"When did Doctor Who start caring about the environment?"
As I write these words, it's been some weeks since Orphan 55 aired as part of Modern Doctor Who's twelfth series. It was an episode that instantly divided fan opinions over its ecological message and, in particular, how on the nose, it was. Which makes returning to Planet of Giants all the more interesting. For the opening story of Classic Who's second season was next to be reviewed, Planet of Giants shows that the series has been doing this sort of thing for a long time now.
The story opens with the Doctor once more trying to get Ian and Barbara back home to the 1960s. This time, he succeeds, but, of course, there's a catch. Thanks to the TARDIS malfunctioning, they've all been shrunk to roughly an inch in size. Exploring their surroundings, they face giant insects and earthworms. All of which are, every one of them, dead.
Why? Because the house of the garden they've landed in is home to a laboratory experimenting with a new and dangerous pesticide. One that a government scientist is determined to stop, and which a businessman is even more set to make a fortune off of, resulting in murder. It's here that the serial takes on its ecological bent, with a collision between science and business, greed over safety, and the threat of potential disaster if the insecticide gets put to wide-scale use. These are big ideas for what is notionally family viewing on a Saturday afternoon.
Which makes it a shame that Planet of Giants doesn't really work.
Part of that is down to execution. The idea of a shrunk TARDIS crew had been an idea for the very first serial, set around Coal Hill School, only for An Unearthly Child to take its place when it was determined to be impractical to realize. A year on, it clearly still was, with things looking more akin to a stage play than a TV show, even by the standards of the time. Things sink off into black a little too often, grass that's a painted backdrop, and efforts to replicate everyday items at large scale (like the briefcase) reveal they're anything but those items. True, there are effective moments, especially in the opening episode, but it never quite works, even by 1964 standards.
It also doesn't help that writer Louis Marks never gets the two plot lines to gel. True, our characters only get into the lab because of the murderer and cause his eventual exposure, but that doesn't mean they work together. Indeed, they could be separate plotlines until the very end, and even that tying together comes across awkwardly. That's without even mentioning the dialogue which, when it comes to the murder mystery plotline, is functional at best. As for the dialogue around the ecological element: if you thought Orphan 55 was on the nose, you should listen to some of the lines Marks writes here. It's difficult to believe that this script came from the same writer who gave us Day of the Daleks and The Masque of Mandragora in later years.
Just as fatal is the fact that the story has a complete lack of pace. Need proof? What we have today as the third episode isn't the original third episode. Instead, on the order of someone who'd lost patience with the story, it's made up of what should have been episodes three and four. Thanks to Ian Levine and the DVD release, we now have a reconstruction of the missing scenes, which weaves in and around broadcast scenes. And are we missing much? Not particularly, as reinstating the material shows that what we're missing merely existed to get another episode out of a story whose plot was already thin and beyond breaking point.
Ultimately, Planet of Giants tries as a story but never quite works. It's ambitious to a fault, an effort at style over substance where neither one works despite the efforts of all involved. It's a failure, albeit a noble one, and one which set the stage for stories like those of Malcolm Hulke, or The Green Death, and even the recent Orphan 55.
So, when did Doctor Who start caring about the environment? Back in the autumn of 1964. And it's been doing so ever since, often better than it did back then.
0 out of 0 found this helpful.
Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink