Tomatos Another Day (1930) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
4 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
"I underwear my shirt is"
ackstasis16 November 2009
'Tomatos Another Day (1930)' (directed by James Sibley Watson and Alec Wilder) made one appearance at a Boston theatre in the early 1930s, but received such a weak audience response that the creators dismissed it as an outright failure. One can understand the audience reaction: the film itself is so incredibly stilted and awkward (albeit deliberately so) that if you approach it in the wrong mind-set – expecting a traditional melodrama – you're likely to be dismayed at its incompetency. Sibley's son, J.S. Watson Jr., remarked that the film might have proved successful had a popular comedian been involved: "Harold Lloyd, directed by (Mack) Sennet, might have brought it off." Indeed, the film did remind me of W.C. Fields' 'The Fatal Glass of Beer (1933),' in which the actors were encouraged to emulate the melodramatic acting style to the nth degree. Watson uses the same deadpan brand of satire, though his actors, rather than hamming it up, adopt a mechanical, minimalistic delivery that makes them sound monumentally uninterested in their roles.

J.S. Watson had previously co-directed, with Melville Webber, 'The Fall of the House of Usher (1928),' a wonderful Poe adaptation strongly indebted to Robert Wiene and German Expressionism. To a director with such a prominent visual style, the arrival of "talkies" must have been disillusioning – all of a sudden, popular films had lost the artistic flair of Murnau and Borzage, and had become utterly mundane. 'Tomatos Another Day' was produced to "show the absurdity of talkies that recorded action in pictures with unnecessary explanations of the action recorded in sound." The film opens with a clock on the cusp of two o'clock. Soon after, the minute hand ticks over, the clock chimes twice, and a character unnecessarily remarks "it is two o'clock." Watson's satire is spot-on: I can recall many early talkies that treated their audience in such a manner, inserting such mundane dialogue as "I am alone" merely because the sound technology was available to them. I just wish that all gentlemen's hats sounded so crunchy.
19 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Wonderful movie
dolive-578-56498731 December 2021
I agree with the top reviewer, that the dialogue is so stilted as to be off-putting for most.

But for me, this is a wicked satire, as the top reviewer notes, and also very funny and atmospherically intriguing. And it's candid about a taboo subject, adultery.

The title's play on "tomorrow's another day" is a treat.

The one thing I don't get is the deliberate misspelling of "tomatos" in (sic) in the title.

If anyone can explain that, I'd be delighted.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A rather painful experiment.
planktonrules4 November 2011
James Sibley Watson made this bizarre art film and apparently thought it was a dismal failure and he tried to hide this film. Somehow, it made it to the DVD set entitled "Unseen Cinema: 1884-1941" and is on Disc 2.

When you see this film, you might easily see why Watson disowned it. Like a Dadaist film, it really makes no sense and Watson deliberately directs his actors to act in a terrible fashion. The leading man and woman talk mechanically--almost zombie-like. It's really rather stupid if you ask me, though I am sure there are folks out there that adore this sort of stuff. Why make a film with deliberately horrible acting?! To quote my youngest daughter "...whatever". As for me, whacking myself in the head with a dead fish is certainly more enjoyable. And, I am sure, a Dadaist would love to see that!
1 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
It's Off-Putting To Me
boblipton17 January 2024
A woman and her lover are in a clinch. Her husband is coming home, so he leaves. Then he returns to get his hat.

This movie looks like a comedy produced by and made for people with no sense of humor, a sort of Mork-from-Ork Earth-humor-har-har moment, in which people speak dull lines in the most stilted manner possible. Various claims are made, that these people are not professional comedians, as if that is an excuse for a dull, even excruciating six minutes of people behaving like amateur zombies. Professional comedians would do their darnedest to make this interesting, even funny.

Writer-director J. S. Watson also had a hand in 1928's THE FALL OF THE HOUSE OF USHER. Fortunately, he soon gave up trying to impose whatever he thought his aesthetic was on audiences.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed