I can't get past this one thing..
On one hand Gawker breaks a story by releasing a sex tape of a person and saying it's public interest in a public figure therefore it's freedom of speech without considering the damage.
The trial for the sex tape release was funded by a Silicon Valley billionaire legally. And at the same time the media respond by talking of his misogynistic comments and unsavoury opinions.
How can they not see the hypocrisy in saying that posting a sex tape is freedom of speech and a person voicing his personal opinions are inappropriate and he should be silenced..?
It really highlights how the world has moved towards political correctness with the influence of media and how freedom of speech is only such when it suits media. So self serving.
On one hand Gawker breaks a story by releasing a sex tape of a person and saying it's public interest in a public figure therefore it's freedom of speech without considering the damage.
The trial for the sex tape release was funded by a Silicon Valley billionaire legally. And at the same time the media respond by talking of his misogynistic comments and unsavoury opinions.
How can they not see the hypocrisy in saying that posting a sex tape is freedom of speech and a person voicing his personal opinions are inappropriate and he should be silenced..?
It really highlights how the world has moved towards political correctness with the influence of media and how freedom of speech is only such when it suits media. So self serving.