Sam's Song (1969) Poster

(1969)

User Reviews

Review this title
32 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
4/10
Sammy's Deathly Secret
sol121812 March 2005
***SPOILERS*** In 1980 Cannon Films took an 1969 unfinished film with then unknown actor Robert De Niro called " Sam's Song" and then added in new footage, shot some ten years later, making the movie look like most of it took place in 1979 instead of 1969, and called it "The Swap".

Robert De Niro who instead of being the kind shy sweet and sensitive young film director Sammy, who tried to get a couple of friends of his back together who were having serious marital problems, in the original film "Sam's Song" is made into the sleazy low-life porno film maker, of both straight and gay X-rated flicks, Sammy Nicoletti.

Sammy is murdered at the start of the movie, when his head is bashed in by an unknown assailant, as he's sitting in his film studio in 1969. Ten years later Sammy's older brother Vito, Anthony Charnota, is released from prison and the first thing he does is go out looking for Sammy's killer. Vito also felt guilty about Sammy's death because he promised his mom, who died due to a stroke because of the shock that Sammy's death brought on, that he would always take care and look after Sammy.

Checking out all the leads Vito goes to see book publisher Erica Moore,Sybil Danning and in the flash-back sequences Jennifer Warren, who was with Sammy at a big house party that she threw at her Long Island estate. The last weekend of Sammy's life before he was murdered. Erica tells Vito that Sammy was with her and here husband Andrew, Jarred Micky, and his girlfriend Carol, Terrayne Crawford, at the estate and later on a ferry sailing off the Island.

It turns out that there was a swap involved between Sammy & Carol and Erica & Andrew where Erica became romantically involved with Sammy and Andrew left Erica for Carol whom he later married. Vito Later tracks down Marge, Phylis Black, who he found out went to the cemetery every week to lay flowers at Sammy's grave. It turns out that Marge was an actress in some of Sammy's kiddie-porn films when she was 12 and 13 years-old.

Together with Marge Vito slowly uncovers the reason for Sammy's murder and it had to do with him blackmailing people of wealth and power who financed his porno film career and in one case was a performer in a gay X-rated porno flick that Sammy directed.

Vito hits pay-dirt when he comes across a number of films, that Sammy left to him which in them shows the person, with XXX sex acts. In one of them is the person who eventually murdered Sammy. Vito is drugged gassed kidnapped and shot during the course of the movie in his efforts to find Sammy's killer and exact justice & vengeance on him but, as it turned out, at the cost of his life.

The ending of "The Swap" has almost the entire cast killed off by somehow trying to fit all the loose ends in this very uneven movie together but that makes the film even more confusing then it already was up to then.

"The Swap" is a bargain-basement-type of crime movie, with organized crime implications added in it, that in many ways comes across more comical then serious. As for the dialog it's more tongue and cheek,"Hey I Can Take My Own Pants Off!", then anything else. The movies ending, that was so obviously forced and contrived, looked as if those making "The Swap" suddenly realized just how silly and inane it was and quickly rapped it up. This in order not to have people in the audience laughing themselves to death and having their family members sue Cannon Films for damages.
15 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Not one for DeNiro to be proud of
thomasmjohnson28 March 2005
The revised title, "The Swap", introduces a certain amount of confusion. The viewer will spend the entire duration of this poor movie wondering what the producers are referring to as a "swap" and not come up with anything plausible. But where a neutral or bland lack of point to support the title would be bad enough, this production actively makes matters worse. This happens in the following way: one of the main characters (Ann) is portrayed by two actresses, one of whom is supposedly 10 years younger than the other. Infuriatingly, the younger actress looks nothing at all like the older actress, and the viewer is led to the FALSE conclusion that the character played by the older actress is an impostor, so that the "swap" concerns one person stealing another's identity. Nothing so interesting turns out to be the fact, of course, and nothing else turns up as a better candidate for the "swap." There are lots of GOOD movies to see; there's no reason to waste time with this one.
6 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
You get what you pay for
mattymatt4ever20 June 2002
I would say I took a gamble by purchasing this movie, but it's hard to constitute $6.99 as a gamble. It came in a boxed with set with another old DeNiro movie, "Born to Run," which I haven't watched yet. Well, like I cynically expected, DeNiro is NOT the star of this film. Sure, his name appears first in the opening credits, but I'm guessing that's because the film was re-issued in 1980 and by then, DeNiro was already a moderately big star. The story basically centers around his character, but we only see him once in the first scene, and then momentarily in flashbacks. This was back when DeNiro had that Tom Selleck-like moustache, looking like an out-of-work porn star.

Not to be totally negative, the unknown actor who plays the main character gives a pretty good, though one-note, performance. The rest of the actors--except for DeNiro--could've been just as effective reading their lines off cue cards. And judging by the way this film was made--like a third-rate student film--I wouldn't be surprised if they were.

The cheap production values are as clear as day, but the film could've saved its integrity with a good script. Some of the dialogue is horribly laughable. But for $6.99, you often get what you pay for. At least it will serve as good filler for my extensive video collection.

My score: 4 (out of 10)
9 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
IMDb info is wrong
intexor27 May 2008
Just to let you know: Sam's Song is in fact a finished movie. In my country you can buy a very cheap DVD release which is actually titled The Swap, but it does contain the full movie Sam's Song.

Not that you guys are missing out on anything if they only released The Swap in your country. Sam's Song is also a horrible movie which doesn't seem to have any kind of plot.

De Niro plays some kind of amateur screenwriter/director who is invited by a befriended couple to some big mansion for a party. He meets a girl there and most of the movie is basically De Niro and this girl falling in love (which is translated on screen as the two of them just running around on a beach and stuff like that). Maybe they did in fact run out of money at a certain point because there doesn't seem to be a real ending to this mess.

The dialogues are laughable most of the time, the scenes just seem to jump from one thing to another with no real meaning or purpose. And I couldn't call it acting either what those people on screen are doing.

I can only assume this was some lame and cheap attempt at making an arty farty movie but they failed miserably. Or maybe this "style" of movie was just popular in the sixties, because there's another De Niro movie out there (Greetings, which is in fact directed by Brian DePalma) that's just as bizar as this movie.

Maybe some real hardcore De Niro fans would appreciate to see some early De Niro work like Sam's Song, but I can say without a doubt that this is a strong contestant for the first place in my top 10 of worst movies of all time.
11 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
James Woods said it best-Thank You Martin Scorsese
mtil77-110 August 2005
I don't think this movie itself is the worst ever put to screen and we all know De Niro can act, so I'm going to have to blame the no name directors who shot this movie in two different sittings and obviously had no idea how to bring the best acting abilities out of someone. De Niro's role for this movie was shot by one director for a movie with a different title and then later inserted into a re-cut version, which is evident by the fact that two different actresses portray Erica even though the time-line between the flashback scenes are only ten years. It doesn't even look like the same person. The movie ends with a lot of unanswered questions but that's only because the filmmakers ran out of money and never finished making it. So all in all, don't expect a ton of entertainment out of this film. Watch it if only to see a very early Robert De Niro performance under bad directing.
8 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Makes ya wonder...don't it?
counterrevolutionary4 January 2004
There are two sorts of people who should watch THE SWAP: people desperate for every minute of De Niro footage they can get, and fans of ultra-low-budget grade-Z schlock.

Although not quite in the class of such anti-classics as ROBOT MONSTER and PLAN 9 FROM OUTER SPACE, this moronic little flick is certainly up there--er, down there--with travesties like MESA OF LOST WOMEN, THE SINISTER URGE, and THEY SAVED HITLER'S BRAIN (another "Frankenfilm" stitched together from an atrocious low-budget movie and even worse lower-budget new footage).

For a bad movie connoisseur, THE SWAP is well worth the few bucks you'll spend for the DVD.
15 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
glimpse of De Niro's genius sparkle in this one
Soulman198121 June 2004
This movie is the oldest one I've seen of Robert De Niro. I got it for a present from my cousin who knows I'm a die-hard De Niro freak.

The quality of the DVD wasn't excellent, but what can one expect from an almost forty-year old flick. "Sam's Song" is the small story of one Sam Nicoletti. He tries to write and make a living but isn't really succeeding. He gets invited by friends for a weekend. There he tries to relax and enjoy the moment of getting out of his boring life. Eventually some small things happen like couple's betrayal and some weekend loving. If you're a real De Niro fan you just have to see it once. He is the only positive thing in this movie from John C. Broderick and John Shade.

I gave this one a 6/10. The film isn't great, script is just below average, screen quality is mediocre... but De Niro shows early glimpse of his genius!
7 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Really, really bad
roger_nt3 January 2004
This film is about as bad as you can get. It shares many characteristics with porno films, in the score (one of the worst I've ever heard) and the dialogue and pacing. Many elements that are meant to be clever are simply ludicrous. It would be fair to say that De Niro is the only actor in this film, the rest being mannequins. Terrayne Crawford (Carol) produced the only other credible performance.
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Glacially slow...and amazingly dull.
planktonrules17 May 2019
Whether you are a fan of Robert De Niro or not, you must admit that "Sam's Song" is clearly NOT among his best work. The film is an amateurish mess and despite a bit of nudity here and there, it's duller than dust. What's worse is that you really don't care anything about the characters nor do you really understand them.

The film seems often like there's no script or scenes are simply taken out of the editor's trash can. You really have no idea who the couple is in the story nor why they'd bring along their friend, Sam (De Niro). You eventually (after way too much story has passed) that they are going to their second home to have a party with friends. A blonde shows up and chaos ensues...or should have ensued. Instead, things happen but so slowly it make you wonder if everyone involved was sedated throughout the picture.

Bad acting, much worse direction and editing make this film VERY difficult to stick with or care about in any way. A total bomb....and a very dull one at that.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
What IS this movie?
Movie Nuttball8 June 2005
Warning: Spoilers
The Swap (Sam's Song) Review The Swap AKA Sam's Song AKA Line of Fire is a fair film that has a different cast including Robert De Niro, Jarred Mickey, Jennifer Warren,Terrayne Crawford, Martin J. Kelley, Phyllis Black, Viva, Anthony Charnota, Lisa Blount, and Sybil Danning. The acting by all of these actors is not so good. Robert De Niro really is as great as he is in other films he's in. Anthony Charnota is really the best of the bunch in this outrageous low budgeter. The film was really a laugh fast. I get back to that in a sec. One part I thought was absolutely unneeded was this clip from adult film. It was strong scene and it completely sucked! Plus also what is shown is a woman's bare chest, again completely unneeded. OK back to hilarious scenes. I was chuckling when the phone was off the hook and made similar if the the exact noises heard in the classic film, Inframan! Then what about the great dialog! For example, Charnota says 'It's been twelve years since I had a mayonnaise and peanut butter sandwich. Now that's what I call cruel and unusual punishment'! He sometimes looks hilarious especially when he gets out and he is looking around! Really the movie is filled with atrocious dialog from beginning to end! Oh and what about the scene when Charnota gets shot in the side and he barely limps! He must really be immune to pain! How can I forget the assassin shooting and killing the woman through the mail slot! Some of the guns sounds like fire crackers and smokes like cap guns! There is much more in this movie. The music is OK. The film is really good if you low budget films that you can laugh at.If you like Robert De Niro, Anthony Charnota, the rest of the cast in the film, Action, Dramas, Thrillers, Crime, and interesting low budget films then see this film today!

Movie Nutball'S NOTE:

If you like low budget films that are so bad that you can laugh at them then I recommend Werewolf (1996), APE (1976), Track of the Moon Beast (1976), Demonicus (2001) Black Friday (2003), and Fear Runs Silent (1999)!
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
This is one bad movie
karl_consiglio12 September 2006
This movie is so bad i would not even know where to begin, basically there is nothing good about it, I mean nothing. Bad plot, bad acting, bad story, no sense , no shape, no logic, can't even afford to be called abstract, its sleazy and cheesy. This Film goes to show how even Great stars like Robert De Niro had to start from the very bottom, I'm sure he looks back at this one in anger and tries to conceal it. I mean I'm a big fan of Robert De Niro and no wonder I had never heard about this one before. I wouldn't believe that they noticed at the time that he could become a promising young actor from this one, no way. this film is unbelievably cheap and by that I don't mean low budget, Just a share lack of know how to make a movie or any artistic imagination for that matter.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Unusual DeNiro film
GOWBTW9 April 2020
This is a very strange film. "Sam's Song" is a film about a political film maker from New York City who goes out to Long Island to meet with friends. He goes to a party with friends he met. And would meet a blonde who would later complicate relationships with her wiles. To me this is more like a sexual romance film than a drama. Of course there is drama in a subtle way. Not much to go on, could have used more story to the film. I liked it though. Just complaints about how it's made. It's a keeper for me. More like a New Yorkers only film. 2 out of 5 stars.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Hey, don't mix up the two films!!!
Roemer26 July 2007
A lot has been said here. But almost none of it is about Sam's Song, and even if it is, it often isn't rue.

Sam's Song is not unfinished. At least, I saw a movie that had opening credits, closing credits, and the rest made sense as well. And Sam's Song is NOT, I REPEAT: NOT "The Swap". Even though I saw the movie on a DVD which promoted it as "The Swap", and even if the cover said it would be about a porn director being killed: it isn't.

It's a fairly simple love story told in an uncommon way. Not much really happens, but that doesn't stop you from being intrigued. The film is not very much concerned about plot, but more about atmosphere and the characters. The film shows us four characters which are all unpredictable and yet very recognizable, maybe just because they are unpredictable and are not Hollywoodlike at all. The fact that De Niro plays a wannabe director hardly plays any part in this movie. It's a pleasant story about two couples: one that just met en one that has been together for years, seemingly destined to live happily ever after.

The film is intriguing because of the unpredictable dialogs, the weird pace, the uncommon silences and, of course, because it's a very honest en typical 60's/70's film, a time document. The director en the editor were clearly not untalented. De Niro plays very differently from his well known parts, but I would call it a different style, not per se worse.

The ending is a bit abrupt and feels weak. It denies the title "Sam's Song". Sam (De Niro) is the protagonist but the movie, in the end, is about the other three characters. That's where the main weakness lays: Sam is the main character, and he is intriguing (De Niro's talent already showing?) but in the end, he is unimportant.

Most votes and comments here are about "The Swap", a version with extra material which doesn't resemble Sam's Song in the slightest anymore. Don't be fooled. Even though that's hard: Sam's Song is sold as The Swap and vice versa. Sam's Song itself is definitely worth to be seen even if it's far from a master piece. 6.5 out of 10
13 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Not for Denrio buffs
Edible Fetus30 January 2000
Ok, if your a big Deniro buff like me you'll assume you need Sam's Song, considering it's one of his earliest films. That's why I bought it. It's not worth it. Do yourself a favor and just lie and tell people you misplaced it, when your showing off your Deniro collection. Deniro's role is quite small, and the movie is so patheticly boring and obsolete, that even the biggest deniro buffs probably won't enjoy it. Along with Were No Angels, this is one Deniro flick, that just doesn't cut it for me.
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Here's the deal
Scatchard9 July 2003
Okay the story is this: De Niro made some lame movie name around 1969 Sam's Song that never saw the light of day. Fast forward a few years (say around 1980) and De Niro is a star so some joker gets a hold of Sam's Song, recuts it, adds some footage and viola! The Swap was born! Which is probably even worse than Sam's Song.

So if you are a De Niro diehard, you have been warned. But hey, so was I and I saw it anyway.
18 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Oh no, please Bob, no.
fod-23 December 1998
This is perhaps the most ridiculously bad film EVER MADE. It is one hell of a tragedy that this is the way Bobby De Niro tried to get his career kick started. Any hilarity which results from its awfulness dies after the first scene in which Bobby is knocked off. The fact that the video sleeve for the copy I purchased (under new title 'Line of Fire') seems to describe a completely different film tells the story pretty well.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
one of the worst ever !!!
bartvanbenthem1 November 2005
i saw this movie 2 days ago and damn .... this movie sucks big time,

even Deniros part isn't worth watching this piece of first class time-waste.

I hated the dialogues, i didn't liked the story at all and it contains one of the worst soundtracks i have ever heard in my entire life.

I can't say anything positive about this movie it was so boring that one of my friends who was also watching this movie fell asleep after 30 mins.

i have seen a lot of crap passing my DVD player but this is certainly the worst ... at the moment i can't think of a movie which i hated more than this one. at the end of the movie we also burned the DVD with my zippo, that was the only fun we had with that DVD.

This piece of crap can't even be called "a movie" it really deserves a place in the IMDb bottom 100 !! 1/10
1 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
"historical document" at best
zimbo_the_donkey_boy1 December 2002
"Determined to avenge his brother's death, Johnny (Robert DeNiro) goes head to head with the mob, vowing to even the score. Realizing how rough the mob can be, DeNiro enlists his closest, and meanest, friends for the savage war he knows will follow. In plots, traps, and blackmail, members of both 'families' set out on a destructive killing spree. Non-stop action from start to amazing finish!" ----- Those Line of Fire liner notes are FULL of outright lies. DeNiro isn't the avenger, he's the dead brother. The mob isn't involved at all. The avenger isn't up against ruffians, nor was DeNiro. They're wussy dilettantes. Neither DeNiro (who is dead) nor his brother enlist any close or mean friends. Nor is there any "war", savage or otherwise. What both families? After all those lies, needless to say, the claim of "non-stop action" is certainly bogus, too. ----- The original film appears to me to have been a skin flick. Perhaps you kids will find this amazing but the puny R-rated scenes of this pap were the scandalous X-rated scenes of decades ago. My guess would be that an old skin-flick was cut down to concentrate more on DeNiro's tiny part but this really LOOKS like excerpts from an old tv show added to an only slightly newer tv show level of flick with some generic porno material edited in. DeNiro's acting doesn't seem to match up with his character's nature but perhaps that's more due to the re-editing than the original acting. I could tell more from a repeat viewing of this tape but I can't bring myself to suffer through it again. ----- The star of the re-shaped film is not "unknown," by the way. He was on lots of tv crime dramas back then. If the repackager had any sense, they would have promoted this as the amusing oddity that it is, adding explanations and analysis along the lines of what you others have written here. But then repackagers DON'T have any sense. Haven't any of you real hardcore DeNiro buffs turned up the true story of this flick yet? Believe it or not, I found this v-t at my public library.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
This is a movie featuring actors as well as Robert DeNiro and some actors.
austin-4511420 April 2017
Is that a garden hose on the cover? It must be a garden hose because I've never seen a gun that small. It must be the kind of gun Ian Fleming envisioned when James Bond was stripped of his Beretta and they replaced it by giving him a gun so small, he could conceal it in his cigarette case. Either way, the only things memorable about this movie are the cover, the fact that DeNiro is given top billing only as a post-Godfather 2 marketing tactic. Not that I remember, but considering that the film apparently went through three different title changes, the seventeen directors seemed to disagree over what the film was about and which character it was about. DeNiro shows up halfway through, unexplained. I don't remember any "swap", as one title promises, and i wouldn't be surprised if Sam was the name of the first protagonist who was inexplicably killed off before DeNiro stepped into frame. In other words, the cover of this movie is like an Easter egg, in a way. Pretty enough to ensure that you pick it up, but not very much to clue in as to whats inside the egg, and by the time you crack it open, you gave five dollars to be split up between seventeen different pseudonym-using Italian directors, this movie is another step closer to getting a real release, and the time you wasted on your treasure hunt in the 5 dollar movie section at Food Lion could have been saved if you were a grown up who was content with the fact that The Deer Hunter already exists and there is no Eldorado of Robert Deniro movies out there for you to discover and tell all your friends about. Just go buy the 87th anniversary of the Deer hunter and go home and eat the chocolate you've always loved. Happy belated Easter, everyone.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Sam's Song is NOT The swap
alruin5 November 2020
The dvd i have says the swap but contains Sam's Song. Two completely different movies. The latter, which I'm reviewing here, is quite avant-garde. A young De Niro falls in love with some blond bird. That's it basically. Irrelevant movie unless you fancy Robert with moustache.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
I'll Swap it for a Movie
Hitchcoc8 December 2006
You can bet when there's a flashback with narration, and the character in the flashback does not appear in current time, the producers have dredged some old film and tried to work it into a new setting. This bomb has Bobby DeNiro looking pretty good, but he is virtually non-existent in the film. Other than the fact that he had something to do with pornography, he has no reason to exist. His brother, fresh out of jail, sets about avenging his death. There are scenes on a yacht, a wronged woman, a young hooker who visits the grave site, and a bunch of other mumbo jumbo. I was pleased to get the skinny from a previous writer which confirmed my suspicions. This holds no position in the DeNiro canon. The first three minutes of the film (the titles) have what appears to be him, in silhouette, walking down the street. The is a first rate bomb.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Sam's Song/ aka The Swap Gorgeous Cinematography!
definitedoll31 August 2005
This movie had to have been made after 1968, because Nixon is president of the USA. So we start there as a young film journalist who is making a film on the president. He gets a call from his wealthier friends to stay at their FABULOUS HOME IN THE HAMPTONS!!! This movie is worth watching alone for that!! My favorite part is where Robert De Niro is pretending to shoot and be shot on the beach, re-creating a scene from a movie he saw. (In practice for the future Godfather role) He is so young and thin, and cuts a great figure in his denim jeans, blue shirt, and sneaks~~ I wish i looked like him!! young & thin!! They (he and new found girlfriend Terrayne Crawford ) run all over the beach and visit this place with a fabulous windmill and break into this wonderful house right next to the windmill~~ talk about fantasy!! Sam (DeNiro) and Carol (Crawford) are impulsive as they jump into the pool together and throw in a wheel chair along with it~~ A lovely young Jennifer Warren stars as the wife and owner of the home~~ her name is Erica in the film~~ she has a smarmy husband named Andrew, who smirks through the whole film~~ Why doesn't she leave this bum???? I won't reveal the ending, but i recommend this film for it's lovely scenes, and good acting by Robert DeNiro~~ you could tell he was on his way~~ and half the fun is getting there!!
5 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
a hack job
godspellgroupie18 February 2009
This film was incoherently reedited as the swap.The original film made more sense.

The film starts with a scene of police cars with flashing lights as one of the officers says that this man is going to explain what happened. then it goes to the beginning. DeNiro plays a tired film editor who spends a weekend with some friends on Long Island as their beach side mansion with swimming pool.The first is a potpourri of poolside shenanigans including DeNiro running off with the pretty lady and going on the beach where they play mock war games,lay down on the beach where he scratches her back,wind up in the lighthouse where they smoke a joint wrapped in a Bible page and of course make love. The second happens on a boat where the married couple are unhappy over the husbands infidelity leading to what happens at the start.

none of this is evident in the Swap which was just a patch job with very little Deniro. I cannot understand why. This swap only gets a 3 ,Sams Song gets a 7
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Ladies and gentlemen, Bobby De Niro...?
MovieAddict201614 November 2004
In 1969 Robert De Niro starred in an unreleased short film entitled 'Sam's Song,' about a group of people on a yacht, or something to such an effect. It seemed to have no plot – and no budget, either, as it was left on the cutting room floor: Where it should have stayed, but it didn't.

Because in 1980 Cannon Films got their hands on the footage. De Niro, by now a huge star (having been in 'Taxi Driver' and 'The Deer Hunter'), was obviously enough of a celebrity to market the picture. Slap his face on a few VHS covers, and you've got yourself a movie.

That's what Cannon did. They took the old footage and inserted it into an entirely new movie that had nothing to do with 'Sam's Song.' They called this new incarnation 'The Swap' – ironic, eh?

'The Swap' takes scenes from 'Sam's Song' and intercuts them with a cheesy film noir revenge story about a guy who gets out of jail to avenge the murder of his brother. It also re-writes its own plots to revolve around the original scenes. De Niro watches a porn movie in the beginning, so instead of merely assuming he likes pornography, 'The Swap' decides to add a little 'twist' into the plot: Sammy (De Niro) was a porn director and he made kiddie porn with 12 and 13-year-olds. Surprisingly, this fact is presented to us in the film quite casually – it's never mentioned twice. Sammy's friends don't care, and neither do the filmmakers, evidently.

Sam's brother Vito, freshly released from jail, decides to do some investigating and unveils a secret plot that has something to do with Sam's murder. Halfway through the film we get a tacky flashback of Sam aboard a yacht with his friends. This was essentially the only footage of the original 'Sam's Song' and it makes no sense to put it in 'The Swap' because it has absolutely nothing to do with the story.

I don't know what to say about this movie because it really isn't a movie. It's a sloppy promotion for a film company that took fifteen minutes of footage from an unfinished film and slapped them in between scenes from another.

It's about as nonsensical as taking 'Raging Bull' and dropping scenes from 'Once Upon a Time in America' in various places, then trying to create a plot connecting the two together. Final analysis: Utterly ridiculous, and not even for De Niro's fans as it was clearly made against his own cooperation.
11 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Incisive, and often very beautiful realist étude; or, American cinema as it might of been
Cristi_Ciopron18 September 2012
Warning: Spoilers
I begin by saying that I am a huge fan of 'Sam's Song', and I have watched it with genuine curiosity—first for its newness, of course—then for its art, its craft and style. It's a movie the American cinema could take pride in; much better than Polanski's early cruise movie. Obviously influenced by the French New Wave, this movies tosses intellectuality, cultural references, satire, alienation, _dreamscapes, tensions, restrained violence, suspicions, mesmerizing cityscapes right at the start (De Niro's walk to his office, something worthy of the early Demme—but perhaps almost 15 yrs earlier, and in less awarded hands), flirts, hipsters, a husband who's a womanizing blockhead and a sour jerk, a broads' fight, and there's a lot about the physical life—party, dance, swimming, adults' games, cruise. A young filmmaker is invited to a villa, for a party, where he meets a supposedly awesome blonde, and charms her, she's easygoing; but De Niro is unlikable. The role, one of De Niro's _juvenilia, seems harshly misplayed, anyway unconvincing as the part of a mild, sensitive, soft—spoken and decent young intellectual—because this actor was always, right from the beginning, too much of a heavy guy, menacing and more or less vaguely chilling; his smirks, grins and grimaces are already those of the countless future sociopaths and psychotics he was to play. Even when lazy and relaxed, he looked too much like a thug. His role, even if in the careless key, simply can't be enjoyed, as he shows too much of his thuggish sloth and menace.

De Niro was begging for typecasting. His whole demeanor and look ask for typecasting, that unpleasant future gallery of raving psychopaths.

But then again, there's something interesting here—and maybe there's no contradiction at all—De Niro's performance as Sam is of the thuggish, Kowalski type, masquerading as a Godard character, streetwise despite his intention—but maybe this is precisely why it can be _homologated to a Belmondo part. You remember, there's also the Belmondo side of the French New Wave, besides the mainstream of Truffaut, Rohmer, Chabrol; though De Niro as Sam reminded me of Depardieu, that kind of _thuggishness, Belmondo's not like that, Depardieu is, and so let's hope the character was, in European terms, written like for Belmondo—and played like by Depardieu.

The broads are Erica (who bares her shapely breasts, quotes Céline, etc.) and the less appealing Carol; she undresses, too.

'Sam's Song' registers as an exercise, of ineffable freshness, somewhat loose in form, willingly so, a realist étude, incisive, convincing, often very beautiful; perhaps the finest movie De Niro was ever in. I also believe that the director was mighty good.

I know nothing about either the director, or the movie's fate, though, when I have found it two years ago, the title sounded quite familiar.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed