The Angel Levine (1970) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
23 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
I'm not Jewish, and I suspect a bit of Talmudic instruction would help, but I think I get it.
Irie21221 September 2009
Warning: Spoilers
A thief while alive, Al Levine (Belafonte) is killed in an auto accident that was innocently caused by Mishkin (Mostel). The other major character, Mrs. Fanny Mishkin (Kaminska), is slowly dying of myocardial edema. That, and the fact that the Mishkins are old and impoverished, is the situation.

Then Levine returns as an angel, on assignment to cure Fanny. The trick is, he can only save her if Mishkin believes in him (the fickle Old Testament god amusing himself, as usual). Unfortunately, Mishkin can't believe, for the obvious reasons: "Levine's meshugga!" and "Send a black angel to a white house?" But also because Mishkin's life has become such hell that he has been praying to die. "It's too late for angels," he cries, "I'll never forgive God for what he's done to me."

It is Fanny who can, and does, believe. The moment she meets the angel Levine, she says, simply, "Have you come to take me away?" Levine replies, "No, I came to give you life." Without a pause, she says, "I didn't want to live. I was in pain for a long time."

The irony is that the only person who believes in the Angel Levine is the one he came to help, and her belief should give him the miraculous power of saving her-- but she doesn't want saving. And so in the end, the message is that we reap what we sow: Fanny, who lived a good life, is allowed to die when she's ready. Levine, who cannot be redeemed from a sinful life as a petty criminal, is dead, an angel with no miracles up his sleeves.

The screenplay is too convoluted, the soundtrack is disquieting, and I wish they'd subtitled the Yiddish dialog between the Mishkins at the end. However, Kadar's direction is sensitive and inventive, and the Manhattan locations bring to life the bleak city of Mayor Lindsay's era. But all the real brilliance in the film is owed to the cast: an impassioned Belafonte and, in a thankless and pointless role as his ex, Gloria Foster (later the Oracle of "The Matrix"), and most especially the great Zero Mostel and even greater Ida Kaminska.
11 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Is it Ever Too Late for Angels ???
caspian197825 January 2022
The Angel Levine is about multiple characters who have lost hope. Everyone of them deals with death in their own ways. The movie is a study on faith as much as it is a study on race. The film is flawed and worse, it is forgotten. To include two giants of the motion pictures, Zero Mostel and. Harry Belafonte, to have a limited audience is a crime. No matter what you believe, The Angel Levin talks bout the pains we all face as humans. A hidden gem of a story, I hope it continues to find an audience in years to come.
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Uneven fable(?)
JohnSeal23 September 2001
Any film starring Zero Mostel is worth watching, and The Angel Levine is no exception. Sadly the film has aged rather poorly, with Harry Belafonte's hipster jive clearly belonging in the New York City of 30 years ago. Whether the film should be viewed literally, as a tale of personal redemption and healing, or as the fable most reviewers assume it to be, is uncertain. There's enough good acting here--especially from Mostel and Ida Kaminska as his dying wife--to recommend this strange little art piece.
17 out of 30 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
It is so, if you think so
jaykay-105 April 2002
Only viewers who are partial to stories that don't clearly differentiate between the real and the imaginary are likely to respond positively to this picture. But the fuzziness of that dividing line is one of the major themes, and as such is rendered effectively. Levine may be an angel from above, or merely a hoodlum with a snappy line of patter - along with a conscience. To its credit, the story works both ways. And if Mishkin has the same beneficial effect on Levine's spiritual life that Levine has on Mishkin's, then the story works on yet a third level of interpretation. The picture slows noticeably in a few spots: as an adaptation of a short story it cannot quite sustain a hour and forty minutes of running time without flagging a bit. Zero Mostel is outstanding, bringing the character to life with every gesture, inflection, movement and facial expression. Harry Belafonte's limited range is barely adequate, but the small supporting cast is a strong one. Those who savor the real/imaginary byplay are also likely to enjoy "Finding Graceland" and "Bronco Billy."
13 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Is it ever too late for an Angel ?
caspian197825 January 2022
Warning: Spoilers
The Angel Levine starring Zero Mostel and Harry Belafonte is a forgotten gem that deserves an audience. Although flawed, the film is a great discussion on race, religion and the role we all play. Much of the movie talks about hope and the lack of. Do we believe in Angels and are we willing to believe are questions the audience is asked. The theme of death is apparent throughout the movie as all the characters are dealing with death one way or another. What makes this movie remarkable is that the storyline captures the truth on how we perceive death as much as we do life.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
The Angel Levine *1/2 Unsettling and Morally Tragic
edwagreen6 May 2007
Warning: Spoilers
I was very disappointed in this 1970 film based on a Bernard Malamud story. This is basically a story of possible redemption, racial bias and the unfulfillment of life based on mistrust.

A black Jewish angel is sent to help a struggling tailor and his critically ill wife. If Morris Mishkin (Zero Mostel) will only believe in the angel (Belafonte), his wife Fanny (Ida Kaminska) will recover. The problem is that Morris has basically given up on life and just refuses to believe that Belafonte is an angel.

When he believes it, Fanny improves but in the end he has doubts and Fanny suffers accordingly. It would have been very nice if there had been an English translation in the last scene when a dying Fanny speaks to Morris.

Jan Kadar, who successfully directed Miss Kaminska in her Oscar nominated brilliant performance in 1966's "The Shop on Main Street" directs this film as well. Kaminska is reduced in the film to mostly bed scenes and her kindness in her speech really doesn't convey the desperate situation that she faces. She keeps calling for Ruthie, their daughter, who disobeyed them by marrying out of the Jewish religion. For most of the film, she does not realize the Angel's appearance in her apartment.

The scene in the pharmacy is muddled and the scene where the Angel's girl friend confronts Belafonte in their apartment, is memorable but all too brief.

We don't know why Belafonte is in danger and why he has died.

Those viewing this film must have left the theater in a state of depression and desperation.
22 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
He's a Meshuggener!
sol-kay20 September 2009
Warning: Spoilers
***Some Spoilers*** Updated version of the 1946 Christmas Classic "It's a Wounderful Life" where here it takes place in the tenement slums and high crime ridden Manhattan Lower East Side instead of the sleepy and picture post-card town of Bedford Falls.

Morris Mishkin, Zero Mostel, had just about had it with life with his wife Fanny, Ida Keminska, bed-ridden with a serious heart ailment his business, Morris' Tailor shop, burned down in a suspected arson fire and worst of all his daughter Ruthie having eloped with a good for nothing gambler and hustler who on top of everything else isn't even Jewish! It's when Morris is just about to do himself in, by him playing in traffic, that a miracle happened. He was saved by the bell, or was it the guy upstairs, by having an angle sent to help him out of his miseries. The Angel Alex Levine played by Harry Belafonte.

Even though he doesn't look Jewish by a long shot, despite his Jewish sounding name, Levine seems well schooled in the Jewish culture and way of life. Even being able to recite, in Hebrew, the Jewish prayer for the breaking of bread at the dinner table! Morris who at first though that the guy-Alex Levine-was either some kind of a nut or even worst break-in burglar soon began to like the guy! Especially when he somehow cured his wife Fanny from her deathly heart ailment. As the movie goes on we soon realize that Levine is a fallen angel from heaven who's out, in the world below, to earn his wings which will put him in good with the big man-God-whom he's on the outs with.

After about the first half hour the movie becomes completely disjointed with Levine not only being seen by Morris, whom he's intended to save, but everyone else he comes in contact with! We even get a gimps of Levine's life before he left the scene, earth, with his former girlfriend Sally, Gloria Foster, who, in him being dead, doesn't seem at all surprised in seeing him!

***SPOILERS*** It's just when Morris starts to believe that Levein is the real deal, an angle sent from heaven to pull his chestnuts out of the fire, that he suddenly disappears like a puff of smoke! With the film, that was so good for the first half, being so hard to follow and understand in the last 45 or so minutes I suspect it was more the result of of a bad editing job then anything else. Levine in fact seemed to be the person who at the beginning of the movie was killed, getting hit by a car, after swiping a woman's fur coat at a Lower East Side delicatessen. It was Morris who alerted the lady who's coat was being swiped which then set off the chain of events for the mugger getting killed in his attempt to flee the scene. If in fact, which I think it was, it was Levine who was the dead mugger it would have made sense for him to come back, as a angle, to pay for his crime by being stuck with helping the very uncooperative Morris! Who made his stay on earth the hell that he was supposed to be in for the life of crime he previously lived there!
4 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Waiting for the other shoe to drop
RedWine_1st27 May 2009
Warning: Spoilers
I watched this on the tube last night. The actor's involved first caught my attention. The first scenes were attention getters. Some funny some sad. Good character development. I felt that the latter third of the film diverged. If it was not for the early part of the movie I would have stopped watching. I kept watching wanting to how how it tied together.

Unfortunately I feel that it never happened. I especially did not like the extend period that several of the character were talking yiddish (?). Was that the other shoe?

Would I recommend? No, I think not. As other reviewers mention much of the slang is dated (60's jive) but it was not too distracting. The ending totally turned me off.
9 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
The best laid plans of angels and men
CatTales1 June 2003
Warning: Spoilers
*some spoilers*

I was pleasantly surprised to find the harsh criticisms (acting, dated dialogue, unclear storyline) unfounded. Belafonte is great as a Brandoesque, menacing, swearing spirit who must earn his wings but is realistically ill-equipped from his past life to do so. He learns too late how empty his hustling, materialistic life was without love. Mostel is likewise great as an anguished man with his dying wife Fanny. In spite of his prayers for a miracle, his bitterness prevents him from accepting (or believing) in one. The two social worlds the characters represent alternately collide and complement the other, the result being hilarious and touchingly sad.

The perplexing ending is actually quite consistent with the rest of the film. After looking everywhere for Belafonte, Mostel looks up to see a falling feather, and he frantically reaches for it as if he's finally willing to believe in angels and miracles. But Belafonte wasn't allowed to finish his miracle (either to restore Fanny's health or Mostel's faith), so he never got his wings. The feather floats tauntingly out of Mostel's grasp, a metaphor for both men's live: it's too late and you don't get a second chance. Like "It's a Wonderful life," this movie is magical, wonderful, funny, but terribly tragic.
21 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Zero Mostel and Harry Belafonte make an interesting pairing in The Angel Levine
tavm6 February 2012
When I looked up Harry Belafonte on netflix.com, this movie was listed as available for streaming. And so it is that I'm now reviewing what was previously unknown to me. Zero Mostel is unemployed because of a bad back and his wife (Ida Kaminska) is bedridden. Belafonte claims to be an angel in order to help with his problems but he has some of his own like a woman named Sally (Gloria Foster) who can't forgive him for his condescending attitude toward her. I'll stop there and just say part of me was confused by the narrative especially when Harry just keeps on making one uncomfortable with his profanities and not-always-trusting manner. Mostel also makes himself hard to identify with especially when he argues with his wife. Still, it was fascinating to watch and I was never bored. So on that note, The Angel Levine is at the least worth a look. P.S. I have to mention that Ms. Foster was born in the same city I was which was Chicago, Ill.
4 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
What a Shame.
vestutoinglish21 January 2014
Okay. I was just out of high school in 1970 when this movie came out and I remember how hip, edgy, and off-kilter certain directors and actors tried to be in the 1970's and into the 1980's ... this movie must have been one of those movies. Good grief, do not waste your time. And waste is the operative word here. Not only of time but of actors, particularly Zero Mostel, Ida Kaminska, and Milo O'Shea. This could have been such a wonderful movie with heart and love, but those in power chose to take the low road. Maybe (since it was 1970) drugs were involved - I would not be surprised. I understand this was based on a short story by Bernard Malamud from 1955 and the original story had a much more upbeat ending. I could see this being much more along the line of Paddy Chayefsky's "Marty", if there had been someone with a better vision. Too bad. Perhaps someone will remake this with the author's original intent. Hopefully.
11 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
THE MOST UNDERRATED MOVIE ON IMDb - and I mean it!
mangalitza920 September 2005
... and I DO mean it. If not literally (after all, I have not seen every movie ever created!), at least, obviously, among the ones, the many I know.

5.3 ??? The rule of thumb with IMDb is this: sometimes movies rated very highly (for example, the piece of Kannes-Kompetition-Krowned-Korean-Kraap called "Oldboy") can be truly bad. But rarely a movie worth watching is actually rated under 6. This movie, very much worth watching, is. A disgrace.

True, I give it a 10 in protest. The movie is not perfect. Its true rating should be an 8 or a 9. It has some acting flaws (Belafonte especially), the script wanders around, sometimes. However, what we have here is one of the greatest directors of all times, the Czech Jan Kadar, directing two of the greatest actors of all time, the beloved, larger-than-life Zero Mostel and the sublime Ida Kaminska in an acting/poetic/moral tour de force. A pair made in Heaven! It's true that this movie, little flaws apart, does not pander to the average audiences, but those interested in watching an excellent (while, again, not beyond criticism) movie of the incomparable director who gave us "The Shop on the Main Street" (the best movie ever about Holocaust) should not miss this just because some silly IMDb rating system decides that "American Beauty" is better than "The Angel Levine".

It isn't.
38 out of 57 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
WORST MOVIE EVER!
skyguywv13 January 2023
Warning: Spoilers
Yes, there are a lot of bad movies out there, but I categorize them as movies with stars that are bad and movies with no stars that are bad. For a movie with at least 2 stars, I'll put this in the top 3 worst movies at all time. NONE of the plot made any sense! Who ever heard of an Angel sent from God cursing like a sailor and even cursing God's name all though the movie? And what was the point of the whole movie when the Angel is supposed to help an old woman's health but she dies anyway? All this was ... was a Black guy complaining about his life for 2 hours and getting NOTHING done. And what was up with his girlfriend? Why was she even IN the movie? None of the scenes with her made any sense either. And what about that ending? WHAT ENDING? I wasnt real crazy about how The Sopranos ended, but this was an outright travesty. It's as though the director filmed every day without a script and hoped for the best, and then didnt have any clue as to how to end this dog. Horrible! Horrible!
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Hard to watch and enjoy.
planktonrules6 September 2020
Morris Miskin (Zero Mostel) is a Jewish man whose faith in God and mankind is at all all-time low. His wife is bedridden and they can barely afford her medications, he's lost his business after it burned down, due to back trouble he's unemployable and he's disowned his daughter for marrying a non-Jew. And, when the film begins, he's applying for welfare benefits as he simply cannot pay his bills. Into this messed up and depressing life arrives a man who claims he's an angel (Harry Belafonte). Not surprisingly, Morris isn't convinced the guy is an angel...especially since the angel curses God and steals. Later in the film this 'angel' even slaps his girlfriend. Clearly, if he is an angel, he's NOT a very good one. But this guy who claims to be angel promises to help Morris if only he'd believe in him.

The acting in this film is excellent...very nice and well done by Belafonte and Mostel. As for the movie itself, it's incredibly depressing...and a bit like a modern telling of Job....just a bit. But is it good and should you watch it? Well, if you are dealing with depression, my suggestion is you skip it. The film is so downbeat and hard to watch...it'll likely make you more depressed if you see it. This actually is likely for ANYONE watching the movie...it's oppressively sad to watch. And, after all is said and done, you might just feel miserable yourself. Interesting? Yes. Enjoyable, good grief, no.
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
This was just soooo horrible
film_ophile1 March 2008
I absolutely hate it when a film completely falls apart near the end, after you've already invested an hour into it. and that's what happened with this film. i was intrigued by its actors and the fact that malamud wrote its source story. I haven't gone to read that story but I cannot imagine that it ends like this film ends.Fortunately i didn't pay good money to see or rent it because my library had it. ohhhh such a waste of excellent acting (the wife in particular was so perfect).but milo o'shea as a Jew?!!!! now THAT was funny. I haven't researched into its making but it played like the director lost his marbles or died 3/4 of the way through the film. Before that point, a story and characters were developing,there were a number of neat plot points and there wasn't too much time wasted. but ooh that last 1/2 hour- if that wasn't the screwiest, most worthless denouement I've ever witnessed, I don't know what is. I just hate it when one's faith is so destroyed like that; it feels like an act of violence.
11 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Faith And Race
bkoganbing16 February 2009
The unlikely duo of Zero Mostel and Harry Belafonte team up to give us some interesting performances and subject matter in The Angel Levine. It's one interesting twist on the themes from It's A Wonderful Life.

Zero is married to Ida Kaminsky and the two of them belong to a special class of elderly Jewish poor in New York. Mostel used to be a tailor and proud of his trade, but his back and arthritis have prevented him from working. Kaminsky is mostly bedridden. He's reduced to applying for welfare. In desperation like Jimmy Stewart, he cries out to God for some help.

Now maybe if he had gotten someone like Henry Travers things might have worked out differently, but even Stewart had trouble accepting Travers. But Travers had one thing going for him, he was over 100 years off this mortal coil and all his ties to earthly things were gone. God sent Mostel something quite different, the recently deceased Harry Belafonte who should have at least been given some basic training for angels before being given an assignment.

Belafonte hasn't accepted he's moved on from life, he's still got a lot of issues. He also has a wife, Gloria Foster, who doesn't know he's passed on, hit by a car right at the beginning of the film. You put his issues and Mostel's issues and you've got a good conflict, starting with the fact that Mostel can't believe in a black Jew named Levine.

This was the farewell performance for Polish/Jewish actress Ida Kaminsky who got a nomination for Best Actress in The Shop on Main Street a few years back. The other prominent role here is that of Irish actor Milo O'Shea playing a nice Jewish doctor. Remembering O'Shea's brogue from The Verdict, I was really surprised to see and hear him carry off the part of the doctor.

The Angel Levine raises some interesting and disturbing questions about faith and race in this society. It's brought to you by a stellar cast and of course created by acclaimed writer Bernard Malamud. Make sure to catch it when broadcast.
16 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
A Real Downer
utgard147 April 2014
Jewish tailor Morris Mishkin (Zero Mostel) can't work anymore due to a back problem. He's disowned his daughter for marrying an Italian. He's got a wife who's very ill and the bills just keep piling up. Times are tough, to say the least. An angel named Alexander (Harry Belafonte) appears to Morris offering to help. But Morris has lost his faith so he doesn't believe in angels, let alone black ones who use foul language and yell a lot. But Alexander can't help unless Morris believes again.

Good cast can only do so much. The script has some nice moments but is mostly a meandering mess. It has a limited premise yet it feels incredibly padded. It's full of familiar stereotypes and tropes, albeit mostly well-meaning ones. Your mileage may vary on how much the intention matters. It's a simple culture clash story with a little bit of dated social commentary and a downbeat ending that makes you feel like your time was wasted. A disappointing but not entirely worthless viewing experience.
5 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Excellent Film about Faith and Mortality
hypestyle8 September 2009
Warning: Spoilers
Faith and Mortality... viewed through the lens of an elderly Ashkenazi Jewish-American gentleman and a younger, African-American Jewish gentleman who waver between being at odds with each other and having frank talks about how their lives have unfolded over the years..

Mostel's character is a tailor with chronic back problems, and a terminally ill wife; Belafonte's character is a career hustler, never settling on a regular job, and a fatal car accident leaves him in an odd Purgatory-- he must convince Mostel to renew his faith, as it has been failing along with his wife's health (and his own).. but Belafonte's Levine has his own problems, still pining for the girlfriend he left behind..

Belafonte's character leaves the film before he seemingly should, and so the the ending is cryptic, and the film suffers somewhat from its ambiguous ending..

This is not a 'typical' Hollywood movie on ethnic relations or about a person's crisis of faith.. it is worth watching more than once and appreciating the excellent performances of the principal actors..
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
A Crushing Ending
Knuckles49120 January 2023
Warning: Spoilers
In the original story Morris finally tells the angel that he believes in him. Levine gets his wings, and the miracle occurs. Morris goes home and finds Fanny puttering around with a dust mop, obviously feeling better. Why the movie ends in desperation, I just don't know. I'm not sure how the addition of Levine's girlfriend improves the storyline. It's kind of pointless. This could have been such a feel-good movie. Like It's a Wonderful Life, we could have been crying happy tears at the end. I can just imagine the last scene...Morris sitting in his chair, reading his newspaper, and Fanny happily cooking in the kitchen.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Very disappointing!
JohnHowardReid26 April 2016
Warning: Spoilers
I purchased this Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer DVD because Leonard Maltin is quoted on the cover as describing it as "touching and humorous." Now "touching" I would agree with to some extent – especially so far as the first two-thirds of the movie are concerned. But "humorous"? Come on, Leonard, what's humorous about a poverty-stricken, God-forsaken little tailor whose lovely wife is literally dying before his eyes? And does the tailor's condition improve as the movie progresses? No, it gets worse, despite everything the worn-to-a-frazzle little guy can do. To add to his woes, he is visited by an angel. And does God send a helpful angel? No, God does nothing of the sort. Instead He sends a self- obsessed, former earthling, who is far more interested in tying up pieces of his own life than helping the tailor. Needless to say, the angel is totally unsuccessful on all fronts. Worse still, the movie doesn't come to a conclusion. It just gets more and more confused and tied up in a total vacuum as it blindly stumbles towards "The End" title.
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Sad and depressing and confusing.
mark.waltz16 March 2024
Warning: Spoilers
Is he or isn't he an angel? Harry Belafonte, that is. Or is he just another con-artist on the streets of New York preying on the fragile and vulnerable? At the beginning of the film, the broke, elderly Zero Mostel is seen watching Belafonte committing a petty crime (stealing a woman's fur coat), and Belafonte is supposedly killed when he's hit by a car.

The depressed Mostel, having applied for welfare (always a delightful way to spend an afternoon, especially in New York City), is dealing with an ailing wife (Ida Kaminska), and has little hope left. Along comes Belafonte as apparently a vision only he can see, and out of the blue, his wife begins to improve. But doubts to what the truth is turns around, and the film becomes very dark and disturbing.

Obviously an art film that hasn't held up well, this is extremely inconsistent and frustrating, and it becomes a chore to get through. Doubts of Belafonte's claim begin when he calls a girlfriend (Gloria Foster) who wants nothing more to do with him. The film works best when it plays on its commentary on a cruel society, so even at its best, it is a downer that even Mostel can't save.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Very interesting!
tforbes-228 January 2012
Warning: Spoilers
I saw this tonight on Jewish Life TV, and could not break away from this. Yes, this is a movie made in 1970, and it shows. Still, the performers in this movie give a fine performance!

The movie is not without its flaws. If nothing else, I would have had subtitles in where the characters spoke Hebrew. But I applaud Harry Belafonte for making this movie, and getting both the cast he got as well as the director is an accomplishment in itself.

What counts is that this movie kept my interest! If that is not entertainment, I don't know what is. Anyway, this is one of several movies made during the 1970s that prove rewarding. Just remember, this is recording a time and place when New York was a different place than it is now.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Fascinatingly Strange Film
ardenphillips2 March 2021
An intriguing exploration of life and death, guilt and redemption. Milo O'Shea, Ida Kaminska, and especially Zero Mostel are all expert with complicated (Bernard Malamud) material. But it is Harry Belafonte as the "angel" Levine that makes this must viewing. Truly fascinating to watch. An odd, but worthwhile film.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed