how tall a building would have to be to give you the time to do all the stuff they did in that time-frame, much taller than what it was)

I also didn't find this exiting at all really, it was quite boring actually. So i was slightly relieved when it was over now we can move on to all thing better (he said hopefully). It is however worth the watch but I couldn't see myself watching this episode again.
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Angelic but no logic.
A_Kind_Of_CineMagic11 February 2019
Warning: Spoilers
Amy and Rory sign off from their travels with the Doctor and their final episode is another dramatic epic.

Although this episode is fun I do not love it, I am sorry to say. This review will be controversial with some people but I am not a 'hater', I always look for positives. I do enjoy various aspects of this which I will discuss in this review but it has lots of content that is really not to my personal taste which I will set out first.

Numerous Moffatt written episodes are among my favourites but this and a number of other Moffatt epics fall flat for me because of his disregard for logic and his insistence of a 'bigger is always better' attitude. I feel this causes him to regularly over inflate story ideas and not bother ensuring things make sense. In this episode we have a number of things I find rather silly:

The main one is why does Rory and Amy getting sent back in time by the Angels mean the Doctor cannot have any further contact with them? The paradox apparently means the Doctor can no longer visit Manhattan but the reason people who were sent back could not leave was because the Angels controlled the building they sent them to and stopped anyone leaving. This begged another question of how those people had survived to old age if they were stuck in one building with no food shopping etc. Anyway, we are told the paradox wiped that building and most Angels out so why can't Amy and Rory leave Manhattan and rejoin with the Doctor from another location? They could get a train to New Jersey and meet him. With more thoughtful writing Moffatt could have trapped them in a more convincing way (an Angel keeping them trapped in a hotel or them being sent to a mystery location where the Doctor cannot find them) but the way it is done doesn't convince me at all sorry.

Even if we accept they are stuck in Manhattan why can River visit them but the Doctor can never speak to them again? Why can't he phone them or whatever at least? And why is it that once he knows how Amy and Rory die he can never see them in their adult timeline again but he CAN visit Amelia as a young girl?

In addition, why does River not get transported back in time when the Angel grabs her wrist? Just because it didn't suit the story.

The Statue of Liberty becoming an Angel is done to be cool and exciting but how could nobody notice it had moved in such a hugely populated area? Isn't it in plain sight of people almost constantly so how can it manage to walk across the city as if nobody is watching? And wouldn't it be very noisy?

We also have the timey wimey idea of River writing stories about events that the Doctor reads as things happen (but cannot read ahead in order to not fix events in an unwanted way). Well isn't it a coincidence the Doctor chose, of his own free will, to randomly read these novels (it is mentioned he has read more than one), to read one at the time they are in Manhattan and to just notice events being about them when he happens to be reading it when they are at the exact right place and time?! It is not really logical, it is overly contrived in my opinion. The film-noir scene at the start is part of this contrivance too. It is purely for effect. Again this COULD have been done convincingly (River sending him a book to read in Manhattan) but it wasn't.

The Doctor travels back to ancient China and puts a message on a piece of pottery which River sees 1500 or so years later in the apartment she is visiting and spurs her to signal the Doctor. How can the Doctor ensure a particular piece of pottery will arrive undamaged in the apartment 1500 years later? It is Moffatt yet again throwing what he thinks is a cool bit of 'timey wimeyness' in which I find jarring and hard to swallow. These things take me out of the my immersion in the story.

This episode also effectively features Amy dying twice - her fall from the roof and her off screen death as an old lady - and 3 deaths for Rory - his death after being first sent back by the Angels, his fall from the roof and his off screen death after being sent back again by another Angel. Incredibly this means in the 33 episodes of the Moffatt era to this point there had been a total of 23 apparent deaths of TARDIS crew which were then reversed in some way (including future companion Clara/Oswin). That is extraordinary overuse of this plot device. It lessens the impact of death scenes as they keep getting magically undone. To be blunt it is repetitive, lazy storytelling to do this so many times.

These elements spoil what could and should have been a great episode for me.

The positives I see in this episode are: The acting is brilliant.

The production looks really good with high standard effects.

There are the creepy Angels who are a top class enemy and make scarily effective attacks on a few occasions.

There is the emotional departure of two well loved companions and the Doctor's dismay at their loss.

There is tension, suspense, excitement and smart dialogue with moments of funny humour.

There are sufficient ingredients which should make this a classic. But the elements I am not keen on drop it to a pretty low rating for me.

My Rating: 4.5/10.

My Ranking: 14th out of 14 episodes in series 7.
16 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
I'm a little confused...
workingmike29 September 2012
Warning: Spoilers
Wasn't the paradox supposed to erase that whole place so how did both of them end up on the same headstone together? Where did they get taken exactly and how did that stupid book get written?! Also.. This episode is by far my favorite probably of all the 2005 series, but that's probably only because of how attached I've grown to Amelia. Either way, it's a fantastically written love/loss story. The New York setting made it even more epic. Also, why at the end was Rory about to walk in the Tardis when he suddenly turns around out of no-where, walks 8 feet back or so, turns around and looks at the headstone? Didn't quite fit for me for some reason.
7 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Angels Sacrifice
hellraiser723 October 2015
Warning: Spoilers
Warning do not read unless you've seen episode.

This is one of the saddest episodes I've ever seen, Amy and Rory are not just my favorite companions in Doctor Who but they are also one of my favorite fictional couples because they just had the most phenomenal chemistry and they really balanced each other out, which is what made the episode all the more heartbreaking.

It's true the episode isn't perfect, some of the plot line has some holes in it and the Doctor and River don't have a lot to do. But despite that it works for me mainly on the sum of it's parts and this episode isn't totally concerned about plot, also in a way this really is more Amy and Rory's episode.

I really loved the moment where it comes to a pivotal moment where Rory is on top of the building and supposedly if he jumps off he will be able to save the universe/time and cancel out the Angel's plan. We then see Ami join him and there is just a beautiful dialog between the two what Ami says I personally feel is part of what true love is about. Despite Rory's wishes for her not to come with him she decides to join him because of her love for him. You could also say what they do is also because of their love for their siblings River and son in law The Doctor (technically he is) so they can live on.

When I see both of them jump, I remember thinking nooooo!, it was really happening and there was nothing the Doctor or anyone could do about it. But then we of course see Amy and Rory's plan worked as they created a paradox to wipe the Angel's out.

The Doctor and everyone are back at the present and it seems like things are alright. But then something even I didn't see coming happens when we see one of the angel's touches Rory and then we suddenly see his name etched on the tombstone, which really made my heart sink because it meant Rory just died.

It then comes down to the most emotional heartbreaking moment when we see Amy about to join Rory, and we knew what that meant. Despite the Doctor's desperate pleas there was no stopping her, in Amy's eyes I already knew that she already made her choice. She then says her tearful goodbyes to River and the Doctor, then suddenly see her name etched on the tombstone next to Rory's, that moment I just broke down and cried because that moment both of them are gone.

Farewell Amy and Rory, I love you both you made the Doctor's adventures less lonely which is why you'll be missed but never forgotten like the stars in the sky.

Rating: 4 stars
3 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
That is how you do it!
reiuhi18 February 2016
Warning: Spoilers
WOW! That is how you end an era. Farewell Amy and Rory.

Positives: +Tense.

+Action Packed.

+Very Scary, the Weeping Angel's scariest appearance to date.

+Emotional.

+Original.

+Amazing Music.

Negatives: -plot hole (the doc. should be able to go back in time and get Amy and Rory in a different location) .

Still, a 10/10.

Perfect exit for some of the greatest companions ever.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
This new format
dwgb530 September 2012
Warning: Spoilers
this may or may not be a spoiler depending on how you keep up with the Doctor; but i have to say, I personally don't like this new format. the show is going on hiatus again and we have to wait another 2 and a half months before the show comes back on. this time we didn't even get half of the shows before it went off. I like the old format, were the Christmas show was the start of the new series and you got at least half of the shows before it went on hiatus and then a couple months later you got the rest of the series. i don't know but as I said I like the old format. i guess like everyone else I just have to adjust to the new format and live with it. This show was great, the best so far. i just don't care for the new format. i've said my piece, so on with the show. Moffat has written his best series so far. He has gotten better and better, may the rest of the series be as go as what we have gotten so far.
5 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
The Angels Take Manhatten Warning: Spoilers
Almost a ten, the ending was absolutely superb though the episode itself, while great wasn't quite ten material in my opinion. I think this was the best possible send off for Amy and Rory, the latest companions to leave the Doctor, poor Doctor immortality can truly be a curse, for him at least. He's still got his wife though, and that's something.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Dramatic and very emotional. One of the best companion exits ever
sdfhkuashfkuu11 April 2016
Warning: Spoilers
The Angel's Take Manhattan is one of the best episodes of Doctor Who ever.

The acting is amazing, and the Angels have never been scarier than this. It's one of the most emotional episodes ever, and the only other companion exits that are better is Face the Raven and Doomsday. (Face the Raven is the best one. Capaldi and Coleman are amazing.)

The music from Murray Gold is as heartbreaking as it is good, and it really makes every scene better. This was the best episode of series 7, with The Name of the Doctor and Asylum of the Daleks close by.

Farewell Ponds.

11/10
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Brilliant
adlerfscastro9 June 2015
Warning: Spoilers
It's not by luck that I love weeping angels episodes. Since "Blink", every episode with these devious creatures managed to keep me thrilled. And "The Angels take Manhattan" is not an exception. From the start when Rory is gone and Amy read the future to the Doctor I knew that this was one promising episode.

The way the story was constructed with all the mystery around, the suspense of the "dark" moments, the creeping moment of Rory's death and finally the unexpected ending, resulted in another fantastic Doctor Who episode. Amelia's last farewell could not be more touching. Definitely one of my favourites.
1 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
...And the Ponds take a bow
dkiliane31 March 2019
Warning: Spoilers
Yes, this is indeed the final episode for Amy and Rory. And Steven Moffat was determined to give them a great send off-with a final appearance (as of 2019 at least) of the weeping angels! And we have River Song too!

The episode begins with an innocuous jaunt to (what I assume is) present day New York. But things quickly get weird when Rory disappears and Amy starts to read a mysterious book that has her, Rory, River and the Doctor as characters. Following the clues they find themselves in early 20th century New York facing the weeping angels as they never have before.

The premise is exciting and works quite well. I enjoyed seeing the angels return to form, performing their time manipulation antics to steal a persons time energy instead of their blatantly murderous ways in season 5. And while it can get a bit convoluted rather quickly (and has some plot holes if you ponder a little too much over it) it makes for a scary adventure that still feels unique.

Of course, the acting is superb and Moffat pulls out all the stops to get the viewer emotionally invested in the finale. And while there are those who feel both the angels and River had worn out their welcome by now, the story around them offers evidence to the contrary, and they fill the episode with a nice sense of nostalgia, also. Some of the Angels' abilities do feel a tad overblown at times and inconsistent, but that is easily forgivable as they still deliver chills in every scene. The Doctor's interaction with River is always fun and in this episode rather heartfelt as well. And his final pleas to Amy before she allows the angel to touch her so she can join her husband in the past breaks our hearts as it breaks the Doctor's. 9/10
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Same Old Same Old That Gives Cynicism De Ja Vu
Theo Robertson30 September 2012
Warning: Spoilers
Angels In Manhatten opens with one of the greatest opening hooks NuWho has ever come up which intrigued and drew in this bitter old cynic , so much so that I seriously considered finding out Steven Moffat's contact details so I could write him a heart felt handwritten apology asking to be forgiven for all the nasty comments I've written about him on this website . Forty minutes later I thought I should thank him - thank you Steven , you've saved me money on a stamp

So what did we get ? Stone angels , River Song , running around , angst ridden emotional drama , timey wimey nonsense , Karen Gillan sounding like she's having a stroke every time she's told to emote and Arthur Darvill being sidelined down to the fact he's by far the most talented cast member . Same old same old , just like nearly every story going back to Smith's debut

I can certainly understand why people will claim this is the greatest piece of television in the history of mankind , and it is if you think drama is composed of intrusive music , slow motion mis-en-scene , and facial expressions that suggest the cast are being stabbed to death by red hot pokers. The greatest drama should mirror reality however . The most life affirming moments of our lives don't involve slow mo , gurning or cacophonies - they involve a certain look from someone or a subtle smile that can stay with us a lifetime. This episode isn't drama - it is merely overwrought melodrama

And talking of life what's the odds that Rory and Amy aren't really dead ? This is yet another dire case of de ja vu that's plagued Moffat - everyone lives and I expect we'll see Amy and perhaps Rory appear later when Moffat leaves the show . I say " perhaps Rory " because Darvill will probably move on to better things whilst other members of the cast will be joining the ever growing queues at the job centre
47 out of 104 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Weeping angel logic thrown out of window
iHelloway13 November 2018
Warning: Spoilers
Overrated piece of crap... Throws weeping angel logic out of window .. Lots of times people do not look at angels and angels are still, lots of times they look at angels and they move with their lights out power, and statue of liberty .. Well appearantly everyone in New York are deff and can't hear giant footsteps ... Just frustrating same as every other weeping angel episode after the original first one ... 9/ 10 ? Bonkers at best it's 7 or 6
19 out of 36 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
The Angels Take Manhattan
studioAT17 August 2023
Warning: Spoilers
Personally I think the Ponds were at their best during Series five, and never really recovered from a dire Series six, with this seventh series (their third) seeming a bit like an epilogue, with them spending a lot of the time seemingly wishing to vacate the Tardis.

It was still sad to see them (well, Amy - Rory was always a wet blanket) leave here, and despite the inclusion of Alex Kingston as River Song (shudder) this is a good episode. And written by Moffat, who knew!

Well acted and performed, this moves at pace and with a sense of purpose that has been lacking from a few Series even episodes.

It's all held together wonderfully by Matt Smith's always likable Doctor too.
0 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed